Connecting the World through Canals:An Analysis of Water Infrastructure in Diplomacy, Economic Relations, and Sustainable Development

Mohd Firdaus Abdullah, Arba'iyah Mohd Noor, Ismail Ali, Noraini Mohamed Hassan, Haslinda Hasan

Abstract


Canals have long been a crucial component in the development of world civilisations, functioning not only as water infrastructure but also as symbols of diplomacy, economic power, and sustainable development that transcend geopolitical boundaries. This article examines the strategic role of canals in linking global societies, strengthening international trade, and fostering cultural exchange from both historical and contemporary perspectives. Employing a qualitative approach, the study underscores the significance of waterways such as the Suez Canal, the Panama Canal, the Kra Canal and others, as both physical and symbolic conduits that facilitate social, economic, and political integration. The findings reveal that canals have accelerated global mobility, shaped major maritime trade networks, and acted as instruments of economic diplomacy. Nevertheless, persistent challenges including geopolitical rivalries, uneven distribution of economic benefits, and ecological vulnerabilities continue to constrain the potential of canals as catalysts for global cohesion. This article argues for enhanced ecological monitoring and the establishment of a more inclusive framework for international cooperation to mitigate these challenges. By situating canals within the context of climate change and sustainable development, it advances a new perspective on water infrastructure as a critical element of global integration, capable of supporting social, economic, and ecological interconnectedness at the international level, thereby making a significant contribution to the academic literature.

References

Abdullah, M. F. (2024). Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Through the Water Treaty Between Kedah and Perlis (1971-1999): Implications for Water Resource Management and Equitable Resource Sharing in Malaysia and Globally. Thammasat Review, 27(2), 197-224.

Abdulah, M. F. (2025). The Forgotten Waters: A Critique of Malaysian Historiograph. Asian Journal of Environment, History and Heritage, 9(1), 111-128.

Abdullah, M. F. & Mohd Noor, A. (2020). Pembangunan bekalan air domestik di Negeri Kedah, 1957–1992. Kajian Malaysia, 38(1), 89-178. https://doi.org/10.21315/km2020.38.1.5.

Abdullah, M. F., Mohd Noor, A. & Enh, A. M. (2023). Hydrological legacies of colonialism: examining water systems in Perlis, Malaya (1909–1950). Journal of International Studies, 19(2), 215-243. https://doi.org/10.32890/jis2023.19.2.8.

Abdullah, M. F., Mohd Noor, A., Chee Seng, T., & Wan Ibrahim, W. K. (2024). The Water War between

Kedah-Penang in Malaysia: The Relation in the Management of Sungai Muda Raw Water, 1965-1985. Geopolitics Quarterly, 20(74), 151-170. https://doi.org/10.22034/igq.2024.180173.

Abdul Rahman, N. (2013). Faktor Perubahan Rejim Kerjasama Maritim di Selat Melaka Selepas Peristiwa 9/11. e-Bangi: Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 8(12), 11-23.

Abdul Rahman, N. S. F., Mohd Salleh, N. H., Ahmad Najib, A. F., & Lun, V. Y. (2016). A descriptive method for analysing the Kra Canal decision on maritime business patterns in Malaysia. Journal of Shipping and Trade, 1, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41072-016-0016-0.

Ahmed, H. Z., Khan, N. U. A., Sajjad, S., & Ahmed, D. (2018). Evaluation of strategic importance of CPEC: a comparative study with Panama Canal project and suez canal project. Paradigms, 12(1), 112-119. https://doi.org/10.24312/paradigms120116.

Atlantic Council Experts. (2025, January 27), 2025. Expert context: What’s going on with Trump and the Panama Canal. Atlantic Council. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/new-atlanticist/expert-context-whats-going-on-with-trump-and-the-panama-canal/

Baba, E. C. (2020). The risks of mega urban projects creating a dystopia: Canal Istanbul. City and Environment Interactions, 6, 100039.

Balzani, P., Cuthbert, R. N., Briski, E., Galil, B., Castellanos-Galindo, G., Kouba, A., ... & Haubrock, P. J. (2022). Knowledge needs in economic costs of invasive species facilitated by canalization. NeoBiota, 78, 207-223. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1566015%2Fv1.

Boughton, J. M. (2001). Northwest of Suez: the 1956 crisis and the IMF. IMF Staff Papers, 48(3), 425-446. https://doi.org/10.2307/4621678.

Chirot, D., & Hall, T. D. (1982). World-system theory. Annual Review of sociology, 8, 81-106.

Conniff, M. L. (2012). Panama and the United States: the End of the Alliance. University of Georgia Press.

Cowan, A. (2008). Gossip and street culture in early modern Venice. Journal of Early Modern History, 12(3-4), 313-333.

Donohoe, H. M. (2012). Sustainable heritage tourism marketing and Canada's Rideau Canal world heritage site. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 20(1), 121-142. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2011.617826.

Fairchild, R. E. (2018). State-corporate Hegemony and Institutional Anomie Revisited: A Case Study of the Nicaragua Canal. [Master's thesis, the George Washington University].

Gardiner, V. (1987). The Indira Gandhi Canal, Rajasthan, India. Geography, 72(3), 251-252. https://doi.org/10.1080/20436564.1987.12452079.

Galil, B. S., Nehring, S., & Panov, V. (2007). Waterways as invasion highways–Impact of climate change and globalization. Biological invasions, 193, 59-74.

Haskin, F. J. (1913). The Panama Canal. Doubleday, Page & Company.

Heine, E. C. (2014). Connect and divide: on the history of the Kiel Canal. The Journal of Transport History, 35(2), 200-219. https://doi.org/10.7227/TJTH.35.2.5.

Hill, R. D. (2012). Rice in Malaya: A study in historical geography. NUS Press.

Ho, C. S. W. (2020). Impact of the Kra Canal on Singapore's security. [Doctoral dissertation, Fort Leavenworth, KS: US Army Command and General Staff College].

Hopper, R. J. (1955). Ancient Corinth. Greece & Rome, 2(1), 2-15. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0017383500020647

Huber, V. (2013). Channelling mobilities: migration and globalisation in the Suez Canal region and beyond, 1869–1914. Cambridge University Press.

Kameneva, M., Lukyanova, G., & Tavberidze, D. (2018). Foreign relations and inter-civilizational interaction from a social-political perspective: The case of Russia, Iran and Egypt.

Keasbey, L. M. (1896). The Nicaragua Canal and the Monroe doctrine: A political history of isthmus transit, with special reference to the Nicaragua Canal project and the attitude of the United States government thereto. GP Putnam.

Kalinov, T. (2019). Canal Istanbul challenges and opportunities and their relationship to the security. IJASOS-International E-journal of Advances in Social Sciences, 5(14), 756-767.

Malterre‐Barthes, C. (2016). The Toshka Project: Colossal Water Infrastructures, Biopolitics and Territory in Egypt. Architectural Design, 86(4), 98-105. https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.2074.

Marston, G. (1988). Armed intervention in the 1956 Suez Canal crisis: the legal advice tendered to the British government. International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 37(4), 773-817. https://doi:10.1093/iclqaj/37.4.773. 

Maurer, N., & Yu, C. (2010). The big ditch: how America took, built, ran, and ultimately gave away the Panama Canal. Princeton University Press.

Menteşe, E. Y., & Tezer, A. (2021). Impacts of infrastructure developments on ecosystem services potential in Istanbul. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 9, 614752. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.614752.

Monika, F., Baiquni, M., & Hadi, M. P. (2020). Indonesia’s maritime strategy facing The Kra Isthmus Canal agenda. Jurnal Pendidikan Geografi: Kajian, Teori, dan Praktek dalam Bidang Pendidikan dan Ilmu Geografi, 25(1), 39-53.dx.doi.org/10.17977/um017v25i12020p039

Mostafa, M. M. (2004). Forecasting the Suez Canal traffic: a neural network analysis. Maritime Policy & Management, 31(2), 139-156. https://doi.org/10.1080/0308883032000174463.

Okazaki, M., & Saito, S. (1989). Copper and zinc balance in soils, rice plants and aquatic systems in an area along the fuchu precipice line, Tokyo, Japan. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 43, 265-275. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00279196.

Özkanlısoy, Ö., & Akkartal, E. (2022). The effect of Suez Canal blockage on supply chains. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Denizcilik Fakültesi Dergisi, 14(1), 51-79. https://doi.org/10.18613/deudfd.933816.

Pagano, A., Wang, G., Sánchez, O., Ungo, R., & Tapiero, E. (2016). The impact of the Panama Canal expansion on Panama’s maritime cluster. Maritime Policy & Management, 43(2), 164-178. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2016.1140241.

Park, C., Richardson, H. W., & Park, J. (2020). Widening the Panama Canal and US ports: historical and economic impact analyses. Maritime Policy & Management, 47(3), 419-433. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2020.1721583.

Petah Wazzan Iskandar. (2019, bulan tarikh). EKSKLUSIF: Terusan Wan Mat Saman kotor, jadi parit terbiar. Berita Harian.. https://www.bharian.com.my/berita/nasional/2019/02/532516/eksklusif-terusan-wan-mat-saman-kotor-jadi-parit-terbiar

Piquet, C. (2004). The Suez Company's concession in Egypt, 1854–1956: modern infrastructure and local economic development. Enterprise & Society, 5(1), 107-127.  https://doi:10.1093/es/khh005

Priestley, G. (2004). Antillean‐Panamanians or Afro‐Panamanians?: Political Participation and the Politics of Identity During the Carter‐Torrijos Treaty Negotiations. Transforming Anthropology, 12(1-2), 50-67.

Ramadhan, M. A., & Prakoso, S. G. (2024). Implication of Thailand's Kra Canal Development for the Surrounding Countries. Southeast Asian Studies & Strategic Perspectives (SEA-Insights Journal), 1(1), 47-57.

Rezani, M. N. F. (2025). Tinjauan Awal Terhadap Tindakan British dalam Usaha Berkaitan ProsesBerkerajaan Sendiri di Singapura, 1948-1959. e-Bangi: Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 22(2), 64-74

Rodriguez-Diaz, E., Alcaide, J. I., & Garcia-Llave, R. (2024). Challenges and Security Risks in the Red Sea: Impact of Houthi Attacks on Maritime Traffic. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 12(11), 1900. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12111900.

Şen, O., Saçu, Ş., Erdik, T., Öztürk, İ., & Stanev, E. V. (2022). Assessing the potential impacts of the Canal Istanbul on the physical oceanography of the Turkish Straits System. Continental Shelf Research, 240, 104723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2022.104723.

Smith, S. C. (2016). Reassessing Suez 1956: New perspectives on the crisis and its aftermath. Routledge.

Soffer, A. (2023). The Impact of the Suez Canal on Egypt’s Geography and Economy, 1867–2019 (150 Years Since Its Opening). In The Suez Canal: Past Lessons and Future Challenges (pp. 181-198). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Sözer, A., & Ozsoy, E. (2017). Water Exchange through Canal İstanbul and Bosphorus Strait. Mediterranean Marine Science18(1), 77-86. https://doi.org/10.12681/mms.1877.

Sulong, R. S. (2012). The Kra Canal and Southeast Asian Relations. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 31(4), 109-125. https://doi.org/10.1177/186810341203100405.

Suphaphorn Jindamaneerojana. (2015). Local History: The Mount of Northern Bangkok Noi Canel (ประวัติศาสตร์ ท้องถิ่น ย่าน ปาก คลอง บางกอกน้อย ฝั่ง เหนือ). Veridian E-Journal, Silpakorn University (Humanities, Social Sciences and arts), 8(2), 2546-2560.

Tanabe, S. (1977). Historical geography of the canal system in the Chao Phraya river delta. Journal of the Siam Society, 65(2), 23-72.

Yan, H. (2021). The making of the Grand Canal in China: Beyond knowledge and power. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 27(6), 584-600. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2020.1846069.

Yip, T. L., & Wong, M. C. (2015). The Nicaragua Canal: scenarios of its future roles. Journal of Transport Geography, 43, 1-13.

Van Der Borg, J. (2017). Sustainable tourism in venice: what lessons for other fragile cities. In Fragile and resilient cities on water: Perspectives from Venice and Tokyo. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

van der Veen, C. (1985). The Amsterdam water supply. Journal‐American Water Works Association, 77(6), 32-45.

 

              


Keywords


Canal, Water Infrastructure, Diplomacy, Economy, Sustainable Development

Full Text:

PDF


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/ebangi.2025.2203.50

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


-


 

_________________________________________________

eISSN 1823-884x

Faculty of Social Sciences & Humanities
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
43600 UKM Bangi, Selangor Darul Ehsan
MALAYSIA

© Copyright UKM Press, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia