Administrative Reform in Guilan Province, Iran: An Analysis of Advantages and Shortcomings

Mohammad Reda Azadehdel (Islamid Azad University, rashila@ukm.my), Rashila Ramli (Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, rashila@ukm.my)

Abstract


The purpose of this paper is to explore administrative reform outcomes in state organisations in terms of public managers’ perspective as reform executives in Guilan Province of Iran. Guilan Province has been selected as research site of this study because it is one of a few successful provinces in Iran that participated in administrative Reform Program, and productivity movement. This study was conducted from 2005 to 2008. The assessment was completed using a multi scale survey based on the Second and the Third Development Plan of Iran. A total of 314 public managers stated their perspective about reform efforts during the Plans. As reform executives managers in different level rated the extent of reform objectives’ performance. The objectives such as the role of Development and Planning Council in Guilan province, public participation in public activities, and attraction and retaining the experts and professionals did not fare well in the Development Plans. Managers believe that the objectives of human resources development and structural Reorganisation have been generally achieved. Nevertheless, there is a considerable gap between actual results and stated objectives of the Plans. Furthermore, public managers pointed out that programs associated with the structural reform dimension has been more successful than plans implemented within human resources development dimension.

Keywords: administrative reform, development plans, public managers, Human Resource Development, Iran

ABSTRAK

Makalah ini bertujuan mengkaji keberhasilan reformasi pentadbiran dari perspektif pengurus yang berkhidmat di agensi kerajaan di Daerah Guilan, Iran. Agensi di daerah menjadi pilihan kerana mempunyai kadar kejayaan yang agak membanggakan dalam usaha reformasi pentadbiran ke arah peningkatan produktiviti. Jangka masa kajian ialah di antara 2005-2008. Kajian dijalankan dengan menggunakan instrumen survei yang meliputi Pelan Pembangunan Iran yang Kedua dan Ketiga. Seramai 314 pengurus agensi awam telah memberi maklumbalas tentang pencapaian objektif reformasi Pentadbiran tersebut. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahawa peranan yang dimainkan oleh Majlis Perancangan dan Pembangunan Guilan, penyertaan awam dalam aktiviti awam serta kebolehan untuk mengekalkan pekerjaan tidak mencapai tahap yang membanggakan. Walau bagaimanapun, objektif reformasi struktural dan pembangunan sumber manusia mencapai tahap yang memuaskan. Umumnya pencapaian reformasi struktural berbanding pembangunan sumber manusia lebih memberangsangkan kerana jangka masa yang lebih lama diperlukan untuk merealisasikan objektifnya.

Kata kunci: reformasi pentadbiran, pelan pembangunan, pengurus awam, Pembangunan Sumber Manusia, Iran


Full Text:

PDF

References


Amuzegar, J. 2005. Iran’s Third Development Plan: An Appraisal. Journal of Middle East Policy Council.12(3):1-27.

Aras, B. 2001. Transformation of the Iranian Political System: Toward New Model? Middle East Review of International Affairs Journal. 5(3): page number?

Country Analysis Brief

Chapin Metz, H. (ed). 1989. Iran: A Country Study. (4th ed.) Washington D.C.: Federal Research Division, GPO for the Library of Congress.

Ebrahimshah, M. 1999. Iran Third Cultural and Socioeconomic Development plan. Iran Export and Import Magazine. 60:12-13.

Farazmand, A. (ed). 2001. Administration Reform in Developing Nations. Bandar Greenwood Publication Group.

Farazmand, A. (ed). 2001. Handbook of Comparative Development in Public Administration: 2nd ed. Revised and Expanded. New York, NY, USA: Marcel Dekker Inc.

Haeri, S. 1999. IRANIAN THIRD DEVELOPMENT PLAN IS GOLD, BUT NOT ACCESSIBLE TO HIM http://www.iran-press-service. com/ articles /third plan.html.

Heady, F. 1991. Public Administration: A Comparative Perspective. 4th ed. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.

Iran Energy Data, Statistics and Analysis, 2006. Energy Information Administration. Country Analysis Briefs, Official Energy Statistics from the U.S Government. http//www.eia.doe. gov/emeu/cabs/Iran/pdf.pdf.

Islamic Republic of Islamic Consultative Assembly. 1990. The First Socioeconomic and Cultural Development Plan Act, Management and Planning Organization, Deputy in Logistic Affairs Scientific Documents and Publication’s Centre.

Islamic Republic of Islamic Consultative Assembly. 1996. The Second Socioeconomic and Cultural Development Plan Act, Management and Planning Organization, Deputy in Logistic Affairs Scientific Documents and Publication’s Centre.

Islamic Republic of Islamic Consultative Assembly. 2003. The Third Socioeconomic and Cultural Development Plan Act, Management and Planning Organization, Deputy in Logistic Affairs Scientific Documents and Publication’s Centre. First Publish.

Mangué Nandongo, G. 2002. Administrative and Civil Service Reform in Equatorial Guinea African Training and Research Centre in Administration for Development (CAFRAD), Tangier, Morocco (Unpublished Research Report).

Monavvarian, A. 2004. Analysis of the Perceived Degree of Success of Reform Efforts: Reform Agents’ Perceptions. Journal of Management Development 23(6): 579- 595.

Monavvarian, A. 2001. The Reform of Public Administration in Iran during the period of the First Five-Year Plan (1988/9-1993/4): Success or Failure? Flinders Institute of Public Policy and management. http//www.ssn.flinders.edu.au/.

Monavvarian, A. 2004. Administrative Reform and Style of Work Behaviour: Adaptors- Innovators-Iran. Journal of Public Organization Review Springer Netherlands 2(2): 141-164.

Roukis, G.S. 2006. Globalization Opaqueness and Conspiracy. Journal of Management Development 25(10): 970-980.

Salehi-Isfahani, D. 2005. Iran’s Third Development Plan: A Reappraisal. Department of Economics Virginia Tech. http://www.filebox.vt.edu/users/salehi/ReplytoAmuzegar.pdf. 15 Jun 2007.

Shokoohi, A. 1996. Public Administrative Reform for Economic Transformation in Iran: The Legal Framework. Journal of Asian Review of Public Administration 8(2): 33-44.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN: 0126-5008

eISSN: 0126-8694