Membina Jambatan Kesepaduan Pelbagai Bangsa di Singapura dalam Arus Kebangkitan Negara Republik Rakyat China

Kamsiah Abdullah (Universiti Brunei Darussalam, kamsiah.abdullah@ubd.edu.bn)

Abstract


(Building Integrative Bridges for Multicultural Communities in Singapore during the Resurgence of the Peoples’ Republic of China)

Following the formal diplomatic link between Singapore and the Republic of China, trade and cultural ties between the two countries greatly expanded. This phenomenon, which marked the rise of The Republic of China, had a different impact on the Chinese who are the major ethnic group in Singapore, and the Malays who are the largest minority in the country. This article explores the various institutions and policies that were adopted by the Singaporean government following the period just after the formalization of the diplomatic ties in 1974, which may have enhanced or unsettled social cohesion between the two communities. The question of assimilation, integration, or forced integration as perceived by those communities is also considered. Latterly, this article focuses on a qualitative study based on a sample of the Singaporean student population, presented in order to demonstrate the extent to which the two communities aspired to remain integrated.The findings of the study reveal an interesting web of attitudes, beliefs and pragmatism in interactions among the respondents which tie in with their perceptions of family identity and loyalty to their culture and religion in building a cohesive and harmonious community together. In the final section, a number of suggestions of ways to foster integration between the different communities, as shared by the respondents, will be reported.

Keywords: Integration; language; Malay; Chinese; Singapore



ABSTRAK

Selepas Singapura dan Republik Rakyat China mengikat hubungan diplomatik pada tahun 1974, hubungan perdagangan dan kebudayaan antara kedua-dua negara telah meningkat dengan begitu pesat sekali. Fenomena dalam arus kebangkitan Negara China telah memberi kesan yang berlainan di antara dua buah kaum yang terbesar di Singapura iaitu orang Cina yang merupakan kaum majoriti terbesar dan orang Melayu, kaum minoritinya. Artikel ini menghuraikan tentang pelbagai institusi dan pelbagai dasar yang dilaksanakan oleh pemerintah Singapura sejurus setelah formalisasi hubungan diplomatik tersebut, yang boleh, sama ada meningkatkan hubungan atau sebaliknya menghalang. Persoalan asimilasi dan integrasi ataupun integrasi paksaan seperti yang disuarakan setengah-setengah kaum telah juga ditimbulkan. Ini disusuli oleh pemaparan satu kajian kualitatif yang bertujuan khusus menyelidiki sejauh mana kedua-dua kaum menghasratkan integrasi dan hidup dalam situasi yang harmoni. Kajian kualitatif ini menggunakan responden pelajar remaja dari kedua-dua kaum terbesar tersebut. Dapatan kajian memperlihatkan jaringan menarik antara sikap pragmatisme, kesetiaan terhadap bahasa dan budaya kaum-kaum terbesar di sini dalam membina jambatan menuju kepada masyarakat yang bersepadu dan harmonis. Sikap, kepercayaan dan pragmatisme responden dalam berinteraksi sangat berkait dengan persepsi mereka tentang identiti, kekeluargaan, kesetiaan terhadap kebudayaan dan agama mereka masing-masing. Dalam bahagian terakhir pula, beberapa saranan dan cadangan tentang cara-cara memupuk integrasi di kalangan komuniti yang berlainan itu telah dikongsikan.

Kata kunci: Integrasi; Melayu; Cina; bahasa; Singapura

 


Full Text:

PDF

References


Aziz Deraman. 2005. Asas Pemikiran Kebudayaan Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

Abdul Rahman Embong. 2012. Negara-Bangsa: Proses dan Perbahasan. Edisi kedua. Bangi: Penerbit UKM.

Clammer, J. R. 1975. Overseas Chinese assimilation and resignification. Southeast Asian Journal of Social Science 3(2): 9-21.

Chin, Y. & Vasu, N. 2007. The Ties that Bind and Blind. Laporan bertajuk A Report on Inter-racial and Inter-religious Relations in Singapore. Centre of Excellence for National Security. S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, Nanyang Technological University. 2 November 2007.

Dahles, H. 2006. Asia Research Centre, Copenhagen Business School. Chineseness as a competitive disadvantage, Singapore Chinese business strategies after failing in China. http://openarchive.cbs.dk/bitstream/handle/10398/7401/heidi.pdf?sequence=1. Tarikh capaian: 12 Februari 2014.

Hanapi Dolah. 1986. Asimilasi Budaya. Bangi: Penerbit UKM.

Hussin Mutalib. 2012. Singapore Malays: Being Ethnic Minority and Muslim in a Global City-state. London: Routledge Contemporary South East Asian series.

Kamsiah Abdullah. 2008. Bahasa dan Budaya Rumpun Melayu di Singapura: Dari Sejarah Silam Hingga ke Asimilasi. Kertas kerja dibentangkan di Seminar MABBIM, 7-8 April, Jakarta.

____________. 2009. Membina Jambatan Antara Masyarakat Melayu dan Cina di Singapura dalam Arus Kebangkitan Negara China. Kertas kerja dibentangkan di Persidangan Antarabangsa Pengajian Melayu III, 31 Mei 2009, Beijing.

___________. 2010. Integrasi Melayu Minoriti Dengan Cina Majoriti di Singapura: Satu Kajian Rintis dalam Domain Peribadi, Keluarga, Pekerjaan, Sosial dan Politik. Dlm. Persidangan Antarabangsa: Minoriti dan Majoriti: Bahasa Dan Budaya, disunting oleh Asmah Haji Omar et al. Kuching, Malaysia: Persatuan Linguistik Malaysia.

Kam-yee Law. 2003. Civic Disobedience of Malay Muslims in Post-September 11th Singapore. Kertas kerja dibentangkan di Hawaii International Conference on Social Sciences, Hawaii, 12 – 15 Jun 2003.

Lily Zubaidah Rahim. 1998. The Singapore Dilemma: The Political and Educational Marginality of the Malays. Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press.

Mansor Hj Sukaimi. 2002. http://www.zawaj.com/articles/singapore_integration.html. Tarikh capaian: 12 Februari 2014.

Mohd Ridhuan Tee Abdullah. 2010. Cabaran integrasi antara kaum di Malaysia: perspektif sejarah, keluarga dan pendidikan. Jurnal Hadhari 2 (1): 61-84.

Mauzy, D. K. & Milne S. R. 2002. Singapore Politics under the People’s Action Party. London and New York: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.

Samsul A. B. 1999. Identity Contestation in Malaysia: A Comparative Commentary on “Malayness” and “Chineseness”. Akademika 55(1): 17-37.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN: 0126-5008

eISSN: 0126-8694