Digital Inequality through Digital Skills and Usage: Examining Cultural Outcomes of Internet Use among Employees in Private University

Authors

  • Umar Halim Centre for Research in Media and Communication, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5470-524X
  • Mohd Nor Shahizan Ali Centre for Research in Media and Communication, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Sabariah Mohamed Salleh Centre for Research in Media and Communication, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17576/ebangi.2025.2202.01

Keywords:

Digital Divide, Digital Inequality, Cultural Outcome, Digital Skill, Internet Usage

Abstract

Persistent debate remains in the literature regarding whether digital skills exert a direct influence on internet outcomes or whether this relationship is mediated by the nature and quality of internet usage. This study addresses this theoretical tension by examining digital inequality—conceptualized through digital skills and cultural-internet usage—and its effects on cultural outcomes among university employees in Indonesia. The study has two primary objectives: first, to examine how digital skills and culturally oriented internet use influence the cultural outcomes of internet engagement among employees in a private university setting. Second, to analyse the differences between academic staff (lecturers) and administrative staff in terms of their digital skills, cultural-internet usage, and cultural-internet outcomes. Using a quantitative approach, data were collected from 64 respondents comprising academic and administrative staff at Universitas Pancasila, Indonesia. The findings of the study reveal that digital skills do not have a direct effect on cultural outcomes, suggesting the presence of an intervening variable. Rather, cultural internet use mediates the link, suggesting that digital competency has to convert into culturally focused online activities if major cultural results are to result. These findings underline the need of not only improving digital competencies but also of encouraging significant online participation to solve digital inequality in higher education institutions. The paper presents both theoretical and pragmatic consequences for academic environments' digital inclusion policies. Keywords: Digital Inequality; digital divide, cultural internet usage; digital skill; cultural outcomeReferencesAshley, S., Maksl, A., & Craft, S. (2017). News Media Literacy and Political Engagement: What’ s the Connection? Journal of Media Literacy Education, 9(1), 79-98. https://doi.org/10.23860/JMLE-2017-9-1-6Bode, L. (2017). Gateway Political Behaviours: The Frequency and Consequences of Low-Cost Political Engagement on Social Media. Social Media and Society, 3(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117743349Büchi, M., & Vogler, F. (2017). Testing a Digital Inequality Model for Online Political Participation. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, 3, 237802311773390. https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023117733903Calderón Gómez, D. (2021). The third digital divide and Bourdieu: Bidirectional conversion of economic, cultural, and social capital to (and from) digital capital among young people in Madrid. New Media and Society, 23(9), 2534–2553. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820933252Deja, M., Rak, D., & Bell, B. (2021). Digital transformation readiness: perspectives on academia and library outcomes in information literacy. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 47(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102403Dogruer, N., Eyyam, R., & Menevis, I. (2011). The use of the internet for educational purposes. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 28, 606–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.115Fauziah, Ibrahim; Siti Noradilah, Zainal; Ezarina, Zakaria; Wan Shahrazad, Wan Sulaiman; Mohammad Rahim, Kamaluddin;Sheerad, S. (2024). Penggunaan Media Sosial, Kemahiran Komunikasi dan Penggunaan Teknologi Maklumat dalam Memperkasakan Keusahawanan Bekas Banduan di Malaysia. E-Bangi: Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 21(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.17576/ebangi.2024.2104.01Halim, U., Febrina, D., Agustina, A., Hidayat, N., & Ningsih, W. (2024). Digital Inequality: E-learning Outcomes among Youth in Indonesia. JTUS, 02(1). https://doi.org/10.58631/jtus.v2i1Halim, U., Hidayat, N., Rosit, M., Suri, I., & Handoko, D. (2024). Digital Opportunities and Internet Outcomes on Educational Domain: A Comparison between Urban and Rural of Indonesian University Students. 22, 20248–20257. https://doi.org/10.57239/PJLSS-2024-22.2.001484Helsper, E. J. (2012). A Corresponding Fields Model for the Links Between Social and Digital Exclusion. Communication Theory, 22(4), 403–426. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2012.01416.xHelsper, E. J., & Van Deursen, A. J. A. M. (2015). Tangible Outcomes of Internet Use. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1117.6722Heponiemi, T., Gluschkoff, K., Leemann, L., Manderbacka, K., Aalto, A. M., & Hyppönen, H. (2021). Digital inequality in Finland: Access, skills and attitudes as social impact mediators. New Media and Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211023007Inan Karagul, B., Seker, M., & Aykut, C. (2021). Investigating Students’ Digital Literacy Levels during Online Education Due to COVID-19 Pandemic. Sustainability, 13(21), 11878. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111878Islam, M. N., & Inan, T. T. (2021). Exploring the Fundamental Factors of Digital Inequality in Bangladesh. SAGE Open, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211021407Kurnia, N. (2020). Whatsapp Group and Digital Literacy among Indonesian Women.Lissitsa, S. (2015). Patterns of digital uses among Israeli Arabs – between citizenship in modern society and traditional cultural roots. 25(5), 447–464.Mihelj, S., Leguina, A., & Downey, J. (2019). Culture is digital: Cultural participation, diversity and the digital divide. New Media and Society, 21(7), 1465–1485. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818822816Nash, C. (2020). Report on Digital Literacy in Academic Meetings during the 2020 COVID-19 Lockdown. Challanges, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3390/challe11020020Norizuandi, Ibrahim; Azlina, Bujang; Zainon, Hj Bibi;Sarehan, Sadikin; Noriham, B. H., & Ambi. (2023). The Impact of ICT in Empowering Sarawak Women in Home-Based Business Communities. E-Bangi: Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, VIII(I), 1–19. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/ebangi.2023.2004.33Scheerder, A., van Deursen, A., & van Dijk, J. (2017). Determinants of Internet skills, uses and outcomes. A systematic review of the second- and third-level digital divide. In Telematics and Informatics (Vol. 34, Issue 8, pp. 1607–1624). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.07.007Shariman, T. P. N. T., Razak, N. A., & Noor, N. F. Mohd. (2012). Digital Literacy Competence for Academic Needs: An Analysis of Malaysian Students in Three Universities. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69, 1489–1496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.090Singh, A. S., & Masuku, M. B. (2014). SAMPLING TECHNIQUES & DETERMINATION OF SAMPLE SIZE IN APPLIED STATISTICS RESEARCH: AN OVERVIEW. International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, II(11), 1–22.Soomro, K. A., Kale, U., Curtis, R., Akcaoglu, M., & Bernstein, M. (2020). Digital divide among higher education faculty. International Journal of Education Technology in Higher Education, 17(21), 1–16.Subramaniam, L., Jalaludin, F. W., Hen, K. W., & Yap, C. S. (2023). The second and third levels of digital divide among Malaysian university students during the Covid-19 pandemic. Telkomnika (Telecommunication Computing Electronics and Control), 21(6), 1326–1333. https://doi.org/10.12928/TELKOMNIKA.V21I6.25258Van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & Helsper, E. J. (2018). Collateral benefits of Internet use: Explaining the diverse outcomes of engaging with the Internet. New Media and Society, 20(7), 2333–2351. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817715282van Deursen, A. J. A. M., Helsper, E. J., & Eynon, R. (2016). Development and validation of the Internet Skills Scale (ISS). Information Communication and Society, 19(6), 804–823. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1078834Van Deursen, A. J. A. M., Helsper, E. J., & Van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2017). The Compoundness and Sequentiality of Digital Inequality.van Deursen, A. J. A. M., van der Zeeuw, A., de Boer, P., Jansen, G., & van Rompay, T. (2021). Digital inequalities in the Internet of Things: differences in attitudes, material access, skills, and usage. Information Communication and Society, 24(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1646777van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2014). The digital divide shifts to differences in usage. New Media and Society, 16(3), 507–526. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813487959van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2019). The first-level digital divide shifts from inequalities in physical access to inequalities in material access. New Media and Society, 21(2), 354–375. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818797082van Deursen, A. J., & van Dijk, J. A. (2021). IQ and digital inequality: An empirical investigation. New Media & Society, 146144482110240. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211024012van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2017). Digital Divide: Impact of Access. In The International Encyclopedia of Media Effects (pp. 1–11). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118783764.wbieme0043van Laar, E., van Deursen, A. J. A. M., van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & de Haan, J. (2017). The relation between 21st-century skills and digital skills: A systematic literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 577–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.010

Downloads

Published

2025-05-31

Issue

Section

Article