THE IMPORTANCE OF UTILIZING SUPPLEMENTARY VOCABULARY MATERIAL IN FORMATIVE AND SUMMATIVE ASSESSMENT OF READING COMPREHENSION: A STUDY ON IRANIAN UPPER INTERMEDIATE EFL LEARNERS

Elahe Moradi, Zargham Ghabanchi

Abstract


Vocabulary knowledge and its role in reading comprehension is one of the main areas of focus in language research for the recent years. Knowledge of vocabularies as the building blocks of language has a very essential role. Without recognizing the meaning of words it would be impossible to produce and comprehend language. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of utilizing supplementary vocabulary material on improving the scores of reading comprehension course among Iranian upper intermediate EFL learners. To fulfill this objective, 80 males and female upper intermediate EFL learners were selected based on availability sampling. The level of students was determined through administering an Oxford Quick Placement Test (OQPT). The participants were divided into experimental and control groups. Both groups were pretested through a TOEFL reading comprehension test. In contrary to the experimental group that received supplementary vocabulary, the students in control group did not receive any supplementary materials. Then, during 21 sessions of treatment, three formative tests were used and in the last session the posttest (summative one) was administered to both groups. Descriptive statistics, covariance analysis, Kolmogrov-Smirnov test, and Levene’s test of equality of error variances were run to analyze the data. The findings revealed that utilizing supplementary vocabulary material had significant effect on reading comprehension scores. Also, the experimental group significantly outperformed the control group (p < .05) more on the summative assessments than the formative ones. Furthermore, the results indicated that female students had better scores compared to male students and they benefited more by utilizing supplementary vocabulary material in EFL upper intermediate reading comprehension classroom.


Keywords


Formative Assessment; Reading Comprehension; Summative Assessment; Supplementary Vocabulary Material

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arnaud, P. & Bejoint, H. (1992). Vocabulary and applied linguistic. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

Baker, S.(1995). "Vocabulary Acquisition: Curricular and Instructional Implications for Diverse Learners." Technical Report No. 14. Eugene, OR: National Center to Improve the Tools of Educators. [ED 386 861]

Cameron, L. (2001). Teaching languages to young learners. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Carter, R. & McCarthy, M. (1988). Vocabulary and language teaching. London: Longman.

Coady, J. & Huckin, T. (1997). Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Huckin, T., & Coady, J. (1999). Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language. Studies in second language acquisition, 21(2), 181-193.

Li, M., & Kirby, J. R. (2014). The effects of vocabulary breadth and depth on English reading. Applied Linguistics, 7, 1-25.

Linse, C. T. & Nunan, D. (2005). Practical English language teaching: Young learners. New York: McGraw-Hill ESL/ELT.

Maher Salah, S. (2008). The relationship between vocabulary knowledge and reading comprehension of authentic Arabic texts. Brigham Young University.

Meara, P. (1980). Vocabulary acquisition: A neglected aspect of language learning. Language Teaching, 13(3-4), 221-246.

Mehrpour, S., Razmjoo, S., & Kian, P. (2011). The Relationship between Depth and Breadth of Vocabulary Knowledge and Reading Comprehension among Iranian EFL Learners. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 222(53).

Nagy, W. E. (1988). Teaching vocabulary to improve reading comprehension. Illinois: National Council of Teachers of English.

Nelson-Herber, J. (1986). Expanding and Refining Vocabulary in Content Areas. Journal of Reading, 29, 626-33.

Pourhosein, A., & Sabouri, N. (2016). A study of factors affecting EFL learners’ reading comprehension skill and the strategies for improvement. International Journal of Linguistics, 6(5), 180-187.

Read, J. (1997). Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Rupley, W. H., Logan, J.W., & Nichols, W. D. (1999). Vocabulary instruction in balanced reading program. The Reading Teacher, 52, 338-346.

Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in language teaching. UK: Cambridge University Press

Snow, C. (2002). Reading for Understanding: Toward an R&D Program in Reading Comprehension. Santa Monica: The RAND Corporation.

Stæhr, L. S. (2008). Vocabulary size and the skills of listening, reading and writing. Language Learning Journal, 36(2), 139-152.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Index