The Triple Helix of Innovation: A Case Study of the Role and Social Relations of Universities, Industry and Government

said noor ashikin, abdullah zaharul

Abstract


The world economic is constantly changing and innovation is one of the keys to remain competitive. The Triple Helix model has been used as a tool to speed up and improve innovation spurt in many countries, especially a developing country such as Malaysia. The government has taken many steps to move Malaysia towards knowledge-based and innovation-based economy, and this Triple Helix model serves as a mechanism to boost the transition. This study attempts to investigate the challenges that arise in the dynamic collaboration of university, industries and government using the Triple Helix model within the context of the Malaysian’s development goals. This study uses semi-structured interviews to gather information and ten participants were selected from the three key spheres of the Triple Helix model: government (government personnel), universities (researchers and research management team), and industries (researchers, managers and executives). The semi-structured interviews were analyzed using a thematic analysis approach. The findings show that there are different facets of challenges faced by the triad collaboration including technological barriers, cultural differences, communication issues, and policy implementation hurdles. The most significant challenge identified was the organizational and structural discrepancies between industries and universities. Despite these challenges, the Triple Helix model remains a potent mechanism for driving innovation and fostering economic growth. Universities are adapting to this model, though issues related to commercialization and procedural inefficiencies persist.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Brockhoff, K. & Teichert, T. 1995. Cooperative R&D and partners’ measures of success. Special issue on the management of technological flows across industrial boundaries. International Journal of Technology Management 10 (1): 111–123.

Bruce, M., Leverick, F., Littler, D. & Wilson, D. 1995. Success factors for collaborative product development: a study of suppliers of information and communication technology. R&D Management, 25(l): 33-44.

Cai, Y. & Etzkowitz, H. 2020. Theorizing the triple helix model: past, present and future. Triple Helix 7 (2-3), 189–226.

Cai, Y. & Liu, C., 2020. The role of university as institutional entrepreneur in regional innovation system: towards an analytical framework. In: Preto, M.T., Daniel, A., Teixeira, A. (Eds.), Examining the Role of Entrepreneurial Universities in Regional Development. IGI Global, Hershey, PA, 133–155.

Cai, Y. 2011. Factors Affecting the Efficiency of the BRICSs' National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Study Based on DEA and Panel Data Analysis. Economics Discussion Paper (2011-52).

Cai, Y., Ferrer, B.R. & Lastra, J.L.M. 2019. Building university–industry Co-innovation networks in transnational innovation ecosystems: towards a transdisciplinary approach of integrating social sciences and artificial intelligence. Sustainability 11 (17), 1–23.

Chandran, V.G.R., Hayter, C.S. & Strong, D.R. 2015. Personal strategic alliances: enhancing the scientific and technological contributions of university faculty in Malaysia. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 24(5): 421-435.

Chandran, V.G.R., Sundram, V.P.K. & Santhidran, S. 2013. Innovation systems in Malaysia: a perspective of university-industry R&D collaboration. AI & Soc 29(3): 435- 444.

Datta, S. & Saad, M. 2011. Innovation in a Developing Country Context: Developing an Integrated Framework through India’s Experience. In Theory and Practice of the Triple Helix System in Developing Countries: Issues and Challenges, edited by Saad, M. & Zawdie, G., 207-229. New York: Routledge.

De Mello, Carvalho & Etzkowitz, H. 2008. New directions in Latin American university-industry-government interactions. International Journal of Technology Management and Sustainable Development 7(3): 193-204.

Etzkowitz, H & Zhou, C. 2017. The Triple Helix: University–Industry–Government Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Routledge, Abingdon.

Etzkowitz, H. 1990. The Second Academic Revolution: The role of the research university in economic development. In The research system in transition, edited by Cozzens, S.E., Healey, P., Rip, A. & Ziman, 109-124. Dordrecht: Springer.

Etzkowitz, H. 2003. Innovation in Innovation: The Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations. Social Science Information 42(3): 293-338.

Etzkowitz, H. 2014. The entrepreneurial university wave: From ivory tower to global economic engine. Industry & Higher Education, 28(4): 223-232.

Etzkowitz, H., Ranga, M. & Dzisah, J. 2012. Wither the university? The novum trivium and the transition from industrial to knowledge society. Social Science Information 51(2):143-164.

Galvao, A., Mascarenhas, C., Marques, C., Ferreira, J. & Ratten, V. 2019. Triple helix and its evolution: a systematic literature review. J. Sci. Technol. Pol. Manag. 10 (3), 812–833.

Godin, B. & Gingras, Y. 2000. The Place of Universities in the Knowledge Production. Research Policy 29 (2): 273–275.

Gulbrandsen, M. 1997. Universities and Industrial Competitive Advantage. In Universities in the Global Knowledge Economy: The Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations, edited by

Etzkowitz H. & L. Leydesdorff. London: Cassell Academic.

Gunasekara, C. 2004. The Third Role of Australian Universities in Human Capital Formation. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 26 (3):329–343.

Leydesdorff, L. & Meyer, M. 2006. Triple Helix indicators of knowledge-based innovation systems: Introduction to the special issue. Research policy 35(10):1441-1449.

Leydesdorff, L., & Meyer, M. 2007. The Scientometrics of a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations (Introduction to the topical issue). Scientometrics 70(2): 207-222.

Ramli, M.F. & Senin, A.A. 2015. Success factors to reduce orientation and resources-related barriers in university-industry R&D Collaboration particularly during development research stages. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 172: 375-382.

Ramli, N., & Zainol, Z. A. 2013. University-Industry Collaboration: A Catalyst towards Entrepreneurial University. In Proceedings of the 8th National Conference on Economic Malaysia Vol. 3: 7-9.

Ranga, M. & Etzkowitz, H. 2012. Great expectations: An innovation solution to the contemporary economic crisis. European Planning Studies 20(9):1429 -1438.

Ranga, M. & Etzkowitz, H. 2013. Triple Helix systems: analytical framework for innovation policy and practice in the Knowledge Society. Industry and Higher Education 27(4): 237-262.

Razak, A.A. & Saad, M. 2007. The role of universities in the evolution of the triple helix culture of innovation network: The case of Malaysia. International Journal of Technology management and Sustainable Development 6(3): 211-225.

Razak, A.A. & White, G.R. 2015. The Triple Helix model for innovation: a holistic exploration of barriers and enablers. International Journal of Business Performance and Supply Chain Modelling 7(3): 278-291.

Sarpong, D., AbdRazak, A., Alexander, E. & Meissner, D. 2017. Organizing practices of university, industry and government that facilitate (or impede) the transition to a hybrid triple helixmodel of innovation. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 123, 142–152.

Subramonian, H. & Rasiah, R. 2016. University-industry collaboration and technological innovation: sequential mediation of knowledge transfer and barriers in automotive and biotechnology firms in Malaysia. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation 24(1):1-23.

Zhou, C. & Etzkowitz, H. 2021. Triple helix twins: a framework for achieving innovation and UN sustainable development goals. Sustainability 13 (12), 6535.

Zhuang, T., Zhou, Z. & Li, Q. 2021. University-industry-government triple helix relationship and regional innovation efficiency in China. Growth Change 52 (1), 349–370.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN: 0126-5008

eISSN: 0126-8694