Pembelajaran Teradun Semasa Pandemik: Analisis Tahap Penerimaan Pensyarah di Kolej Komuniti di Malaysia (Blended Learning During the Pandemic: An Analysis of Lecturer Acceptance Levels in Malaysian Community Colleges)
Abstract
Situasi pandemik COVID-19 telah mengubah pelaksanaan pendekatan pembelajaran kepada pembelajaran teradun. Pendekatan ini masih lagi pada fasa awal dan tahap penerimaan pensyarah di Kolej Komuniti di Malaysia masih lagi belum diketahui. Justeru, kajian ini adalah bertujuan untuk mengenal pasti tahap penerimaan pensyarah terhadap pembelajaran teradun bagi kursus teknikal yang dilaksanakan dalam konteks Kolej Komuniti. Kajian ini menggunakan reka bentuk kajian tinjauan melalui pendekatan kuantitatif. Seramai 38 pensyarah dikenal pasti melalui teknik persampelan bertujuan dan bola salji yang memenuhi dua kriteria pemilihan iaitu: i) pensyarah Kolej Komuniti peringkat sijil yang mengajar bidang teknikal dan ii) pernah atau sedang melaksanakan pembelajaran teradun. Analisis deskriptif dan inferensi dijalankan menggunakan perisian SPSS Statistics for Windows Version 26.0 bagi menganalisis skor min pemboleh ubah kemudagunaan dan kebolehgunaan pembelajaran teradun serta sikap dan niat pensyarah terhadap penggunaan pembelajaran teradun. Manakala korelasi Pearson dijalankan bagi mengenal pasti hubungan antara sikap dengan niat penggunaan pembelajaran teradun. Hasil daripada analisis mendapati skor min bagi kemudahgunaan, kebolehgunaan, sikap dan niat adalah tinggi dalam kalangan responden manakala analisis korelasi Pearson menunjukkan terdapat hubungan yang signifikan (r=0.84, p < 0.01) antara sikap dan niat penggunaan pembelajaran teradun dalam kalangan pensyarah Kolej Komuniti. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan tahap penerimaan pembelajaran teradun bagi kursus-kursus teknikal dalam kalangan pensyarah Kolej Komuniti adalah tinggi. Walaubagaimana pun, adalah penting bagi semua pihak memberi sokongan yang wajar untuk memastikan pendekatan pembelajaran ini dapat dilaksanakan dengan sistematik dan lebih berkesan.
Kata Kunci: Pembelajaran teradun; Kolej Komuniti; Model TAM; Pendidikan Teknik dan Latihan Vokasional (PLTV); pandemik
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic situation has changed the implementation of the learning approach to blended learning. This approach is still in its initial phase and the level of acceptance of lecturers in community colleges in Malaysia is still unknown. Thus, this study aims to identify the level of acceptance of lecturers towards blended learning for technical courses implemented in the context of community colleges. This study is a survey research conducted via quantitative approach. A total of 38 lecturers were identified through purposeful and snowballing sampling techniques that met two selection criteria: i) certificate level community college lecturers who teach technical fields and ii) have or are implementing blended learning. Descriptive and inferential analyses were conducted using SPSS Statistics for Windows Version 26.0 software. A Pearson correlation was also conducted to identify the relationship between attitudes and intentions towards the use of blended learning. The results of the analysis found that the mean score for usability, attitude, and intention was high among the respondents, while Pearson correlation analysis showed that there was a significant relationship (r = 0.84, p<0.01) between attitude and intention to use blended learning among Community College lecturers. The findings of this study demonstrated that the level of acceptance of blended learning for technical courses among Community College lecturers was high. However, it is important for all parties to provide appropriate support to ensure that this learning approach can be implemented systematically and more effectively.
Keywords: Blended learning; Community College; TAM Model; Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET); pandemic
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adinda, D. & Mohib, N. 2020. Teaching and instructional design approaches to enhance students’ self-directed learning in blended learning environments. Electronic Journal of e-Learning 18(2): 162–174.
Ahmad Al-Munzir, R. & Mansur, N. 2020. Kajian tinjauan impak pandemik covid-19 terhadap tahap kesediaan pelajar kolej komuniti lahad datu bagi pembelajaran secara atas talian. Seminar Pembelajaran Sepanjang Hayat Peringkat Kebangsaan (SPHS2020): 11-20. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348317544.
Ahmad Zaki, A., Zulazhan Ab, H. & Nurkhamimi, Z. 2020. Kesediaan pelajar generasi z di universiti Malaysia Kelantan dalam pembelajaran teradun Bahasa Arab dalam era IR4.0. Journal of Islamic Social Sciences and Humanities 22(1):86-95.
Alif Jasni, M., Hajar Abu Bakar Ah, S., Omar, N. & Che Mohd Nasir, N. 2021. Aksesibiliti dan manfaat telefon dalam kalangan gelandangan semasa pandemik Covid-19. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities 18(5).
Ali, S. N., Khalid Khan, N. L., & Abdul Ghani, A. T. W. 2018. Abad 21: Trend pembelajaran dan pengajaran Politeknik dan Kolej Komuniti Malaysia. Putrajaya: Bahagian Instruksional dan Pembelajaran Digital, Jabatan Pendidikan Politeknik dan Kolej Komuniti, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Ana, A., Binti, F., Halim, A., Saleh, I., Mulyadi, Y., Salira, A.B., Muktiarni, M., Sari, A.R., Hanim, W., Binti, N., Muda, W. & Khoerunnisa, I. 2021. pltv teaching strategy during COVID-19: a comparative study of Indonesia and Malaysia. Journal Of Technical Education and Training 13(4): 28–41. http://penerbit.uthm.edu.my/ojs/index.php/jtet.
Anthony, B., Kamaludin, A., Romli, A., Raffei, A.F.M., Nincarean A/L Eh Phon, D., Abdullah, A., Ming, G.L., Shukor, N.A., Nordin, M.S. & Baba, S. 2019. Exploring the role of blended learning for teaching and learning effectiveness in institutions of higher learning: an empirical investigation. Education and Information Technologies 24(6): 3433–3466.
Anthony Jnr, B., Kamaludin, A., Romli, A., Mat Raffei, A.F., A.L Eh Phon, D.N., Abdullah, A., Leong Ming, G., A Shukor, N., Shukri Nordin, M. & Baba, S. 2020. Predictors of blended learning deployment in institutions of higher learning: theory of planned behavior perspective. International Journal of Information and Learning Technology 37(4): 179–196.
Anthony, B., Kamaludin, A., & Romli, A. 2021. Predicting academic staffs behaviour intention and actual use of blended learning in higher education: model development and validation. Technology, Knowledge, and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-021-09579-2
Appavoo P. 2020.Acceptance of technology in the classroom: a qualitative analysis of mathematics teachers’ perceptions. In: Satapathy S., Bhateja V., Nguyen B., Nguyen N., Le DN. (eds) Frontiers in Intelligent Computing: Theory and Applications. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. Singapore. Springer https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9920-6_37.
Bervell, B. & Umar, I.N. 2018. Blended learning or face-to-face? does tutor anxiety prevent the adoption of learning management systems for distance education in ghana? Open Learning 35(2): 159–177.
Chua Yan Piaw. 2021. Kaedah dan statistik penyelidikan. edisi keempat. Malaysia: McGraw Hill (M) Sdn. Bhd.
Chua Yan Piaw. 2021. Kaedah dan statistik penyelidikan, asas statistik penyelidikan. Edisi keempat. Malaysia: McGraw Hill (M) Sdn. Bhd.
Cobo-Rendon, R., Peña, K. L., Mella-Norambuena, J., Martin, N. C. S., & Peña, F. 2021. Longitudinal analysis of teacher technology acceptance and its relationship to resource viewing and academic performance of college students during the Covid-19 pandemic. Sustainability 13(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/su132112167.
Commonwealth of Learning. 2020. Strategies for blended TVET in response to COVID-19. Burnaby, Canada: Commonwealth of Learning.
Dakduk, S., Santalla-Banderali, Z., & van der Woude, D. 2018. Acceptance of blended learning in executive education. SAGE Open 8(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018800647
Dasar e-Pembelajaran Negara 2.0. (2015). In Jabatan Pendidikan Tinggi, Kementerian Pendidikan Tinggi.
Davis, F. D., Bogozzi, R. P. & Warshaw, P. R. 1989. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science 35: 982-1003.
Eliza Annis, T., Ruzzakiah, J., & Jamaiah, Y. 2020. Investigating the e-learning usage among PLTV students and teachers-a preliminary study. Akademika 90 (Isu Khas 3): 5–18. https://doi.org/10.17576/akad-2020-90IK3-01
Fishbein, M. & Ajzen, I. 1975. Belief, attitude, intention and behaviour: an introduction to theory and research. Addison-Weseley, Reading, Mass.
Fisher, R., Perényi, Á. & Birdthistle, N. 2018. The positive relationship between flipped and blended learning and student engagement, performance and satisfaction. Active Learning in Higher Education: 1-17 doi: 10.1177/1469787418801702.
Garrison, D.R. and Kanuka, H. 2004. Blended learning: uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education 7(2): 95-105.
Ghazal, S., Al-Samarraie, H., & Aldowah, H. 2018. I am still learning: modeling LMS critical success factors for promoting students’ experience and satisfaction in a blended learning environment. IEEE Access 6: 77179–77201.
Güzer, B., & Caner, H. 2014. The past, present and future of blended learning: an in depth analysis of literature. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 116 :4596–4603.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.992
Hasni, M., & Saupi, M. N. 2020. Acceptance, effectiveness and relationship of blended learning implementation among lecturers in Polytechnic Sultan Mizan Zainal Abidin. International Journal of Integrated Education, Engineering and Business 3(2):121-131 https://doi.org/10.29138/ijebd.v3i02.988
Horn, M. B., & Staker, H. (2014). Blended: using disruptive innovation to improve schools. In Blended: using disruptive innovation to improve schools. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Ifeyinwa Constance, O. & Nzube Happiness, I. 2021. Level of application of blended learning pedagogical design by business educators in tertiary institutions in Anambra State. NAU Journal of Technology & Vocational Education 6(1) http://www.nauhtved.com.ng.
International Labour Organization. 2021. Skills development in the time of COVID-19: taking stock of the initial responses in technical and vocational education and training. Geneva: ILO.
Ismail, N., Ayub, A. F. M., Yunus, A. S. M., & Jalil, H. A. 2017. Utilising CIDOS LMS in technical higher education: the influence of compatibility roles on consistency of use. Advanced Science Letters 23(8): 7783–7787. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2017.9576
Ismail, M.E., Hamzah, N., Ariffin, A., Ismail, I.M., Daud, K.A.M., Utami, P. and Khairudin, M. 2018. The acceptance of MOOC among TVET students in higher education: an observation. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan 15(2): 1-9.
Izani, I. & Yahya, D. 2014. Kepimpinan servant dan pengaruhnya terhadap pengurusan perubahan di sekolah. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia 39.
Jabatan Pendidikan Politeknik Dan Kolej Komuniti. 2018. Informasi Kolej Komuniti. Edisi Oktober 2018.
Junus, K., Santoso, H. B., Putra, P. O. H., Gandhi, A., & Siswantining, T. 2021. Lecturer readiness for online classes during the pandemic: a survey research. Education Sciences 11(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11030139
Kazu, I. Y., Demirkol, M. 2014. Effect of blended learning environment model on high school students' academic achievement. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology - TOJET 13(1):78-87.
Köse, U. 2010. A blended learning model supported with Web 2.0 technologies. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 2: 2794–2802. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.417
Kundu, A., Bej, T., & Rice, M. 2021. Time to engage: implementing math and literacy blended learning routines in an Indian elementary classroom. Education and Information Technologies 26(1): 1201–1220.
Krismadinata, Unung Verawardina, Nizwardi Jalinus, Fahmi Rizal, Sukardi, Putu Sudira, Dochi Ramadhani, Arina Luthfini Lubis, John Friadi, Ari Syaiful Rahman Arifin, Dony Novaliendry 2020. Blended learning as instructional model in vocational education: literature review. Universal Journal of Educational Research 8(11B): 5801 - 5815. doi: 10.13189/ujer.2020.082214.
Mahanim, H., & Mohaida, M. 2021. Implementation Of LMS-CIDOS in polytechnic english language classroom: issues and challenges. Asian Journal of University Education 17(4): 527–537. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v17i4.16253
Marko, R. & Nina, K. 2017. Acceptance of technology and its impact on teacher’s activities in virtual classroom: integrating UTAUT and CoI into a combined model. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology 16.
Maslin, M. 2007. The technology acceptance model and the e-learning. 12th International Conference on Education, Sultan Hassanal Bolkiah Institute of Education Universiti Brunei Darussalam https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228851659.
Melvina Chung, H.C. & Sara, B. 2021. Penggunaan aplikasi WhatsApp dalam e-pembelajaran bagi guru interim di IPG. Jurnal Kurikulum dan Pengajaran Asia Pasifik 9(1):1-10.
Mohamed Nor Azhari, A., Arasinah, K., Che Ghani Che, K., Arman Shah, A., Mohammad Adam, J., Komariah, K. & Budiastuti, E. 2020. How good is myguru: the lecturers’ perceived usefulness and attitude. Cakrawala Pendidikan 39(2): 422–431.
Mohd Hafiez, A. & Sharifah Nadiyah, R. 2020. Aplikasi Google Classroom di Kolej Komuniti. Kolej Komuniti Selandar: Perpustakaan Negara Malaysia.
Mohd. Majid Konting. 2000. Kaedah penyelidikan pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
Mohd Sharul Nizam, M. D., Hafiz, M. R., & Rohizah, A. R. 2021. student readiness towards online learning during movement control order (MCO) in Malaysia: A Descriptive Analysis. Akademika 91(Isu Khas): 97–107. https://doi.org/10.17576/akad-2021-91IK-09
Mohammad Taufiq, A.G., Wan Ab Aziz, W.D. & Mohammad Najib, J. 2019. Penerimaan pelajar kursus Bahasa Arab di Universiti Malaysia kelantan terhadap pembelajaran teradun berteraskan Model Penerimaan Teknologi (TAM). Asian People Journal (APJ) 2(1): 84–94.
Muhammad Azeem, A., Tsegay, S. M., & Meijia, Y. 2021. Blended learning for diverse classrooms: qualitative experimental study with in-service teachers. SAGE Open 11(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211030623
Nadlifatin, R., Ardiansyahmiraja, B. & Persada, S.F. 2020. the measurement of university students’ intention to use blended learning system through Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) at developed and developing regions: lessons learned from Taiwan and Indonesia. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning 15(9): 219–230.
Nor Halina Nordin, Norlizawati Hashim & Norhafinas Abd Latib. 2020. Cabaran pensyarah kolej komuniti dalam melaksanakan proses pengajaran dan pembelajaran dalam talian. E-Proceedings of The Green Technology & Engineering 2020 Virtual Conferences: 193-202.
Nur Hafizah, Y., & Muhammad Ridhwan, S. 2021. Reaksi masyarakat Malaysia terhadap Perintah Kawalan Pergerakan (PKP) semasa penularan wabak Covid-19. Akademika 91(2): 69–78. https://doi.org/10.17576/akad-2021-9102-06
Raes, A., Detienne, L., Windey, I., & Depaepe, F. 2020. A systematic literature review on synchronous hybrid learning: gaps identified. Learning Environment Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-019-09303-z
Ratto, M., Shapiro, R. Benjamin, Truong, T. M., & Griswold, W. G. (2013). The ActiveClass project: experiments in encouraging classroom participation. In B. Wasson, S. Ludvigsen, & U. Hoppe (Eds.), Designing for Change in Networked Learning Environments (pp. 477–486). New York City, NY: Springer Publishing.
Razali, A. R., Norah, M. N., & Haniza, M. D. (2021). Penerimaan sistem e-pembelajaran bagi menyokong pembelajaran teradun di Institut Pendidikan Guru. Innovative Teaching and Learning Journal 5(1), 83–98
Rozita, S., Mohd Asnawi,A.W., Wan Marina, W.M.N., Zainal Azhar, Z.A., Siti Noridah, A., Asuralyzah, S. Mat Abdul Shukor, A.W., Masrulanita, M., Nur Khairaine,R., Mohd Fazirul, I. I., Mohd Saiful, N.K. & Mohd Sallehuddin, Y. 2021. Pelan tindakan pemulihan dan garis panduan pengoperasian Politeknik dan Kolej Komuniti pasca COVID-19. Putrajaya.Bahagian Governan dan Kecemerlangan JPPKK.
Sanchez-Gomez, M.C., Martin-Garcia, A.V., & Mena, J. 2020. Blended learning in tertiary education: teacher’s beliefs according to the Technology Acceptance Model. International Journal of Learning Technology 15(4).
Sankaran, S. & Norazlinda, S. 2021. Reka bentuk LMS dan pengurusan pembelajaran berasaskan blended learning dalam kalangan pelajar sarjana pendidikan. Sains Insani 6(1): 59–65.
Siripongdee, K., Pimdee, P., & Tuntiwongwanich, S. (2020). A blended learning model with IoT-based technology: effectively used when the COVID-19 pandemic? Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists 8(2): 905-917. https://dx.doi.org/10.17478/jegys.698869
Smith, K., & Hill, J. 2018. Defining the nature of blended learning through its depiction in current research. Higher Education Research and Development 38(2): 383–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1517732
Stapa, M.A., & Mohammad, N. (2021). The use of addie Model for designing blended learning application at vocational colleges in Malaysia. Asia-Pacific Journal of Information Technology and Multimedia 8(1): 49 – 62. https://doi.org/10.17576/apjitm-2019-0801-05
UNICEF.2020. Child mortality and COVID-19. Retrieved on: 23 January 2022. https://data.unicef.org/topic/education/covid-19.
Zainal Azhar, Z.A., Salbiah, K., Mohd Ezry, M.R.T., Nurhidayah, A., Harun, S., Nurul Faiza, M.Z. & Normatul Shafinaz, O. 2014. garis panduan amalan terbaik konsep pembelajaran teradun bagi Politeknik-Politeknik Malaysia. Putrajaya. Bahagian Instruksional dan Pembelajaran Digital, JPP.
Wintarti, A., Masriyah, Ekawati, R., & Fiangga, S. 2019. Blended learning as a learning strategy in the disruptive era. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1387(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1387/1/012127
Zulkurnain, H., Muhamad Asrul, M.N. & Norazlina, M. 2021. Analisis penerimaan penggunaan aplikasi Telegram bagi modul latihan penyediaan asas (SPU 1033) di Kolej Komuniti Kota Marudu, Sabah. International Journal of Humanities Technology and Civilization (IJHTC) 1(10): 23–36.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
ISSN: 0126-5008
eISSN: 0126-8694