Balancing Ideals and Reality: Exploring the Dilemma of Legal Remedies in Unjust Dismissal
Abstract
The primary quandary in legal theory pertains to whether the law ought to mirror the current state of circumstances or aspire to an ideal standard. This study has the potential to be applied to a variety of legal domains, including employment law, with a particular emphasis on the concept of remedies for cases involving terminating employees unfairly. Reinstatement is the principal type of remedy that can be utilised in situations involving unfair termination. These kinds of claims are granted by the court only infrequently because of specific justifications. The objective of this article is to provide a comprehensive explanation of the fundamental concepts that underpin Western jurisprudence within the context of legal theory. Through a variety of approaches, including legislative interpretations, case studies, and practical applications, the essay demonstrates the enduring impact and adaptability of legal principles in the context of seeking remedies in the form of monetary compensation. The disparity between legislative restrictions and the remedies available to employees becomes clearer through a critical analysis of key legal concepts articulated by notable scholars. By examining their interpretations, one can uncover the underlying tensions between statutory limitations and judicial remedies, revealing whether the law truly serves its protective purpose or merely imposes procedural hurdles.References
Ab. Halim, M. ‘. and Amni, S. Z. (2023). Legal system in the perspectives of H.L.A Hart and Lawrence M. Friedman. Peradaban Journal of Law and Society, 2(1), 51-61. https://doi.org/10.59001/pjls.v2i1.83)
Adikaram, A. S. and Kailasapathy, P. (2022). What not to do: (in) justice enactment in handling complaints of sexual harassment. University of Colombo Review, 3(1), 100. https://doi.org/10.4038/ucr.v3i1.62
Aman‐Ullah, A., Aziz, A., Ibrahim, H., Mehmood, W., & Abbas, Y. A. (2021). The impact of job security, job satisfaction and job embeddedness on employee retention: an empirical investigation of Pakistan’s health-care industry. Journal of Asia Business Studies, 16(6), 904-922. https://doi.org/10.1108/jabs-12-2020-0480
Antonov, M. (2016). The legal conceptions of Hans Kelsen and Eugen Ehrlich: weighing human rights and sovereignty. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2717494
AP D’Entreves, Natural Law, revised edn (London: Hutchinson,1970)
Austin, The Province of Jurisprudence Determined, Hart(ed), 1954, 2nd edn (New York: B Franklin, 1970)
Autor, D., Donohue, J. J., & Schwab, S. J. (2002). The costs of wrongful-discharge laws. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.355861
Beebeejaun, A. (2018). Unfair dismissal in the Mauritius context: a comparative study. International Journal of Law and Management, 60(6), 1299-1312. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijlma-07-2017-0158
Do, M. and Schertzer, R. (2023). How should courts respond to political questions? exploring the dialogical turn in the supreme court of Canada’s federalism and indigenous case law. Law &Amp; Social Inquiry, 49(1), 478-508. https://doi.org/10.1017/lsi.2022.89
Donohue, J. J. and Siegelman, P. (2005). The evolution of employment discrimination law in the 1990s: a preliminary empirical investigation. Handbook of Employment Discrimination Research, 261-284. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09467-0_13
Dreamland Corporation (M) Sdn Bhd v Choong Chin Sooi, [1988] 1 MLJ 111
Dworkin, Taking Rights Seriously (Cambridge,Mass: Harvard University Press,1978), Chapter 2,3,4,7)
Dyzenhaus, D. (2011). Austin, hobbes, and dicey. Canadian Journal of Law &Amp; Jurisprudence, 24(2), 409-430. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0841820900005245)
Eguchi, K. (2008). Damages or reinstatement: incentives and remedies for unjust dismissal. Review of Law &Amp; Economics, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.2202/1555-5879.1169
Employment Rights Act 1996, c. 18. Available at: Legislation.gov.uk(https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1996/18/contents)
Eneh, N. E., Bakare, S. S., Adeniyi, A. O., & Akpuokwe, C. U. (2024). Modern labor law: a review of current trends in employee rights and organizational duties. International Journal of Management &Amp; Entrepreneurship Research, 6(3), 540-553. https://doi.org/10.51594/ijmer.v6i3.843
Fanani, A. Z. and Zulkarnain, M. S. (2022). Understanding john austin's legal positivism theory and hans kelsen's pure legal theory. Peradaban Journal of Law and Society, 1(2), 107-118. https://doi.org/10.59001/pjls.v1i2.41)
Fuller, The Morality of Law (New Haven: Yale University Press,1969)
Goźdź-Roszkowski, S. (2023). Strategies of justification in resolving conflicts of values and interests. a comparative analysis of constitutional argumentation in cases of animal sacrifice. HERMES - Journal of Language and Communication in Business, (63), 5-17. https://doi.org/10.7146/hjlcb.vi63.140129
Griffo, C., Almeida, J. P. A., & Guizzardi, G. (2020). Legal theories and judicial decision-making: an ontological analysis. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications. https://doi.org/10.3233/faia200661
Hadi, S. and Michael, T. (2022). Hans kelsen's thoughts about the law and its relevance to current legal developments. Technium Social Sciences Journal, 38, 220-227. https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v38i1.7852
Han Chiang High School & Another and National Union of Teachers in Independent School [1988] 2 ILR 611
Hastings, T. and Heyes, J. (2016). Farewell to flexicurity? austerity and labour policies in the european union. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 39(3), 458-480. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831x16633756
HLA Hart, The Concept of Law, 2nd edn (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994), Chapter 9
Holiday Inn Kuching v Lee Chai Siok Elizabeth [1992] 2 MLJ 322
Holmes, Oliver Wendell Jr. "The Path of the Law." Harvard Law Review 10, no. 8 (1897): 457-478.
Industrial Court Website:https://www.mp.gov.my/index.php?lang=en & https://www.mp.gov.my/fullawards/searchFullAwards.php
Kaplan, J. (2021). In defense of hart’s supposedly refuted theory of rules. Ratio Juris, 34(4), 331-355. https://doi.org/10.1111/raju.12331
Kellogg, F. R. (2006). Oliver wendell holmes, jr., legal theory, and judicial restraint. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511498640
Langford, P. and Bryan, I. (2013). Hans kelsen's concept of normative imputation. Ratio Juris, 26(1), 85-110. https://doi.org/10.1111/raju.12004
Langford, P. and Bryan, I. (2013). Hans kelsen's concept of normative imputation. Ratio Juris, 26(1), 85-110. https://doi.org/10.1111/raju.12004
Leiter, Brian. "Dworkin's Rights as Trumps: A Critique." *Legal Theory*, vol. 9, no. 3, 2003, pp. 265-295.)
Małecka, M. (2016). Posner versus kelsen: the challenges for scientific analysis of law. European Journal of Law and Economics, 43(3), 495-516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-016-9552-1
Matta, F. K. (2020). Not all fairness is created equal: a study of employee attributions of supervisor justice motives. Journal of Applied Psychology, 274-293
Möller, K. (2018). Dworkin’s theory of rights in the age of proportionality. The Law &Amp; Ethics of Human Rights, 12(2), 281-299. https://doi.org/10.1515/lehr-2018-0011
Muhl, C. J. (2001). The employment-at-will doctrine: Three major exceptions. Monthly Lab. Rev., 124, 3.
Muñiz, J. R. (1997). Legal principles and legal theory. Ratio Juris, 10(3), 267-287. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9337.00061
Paulson, S. L. (2018). The purity thesis. Ratio Juris, 31(3), 276-306. https://doi.org/10.1111/raju.12217
Polkey v AE Dayton Services Ltd [1987] UKHL 8
Reychav, I. and Sharkie, R. (2010). Trust: an antecedent to employee extra‐role behaviour. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 11(2), 227-247. https://doi.org/10.1108/14691931011039697
Sathiah Seelan Rengasamy V. Brooks Property and Facility Services [2024] MELRU 1778
Second Schedule Industrial Relation Act 1967 (Act 177)
Section 113 Employment Rights Act 1996
Section 113 Employment Rights Act 1996
Section 116 Employment Rights Act 1996
Section 116 Employment Rights Act 1996
Sery, J. (2022). The rhetorical roots of legal pragmatism. Journal for the History of Rhetoric, 25(3), 303-328. https://doi.org/10.5325/jhistrhetoric.25.3.0303
Smith, D. (2007). Dworkin's theory of law. Philosophy Compass, 2(2), 267-275. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2007.00058.x
Stapp v Shaftesbury Society [1982] ICR 716
Sumargi, Slamet Suhartono, Yovita Arie Mangesti, & Atik Krustiati (2023). The concepts of arrangement in case fees in civil cases. Technium Social Sciences Journal, 44, 693-698. https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v44i1.9054
Sunaryo, A. C., Yulivan, I., & Nawir, J. (2024). Analysis of employee commitment to the organization with job involvement as an intervening variable at pt. x. Ilomata International Journal of Management, 5(4), 1318-1341. https://doi.org/10.61194/ijjm.v5i4.1337
Swaminathan, S. (2021). Analogy reversed. The Cambridge Law Journal, 80(2), 366-396. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0008197321000295
Telekom Malaysia Kawasan Utara v Krishnan Kutty a/l Sanguni Nair & Ors.[2002] 3 MLJ 129/ Sathiah Seelan Rengasamy V. Brooks Property And Facility Services[2024] MELRU 1778
Telekom Malaysia Kawasan Utara v Krishnan Kutty a/l Sanguni Nair & Ors. [2002] 3 MLJ 129
Trudeau, G. (1991). Is reinstatement a remedy suitable to at- will employees? Industrial Relations, 30(2), 302-315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-232x.1991.tb00791.x
Valles Santillán, G. G. (2022). Ronald dworkin’s legal non-positivism: main characteristics 1and its confrontation with legal positivism of the twentieth century (h.l.a. hart). Mexican Law Review, 107-117. https://doi.org/10.22201/iij.24485306e.2022.2.16570
Vinx, L. (2011). Austin, kelsen, and the model of sovereignty. Canadian Journal of Law &Amp; Jurisprudence, 24(2), 473-490. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0841820900005282
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
It is the author's responsibility to ensure that his or her submitted work does not infringe any existing copyright. Furthermore, the author indemnifies the editors and publisher against any breach of such a warranty. Authors should obtain permission to reproduce or adapt copyrighted material and provide evidence of approval upon submitting the final version of a manuscript. This journal does not allow the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions or retain publishing rights without restrictions.
