Bases of Traditional Authority among the Orang Asli of Peninsular Malaysia*
Abstract
The aim of this article is to examine some basic factors connected with authority and leadership in traditional Orang Asli society. For this purpose, two societies were chosen, i.e. the Temiar asstudied by Benjamin in the 1960s and the Temuan as studied by Baharon in the 1970s. The two societies were comparedfrom the point of view of the perception of its members towards their headmen or leaders. The ethnographic evidence shows that while the Temuan clearly use concepts of authority and leadership based on their adat (customs) to regulate interaction between members, such concepts are not relevant to the same degree among the Temiar.ABSTRAKMakalah ini bertujuan untuk meneliti beberapa faktor asas dalam sistem wibawa dan kepimpinan masyarakat Orang Asli tradisional. Dua buah masyarakat telah dipilih, iaitu masyarakat Temiar yang telah dikaji oleh Benjamin pada tahun 1960-an dan masyarakat Temuan yang telah dikaji oleh Baharon pada awal tahun 1970-an. Kedua-dua masyarakat dibanding dari sudut persepsi anggotanya terhadap pihak yang berperanan mengetuai masyarakat mereka. Didapati dari bukti-bukti etnografis bahawa masyarakat Temuan menggunakan konsep-konsep wibawa dan kepimpinan yang terkandung dalam sistem adat kelompoknya adalah lebih jelas menguasai sistem interaksi antara anggota masyarakat itu kalau di- bandingkan dengan masyarakat Temiar.References
Alatas, S.H. 1968. Occupational prestige amongst the Malays in Malaysia. JMBRAS 41(1): 146-156.
Baharon, B.A.R. 1973. Park Gong: An Orang Asli Community in Transition. Ph.D thesis, University of Cambridge.
Benjamin, G. 1966. Temiar Social Groupings. Federation Museums Journal, new series, 12: U25.
Benjamin. G. 1968. Headmenship and leadership in Temiar Society. Federation Museums Journal, new series, 1-43.
Couillard, M.A. 1980. Tradition in Tension: Carving in a Jah Hut Community. Penang: Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia.
Dumont, L. 1970. Homo Hierarchicus. Weidenfeld and Nicholson: London.
Fortes, M &Evans-Pritchard. E. E (eds.) 1955. African Political Systems. London: Oxford University Press.
Sahlins, M. 1963. Poor man, rich man, big-man, chief: Political types in Melanesia and Polynesia. Comparative Studies in Society and History 5: 285-303.
Syed Husin Ali. 1975. Malay Peasant Society and Leadership. Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
It is the author's responsibility to ensure that his or her submitted work does not infringe any existing copyright. Furthermore, the author indemnifies the editors and publisher against any breach of such a warranty. Authors should obtain permission to reproduce or adapt copyrighted material and provide evidence of approval upon submitting the final version of a manuscript. This journal does not allow the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions or retain publishing rights without restrictions.