D.H. Lawrence’s St. Mawr: An Ecocritical Study

Authors

  • Noorbakhsh Hooti Associate professor, Razi university, English Department, Kermanshah, Iran
  • Amir Ashrafian Lorestan University, Khorramabad The Islamic Republic of Iran

Abstract

This study is an attempt to give a close ecocritic scrutiny to Lawrence’s St. Mawr. It unravels the dreary repercussions endowed by the environmental crisis, which haunted the imagination of literary artists. It was then that an interdisciplinary school emerged, named ecocriticism, to survey the impact of Industrialism on  imagination; the abuses of nature under the wing of Judeo-Christian religions; the impact of philosophy on nature; the secular apocalyptic outcome of mistreating nature; the man-women relationship, affected by environmental suppression; the description of nature in literature; the parallel situations of oppressed women and oppressed nature, as ecofeminism; and the way, in which, the misuses of the literary genre of pastoral have resulted in ecocritics new definition of it, as post-pastoral. Indeed, it brings to light the tragic attitude of man toward nature, which has lessened his gentleness and mental delicacy and made him a furious and revengeful social animal. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/3L-2014-2002-03 Keywords: anthropocentrism; biocentrism; blood-intimacy; ecocriticism; ecofeminism

Author Biography

Noorbakhsh Hooti, Associate professor, Razi university, English Department, Kermanshah, Iran

English Department, Associate professor

References

Borlik, T. A. (2011). Ecocriticism and early modern English: Green pastures. New York: Routledge.

Boulton, J. T. (2004). Late essays and articles of D. H. Lawrence. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Cronon, W. (19960.Uncommon ground: Rethinking the human place in nature. London: Norton.

Dreese, D. N. (2002). Ecocriticism: creating self and place in environmental and American Indian literatures. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.

Garrard, G. (2004). Ecocriticism: The new critical idiom. New York: Routledge.

Gaard, G. (1993). Ecofeminism:Women, animals, nature. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

Glotfelty, C. & Harold, F. (1995). The ecocriticism reader: Landmarks in literary ecology. Athens and London: The University of Georgia Press.

Heidegger, M. (1977). Basic writing. New York: Harper and Row.

Lawrence, D.H. (2007). St. Mawr. Australia: A project Gutenberg of Australia ebook * eBook No.: 0700621h.html. Retrieved January 06, 2012 from arthursbookshelf.com/.../lawrence/St.%20Mawr%20-%20D.%20H.

Orr. D. W. (2002). The nature of design: Ecology, culture, and human intention. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Sanders, S. R. (1996). Speaking a word for nature. New York: Routledge.

Toyokuni, T. (1990). A study of St. Mawr: From culture to nature. Otaru: Otaru University of Commerce Academic Collections.

Yahya, H., Zalina Md Lazim, Vengadasamy, R. (2012). Eco-resistance in the poetry of the Arab poet Mahmod Darwish. 3L The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies Vol 18(1): 75-87.

Žižek, S. (1991). Looking awry: An introduction to Jacques Lacan through popular culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Downloads

Published

2014-06-23

Issue

Section

Articles