Stakeholder Participation in Current Ecotourism for Sustainability of Malaysia

Authors

  • Kok Onn Kwong Centre for Research in Development, Social Environment (SEEDS), Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities (FSSK), Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), Bangi http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0986-6700
  • Velan Kunjuraman Centre for Research in Development, Social Environment (SEEDS), Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities (FSSK), Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), Bangi
  • Jayaraj Vijaya Kumaran Faculty of Earth Science, Universiti Malaysia Kelantan (UMK), Kota Bharu
  • Muhamad Azahar Abas Faculty of Earth Science, Universiti Malaysia Kelantan (UMK), Kota Bharu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17576/ebangi.2025.2201.35

Keywords:

Ecotourism development, stakeholders’ collaboration, Royal Belum State Park, Malaysia, mixed method, Southeast Asia

Abstract

This review on ecotourism in Malaysia, Southeast (SE) Asia examines the motivations and satisfaction levels of major stakeholders, aiming to fill a gap in understanding their participation. Royal Belum State Park (RBSP) is known for its rich biodiversity, cultural significance and Indigenous communities, making it an ideal destination for ecotourism. Protected areas such as RBSP, play an important role in providing ecosystem services, preserving biodiversity and offering spaces for local communities. Accordingly, ecotourism at RBSP should balance the biodiversity conservation with needs of the locals. This requires active stakeholder participation, where the interests and rights of all involved parties are recognized and integrated into ecotourism management and decision-making. The study focuses on tourists’, local community and other important stakeholders’ motivations, particularly their desire to experience nature and how this insight can inform more effective management policies and promote sustainability in tourism activities. The review highlights a gap in ecotourism research especially in SE Asia, regarding the use of social theories and mixed methods. It emphasizes that the underutilization of mixed methods limits the understanding of stakeholder dynamics and hinders comprehensive research. The study advocates for integrating both qualitative and quantitative methods to improve the reliability of findings and better address the needs of various stakeholders. The ultimate goal is to enhance ecotourism sustainability and stakeholder engagement at RBSP by informing management policies that balance conservation with local development. By improving understanding of tourist preferences, the study seeks to support responsible tourism practices that benefit both the environment and local communities.ReferencesAbdullah, M., Mamat, M. P., Yaacob, M. R., Radam, A., & Fui, L. H. (2015). Estimate the conservation value of biodiversity in national heritage sites: A case of the Forest Research Institute Malaysia. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 30(30), 180–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2015.10.032Alegre, J., Mateo, S., & Pou, L. (2011). A latent class approach to tourists’ length of stay. Tourism Management, 32(3), 555–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2010.05.003Ap, J. (1990). Residents’ perceptions research on the social impacts of tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 17(4), 610–616.Bramwell, B., & Sharman, A. (1999). Collaboration in local tourism policymaking. Annals of Tourism Research, 26, 392–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-7383(98)00105-4Butler, R. W. (1980). The concept of a tourism area cycle of evolution: Implications for resources management. The Canadian Geographer, 24(1), 6–12.Canosa, A., Moyle, B. D., Moyle, C. L., & Weile, B. (2017). Anthropology and sociology in tourism doctoral research. Tourist Studies, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468797617737999Canosa, A., Graham, A., & Wilson, E. (2018). Growing up in a tourist destination: Negotiating space, identity and belonging. Children’s Geographies, 16(2), 156–168.Carroll, A. B. (1993). Stakeholder thinking in three models of management morality: A perspective with strategic implications. In J. Nasi (Ed.), Understanding stakeholder thinking (pp. 47–74). LSR-Publications.Ceballos-Lascuráin, H. (1993). Ecotourism as a worldwide phenomenon. In K. Lindberg & D. E. Hawkins (Eds.), Ecotourism: A guide for planners and managers (pp. 12–14). The Ecotourism Society.Chin, Y. W. (2024). Environmental health risks and well-being among the Orang Asli in Peninsular Malaysia: A review. e-Bangi, Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 21(4), 463–475. https://doi.org/10.17576/ebangi.2024.2104.36Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Deng, J., & Bender, M. Y. (2007). Visitors’ perception of tourism development in West Virginia. In C. L. Blank & C. Vogt (Eds.), North Eastern Recreation Research Symposium proceedings (pp. 181–188). Bolton Landing.Diamantis, D. (1999). The concept of ecotourism: Evolution and trends. Current Issues in Tourism, 2(2–3), 93–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683509908667847Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. The Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91. https://doi.org/10.2307/258887Dredge, D., & Jenkins, J. (Eds.). (2011). Stories of practice: Tourism policy and planning (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315610849Easterling, D. S. (2004). The resident’s perspective in tourism research. Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing, 17, 45–62.Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman.Gezici, F., Gül, A. Y., & Alkay, E. (2004). Potential, thresholds, and threats of tourism development in Bodrum Peninsula (Turkey). In F. D. Pineda & C. A. Brebbia (Eds.), Sustainable tourism III (pp. 13–24). WIT Press.Gursoy, D., Jurowski, C., & Uysal, M. (2002). Resident attitudes: A structural modeling approach. Annals of Tourism Research, 29(1), 79–105.Jang, S., & Cai, L. A. (2002). Travel motivations and destination choice: A study of the British outbound market. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 13(3), 111–133.Jevtovic, A. (2019). Sociology of tourism in the globalization process and social networks. Journal of Economics, Management and Informatics, 10(2), 43–62. https://doi.org/10.5937/bizinfo1902043JKruja, D., & Hasaj, A. (2009). Comparisons of stakeholders’ perception towards sustainable tourism development and its impacts in Shkodra Region (Albania). Turizam, 14(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.5937/Turizam1001001KKunjuraman, V., & Hussin, R. (2017). Challenges of community-based homestay programme in Sabah, Malaysia: Hopeful or hopeless? Tourism Management Perspectives, 21, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2016.10.007Kunjuraman, V. (2020). Community-based ecotourism managing to fuel community empowerment? An evidence from Malaysian Borneo. Tourism Recreation Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508281.2020.1841378Kunjuraman, V., Hussin, R., & Aziz, R. C. (2022). Community-based ecotourism as a social transformation tool for rural community: A victory or a quagmire? Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 39, 100524.Kunjuraman, V. (2023). A revised sustainable livelihood framework for community-based tourism projects in developing countries. Current Issues in Tourism, 26(4), 540–546. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2022.2116563Kunjuraman, V. (2024). The development of sustainable livelihood framework for community-based ecotourism in developing countries. Tourism and Hospitality Research, 24(1), 48–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/14673584221135540Kwon, H. (2008). Ghosts of war in Vietnam. Cambridge University Press.Lai, K., & Li, X. (2015). Tourism destination image: Conceptual problems and definitional solutions. Journal of Travel Research, 55(8), 1065–1080. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287515619693Latkova, P. (2008). An examination of factors predicting residents' support for tourism development. Michigan State University, Department of Park, Recreation, and Tourism Resources, 396 p.Larsen, J., & Urry, J. (2011). Gazing and performing. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 29(6), 1110–1125. https://doi.org/10.1068/d21410Marsden, T., & Murdoch, J. (1998). Editorial: The shifting nature of rural governance and community participation. Journal of Rural Studies, 14(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsnr.2015.0013Masud, M. M., Azam, M. N., Mohiuddin, M., Banna, H., Akhtar, R., Alam, A. S. A. F., & Begum, H. (2017). Adaptation barriers and strategies towards climate change: Challenges in the agricultural sector. Journal of Cleaner Production, 156, 698–706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.060McAdam, D., & Paulsen, R. (1993). Specifying the relationship between social ties and activism. American Journal of Sociology, 99(3), 640–667. https://doi.org/10.1086/230319Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment. (2006). Multilateral environmental agreements: Capacity building and implementation project (MEA). Putrajaya, Malaysia. ISBN 983-42860-1-5.Murphy, P. (1985). Tourism: A community approach (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203068533Pimid, M., Latip, N. A., Marzuki, A., Umar, M. U., & Krishnan, K. T. (2020). Stakeholder management of conservation in Lower Kinabatangan. Journal of the Malaysian Institute of Planners, 18(3), 71–81.Ponte, J., Couto, G., Pimentel, P., Sousa, Á., & Oliveira, A. (2021). Tourism planning in the Azores and feedback from visitors. Tourism Management Studies, 17, 7–15.Shakthinathan, R., & Kunjuraman, V. (2024). A systematic literature review of resilience approaches in small and medium tourism-based sectors. e-Bangi, Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 21(4), 583–597. https://doi.org/10.17576/ebangi.2024.2104.46Sharma, N. (2020). Role of research in nation building. NOLEGEIN Journal of Business Risk Management, 3, 9–13. https://doi.org/10.37591/njbrm.vi0.637Sharpley, R. (2002). Rural tourism and the challenge of tourism diversification: The case of Cyprus. Tourism Management, 23(2), 233–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5177(01)00078-4Sirakaya, E., Teye, V., & Sonmez, S. (2002). Understanding residents’ support for tourism development in the central region of Ghana. Journal of Travel Research, 41(1), 57–67.Smith, V. (2010). Enhancing employability: Human, cultural, and social capital in an era of turbulent unpredictability. Human Relations, 63(2), 279–300.Somarriba-Chang, M. A., & Gunnarsdotter, Y. (2012). Local community participation in ecotourism and conservation issues in two nature reserves in Nicaragua. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 20(8), 1025–1043. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2012.681786Urry, J. (1994). Time, leisure, and social identity. Sage Journals, 3(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X94003002001Van Der Have, R. P., & Rubalcaba, L. R. (2016). Social innovation research: An emerging area of innovation studies? Research Policy, 45(9), 1921–1935.Wang, X., Zhang, J., Gu, C., & Zhen, F. (2009). Examining antecedents and consequences of tourist satisfaction: A structural modeling approach. Tsinghua Science and Technology, 14(3), 397–406.Wondirad, A. (2019). Does ecotourism contribute to sustainable destination development, or is it just a marketing hoax? Analyzing twenty-five years of the contested journey of ecotourism through a meta-analysis of tourism journal publications. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 24(11), 1047–1065. https://doi.org/10.1080/10941665.2019.1665557World Travel & Tourism Council (WTTC). (2024). Economic impact research (EIR).

Author Biography

Kok Onn Kwong, Centre for Research in Development, Social Environment (SEEDS), Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities (FSSK), Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), Bangi

Kwong Kok Onn is currently pursuing a Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) in Anthropology and Sociology (Research) at the Research Center for Development, Social and Environmental (SEEDS) within the Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities (FSSK) at Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM; starting 2023). His research focuses on the involvement of Multiple Stakeholders’ Participation in Ecotourism Development for Future Sustainability at Royal Belum State Park.

Downloads

Published

2025-02-28

Issue

Section

Article