Impact of Language Learning Software on Hearing-Impaired Students’ Language Skills (Impak Perisian Pembelajaran Bahasa terhadap Kemahiran Bahasa Murid Pendidikan Khas Pendengaran)
Abstract
This paper discusses the impact of language learning software that was developed for hearing-impaired students for the Malay Language. The software was developed using Microsoft PowerPoint on a topic of reinforcement words with sign language. This study conveyed an experimental research design using pre-test and post-test of 8 hearing-impaired year 6 students that were selected randomly for this study. The study was conducted at one of the primary schools in Hulu Langat in Selangor. The pre and post-test analysis were based on the mean score value. The mean score value increased from 10.3% to 86.4% for multiple-choice questions and increased from 4.2% to 91.7% for sentence structure questions for the post-test analysis. The finding of this study found that students were able to choose appropriate reinforcement words for multiple-choice questions. The study also showed that students were able to construct sentences using appropriate reinforcement words. The implications of the study showed that learning software with interactive elements using sign language and attractive visuals can help hearing-impaired students to improve their understanding on reinforcement words. The usage of technology in various aspects of multimedia along with sign language video also helps to enhance the language skills of hearing-impaired students especially for those who practise visual learning styles. In conclusion, studies that focus on teaching using learning software with exciting elements are encouraged in the future.
Keywords: Language learning software; hearing-impaired students; language skills; reinforcement words; technology
Abstract
Kajian ini membincangkan impak perisian pembelajaran bahasa yang dibangunkan untuk murid pendidikan khas pendengaran bagi mata pelajaran Bahasa Melayu. Perisian ini dibangunkan dengan menggunakan Microsoft PowerPoint mengenai topik kata penguat dengan mengintegrasikan bahasa isyarat. Kajian ini menggunakan kaedah eksperimen berasaskan ujian pra dan ujian pos. Subjek kajian terdiri daripada 8 orang murid pendidikan khas pendengaran tahun 6 yang dipilih secara rawak. Kajian ini dijalankan di sebuah sekolah rendah di daerah Hulu Langat di negeri Selangor. Analisis ujian pra dan ujian pos adalah berdasarkan nilai skor min. Nilai skor min meningkat daripada 10.3% kepada 86.4% untuk soalan jenis aneka pilihan. Bagi pembinaan soalan juga wujudnya peningkatan daripada 4.2% kepada 91.7%. Hasil dapatan kajian mendapati murid dapat memilih kata penguat yang bersesuaian dan tepat bagi soalan aneka pilihan. Malahan dapatan kajian turut mendapati murid mampu membina ayat dengan menggunakan kata penguat yang sesuai. Implikasi kajian menunjukkan perisian pembelajaran yang mempunyai elemen interaktif menggunakan bahasa isyarat dan visual yang menarik dapat membantu murid pendidikan khas pendengaran dapat meningkatkan pemahaman terhadap topik kata penguat. Penggunaan teknologi dengan pelbagai aspek multimedia berserta dengan video bahasa isyarat juga membantu dalam peningkatan kemahiran bahasa murid pendidikan khas pendengaran khususnya dalam kalangan murid yang mengamalkan gaya pembelajaran visual. Kesimpulannya, kajian yang memberi fokus kepada pengajaran yang menggunakan perisian pembelajaran yang mempunyai elemen yang menarik adalah digalakkan pada masa akan datang.
Kata kunci: Perisian pembelajaran bahasa; murid pendidikan khas pendengaran; kemahiran bahasa; topik kata penguat; teknologi
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abdullah Yusoff. 2002. Kecacatan Komunikasi Berkaitan dengan Pendidikan, Bahasa dan Kebahasaan Orang Pekak. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa.
Baggiyalakshmi, J. and Sambathrani. 2016. Learning styles of children with hearing impairment at secondary level. PARIPEX - Indian Journal of Research 5(2): 328-329.
Beal- Alvarez, J. and Cannon, J. E. 2014. Technology intervention research with deaf and hard of hearing learners: Levels of evidence. American Annals of the Deaf 158(5): 486-505.
Davenport, C. A., Alber-Morgan, S. R., Clancy, S. M. and Kranak, M. P. 2017. Effects of a picture racetrack game on the expressive vocabulary of deaf preschoolers. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 22(3): 326-335.
Easterbrooks, S. R. and Stoner, M. 2006. Using a visual tool to increase adjectives in the written language of students who are deaf or hard of hearing. Communication Disorders Quarterly 27(2): 95-109.
Flórez-Aristizábal, L., Cano, S., Collazos, C. A., Benavides, F., Moreira, F. and Fardoun, H. M. 2019. Digital transformation to support literacy teaching to deaf children: From storytelling to digital interactive storytelling. Telematics and Informatics 38(2019): 87-99.
Hallahan, D. P., Kauffman, J. M. and Pullen, P. C. 2014. Exceptional Learners: An Introduction to Special Education. Boston: Pearson.
Harris, M., Terlektsi, E. and Kyle, F. E. 2017. Literacy outcomes for primary school children who are deaf and hard of hearing: A cohort comparison study. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 60(3): 701-711.
Hazita Azman, Sepideh Mirzaeifard and Zaini Amir. 2017. Hypermedia literacy: An insight into English as a foreign language online reading processes. Akademika 87(1): 207-220.
Kazemi, S., Mahdavi-Zafarghand, M. and Tahriri, A. 2016. The relationship between learning styles and vocabulary recall among sensorineural hearing loss EFL learners. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research 3(4): 325-346.
Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. 2015. Buku Panduan Pengoperasian Program Pendidikan Khas Integrasi. Bahagian Pendidikan Khas: Putrajaya.
Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. 2014. Kod Amalan Pendidikan Murid Berkeperluan Khas. Bahagian Pendidikan Khas: Putrajaya.
Knoors, H. and Marschark, M. 2014. Teaching Deaf Learners: Psychological and Developmental Foundations. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kumar, E. K., Kishore, P. V. V., Sastry, A. S. C. S., Kumar, M. T. K. and Kumar, D. A. 2018. Training for 3-D sign language recognition with color texture coded joint angular displacement maps. IEEE Signal Processing Letters 25(5): 645-649.
Kyle, F. E. and Harris, M. 2011. Longitudinal patterns of emerging literacy in beginning deaf and hearing readers. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 16(3): 289-304.
Leigh, I. W. and Andrews, J. F. 2016. Deaf People and Society: Psychological, Sociological, and Educational Perspectives. 2nd edition. New York: Routledge.
Loughran, S. 2013. Cultural identity, deafness and sign language: A postcolonial approach. LUX: A Journal of Transdisciplinary Writing and Research from Claremont Graduate University 2(1): 19-26.
Marschark, M., Sarchet, T. and Trani, A. 2016b. Effects of hearing loss and sign language use on working memory. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 21(2): 148-155.
Mohd Hanafi Mohd Yasin, Safani Bari and Nur Ain Mat Hassan. 2013. Cue speech and language achievement of hearing-impaired children. Asian Social Science 9(16): 81-86.
Mohd Hanafi Mohd Yasin, Safani Bari and Rosman Salubin. 2012. Emotional intelligence among deaf and hard of hearing children. Social Sciences (Pakistan) 7(5): 679-82.
Naimie Mohd Nawawi, Mohd Khairul Amri Kamarudin, Fuad Mat Jali and Mohd Syaiful Nizam Abu Hassan. 2020. Needs analysis assesment to sign language use for persons with disabilities (PWDs) categories hearing problems. Akademika 90 (2): 51-61.
Napoli, D. J., Mellon, N. K., Niparko, J. K., Rathmann, C., Mathur, G., Humphries, T., Lantos, J. D. 2015. Should all deaf children learn sign language? Paediatrics 136(1): 170-176.
Padidar, H. A., Tayebi, G. and Shakarami, A. 2015. The relationship between learning styles and vocabulary learning and retention. Spectrum: A Journal of Multidisciplinary Research 4(1): 249-263.
Pappas, M., Demertzi, E., Papagerasimou, Y., Koukianakis, L., Kouremenos, D., Loukidis, I. and Drigas, A. 2018. E-Learning for deaf adults from a user-centered perspective. Education Sciences 8(206): 3-15.
Qi, S. and Mitchell, R. E. 2011. Large-scale academic achievement testing of deaf and hard-of-hearing students: Past, present, and future. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 17(1): 1-8.
Rosadah Abd Majid, Manisah Mohd Ali and Aliza Alias. 2014. Teacher character strengths and talent development. International Education Studies 7(13): 175-183.
Rubashini Ramakrishnan and Norshidah Mohamad Salleh. 2018. Teacher’s self-efficacy: A systematic review. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences 8(12): 2379-2402.
Safani Bari and Mohd Hanafi Mohd Yasin. 2009. Ciri-ciri kanak-kanak bermasalah pendengaran. In Pendidikan Kanak-kanak Berkeperluan Khas: Konsep dan Amalan, edited by Zalizan Mohd Jelas, 140-163. Bangi: Penerbit UKM.
Sameer Ahmed Boset and Adelina Asmawi. 2020. Mediating effect of work motivation on the relationship between competency and professional performance of EFL teachers. Akademika 90(1): 63 75.
Sass-Lehrer, M. 2016. Early Intervention for Deaf and Hard-Of-Hearing Infants, Toddlers, and Their Families: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press.
Schunk, D. H. 2012. Learning Theories: An Educational Perspective. Boston: Pearson Education.
Strassman, B. K., Marashian, K. and Memon, Z. 2019. Teaching academic language to d/deaf students: Does research offer evidence for practice? American Annals of the Deaf 163(5): 501-533.
Syar Meeze Mohd Rashid, Mohd Hanafi Mohd Yasin and Noraidah Sahari @ Ashaari. 2019. Undergraduate students of special education’s readiness towards the use of information and technology (ICT) in teaching and learning the sign language. Creative Education 10: 2374-2385.
Worsfold, S., Mahon, M., Pimperton, H., Stevenson, J. and Kennedy, C. 2018. Predicting reading ability in teenagers who are deaf or hard of hearing: A longitudinal analysis of language and reading. Research in Developmental Disabilities 30(77): 49-59.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
ISSN: 0126-5008
eISSN: 0126-8694