Penglibatan kesatuan sekerja merupakan penglibatan ahli-ahli kesatuan sekerja dalam tindakan kolektif dan aktiviti-aktiviti kesatuan sekerja yang menjadikan sebuah kesatuan sekerja itu mencapai objektif penubuhannya dalam organisasi. Penglibatan kesatuan sekerja adalah sebahagian daripada proses pembuatan keputusan dan perancangan operasi organisasi di antara kesatuan sekerja dan pihak pengurusan. Oleh itu, tujuan kajian ini adalah untuk mengenalpasti tahap penglibatan kesatuan sekerja dan pengaruh komitmen kesatuan sekerja serta ideologi kesatuan sekerja terhadap penglibatan kesatuan sekerja di sektor telekomunikasi terpilih di Sabah. Kajian ini merupakan kajian rintis yang menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan melibatkan 30 orang ahli kesatuan sekerja. Analisis deskriptif serta analisis regresi linear digunakan bagi mencapai objektif kajian. Hasil dapatan kajian menunjukkan tahap penglibatan kesatuan sekerja berada pada tahap tinggi. Model kajian ini adalah signifikan di mana komitmen kesatuan sekerja serta ideologi kesatuan sekerja mempengaruhi penglibatan kesatuan sekerja sebanyak 68 peratus. Ini menunjukkan teori penglibatan kesatuan sekerja boleh diimplementasikan dalam sektor telekomunikasi di Sabah.Kata kunci: Kesatuan sekerja; Komitmen Kesatuan Sekerja; ideologi kesatuan sekerja; penglibatan kesatuan sekerja; syarikat telekomunikasiAbstract: Trade union participation is the active participation of trade union members in collective action and trade union activities so that a trade union can achieve the goals of its establishment. Trade union participation is part of the decision-making process and operational planning of the organization between trade unions and management. Therefore, the first objective of this study is to examine the level of union participation in the selected telecommunications sector in Sabah. Meanwhile, the second objective is to identify the influence of trade union commitment and trade union ideology on trade union involvement. This study is a pilot study that uses a quantitative approach and involves 30 trade union members. Descriptive analysis and linear regression analysis were used to achieve the study's objectives. The study results show that the level of trade union participation is at a high level. This research model is significant were trade union commitment and trade union ideology influence trade union participation by 68 percent. This shows that the theory of trade union participation can be implemented in the telecommunications sector in Sabah.Keywords: Trade Unions; Trade Union Commitment; Trade Union Ideology; trade union participation involvement; telecommunication companiesReferencesAhmad, M., & Yussof, K. (2019). Dasar perburuhan dan impaknya terhadap pergerakan kesatuan sekerja di Malaysia: Satu kajian awal. Journal of Borneo Social Transformation Studies, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.51200/jobsts.v0i0.2170Aryee, S., & Chay, Y. W. (2001). Workplace justice, citizenship behaviour, and turnover intentions in a union context: Examining the mediating role of perceived union support and union instrumentality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 154–160. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.154Ahiauzu, A. I. (1985). Ideology, culture and trade union behavior: The Nigerian Case. chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.ide.go.jp/library/English/Publish/Periodicals/De/pdf/85_03_05.pdfBolton, D., Bagraim, J. J., Witten, L., Mohamed, Y., Zvobgo, V., & Khan, M. (2007). Explaining union participation: The effects of union commitment and demographic factors. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 33(1), 74–79. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v33i1.254Chawla, G., Singh, T., & Singh, R. (2020). Operationalizing the antecedents and outcomes of union participation in the Indian context. Journal of Indian Business Research, 12(4), 481–508. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIBR-03-2019-0086Fullagar, C. J., Gallagher, D. G., Clark, P. F., & Carroll, A. E. (2004). Union commitment and participation: A 10-year longitudinal study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(4), 730–737. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.4.730Fuad Mohamed Berawi. (2017). Metodologi penyelidikan: Panduan menulis tesis (2nd ed.). University Utara Malaysia.Gaudart, C., Petit, J., Dugué, B., Daniellou, F., Davezies, P., & Théry, L. (2012). Impacting working conditions through trade union training. Work, 41(2), 165–175. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-20121281Ginni, C. (2018). Worker participation in union activities: A conceptual review. Personnel Review, 47(1), 206–226. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-09-2016-0253Hu, E., Zhang, M., Shan, H., Zhang, L., & Yue, Y. (2018). Job satisfaction and union participation in China: Developing and testing a mediated moderation model. Employee Relations, 40(6), 964–980. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-10-2017-0245Hassan, M. (2020). Protection on workers’ right in trade unionism in Malaysia. International Journal of Law, Government and Communication, 5(20), 138–147. https://doi.org/10.35631/ijlgc.5200011Ibrahim, D. (2016). Pergerakan kesatuan sekerja di Sabah pada era pra Malaysia hingga tahun 1999. Jurnal Kinabalu, 18. https://doi.org/10.51200/ejk.v18i0.492Ifeanyi Emmanuel, O., Clara Chika, A., & Chizoba Bonaventure, O. (2020). Trade union performance and industrial relations climate in the Nigerian petroleum sector. International Journal of Business, Economics and Management, 7(1), 42–56. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.62.2020.71.42.56Ismail, F., Omar, S. S., Johar, S. S., Kamri, K. A., & Damin, D. A. (2018). Peranan dan penerimaan kesatuan sekerja di Malaysia. Universiti Tun Hussein Onn. http://ocs.uthm.edu.my/uthmocr/index.php/hsp/article/download/118/25Jangli, M., & Abd. Hamid, F. (2018). Densiti, cakupan dan pengiktirafan kesatuan sekerja: Analisis kajian lepas. MANU Jurnal Pusat Penataran Ilmu Dan Bahasa (PPIB), 2018, 183–198. https://doi.org/10.51200/manu.v0i0.1591Kelly, C., & Kelly, J. (1994). Who gets involved in collective action?: Social psychological determinants of individual participation in trade unions. Human Relations, 47(1), 63–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679404700104Li, M., Huang, W., Zhang, C., & Yang, Z. (2019). How union participation influences union commitment and job involvement. Employee Relations, 41(6), 1348–1363. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-06-2018-0170Metochi, M. (2002). The influence of leadership and member attitudes in understanding the nature of union participation. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 40(1), 87–111. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8543.00224Morin, A. J. S., Gallagher, D. G., Meyer, J. P., Litalien, D., & Clark, P. F. (2021). Investigating the dimensionality and stability of union commitment profiles over a 10-year period: A latent transition analysis. In ILR Review, 74, (1). https://doi.org/10.1177/0019793919883815Pallant, J. (2007). SPSS survival manual. A step-by-step guide to data analysis using SPSS (3rd ed.). Allen & Unwin.Sharifah Nursyahidah, S. A. (2021). Kesatuan sekerja dan hubungan pekerjaan: Artikel sorotan. Malaysian Journal of History, Politics & Strategic Studies, 48(3), 68–104. https://www.scribd.com/presentation/128850080/Akta-Kesatuan-PekerjaTara Myers, M. P. (2021). Union commitment and participation. Quality Improvement Centre for Workplace Development.Tripti, S., & Ginni, C. (2015). Antecedents and consequences of union participation: A review. Journal of Advanced Management Science, 44–49. https://doi.org/10.12720/joams.3.1.44-49Tarumaraja, B. A., Omar, F., Halim, F. W., & Hafidz, S. W. M. (2015). Analysing the validity of union commitment scale using confirmatory factor analysis with Malaysian samples. Asian Social Science, 11(22), 96–104. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v11n22p96Yang, L., Zhang, Q., Gong, H., & Cheng, Y. (2023). Cross-level effects of union practices on extra-role behaviors: The mediating role of industrial relations climate, union commitment and union instrumentality. International Journal of Manpower, 44(1), 133–151. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-10-2020-0467Yussof, K. S. M. (2020). The influence of industrial relations climate and unions effectiveness on interest-based bargaining. Journal of Social Sciece and Humanities. 17(6), 1823–1884.
Author Biographies
Nurul Fadilah Ahmad, University Malaysia Sabah
Fakulti Sains Sosial dan Kemanusiaan,Universiti Malaysia Sabah.
Kee Y Sabariah Kee Mohd Yussof, Universiti Malaysia Sabah
Pensyarah Kanan,Program Hubungan Industri,Fakulti Sains Sosial dan Kemanusiaan,Universiti Malaysia Sabah.