Negotiating the TPP: Malaysia’s Trade Strategy from a Neoclassical Realist Perspective

Abstract

This study aims to explain Malaysia’s approach to the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) negotiations through a two-level neoclassical realism (NCR) lens. While structural factors such as economic structure and economic vulnerability shaped the broader context of Malaysia’s participation in the negotiations, this study argues that it is domestic political imperatives, in this case, elite legitimation, that ultimately determined the state’s negotiation strategy. Malaysia initially embraced the agreement under Prime Minister Najib Razak’s Barisan Nasional (BN) administration to boost Malaysia’s economy through trade liberalisation. This in 2017 shifted following the U.S. withdrawal and in 2018 following the succession of Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad, who is historically more opposed to economic liberalism, when he called for a review of certain sensitive provisions that could threaten the Bumiputera framework and domestic policies. Our findings suggest that this pragmatic yet fluctuating approach was shaped by Malaysia’s successive ruling elites’ converged performance and particularistic legitimation, supported by procedural legitimation. First, performance-based legitimation was achieved by emphasising the economic benefits. Second, particularistic legitimation was boosted through the protection of Bumiputera privileges in sensitive sectors such as government procurement and state-owned enterprises. Additionally, both pathways were shaped by procedural legitimation, which was attained by maintaining public confidence and securing electoral support. By situating Malaysia’s TPP negotiations within this framework, our study contributes to the literature on domestic political influences in foreign economic policymaking, particularly in Southeast Asia. As such, it highlights how domestic political considerations shape trade strategies beyond structural factors.ReferencesAhamat, H. & Rahman, N. A. (2017). The TPP and government procurement in Malaysia. In Chaisse, J., Gai, H., Lo, Cf. (Eds.), Paradigm shift in international economic law rule-making. ODS 2017. Economics, Law, and Institution in Asia Pacific (pp. 325-342). Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6731-0_19Akmal, M. (2019). Cabaran Kerjasama Ekonomi Malaysia dan Indonesia dalam Pelaburan dan Perdagangan Era Tun Mahathir Mohamad (1981-2003). e-Bangi: Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 16(5), 1-17.Alagappa, M. (1995). Political Legitimacy in Southeast Asia: The Quest for Moral Authority. Redwood City: Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780804764704 Alesina, A., Spolaore, E., & Wacziarg, R. (2005). Trade, growth and the size of countries. In Aghion, P. & Durlauf, S. (Eds.), Handbook of Economic Growth (pp. 1499–1542). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1574-0684(05)01023-3Amin, H., & Mathieson, R. (2017, November 8). Suspending parts of TPP may save pact without renegotiation: Malaysia. The Japan Times. https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2017/11/08/business/suspending-parts-tpp-may-save-pact-without-renegotiation-malaysia/Ariff, M. (2010, February 3). A holistic approach to reforming Malaysia’s economy. East Asia Forum. https://eastasiaforum.org/2010/02/03/a-holistic-approach-to-reforming-malaysias-economy/Ariff, M., & Yap, M. M. C. (2001). Financial crisis in Malaysia. In Yu, T. S., & D.Q. Xu (Eds.), From crisis to recovery: East Asia rising again? (pp. 305-345). World Scientific. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812810496_0009Athukorala, P. C. (2005). Trade Policy in Malaysia: Liberalization Process, Structure of Protection, and Reform Agenda. Asean Economic Bulletin, 22(1), 19–34. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25773841Athukorala, P. C. (2006). Trade Policy Reforms and the Structure of Protection in Vietnam. The World Economy, 29(2), 161–187. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9701.2006.00776.xAthukorala, P. C. (2013). The Malaysian economy during three crises. In Malaysia's Development Challenges (pp. 83-105). Routledge.Bennett, A., & Checkel, J. T. (Eds.). (2014). Process Tracing: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Bowie, A., & Unger, D. (1997). The Politics of Open Economies: Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, and Thailand. Cambridge University Press.Chin, J. (1998). Malaysia in 1997: Mahathir’s Annus Horribilis. Asian Survey, 38(2), 183–189. https://doi.org/10.2307/2645677Chong, J. H. (2016, January 26). PM Najib says TPPA to ensure Malaysia 'stays' globally competitive. The Edge Malaysia. https://theedgemalaysia.com/my/article/pm-najib-says-tppa-ensure-malaysia-stays-globally-competitiveDaniel, T. (2018, August 7). Malaysia’s May 2018 general election and foreign policy. Institute of Strategic and International Studies (ISIS) Malaysia. https://www.isis.org.my/2018/08/07/malaysias-may-2018-general-election-and-foreign-policy/Dardak, R. A. & Masdek, N. R. (2023). Trade liberalization in ASEAN and its impacts on Malaysia’s food security. FTTC Agricultural Policy Platform. https://ap.fftc.org.tw/article/3397Department of Statistics Malaysia. (2024). Gross Domestic Product (GDP) by state, 2023. https://www.dosm.gov.my/portal-main/release-content/gross-domestic-product-gdp-by-state-20232023DiCaprio, A., & Santos-Paulino, A. U. (2011). Can free trade agreements reduce economic vulnerability?. South African Journal of Economics, 79(4), 350-375. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1813-6982.2011.01310.xGeorge, A. L., & Bennett, A. (2005). Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. MIT Press.Gerring, J. (2006). Case Study Research: Principles and Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Gilley, B. (2009). Is Democracy Possible? Journal of Democracy, 20(1), 113–127. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.0.0052Gnangnon, S. K. (2023). Trade costs and tax transition reform in developing countries. Economics of Transition and Institutional Change, 31(4), 941-977. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecot.12359 Gomez, E. T., & Saravanamuttu, J. (2013). The new economic policy in Malaysia: Affirmative action, ethnic inequalities and social justice. NUS Press.Goodman, M. P. (2018). From TPP to CPTPP. Center for Strategic & International Studies (CSIS). https://www.csis.org/analysis/tpp-cptppGreen, M. J. (2016, September 3). The legacy of Obama’s “pivot” to Asia. Foreign Policy. https://foreignpolicy.com/2016/09/03/the-legacy-of-obamas-pivot-to-asia/Hamzah, M. S., Abdullah, H., & Abdul Hamid, M. S. (2019). Economic Growth, Financial Development, And Institutions: A Review of the Literature. e-Bangi: Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 16(8), 1-16.Helfen, M. O., Schüßler, E., & Stevis, D. (2016). Translating European labour relations practices to the United States through global framework agreements? German and Swedish multinationals compared. ILR Review, 69(3), 631-655. https://doi.org/10.1177/0019793915624090 Helleiner, E. (2002). Economic Nationalism as a Challenge to Economic Liberalism? Lessons from the 19th Century. International Studies Quarterly, 46(3), 307–329. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3096091Horlick, G. N. (2016). Trans-Pacific Partnership. Global Trade and Customs Journal, 11(4), 149–152. https://doi.org/10.54648/gtcj2016017 Ibrahim, M. A. (2022). Malaysia’s Trade and Economy Transition between the Era of Tunku Abdul Rahman and Tun Mahathir, 1960s -1990s. SEJARAH, 31(1), 125–139. https://doi.org/10.22452/sejarah.vol31no1.7Idris, R. (2016). Trade openness in Malaysia: Evidence from trade with ASEAN and Australasian countries. Scholars Journal of Economics, Business, and Management, 3(1), 669-679. DOI: 10.36347/sjebm.2016.v03i12.005International Trade Administration. (2024, January 05). Trade agreements. https://www.trade.gov/country-commercial-guides/malaysia-trade-agreementsJomo K. S. (2007). Malaysian Industrial Policy. Singapore: Singapore University Press, and Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Kadir, A. W. A. (2007). The Malaysian economy: Vulnerability to crises. Institute of Development Studies, 38(4), 59-71. https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/ndownloader/files/48238522Khatri, Y., Lee, I., Liu, O., Meesook, K., & Tamirisa, N. (2001). Malaysia: From crisis to recovery. International Monetary Fund.Khor, M. (2018, March 8). The new CPTPP trade pact is much like the old TPP (SouthViews No. 165). South Centre. https://www.southcentre.int/southviews-no-165-8-march-2018/Kim, D. H., & Lin, S. C. (2009). Trade and Growth at Different Stages of Economic Development. The Journal of Development Studies, 45, 1211–1224. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220380902862937Kuek, T. H., Puah, C. H. & Arip, M.A. (2020). Financial vulnerability and economic dynamics in Malaysia. Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice, 9(1), 55-73. https://doi.org/10.2478/jcbtp-2020-0023Kuik, C. C. (2017). Explaining the contradiction in China’s South China Sea Policy: Structural drivers and domestic imperatives. China: An International Journal, 15(1), 163-186. https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/chn.2017.0009Kuik, C. C. (2021a). Elite legitimation and the agency of the host country: Evidence from Laos, Malaysia, and Thailand’s BRI engagement. In Schneider, F. (Eds.), Global perspectives on China's Belt and Road Initiative: Asserting agency through regional connectivity (pp. 217–244). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9789048553952-010Kuik, C. C. (2021b). Asymmetry and authority: Theorizing Southeast Asian Responses to China’s Belt and Road Initiative. Asian Perspective, 45(2), 255-276. https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/apr.2021.0000Kuik, C. C. (2024). Explaining hedging: The case of Malaysian equidistance. Contemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal of International and Strategic Affairs, 46(1), 43–76. https://doi.org/10.1355/cs46-1cLaMarche, N. (2015, November 23). Malaysia’s Vision 2020. McGill International Review. https://www.mironline.ca/malaysias-vision-2020/Lampton, D. M., Ho, S., & Kuik, C. (2020). Rivers of Iron: Railroads and Chinese Power in Southeast Asia (1st ed.). University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv153k6k1Lee, C. (2016). 3. The Political Economy of Joining TPP: The Case of Malaysia. In S. Basu Das & M. Kawai (Ed.), Trade Regionalism in the Asia-Pacific: Developments and Future Challenges (pp. 50-70). Singapore: ISEAS Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1355/9789814695459-007Maliszewska, M, Olekseyuk, Z. & Osorio-Rodarte, I. (2018). Economic and distributional impacts of Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership: The case of Vietnam. Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group.Ministry of International Trade and Industry. (2014). TPP–Briefing–Notes–Website (FINALrev1) [PDF]. Malaysia: Ministry of International Trade and Industry. Retrieved July 14, 2025, from https://www.miti.gov.my/miti/resources/fileupload/TPP%20-%20Briefing%20Notes%20-%20Website%20(FINALrev1).pdf#:~:text=Malaysia%20too%20needs%20to%20pursue%20the%20bilateral,to%20gain%20market%20access%20in%20the%20internationalNaidu, G. (2008). Infrastructure development in Malaysia. In N. Kumar (Ed.), International infrastructure development in East Asia – towards balanced regional development and integration (pp. 204–337). ERIA. https://www.eria.org/uploads/media/research-project-report/rpr_fy2007_2_chapter_7.pdfNajat, N. S., & Masoud, M. A. (2014). Dynamic relationship between tourism, trade, infrastructure and economic growth: Empirical evidence from Malaysia. Journal of African Studies and Development 6(3), 49–55. https://doi.org/10.5897/jasd2013.0260Nambiar, S. (2012). Malaysia and the Global Crisis: Impact, Response, and Rebalancing Strategies. The Global Financial Crisis and Asia, 218–244. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199660957.003.0011Nambiar, S. (2014, July 2). The TPP: Najib Razak’s gordian knot. Malay Mail. https://www.malaymail.com/news/what-you-think/2014/07/02/the-tpp-najib-razaks-gordian-knot-shankaran-nambiar/698835Nambiar, S. (2016, February 13). Is the TPP really a leap forward for Malaysia? East Asia Forum. https://eastasiaforum.org/2016/02/13/is-the-tpp-really-a-leap-forward-for-malaysia/Nikkei Asia. (2018, June 9). Mahathir vows in interview to review TPP and China deals. Nikkei Asia. https://asia.nikkei.com/Politics/Malaysia‑in‑transition/Mahathir‑vows‑in‑interview‑to‑review‑TPP‑and‑China‑dealsOkamoto, Y. (1994). Impact of trade and FDI liberalization policies on the Malaysian economy. The Developing Economies, 32(4), 460-478. https://www.ide.go.jp/library/English/Publish/Periodicals/De/pdf/94_04_06.pdf  Palmer, D. (2015, July 26). POLITICO’s guide to the Trans-Pacific Partnership countries. POLITICO. https://www.politico.com/story/2015/07/trans-pacific-partnership-countries-guide-120604PricewaterhouseCoopers Advisory Services (PwCAS). (2022). Cost-benefit analysis on the potential impacts of the CPTPP on the Malaysian economy and key economic sectors. https://fta.miti.gov.my/miti-fta/resources/CPTPPA/25072022_CPTPP_Cost_Benefit_Analysis_Final_Report_-_for_publication.pdfRadhi, N. A., Abdulhadi, A., & Muhtar, M. A. (2020). Introduction to Malaysia’s trade policies. Khazanah Research Institute. https://www.krinstitute.org/assets/contentMS/img/template/editor/2%20Trade%20policies.pdf Rasiah, R. (2011). Is Malaysia Facing Negative Deindustrialization? Pacific Affairs, 84(4), 714–735. https://doi.org/10.5509/2011844715Ridzuan, A. R., Ismail, N. A., & Fatah, A. (2018). Foreign direct investment and trade openness: Do they lead to sustainable development in Malaysia? Journal of Sustainability Science and Management, Special issue (4).Rinehart, I. (2014). Malaysia: Background and U.S. Relations. Congressional Research Service Report R43505. April 21 R43505.Ripsman, N. M., Taliaferro, J. W., & Lobell, S. E. (2016). Neoclassical Realist Theory of International Politics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199899234.001.0001Rodriguez, F. & Rodrik, D. (2000). Trade policy and economic growth: A skeptic’s guide to the cross-national evidence [Postgraduate research, University of Maryland and Harvard University]. https://drodrik.scholar.harvard.edu/files/dani-rodrik/files/trade-policy-economic-growth.pdf Rose, G. (1998). Neoclassical realism and theories of foreign policy. World Politics, 51(1), 144–172. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887100007814Saari, M. Y. (2018). Structure of the Malaysian economy: An input-output analysis. Khazanah Research Institute.Sauh, S. M., Ghani, M. H. A., Khairuddin, Z. N., & Asmaai. (2024). A review of rural MSMEs affirmative policy post 2024 economic congress: Challenges and policy recommendations. International Journal of Business, Economics, and Law, 32(1), 58-65. https://ijbel.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/IJBEL32-ISU1_042.pdfSauvé, P. (2018). Malaysia’s trade governance at a crossroads: An overview. Khazanah Research Institute. https://www.krinstitute.org/assets/contentMS/img/template/editor/Malaysia%20Trade%20Governance%20at%20a%20Crossroads_Full%20Book%20(1).pdf Schmidtke, H. (2018). Elite legitimation and delegitimation of international organizations in the media: Patterns and explanations. The Review of International Organizations, 14(4), 633–659. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-018-9320-9SME Corporation Malaysia. (2025). Initiatives. https://smecorp.gov.my/index.php/en/Sta Maria, R. F. (2018). Malaysia’s trade policy: Time for review. Researchers at ISEAS- Yusof Ishak Institute Analyse Current Events, 2018(34), 2-9. https://www.iseas.edu.sg/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/ISEAS_Perspective_2018_34@50.pdfSyarip, R. (2015). Responding to the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP): Comparative Study on International Trade Policy of Malaysia, Vietnam, and Indonesia.Tham, S. Y. (2014). Trade Policy Formulation in Malaysia: Navigating between the Economic and Race Paradigms. In A. Milner, A. R. Embong, & T. S. Yean (Eds.), Transforming Malaysia: Dominant and Competing Paradigms (pp. 178–201). ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute; Cambridge Core. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/AD6B777E72EE06C2A8A785E1C2C1CC5BTham, S. Y. (2019, January 28). Why is Malaysia slow to ratify the CPTPP?. Yusof Ishak Institute. https://www.iseas.edu.sg/media/commentaries/why-is-malaysia-slow-to-ratify-the-cptpp-by-tham-siew-yean/The Cove. (2021). #KYR: Malaysia – Diplomacy. https://cove.army.gov.au/article/kyr-malaysia-diplomacyUhlin, A., & Verhaegen, S. (2023). Elites’ (De)legitimation practices toward international organizations. Global Studies Quarterly, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.1093/isagsq/ksad024Weiss, J. C. (2019). How Hawkish Is the Chinese Public? Another Look at “Rising Nationalism” and Chinese Foreign Policy. Journal of Contemporary China, 28(119), 679–695. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2019.1580427Wong, C. M. D. S. (2017). Malaysia’s participation in the Trans-Pacific Partnership negotiations: Reflections for the future. In National interest analysis of Malaysia's participation in the Trans-Pacific Partnership (pp. 158–175). Institute of Strategic and International Studies (ISIS) Malaysia. https://www.ide.go.jp/library/English/Publish/Reports/Brc/pdf/15_09.pdfWong, A. P. H., & Kee, D. M. H. (2022). Driving Factors of Industry 4.0 Readiness among Manufacturing SMEs in Malaysia. Information, 13(12), 552. https://doi.org/10.3390/info13120552Yeung, H. W. C. (2015). Strategic coupling, regional production networks, and the new global economy: East Asia’s evolving regionalism. Environment and Planning A, 47(4), 703–720. https://doi.org/10.1068/a130239pYusof, Z.  A. & Bhattasali, D. (2008). Economic growth and development in Malaysia: Policy making and leadership. Commission on Growth and Development Working Paper, 27, 1-76. https://doi.org/10.1596/28046