English Get-Passives: Reassessing the Frequencies across Genres
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2020-2003-08Keywords:
get-passive, text type, common verb, COCA, adversative and non-adversative meaningAbstract
This study investigates the get-passive in American English, with emphasis on its distribution in different text types and its semantic features characterized by co-occurring verbs. The data was drawn from the Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA), i.e. the latest version with eight different genres. The findings indicate that the get-passive is a linguistic feature of informal English due to its highest frequency in spoken genres, e.g. TV and movie subtitles, and blogs. Furthermore, common verbs constituting the get-passive were explored and their meanings in context were analyzed. In agreement with previous studies, the semantic analysis of get-passives revealed a higher proportion of verbs expressing adversity, followed by those with positive and neutral meanings, respectively. The existence of non-adversative get-passive predicts a decline in the adversative type.References
Alonsagay, I. & Nolasco, J. (2010). Adversativity and the Get-passive in Philippine and British English: A corpus-based contrastive study. Philippine Journal of Linguistics. 41, 1-13.
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.
Carter, R. & McCarthy, M. (1999). The English Get-passive in Spoken Discourse: Description and Implications for an Interpersonal Grammar. English Language and Linguistics.
(1), 41-58.
Carter, R., McCarthy, M., Mark, G, & O’Keeffe, A. (2011). English Grammar Today. An A-Z of Spoken and Written Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chan, E. Y. & Maglio, S. (2020). The Voice of Cognition: Active and Passive Voice Influence Distance and Construal. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 46(4), 547-558.
Collins, P. (1996). Get-passives in English. World Englishes. 15, 43-56.
Cowan, R. (2008). The Teacher’s Grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Crawford, W. J. & Csomay, E. (2016). Doing Corpus Linguistics. London: Routledge.
Crystal, D. (2004). Rediscover Grammar. Essex: Pearson Education
Davies, M. (2020). Corpus of Contemporary American English.
Eastwood, J. (2005). Oxford Learner’s Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Francis, G., Hunston, S. & Manning, E. (1996). Grammar Patterns 1: Verbs. London: Harper Collins.
Fredriksson, A. (2016). A Corpus-based Contrastive Study of the Passive and Related Constructions in English and Swedish [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of
Gothenburg.
Gustafsson, E. (2014). Variation of English Passives Used by Swedes. A Corpus-based Study of the Usage of Be-passives and Get-passives. Student Thesis, Linnaeus University,
Sweden.
Huddleston, R. & Pullum, G. (2002). The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Leech, G., Hundt, M, Mair, C., and Smith, N. (2009). Chang in contemporary English. A grammatical study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Loan, N. T. T. (2019). A Case Study of Teacher Feedback on Thai University Students’ Essay Writing. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies, 19(2), 121-138.
Mair, C. (2006). Tracking Ongoing Grammatical Change and Recent Diversification in Present-day Standard English: The Complementary Role of Small and Large Corpora. In
Renouf, A. & Kehoe, A. (Eds.), The Changing Face of Corpus Linguistics (pp. 355-376). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Mair, C. & Leech, G. (2006). Current Changes in English Syntax. In Aarts, B. & McMahon, A. (Eds.), The Handbook of English Linguistics (pp.318-342). Oxford: Blackwell.
McEnery, T. and Xiao, R. (2010). Corpus-based Contrastive Studies of English and Chinese. New York: Routledge.
Quirk, R, Greenbaum S., Leech, G. & Svartvik, J. (1985). A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman
Sawasaki, K. (2000). On Adversity in English Get-Passives. Journal of Hokkaido Linguistics. 1, 15-28.
Schwarz, S. (2017). "Like Getting Nibbled to Death by a Duck": Grammaticalization of the Get-passive in the TIME Magazine Corpus. English Word-Wide, 37(3), 305-335.
Schwarz, S. (2019). Signs of Grammaticalization. Tracking the Get-passive through COHA. In Claridge, S. & Bos, B. (Eds.), Developments in English Historical Morpho-Syntax.
(pp. 199-222). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Schmitt, N. (2010). Research Vocabulary. A Vocabulary Research Manual. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Simargool, N. (2008). Interlanguage Passive Construction. Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics. 12(1), 97-103
Stubbs, M. (2001). Words and Phrases: Corpus Studies of Lexical Semantics. Oxford: Backwell.
Villalibre, E. (2015). Is the Get-passive Really That Adversative? Miscelánea: A Journal of English and American Studies. 51, 13-26.
Wanner, A (2013). The Get-passive at the Intersection of Get and the Passive. In Alexiadou, A. & Scahfer, F. (Eds.), Non-canonical Passives (pp. 43-62). Amsterdam: John
Benjamins Publishing Company.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
If the article is accepted for publication, copyright of this article will be vested to UKM Press, National University of Malaysia (UKM).
All articles published in this journal are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license, unless otherwise stated.
