Etnisiti atau Anomie? Analisis Sosiologikal Peristiwa Pergaduhan Beramai-rarnai di Petaling Jaya Selatan
Abstract
This article discusses several sociological implications derived from a field research on the ethnic-related collective fightings which took place in Petaling Jaya Selatan in March 2001, which is now notoriously known as the "Kampung Medan Incident ". The discussion draws upon several related concepts: anomie, ethnicity, social distance, class, hate crimes, gangsterism and collective behaviour: Further; the discussion touches upon the possibility of approaching this subject matter from the symbolic-interactionism and anomic perspetives.Key words: ethnic relations in Malaysia, collective behaviour; anomie, classABSTRAKArtikel ini membincangkan beberapa aspek implikasi sosiologikal hasil penyelidikan terhadap pergaduhan antara-etnik yang terjadi di Petaling Jaya Selatan pada Mac 2OO1 yang kini dikenali sebagai "Peristiwa Kampung Medan ". Implikasi ini dibincangkan dengan menggunakan beberapa konsep yang relevan seperti anomie, etnisiti, jarak sosial, kelas, jenayah benci, gangsterisme dan kelakuan kolektif. Turut dibincangkan ialah kemungkinan peristiwa ini boleh dianalisis secara teoritis daripada sudut pandangan interaksi-simbolik dan anomie.Kata kunci: hubungan etnik di Malaysia, kelakuan kolektif anomie, kelasReferences
Adomo, T. W., et al. 1950. The Authoritarian Personality. New York: Harper & Brothers.
Blumer, G. Herbert. 1969. Collective Behaviour. Dlm. Alfred McClung Lee, pnyt., Principles of Sociology. New York: Barnes & Noble Books. hal. 65-121.
Bogardus, S. Emory. 1968 (Januari). Comparing Racial Distance in Ethiopia, South Africa, and the United States. Sociology and Social Research 52(2): 149-56.
Cooley, Charles Horton. 1964 [1902]. Human Nature and Social Order. New York: Schoken Books.
Community Relations Service, US Department of Justice. 1997. Hate Crime: The Violence of Intolerance. Washington: CRS Bulletin.
Durkheim, E. 1964. The Division ofLabour in Sociery. New York: Free Press.
Durkheim, E. 1951. Suicide. New York: Free Press.
Green, P. Donalp, Jack Glaster & Andrew Rich. 1998. From Lynching to Gay-Bashing: The Elusive Connection Between Economic Conditions and Hate Crime. Dlm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 75: 1-11.
Goffman, Erving. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.
Goffman, Erving. 1961. Encounters: Two Studies in the Sociology of Interaction. Indianapolis. IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
Goffman, Erving. 1971. Relations in Public. New York: Basic Books.
Goffman, Erving. 1983. The lnteraction Order. American Sociological Review 48: 1-17.
Hamm, Mark. 1993. Americam Skinheads: The Criminology and Control of Hare Crime. Westport: Praeger Publishers London.
Hamm, Mark S. (ed.). 1994. Hate Crime: lnternational Perspectives on Causes and Control. Cinninati: Anderson.
Herrek, Gregory & Kevin Berrill (ed.). 1992. Hate Crimes; Confronting Violence Against Lesbian and Gay Men. Newbury Park, C A: Sage Publication.
Hotman,
Jacobs, James B. & Jessica S. Henry. 1996. The Social Construction of a Hate Crime Epidemic. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 86(2): 366-391.
Jennes, Valerie & Kendal Broad. 1997. Hate Crimes, New Social Movements and the Politics of Violence. New York: Aldyne De Gruyter.
Kelly, Robert J. & Jess Magham (eds.). 1998. Hate Crimes: The Global Politics of Polarization. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
Levin, Brian. 1993, Winter. Bias Crimes: A Theoretical & Practical Overview. Stanford Law &Policy Review 4.
Levin, Jack & Jack McDevitt. 1993. Hate Crimes: The Rising Tide of Bigotry and Bloodshed. New York: Plenum Press.
Mead, George Herbert. 1962. Mind, Self and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Merton, Robert K. 1957. Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: The Free Press.
Park, Robert E. 1952. Human Communities. Glencoe, Ill: The Free Press.
Smelser, Neil J. 1962. Theory of Collective Behavior. New York: Free Press.
Tonnies, Ferdinand. 1963. Community and Society. New York: Harper & Row.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
It is the author's responsibility to ensure that his or her submitted work does not infringe any existing copyright. Furthermore, the author indemnifies the editors and publisher against any breach of such a warranty. Authors should obtain permission to reproduce or adapt copyrighted material and provide evidence of approval upon submitting the final version of a manuscript. This journal does not allow the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions or retain publishing rights without restrictions.