Reading English Academic Texts: Evidence from ESL Undergraduates’ Eye Movement Data

Authors

  • Nur Ainil Sulaiman Faculty of Education, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
  • Khazriyati Salehuddin Faculty of Social Science and Humanities, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
  • Rozainee Khairudin Faculty of Social Science and Humanities, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2020-2601-05

Abstract

Reading English academic texts can be a daunting task for many ESL university students. The complex features of academic texts which include academic discourse, text structure, and vocabulary may affect the reading process. An investigation of how ESL university students read English academic reading materials would provide insights on what learners do to attain comprehension of the text. This study aims to investigate the cognitive processes that take place when ESL undergraduates read English academic texts using eye movement data. Quantitative data (total fixation duration, total fixation count, fixation duration) and qualitative data (scan path) of eye movements derived from eye tracker accompanied with retrospective interview were collected from twenty ESL undergraduates from two academic programmes. The findings revealed that participants who failed to recall the texts had longer fixation duration and resulted in more in words regressions compared to participants who recalled and explained the texts accurately. Vocabulary used in academic texts was found to be one of the factors that affect the comprehension of the texts. The findings of the study suggest that specialised instructions that emphasise academic reading skills should be implemented at the early level of tertiary education.  Keywords: English academic texts; academic reading; eye movements while reading; eye tracking; cognitive processes

Author Biographies

Nur Ainil Sulaiman, Faculty of Education, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia

 Nur Ainil Sulaiman is a doctoral student at the Faculty of Social Science and Humanities, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. She is currently teaching at Faculty of Education, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia and her areas of interest are second language reading and vocabulary acquisition.

Khazriyati Salehuddin, Faculty of Social Science and Humanities, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia

Khazriyati Salehuddin is an Associate Professor and Psycholinguist at the Faculty of Social Sciences & Humanities, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Her areas of interest are psycholinguistics, language and cognition and developmental psychology. She has lead several research groups related to the area, and has published several journal articles, book chapters and a monograph on the area.

Rozainee Khairudin, Faculty of Social Science and Humanities, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia

Rozainee Khairuddin is an Associate Professor at the Faculty of Social Sciences & Humanities, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Her area of expertise is in cognitive psychology, cognitive science and cognitive neuroscience.

References

Alderson, J. C. (2000). Assessing Reading. Cambridge Language Assessment Series, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Arifur Rahman, Yap, N.T, Darmi, R. (2018). The Assosiation between Vocabulary Size and Language Dominance of Bilingual Malay- English

Undergraduates. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature®, 24(4), 85-101.

Asgari, A., & Mustapha, G. (2012). Vocabulary Learning Strategies of Malaysian ESL Students. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities,

(3).

Bax, S. (2003).The Cognitive Processing of Candidates During Reading Tests: Evidence from Eye Tracking. Language Testing 30(4): 441-465.

Bernard, H. R. & Ryan, G. W. (2010). Analyzing Qualitative Data: Systematic Approaches. UK: SAGE Publication Inc.

Bojko, A. (2009). Informative or misleading?Heatmaps deconstructed. In J. Jacko (Ed.), Human-computer interaction: New trends (pp. 30-39).

Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.

Carver, R. P. (1992). Reading rate: Theory, research, and practical implications. JOurnal of Reading, 36, 84-95.

Choo, L. B., Lin, D. T. A., Singh, M. K. M., & Ganapathy, M. (2017). The Significance of the Academic Word List among ESL Tertiary Students in a

Malaysian Public University. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature®, 23(4).

Conklin, K., & Pellicer-Sánchez, A. (2016). Using eye-tracking in applied linguistics and second language research. Second Language Research, 32(3),

-467.

Coxhead, A. (2000). A New Academic Word List. Tesol Quarterly, 34(2), 213-238. doi: 10.2307/3587951

Duchowski, A. (2003). Eye tracking methodology. Theory and practice. Verlag: Springer.

Elgort, I., Brysbaert, M., Steven, M., & Assche, E. V. (2017). Contextual word learning during reading in a second language: An eye movement study.

Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 1-26. doi: 10.1017/S0272263117000109

Godfroid, A., Ahn, J., Choi, I., Ballard, L., Cui, Y., Johnston, S.,Yoon, H.-j. (2017). Incidental vocabulary learning in a natural reading context: an eye-

tracking study. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1-22. doi: :10.1017/S1366728917000219

Godfroid, A., Boers, F., & Housen, A. (2013). An eye for words: Gauging the role of attention in incidental L2 vocabulary acquisition by means of eye-

tracking. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(3), 483-517.

Harji, M. B., Balakrishnan, K., Bhar, S. K., & Letchumanan, K. (2015). Vocabulary Levels and Size of Malaysian Undergraduates. English Language

Teaching, 8(9), 119.

Holmqvist, K., Nystrӧm, M., Andersson, R., Dewhurst, R., Jarodzka, H. & Weijer, J. V. D. (2011). Eye Tracking. A Comprehensive Guide to Methods

and Measures. United States: Oxford University Press.

Hu, M. & Nation, I. S. P. (2000). Unknown Vocabulary Density and Reading Comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language and Linguistics Compass

(403-430)

Hudson, T. (2007). Teaching second language reading: Oxford University Press Oxford.

Hyönä, J., Lorch, R., & Rinck, M. (2003). Eye movement measures to study global text processing. The mind’s eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of

eye movement research, 313-334.

Hyönä, J. (2010). The Use of Eye Movements in the Study of Multimedia Learning. Learning and Instruction 20(2): 172-176.

Jian, Y.-C., & Ko, H.-W. (2017). Influences of text difficulty and reading ability on learning illustrated science texts for children: An eye movement

study. Computer & Education, 113, 263-279. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.06.002

Kamariah, Y., Mahani, M., & Bordin, W. (2016). The breadth of receptive vocabulary knowledge among English major university students. Journal of

Nusantara Studies, 1(1), 7-17.

Kendeou, P., McMaster, K. L., & Christ1, T. J. (2016). Reading comprehension: Core components and processes. Behavior and Brain Sciences, 3(1), 62-

doi: 10.1177/2372732215624707

Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition: Cambridge university press.

Krashen, S. (2011). Academic Proficiency (Language and Content) and the Role of Strategies. TESOL, 2.

Kulesz, P. A. (2014). The effects of reader characteristics, text features, and comprehension processes on reading comprehension. (Doctor of

Philosophy PhD), University of Houston.

Meganathan, P., Yap, N. T., Paramasivam, S., & Jalaluddin, I. (2019). Incidental and Intentional Learning of Vocabulary among Young ESL Learners.

L: Language, Linguistics, Literature®, 25(4).

Mohamed, A.A. (2017). Exposure frequency in l2 reading an eye-movement perspectiveof incidental vocabulary learning. Studies in Second Language

Acquisition, 1-25.

Mcnamara, D. S., Graesser, A. C., & Louwerse, M. M. (2012). Sources of text difficulty: Across genre and grades. In J.P. Sabatini & E.Albro (Eds.),

Assessing reading in the 21st century: Aligning and appling advances in the reading and measurement sciences. Lanham, MD: R&L Education.

Nation, I. S. P., & Heatley, A. (1994). Range: A program for the analysis of vocabulary in texts [software]. Retrieved from

http://www.victoria.ac.nz/lals/staff/paul-nation/nation.aspx

Pellicer-Sánchez, A. (2016). Incidental L2 vocabulary acquisition from and while reading: An eye-tracking study. Studies in Second Language

Acquisition, 38(1), 97-130.

Perfetti, C., & Stafura, J. (2014). Word knowledge in a theory of reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(1), 22-37. doi:

1080/10888438.2013.827687

Pulido, D. 2004.The Relationship between Text Comprehension and Second Language Incidental Vocabulary Acquistion. A Matter of Topic Familiarity?

Language Learning 54(233-284.

Radach, R., & Kennedy, A. (2013). Eye movements in reading: Some theoretical context. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(3),

-452.

Raney, G. E., Campbell, S. J., & Bovee, J. C. (2014). Using Eye Movements to Evaluate the Cognitive Processes Involved in Text Comprehension. J Vis

Exp(83). doi: 10.3791/50780

Rayner, K. (2009). Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. The quarterly journal of experimental psychology,

(8), 1457-1506.

Rayner, K., & Morris, R. K. (1990). Do Eye Movement Reflect Higher Order Process in Reading? In G. d. Y. R. Groner, R. Parham (Ed.), From Eye to

Mind: Information Acquisition in Perception, Search and Reading. North-holland: Elsevier Science Publishers

Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (2006). Eye movement control in reading. In M. J. Traxler & M. A. Gemsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (2nd

Edition ed.). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Academic Press.

Rayner, K., Pollatsek, A., Ashby, J., & Clifton Jr, C. (2012). Psychology of reading: Psychology Press.

Reichle, E. D., Liversedge, S. P., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (2009). Encoding multiple words simultaneously in reading is implausible. Trends in

Cognitive Sciences, 13, 115-119.

Richards, J. C., Platt, J., & Platt, H. (1992). Language teaching and applied linguistics: Logman Group UK Ltd.

Schubert, C. (2012). Video Analysis of Practice and the Practice of Video Analysis. Selecting Field and Focus in Videography. In. Knoblauch, H.,

Schnettler, B., Raab, J. & Soeffner, H.-G. (eds.). Video Analysis: Methodology and Methods, Frankfurt: Peter Lang.

Shehzad, M. W., Alghorbany, A., Lashari, S. A., & Lashari, T. A. (2019). Self-efficacy Source and Reading Comprehension: The Mediating Role of

Reading Self-efficacy Beliefs. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature®, 25(3).

Snow, C. E. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R & D program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.

Salehuddin, K. (2018). Can the eye tracker reveal how the Qur’an can be learned by heart? Al- Shajarah: Journal of the International Institute of

Islamic Thought and Civilisation, 23(1), 125-147.

Salehuddin, K., Shahimin, M.M., Sulaiman, M.Z., & Md Zolkapli, R.B. (Forthcoming, Dec 2019).Heat Maps and Scan Paths: Qualitative eye tracking

evidence on how the Qur’an is memorized through reading. Journal of Nusantara Studies, (Dec).

Sulaiman, N. A., Salehuddin, K., & Khairuddin, R. (2018). Academic word list knowledge of Malaysian ESL undergraduates. GEMA Online® Journal of

Language Studies, 18(4).

Van den Broek, P. (2005). Integrating memory-based and constructionist processes in accounts of reading comprehension. Discourse Processes, 39(2-

, 299-316.

Wallot, S., O'Brien, B. A., Haussmann, A., Kloss, H., & Lyby, M. S. (2014). The role of reading time complexity and reading speed in text

comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(6), 1745-1765. doi:

http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000030

Weaver, C. (1980). Psycholinguistics and Reading. From Process to Practice. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Winthrop Publishers, Inc.

Yeari, M., & Broek, P. v. d. (2011). A cognitive account of discourse understanding and discourse interpretation: The Landscape Model of reading.

Discourse Studies, 13(5), 635-643.

Yusri, S. & Or-Kan, S. (2019).Examining University Students' Reading Performances and Behaviours with the Use of Eye Trackers. internatinal journal

of academic research in business and social sciences 9(8): 114-123.

Zarrati, Z., Nambiar, R. M. K., & Maasum, T. N. R. T. M. (2014). The Importance of Text Structure Awareness in Promoting Strategis Reading among

EFL Readers. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 118, 537-544.

Downloads

Published

2020-03-30

Issue

Section

Articles