Dasar Luar Malaysia Terhadap China Sehingga Era Pentadbiran Pakatan Harapan: Membina Saling Percaya dalam Situasi Geopolitik yang Berubah (Malaysia’s Foreign Policy Towards China Until the Administration of Pakatan Harapan: Building Mutual Trust in Changing Geopolitics)

Mohamad Ikhram Mohamad Ridzuan, Mohd Ikbal Mohd Huda, Nurliana Kamaruddin, Noraini Zulkifli

Abstract


Persaingan antara Amerika Syarikat dengan China ketika era ini adalah lebih kompleks berbanding ketika era Perang Dingin. Senario tersebut dapat dilihat melalui Perang Perdagangan, teknologi 5G, inisiatif projek mega, isu Laut China Selatan dan yang terbaharu ialah isu Covid-19. Malaysia telah mengambil pendekatan pragmatik dan lebih berhati-hati agar tidak terperangkap dengan persaingan kedua-dua buah kuasa tersebut. Walaupun begitu, buat pertama kali ketika era Pakatan Harapan (PH), Malaysia telah mengambil keputusan membatalkan projek mega kereta api laju Kuala Lumpur-Singapura (HSR), perbincangan semula kos pembinaan Laluan Rel Pantai Timur (ECRL) dan isu grey zone di Laut China Selatan. Peristiwa tersebut telah mewujudkan ketegangan hubungan bilateral Kuala Lumpur-Beijing. China bertindak menangguhkan sebarang bentuk kerjasama untuk menilai semula dasar luar Kuala Lumpur terhadap Beijing di bawah kerajaan baharu Pakatan Harapan. Walau bagaimanapun, Mahathir mengadakan rundingan semula dengan China untuk meneruskan projek-projek tersebut. Keputusan yang telah dijangka meninggalkan impak yang signifikan mengapa Malaysia meningkatkan keyakinan dan kerjasama dengan China walaupun berhadapan dengan ancaman keselamatan nasional. Objektif kajian ialah menganalisis faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi peningkatan hubungan bilateral diplomasi dengan menggunakan kaedah kepustakaan dan temu bual. Skop kajian bermula pada tahun 1971 sehingga tahun 2018. Kajian mengaplikasikan teori realisme neoklasikal dan konsep keseimbangan ancaman kerana menghujahkan respon dan pendirian Malaysia terhadap China berdasarkan faktor ancaman, risiko dan peluang. Hasil kajian mendapati trend hubungan kerjasama bilateral Malaysia-China dipengaruhi oleh faktor kebolehpercayaan. Kedua, faktor kepimpinan dalam mengenal pasti konteks ancaman dan peluang turut mempengaruhi hubungan bilateral. Ketiga, keharmonian ekonomi, politik dan diplomatik memerlukan hubungan saling percaya dan kebergantungan seiring dengan order antarabangsa.

Kata kunci: China; Dasar Luar; Geopolitik; Malaysia; Saling Percaya

 

Abstract

 

The competition between the United States and China is now more complex compared to the era of the Cold War. This is evident from the Trade War, the issue of 5G technology, megaproject initiatives, the South China Sea issue and most recently the Covid-19 issue. Malaysia has taken a pragmatic approach and has been careful not to get caught up in the competition between the two powers. During the Pakatan Harapan (PH) era, Malaysia decided to cancel the Kuala Lumpur-Singapore high-speed rail (HSR) mega project, renegotiate the construction cost of the East Coast Rail Link (ECRL) as well as the grey zone issue in the South China Sea. These decisions created tension in the Kuala Lumpur-Beijing bilateral relations. In response, China delayed any form of cooperation to re-evaluate Kuala Lumpur’s foreign policy towards Beijing under the new Pakatan Harapan government. However, Mahathir successfully renegotiated with China to proceed with the projects. This event is expected to leave a significant impact on why Malaysia is increasing its confidence and cooperation with China despite facing national security threats. By utilizing library research and interviews this study analyzes the factors influencing the improvement of bilateral diplomatic relations between Malaysia and China from 1971 until 2018. The study applies the theory of neoclassical realism and the concept of threat balance to argue that Malaysia’s response and stance towards China are based on threat, risk, and opportunity factors. First, it finds that the trend in Malaysia-China bilateral cooperation is influenced by the perception of trust. Second, the factor of leadership in identifying threats and opportunities also influences bilateral relations. Third, economic, political, and diplomatic harmony requires a relationship of mutual trust and interdependence in line with the international order.

Keywords: China; Foreign Policy; Geopolitics; Malaysia; Reliability


Full Text:

PDF

References


Amadi, L. 2012. Africa: Beyond the new dependency: A political economy. African Journal of Political Science and International Relations 6(8): 191-203.

Azrul Azlan Abdul Rahman. 2018. Hubungan Asean-Sino: Antara order asia atau dilema “China Rise”. Akademika 88(3): 5-18.

Buzan, B. 1983. People, States, and Fear: The National Security Problem in International Relations. Wheatsheaf Book Ltd: London.

Buzan, B & Jones. C. 1993. The Logic of Anarchy: Neorealism to Structural Realism. New York: Columbia University Press.

Bünte, Marco. 2018. Building governance from scratch: Myanmar and the extractive industry transparency initiative. Journal ofContemporary Asia 48(2): 230-251.

Cheng, Joseph Y. S. 2001. Sino-Asean relations in the early twenty first century. Contemporary Southeast Asia 23(3): 420-456.

Deborah Welch Larson & Alexei Shevchenko. 2010. Status seekers: Chinese and Russian responses to U.S primacy. International Security 34, hlm. 63-95.

Dos, Santos. 1970. The Structure of Dependence. American Economic Review 60(21): 231-236.

Ganesan, N. 2008. Malaysia-China relations: Domestic and structural imperatives. Dlm Lam Peng Er, Ganesan Narayanan. & Durkop Colin (pnyt.). East Asia’s relations with a rising China, hlmn 243-276.

Germany: Konrad Adenauer Stiftung.

Garcia-Herrero & Jianwei Xu. 2019. Countries’ perceptions of China’s Belt and Road Initiative: A big data analysis. Bruegel Working Paper Issue 1.

Gomez, E & Lafaye De Micheaux.E. 2017. Diversity of Southeast Asian Capitalism: Evolving State-Business Relations in Malaysia. Journal of Contemporary Asia 47(5): 1-23.

Grieco, Joseph. 1995. The Maastricht Treaty, economic and monetary union, and the neorealist research programme. Review of International Studies 21(1): 21-40.

Haacke, Jurgen. 2010. Seeking Influence: China Diplomacy towards ASEAN after the ASEAN crisis. Asian Perspective 26(4): 13-52.

Hashim Mokhtarudin. 2003. Hubungan MalaysiaChina: Cabaran dan peluang pada abad ke-21. Kuala Lumpur: Institut Terjemahan Negara Malaysia Berhad.

Hirschfeld, K. 2017. Rethinking Structural Violence. Society 54(2): 156-162.

Jin Zhesong & Li Jun. 2011. Foreign trade growth and economic development in China: Retrospective and future prospects. Bejing: Enrich Professional Publishing.

Keohane, R. 2005. After hegemony: Cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton University Press.

Khadijah Khairuddin. 2011. Malaysia-Japan relations: explaining the root causes of the pro-Japan orientation of Malaysia in the post-1981 period. Disertasi Ph.D. University of London.

Kopela, Sophia. 2017. Historic titles and historic rights in the Law of the Sea in the light of the South China Sea arbitration. Ocean Development & International Law 48(2): 181-207.

Kuik Cheng Cwee. 2008. The essence of hedging: Malaysia and Singapore’s response to a rising China. Contemporary Southeast Asia 30(2): 159-185.

Kuik Cheng Cwee. 2012. Malaysia’s China Policy in the Post-Mahathir era: a neoclassical explanation. (RSIS, No 224). Singapore: Nanyang Technological University.

Kuik Cheng Cwee. 2013. Malaysia’s China Policy under Abdullah: More Continuity than Change? Dlm. Bridget Welsh & James U.H. Chin (pnyt.). Awakening: The Abdullah Badawi years in Malaysia, hlmn. 591-607. Petaling Jaya: Strategic Information and Research

Development Centre (SIRD).

Kuik Cheng Cwee. 2016. How do weaker states hedge? Unpacking ASEAN state’s alignment behaviour towards China. Journal of Contemporary China 25(100): 500-5014.

Kuik Cheng Cwee. 2017. Explaining the Contradiction in China’s South China Sea Policy: Structural Drivers and Domestic Imperatives. China: An International Journal 15(1): 163-186.

Lai Yew Meng & Kuik Cheng Chwee. 2020. Structural sources of Malaysia’s South China Sea policy: Power uncertainties and small-state hedging. Australian Journal of International Affairs: 1-28.

Lee Poh Ping & Lee Kam Hing. 2005. Malaysia-China relations: A Review. Dlm. Malaysia, Southeast Asia and the Emerging China: Political, Economic and Cultural Perspective, disunting oleh Hou Kok Chung & Yeoh Kok-Kheng, 3-28. Kuala Lumpur: Institut of China Studies.

Lee Poh Ping. 2010. Advancing east Asian regionalism. Developing Economies 48(2): 286-288.

Stephen Leong. 1987. Malaysia and the People’s Republic of China in the 1980s: Political vigilance and economic pragmatism. Asian Survey 27(10): 1109-1126.

Joseph Liow. 2000. Malaysia-China Relations in the 1990s: The Maturing of a Partnership. Asian Survey: 672-691.

Lo, C.K. 1989. China’s policy towards territorial disputes: The case of the South China Sea. London: Routledge.

Lobell, S. E., Ripsman, N. M., & Taliaferro, J. W. 2009. Neoclassical realism, the state, and foreign policy. Cambridge University Press.

Lobell, S. E. 2009. Threat Assessment, The State, and Foreign Policy: A Neoclassical Realist Model.Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.

Lobell, S.E. 2018. A granular theory of balancing. International Studies Quarterly 62(3): 593-605.

Mohd Ikbal bin Mohd Huda. 2015. Bantuan pembangunan rasmi Jepun ke Malaysia1996-2010: Impak ke atas pembangunan sosioekonomi Malaysia. Disertasi Ph.D Universiti Malaya.

Mohd Ikhram Mohd Ridzuan, Ikbal Huda & Sity Daud. 2019. Enam dekad grand strategy Malaysia terhadap China (1957-2018): Dasar luar negara membangun terhadap negara kuat. The International Journal of East Asian Studies 8 (1): 31 – 44.

Nathan, K.S. 1987. Malaysia and the Soviet Union: A relationship with a distance. Asian Survey 27(10): 1059-1073.

Nathan, K. S. 1990. Malaysia in 1989: Communists end Armed Struggle. Asian Survey 30(2): 210-220.

Noor Elina, & Qistina, T. N. 2017. Great power rivalries, domestic politics and Malaysian foreign policy. Asian Security 13(3): 200-219.

Nor Azizan Idris. 1990. Peranan dan pengaruh Tunku Abdul Rahman dalam sejarah dasar luar negara: Tahun- tahun awalan 1957-1962. Jebat, Vol. 18.

Powell Bingham, Dalton Russell & Strom Kaare. 2015. Comparative politics today: A world view 11edt. England. Pearson.

Ramli Dollah & Wan Shawaluddin. 2019. Bilateralisme dan hubungan luar Malaysia. Indonesia: UNDIP PRESS.

Razak Baginda & Rohana Mahmood.1995. Malaysia’s defence & foreign policies. Selangor: Pelanduk Publications.

Razak Baginda. 2016. China-Malaysia Relations and Foreign Policy. New York: Routledge.

Schweller, R.L. 1997. New Realist Research on Alliances: Refining, Not Refuting Waltz’s Balancig Proposition. American Political Science Review 91(4): 927 – 930.

Schweller, R.L. 1998. Deadly Imbalances. Tripolarity and Hitler’s Strategy of World Conquest. New York: Colombia University Press.

Schweller, R.L. 2003. The Progressiveness of Neoclassical Realism. Dlm. C.Elman dan M.F. Elman (pnyt.). International Relations Theory: Appraising the Field, hlmn. 311-348. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Schweller, R.L. 2004. Unanswered Threats: A Neoclassical Realist Theory of Underbalancing. International Security 29(2): 159-201.

Schweller, R.L. (2006) Unanswered Threats: Political Constraints on the Balance of Power. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

See Seng Tang. 2016. Multilateral Asian Security Architecture: Non-A New York: Routledge.

Severino, Rodolfo C. 2008. ASEAN. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

Shee Poon Kim. 2004. The political economy of Mahathir’s China policy: Economic cooperation, political and strategic ambivalence. Ritsumeikan Annual Review of International Studies, Vol. 3: 59-79.

Sity Daud. 2020. Dasar Pembangunan dan Populisme Malaysia. Bangi: Penerbit UKM.

Sity Daud. 2004. Globalisasi dan negara pembangunan. Akademika (64):27-41.

Sity Daud. 2012. Negara dan ideologi pembangunan. Dlm. Ghazali Mayudin, Jamaie Hamil, Sity Daud & Zaini Othman (pnyt.). Demokrasi kepimpinan dan keselamatan dalam politik malaysia, hlm. 152-171.

Bangi: Penerbitan Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

Smith. N.R. 2019. “A new Cold War?: Assessing the current US-Russia Relationship”. Switzerland: Palgrave.

Swee-Hock, Lijun, S., & Wah,C.K. 2005. ASEAN-China relations: Realities and prospects. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

Taliaferro, J.W. 2006. State Building for Future Wars: Neoclassical Realism and the Resource-Extractive State. Security Studies 15(3): 464–95.

Taliaferro, J.W. (2009) Neoclassical Realism and Resource Extraction: State Building for Future War. Dlm. S.E. Lobell, N.M. Ripsman, and J.W. Taliaferro (pnyt.). Neoclassical Realism, the State, and Foreign

Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, hlmn. 194–226.

Tuan Yuen, K. O. N. G. 2017. Belt and Road Initiative: A new impetus to strengthen China-Malaysia relations. East Asian Policy 9(2): 5-14.

The Edge Market. 2016. 1MDB completes RM9.83 billion energy asset sale, 24 Mac. https://www.theedgemarkets.com/article/1mdb-completes-rm983-billion-energy-asset-sale. Diakses pada 5 September 2019.

The Edge Market. 2019. Dr M’s Japan visit Pay Off as Putrajaya Gets Lowest Samurai Bond Coupon in ASEAN, 8 Mac. https://www.theedgemarkets.com/article/dr-ms-japan-visits-pays-putrajaya-gets-lowest-samurai-bond-coupon-asean. Diakses pada 5

September 2019.

Waltz, K.N. 1954. Man, the State, and War: A Theoretical Analysis. New York: Columbia University Press.

Waltz, K.N. 1997. Evaluating Theories. The American Political Science Review 91(4): 913-917.

Waltz, K.N. 2000. Structural Realism after the Cold War. International Security 25(1): 5-41.

Walt, Stephen. 1985. Alliance formation and the balance of world power. International Security 9(4): 3-43.

Walt, Stephen. 1987. The Origins of Alliances. Ithaca: New York.

Wohlforth, W.C. 1993. The Elusive Balance: Power and Perceptions During the Cold War. New York: Cornell University Press.

Wohlforth, W.C. 2009. Unipolarity, status competition, and great power war. World Politics 61(1): 28–57.

Yiping, Li. 2006. Sino-Malaysian diplomacy in the Post-Cold War period: A regional analysis. Dlm. China and Malaysia in a Globalizing World: Bilateral Relations, Regional Imperatives and Domestic Challenges, disunting oleh Emile Kok Kheng Yeoh dan Hou Kok

Chung, 45-56. Kuala Lumpur: Institute of China Studies.

Yeoh, Emile Kok-Kheng. 2019. Malaysia: Perception of contemporary China and its economic, political and societal determinants. The Pacific Review 32 (3): 395-418

Zakaria Ahmad. 2011. A quasi-pact of enduring value: A Malaysian perspective of the FPDA. Dlm. Ian Storey, Ralf Emmers, & Daljit Singh (pnyt.). Five power Defence Arrangements at forty, hlm. 98-104.

Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

Zakaria Fareed. 1998. From Wealth to Power: The Unusual Origins of Americas World Role. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Zarina Othman. 2019. Neorealisme dan Institusionalisme dalam perang dan keamanan. Dlm. Demokrasi Kepimpinan & Keselamatan dalam Politik Malaysia, disunting oleh Ghazali Mayudin, Jamaie Hamil,

Sity Daud dan Zaini Othman. Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

Zhang Yunling. 2008. China-Asean: Making New Partnership. China: Social Sciences Academic Press.

Zaharul Abdullah, Abdul Rahman Embong & Sity Daud. 2020. China’s Economic in Malaysia and Malaysia’s response. Southeast Asian Social Science Review 5(1): 26-52.

Prashanth Parameswaran. 2019. Southeast Asia and China’s Belt and Road Initiative. Diplomat Magazine.

https://thediplomat.com/2019/05/southeast-asia-and-chinas-belt-and-road-initiative/. Diakses pada 17 Mei 2019.

Pejabat Perdana Menteri Malaysia (https://www.pmo.ov.my/ms/2019/03/kerajaan-malaysia-akan-buat-ketetapan-sendiri-berkaitan-china-pm/) diakses pada 21 Mei 2019

Sarah Zheng. 2019. Malaysia’s China-backed US$10.5 billion East Coast Rail Link back on track. South China Morning Post.https://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/article/3026936/malaysias-china-backed-us105-billion-east-coast-rail-link-back diakses pada 13 Sept 2019.

Sarah Zheng. 2019. China, Malaysia seek to resolve South China Sea disputes with new dialogue mechanis. South China Morning Post. https://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/article/3026957/china-malaysia-seek-resolve-south-china-sea-disputes-new diakses

pada 13 Sept 2019.

Dato’ Abdul Majid bin Ahmad Khan. Bekas Duta Malaysia ke China & Presiden Lembaga Pembangunan dan Pelaburan Malaysia (MIDA). 2019. Temu bual.

Tan Sri Ahmad Fuzi bin Abdul Razak. Mantan Ketua Setiausaha Kementerian Luar Malaysia (2001-2006). Tempat: Kuala Lumpur, 29 November 2019.

Dato Dr. Chamil Wariya. Ketua Pegawai Esekutif Institut Akhbar Malaysia (MPI) dan Pakar Tokoh Kepimpinan Malaysia. Tempat: Cyberjaya, 19 Disember 2019.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN: 0126-5008

eISSN: 0126-8694