Indikator Perubahan Dalam Pelaksanaan Program Transformasi Daerah: Proses Pemerkasaan Pejabat Pendidikan Daerah Sebagai Organisasi Pembelajaran (Change Indicator in Implementation of District Transformation Program: Strengthening of District Education Process as A Learning Organization)
Abstract
Program Transformasi Daerah atau District Transformation Programme (DTP) di bawah Anjakan ke-6 bertujuan untuk mempercepatkan penambahbaikan prestasi sekolah melalui program yang sistematik dan dipimpin oleh Pejabat Pendidikan Daerah (PPD). Kajian ini menggunakan kaedah tinjauan yang bertujuan untuk mengenal pasti tahap indikator perubahan di PPD, mengkaji hubungan dan sumbangan antara proses pemerkasaan, organisasi pembelajaran dengan indikator pengurusan perubahan di PPD. Seramai 93 orang Ketua Pegawai Pendidikan Daerah dipilih dari seluruh Malaysia. Teknik pensampelan kelompok dan pensampelan rawak strata digunakan bagi menentukan responden kajian. Hasil analisis deskriptif menunjukkan bahawa indikator pengurusan perubahan di PPD di Malaysia berada pada tahap sangat tinggi di mana kedua-dua komponen iaitu aktiviti (Min = 4.68) dan hasilan (Min = 4.60) berada pada tahap tinggi. Ini menunjukkan bahawa indikator bagi komponen aktiviti dilaksanakan dengan baik bagi membolehkan indikator komponen hasilan berada pada tahap yang tinggi. Analisis korelasi Pearson menunjukkan terdapat hubungan positif kuat antara ketiga-tiga pemboleh ubah yang dikaji iaitu proses pemerkasaan, organisasi pembelajaran dan indikator perubahan. Analisis regresi mendapati terdapat sumbangan faktor proses pemerkasaan kepada organisasi pembelajaran dan indikator perubahan, serta sumbangan faktor organisasi pembelajaran kepada indikator perubahan. Dapatan analisis berganda menunjukkan bahawa daripada lima prinsip tersebut, hanya dua prinsip yang iaitu sistem berfikir dan penguasaan peribadi didapati memberi sumbangan terhadap implementasi indikator pengurusan perubahan di PPD. Implikasinya, dapat dijadikan rujukan kepada PPD dalam memantau perubahan dalam Program Transformasi Daerah yang dilaksanakan berada dalam landasan yang betul melalui indikator perubahan ini. Kesimpulannya, kajian ini memberikan nilai tambah terhadap pelaksanaan Program DTP dalam memperkasakan PPD sebagai organisasi pembelajaran.
Kata kunci: Indikator Perubahan; Organisasi Pembelajaran; Pemerkasaan Pejabat Pendidikan Daerah; Program Transformasi Daerah; Pegawai Pendidikan Daerah.
Abstract
The District Transformation Program (DTP) under the 6th Shift aims to accelerate the improvement of school performance through a systematic program led by the District Education Office (PPD). This study aims to identify the level of change indicator in the PPDs, the relationship and contribution between strengthening processes, learning organizations with change indicators in PPDs. A total of 93 District Chief Education Officers were selected from all over Malaysia. Group sampling techniques and strata random sampling were used to determine the respondents. The results of the descriptive analysis show that the change indicators PPD in Malaysia are at a very high level where components of Activity (Mean = 4.68) and Output (Mean = 4.60). This indicates that the indicators for the activity component are well implemented to enable the output component indicators to be at a high level. Pearson's correlation analysis shows there are strong positive relationships between the three variables studied i.e. the strengthening process, learning organization and change indicator. Regression analysis found that there was a contribution of strengthening factor to learning organization and change indicators, as well as the contribution of learning organizational factors to change indicators. Multiple analysis show that out of the five principles, only two principles namely thinking system and personal mastery were found to contribute to the implementation of change management indicators in PPD. The implication, is that it can be use as a reference to the PPD in monitoring changes in the District Transformation Program that are implemented are on the right track through these indicators of change. In conclusion, this study provides added value to the implementation of the DTP Program in empowering PPD as a learning organization.
Keywords: Change Indicators; Learning Organization; Strengthening; District Transformation Program; District Education Officer
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ab. Aziz Yusof. 2010. Gelagat Organisasi: Satu Pendekatan Strategik. Kedah: UUM Press.
Abdul Jalil Ali, Abdul Ghani Kanesan Abdullah & Isrihan Bt Mohamed. 2019. Amalan pengupayaan dan autonomi guru dalam Pembelajaran Dan Pemudahcaraan Abad Ke 21 Jurnal Kepimpinan Pendidikan 6(1): 49-58.
Ali Basyah & Eddy Sutadji. 2017. Logic Model evaluation for SMK/ SMA teacher in dual expertise educational program certification program. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research 79-82.
Andhika R.L, Nurasa. H, Karlina, N. & Candradewini, C. 2018. Logic Model of governance innovation and public policy in public service. Policy & Governance Review (2) 2: 84-98.
Aramugam. T 2014. Pengaruh moderasi kapasiti kepimpinan diri guru terhadap hubungan antara organisasi pembelajaran dengan komitmen kualiti pengajaran guru di sekolah berprestasi tinggi di Malaysia. Ph.D Thesis, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Pulau Pinang.
Azlah Md Ali, Thuaibah, Rozeyta Omar, Noor Ella Mohamad Zip, Nor Suziani Ismail & Thahiroh Zulkifli. 2009. Keberkesanan latihan di kalangan kakitangan kumpulan sokongan di pejabat Setiausaha Kerajaan Negeri Kedah Darul Aman. Johor Bahru: Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Buletin Kesatuan Perkhidmatan Perguruan Kebangsaan (NUTP) Guru Malaysia. 2014. Guru Malaysia: PP2588/10/2014.
Creswell, J. 2012. Educational Research: Planning, Conducting and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. 4th Edition. Boston, MA: Pearson.
Dan, X., Xu, S., Liu, J., Hou, R., Liu, Y., & Ma, H. 2018. Relationships among structural empowerment, innovative behaviour, self‐efficacy, and career success in nursing field in mainland China. International Journal of Nursing Practice 24(5): 1-9.
Dana, B. 2010. Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) Climate Survey Process and Tool. Project Developed for American Health Association and National Center for Assisted Living: 10-11.
Farrukh, M., & Waheed, A. 2015. Learning organization and competitive advantage: An integrated approach. Journal of Asian Business Strategy 5(4): 73-79.
Ghazali Darussalam & Sufean Hussin. 2016. Metodologi Penyelidikan Dalam Pendidikan: Amalan dan Analisis Kajian. Kuala Lumpur: Penerbit Universiti Malaya.
Jaggil Apak & Muhamad Suhaimi Taat. 2018. Pengaruh kesediaan guru terhadap pengurusan bilik darjah abad Ke-21. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities 3 (4): 6-22.
Kanter, R. M. 1977. Men and Women of the Corporation. New York: Basic Books.
Kanter, R. M. 1993. Men and Women of the Corporation. 2nd Ed. New York: Basic Books.
Kellogg, W. K. 2004. WK Kellogg Foundation Logic Model Development Guide. Michigan: WK Kellogg Foundation.
Kellogg, W. K. 1998. Foundation. Evaluation Handbook. Enero.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. 2002. Pembangunan Pendidikan 2001-2010. Kuala Lumpur: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. 2013. Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013- 2025. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. 2013. Buku Panduan PPD: Dasar Transformasi Daerah. Putrajaya: Bahagian Pengurusan Sekolah Harian.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. 2015. Panduan Pengurusan Program Transformasi Daerah Edisi 2. Putrajaya: Bahagian Pengurusan Sekolah Harian.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. 2016. PISA 2015. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. 2016. Laporan TIMSS 2015. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. 2017. Panduan Pengurusan Program Transformasi Daerah Edisi 3. Putrajaya: Bahagian Pengurusan Sekolah Harian.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. 2017. Laporan Tahunan 2015 PPPM 2013-2025. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Kowal, J., & Ableidinger, J. (2011). How to Know when Dramatic Change Is on Track: Leading Indicators of School Turnarounds. Ohio: ERIC Clearinghouse.
Laschinger, H. 2012. Conditions for work effectiveness questionnaire I and II: User manual. Canada: Western University.
Lennie, J., Tacchi, J., Koirala, B., Wilmore, M., & Skuse, A. J. 2011. Equal Access Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation Toolkit: Helping communication for development organisations to demonstrate impact, listen and learn, and improve their practices. Australian Research Council.
Malek Shah Mohd Yusof. 2005. CAPAM Symposium on Networked Government: The public service as a learning organization: the Malaysian experience. International Review of Administrative Sciences 71(3) : 463-474.
Mainguet, C., & Baye, A. 2006. Defining a framework of indicators to measure the social outcomes of learning. Proceedings of the Copenhagen Symposium, 153-163. City: Publishing House. http://www.oecd.org/education/innovation-education/37425733.pdf. Retrieved on: 10 June 2017.
Md Zahidul Islam, Sajjid M Jasimuddin & Ikramul Hasan. 2015. Organizational culture, structure, technology infrastructure and knowledge sharing: Empirical evidence from MNCs based in Malaysia. Vine 45 (1): 67-88.
Mohd Izham Mohd Hamzah, Nor Azlin Ibrahim & Jamalullail Abdul Wahab. 2020. Kepimpinan Transformasional : Hubungan serta Peramal kepada Amalan Komuniti Pembelajaran Profesional. Akademika 90(3): 1-16.
Mohd Izham Mohd Hamzah, Nurul Sahadila Abd Rani & Mohd Effendi Ewan Mohd Matore. 2021. Change management indicators and their applications in strenghthening the process and learning organization levels. Sustainability 13(24) 13988: 1-19.
Mua’azam Bin Mohamad, Yahya Bin Don & Siti Noor Bt Ismail. 2016. Kepimpinan strategik dan hubungannya dengan kesediaan perubahan warga organisasi. Jurnal Kepimpinan Pendidikan 3(2): 1-14.
Muhammad Faizal A. Ghani, Rosnah Ishak, Saedah Siraj & Husaina Banu Kenayathulla. 2014. Keberkesanan amalan organisasi pembelajaran di sebuah sekolah cemerlang di Kuala Terengganu, Terengganu: satu kajian awal. Jurnal Kurikulum dan Pengajaran Asia Pasifik 2(3): 22-42.
Nasri, N., Vahid Dastjerdy, H., Eslami Rasekh, A., & Amirian, Z. 2017. Iranian EFL Teachers’ Practices and Learner Autonomy: Do Gender, Educational Degree, and Experience Matter? Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching 11(2), 146-158
Norashikin Hussein, Safiah Omar, Fauziah Noordin & Noormala Amir Ishak. 2016. Learning organization culture, organizational performance and organizational innovativeness in a public institution of higher education in Malaysia: a preliminary study. Procedia Economics and Finance : 512-519.
Norhafizah Abd Rani, Wan Idros Wan Sulaiman, Maizatul Haizan Mahbob. 2018. The Influence of organizational culture on training and development among support staff at UPM. e-Bangi Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities. 11(2): 142-173.
Nor Foniza Maidin. 2012. Amalan organisasi pembelajaran di sekolah cemerlang: satu kajian kes. Ph.D Thesis, Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Selangor.
Norisyah Abd Rahim. 2019. Pengaruh kepimpinan transformasi dan budaya sekolah terhadap organisasi pembelajaran sekolah menengah imtiaz di malaysia. Jurnal ILMI 8(1): 64-89.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 1993. Core Set of Indicators for Environmental Performance Reviews.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2009. Education at Glance 2009.
Orgambídez-Ramos, A., & Borrego-Alés, Y. 2014. Empowering employees: Structural empowerment as antecedent of job satisfaction in university settings. Psychological Thought 7(1): 28-36.
Pallant, J. 2005. SPSS Survival Manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS. Canberra, Australia: National Library of Australia.
Park, J. H. 2006. Measurement and validation of Senge's learning organization model in Korean vocational high schools. Doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia.
Pigeon, M., Montani, F., & Boudrias, J. S. 2017. How do empowering conditions lead to empowered behaviours? Test of a mediation model. Journal of Managerial Psychology 32 (5): 357-372.
Priyadhashany, A. J., & Sujatha, S. 2015. Does structural empowerment impact on job satisfaction via psychological empowerment? A mediation analysis. Global Management Review 10(1):23-42.
Puncreobutr, V. 2016. Structural empowerment and organizational commitment of lecturers in Private International Educational Institutions at Thailand. Journal of Education and Practice 7(11): 158-163.
Ravangard, R., Sajjadnia, Z., Farmani, M., & Bahadori, M. 2014. Relationship between organizational learning and employees' empowerment: A case study among medical sciences staff. Health Scope 3(2): 1-6.
Rosnah Ishak, Muhammad Faizal A. Ghani & Saedah Siraj. 2014. Amalan kepimpinan organisasi pembelajaran di sekolah berprestasi tinggi Malaysia. Jurnal Kepimpinan Pendidikan 1(2): 1-12.
Rozita Radhiah Said, Mohammad Brahim & Azhar Md Sabil. 2016.
Bimbingan dan Pementoran Berfokus oleh Sisc+ Bm: Impak terhadap Kualiti Pengajaran Guru Bahasa Melayu di Sekolah-sekolah Menengah Daerah Samarahan, Sarawak. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia 41(2): 131-139.
Salwati Shafee, Zuraidah Abdullah & Simin Ghavifekr. 2019. Peranan amalan bimbingan dalam meningkatkan pembelajaran profesional guru. Jurnal Kepimpinan Pendidikan 6(1): 1-26.
Samarudin Rejab. 1978. Decentralization Of Urban Development In Southeast Asia: Comparative Notes And Research Questions. Samarudin Rejab. Akademika 13(1): 11-29.
Senge, P.M. 1990. The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Science Of The Learning Organization. New York: Doubleday Dell Publishing Group.
Siva Rabindarang, Khuan Wai Bing & Khoo Yin Yin. 2014. Refleksi Tenaga Pengajar Terhadap Kepemimpinan Distributif dan Tekanan Kerja dalam Pendidikan Teknik dan Vokasional. Akademika 84 (1&2): 17-27.
Skytt, B., Hagerman, H., Strömberg, A., & Engström, M. 2015. First line managers’ descriptions and reflections regarding their staff's access to empowering structures. Journal of Nursing Management 23(8): 1003-1010.
Soewarto Hardhienata, Syarif Maulana & Eka Suhardi. 2019. Analisis sequential explanatory learning organization pada guru ditinjau dari komitmen guru terhadap organisasi dan pemberdayaan. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan 7(1): 716-724.
Song, J. H., Chai, D. S., Kim, J., & Bae, S. H. 2018. Job performance in the learning organization: the mediating impacts of self‐efficacy and work engagement. Performance Improvement Quarterly 30(4): 249-271.
Toprak, M., & Summak, M. S. 2014. Involvement in change and commitment to change: a study at Public Schools. International Journal of Social Sciences & Education 4(4): 953-968.
Wei Boon Quah. 2017. The level of readiness to change among staffs in community college of Sungai Petani. Journal on Technical and Vocational Education 1(1): 71-78.
Yang, J., Liu, Y., Chen, Y., & Pan, X. 2014. The effect of structural empowerment and organizational commitment on Chinese nurses' job satisfaction. Applied Nursing Research 27(3): 186-191.
Zainudin Hassan & Mohd Zaki Mohamed Som. 2015. Perkembangan dan reformasi sistem pendidikan di malaysia. Jurnal Pendidikan Nusantara Indonesia 1(1): 110-123.
Zuraidah Abduliah & Rahimah Ahmad. 2017. Komuniti pembelajaran profesional: Satu kajian perbandingan antara sekolah menengah kebangsaan harian biasa dan sekolah menengah kebangsaan anugerah cemerlang 2007. Jurnal Administrasi Pendidikan 10(20): 1-13.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
ISSN: 0126-5008
eISSN: 0126-8694