Metadiscourse Markers in Dr. Zakir Naik's Persuasive Discourse
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2021-2104-18Keywords:
Metadiscourse, interpersonal Metadiscourse, Islamic discourse, Persuasion discourse, Zakir NaikAbstract
The International speaker Dr Zakir Naik has been the target of many studies for his influential speeches. Analysing persuasive speeches can be tackled from different angles, amongst which is the functional markers of persuasion represented by the Metadiscourse markers. Dr Zakir Naik's persuasive speeches have never been analyzed from a metadiscourse perspective. This paper aims to investigate the types and functions of metadiscourse markers in Zakir Naik's speeches. After transcribing Zakir Naik's videos manually, the coding process was accomplished via NVivo software and Microsoft Excel. Applying Dafouz-Milne's (2008) categories in the codification process, the interpersonal and textual metadiscourse markers are revealed. In terms of interpersonal metadiscourse markers, commentaries have been chiefly employed, contributing to Naik's relation to the audience. In terms of the textual metadiscourse markers, logical markers showed the highest usage. Such markers help in connecting his various persuasion strategies and multi-argument to make them smoothly connected. This paper has found that, generally, Zakir Naik has effectively developed and promoted his arguments via the extensive use of various metadiscourse tools while establishing an excellent relationship with the audience to attain a continuous relationship. This paper also argues that a fruitful approach to explore the interpersonal and textual definitions of language is Dafouz-Milne's categorization of metadiscourse markers as a powerful methodological tool in discourse analysis.References
Abdel-Moety, D. M. (2019). A Metadiscursive Analysis of Arabic Religious Discourse. Journal of Semitic Studies, 64(1), 199-220 https://doi.org/10.1093/jss/fgy028
Aertselaer, J. & Dafouz-Milne, E. (2008). Argumentation patterns in different languages: An analysis of metadiscourse markers in English and Spanish texts. In M. Pütz & J. Neff-van Aertselaer (Ed.), Developing Contrastive Pragmatics: Interlanguage and Cross-Cultural Perspectives (pp. 87-102). Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110207217.1.87
Al-Nasher, A. A. (2010). Persuasion Strategies in Religious Discourse with Reference to Deedat's The Choice: Islam and Christianity. Doctoral dissertation, King Abdul Aziz University. Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
Anwardeen, N. H., Luyee, E. O., Gabriel, J. I., & Kalajahi, S. A. R. (2013). An Analysis: The Usage of Metadiscourse in Argumentative Writing by Malaysian Tertiary Level of Students. English Language Teaching, 6(9), 83-96. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1077130
Ari, Y. (2019). Illocutionary acts in the context of persuasion used in Zakir naik's speech. Doctoral dissertation, UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya. Surabaya, Indunesia.
Arini, S. R. (2017). A Study On Logical Appeal Of Zakir Naik In Answering Question At The International Public Speaking Forum. Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Mataram. Mataram, Indunesia.
Azam, S. (2016). How Zakir Naik Appropriated Liberalism's Flaws—and Won. Economic & Political Weekly, 51(33), 59. https://shortest.link/1KPV
Beauvais, J. (1989). A speech act theory of Metadiscourse. Written Communication, 6, 11–31. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0741088389006001002
Ben-Anath, D. (2005). The role of connectives in text comprehension. Studies in Applied Linguistics and TESOL, 5(2). https://journals.library.columbia.edu/index.php/SALT/article/view/1569
Crismore, A. (1984). The rhetoric of textbooks: metadiscourse. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 16 (3), 279–296. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0022027840160306?journalCode=tcus20
Crismore, A. (1989). Talking with readers: Metadiscourse as rhetorical act (Vol. 17). Peter Lang Pub Incorporated. New York.
Crismore, A. Markkanen, R., & Steffensen, M. S. (1993). Metadiscourse in persuasive writing: A study of texts written by American and Finnish university students. Written communication, 10 (1), 39-71. https://journals.sagep ub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0741088393010001002
Dafouz-Milne, E. (2003). Metadiscourse revisited: a contrastive study of persuasive writing in professional discourse. Regreso al metadiscurso: estudio contrastivo de la persuasión en el discurso profesional. Estudios ingleses de la Universidad Complutense, 11, 29-52. http://revistas.ucm.es/fll/11330392/articulos/EIUC0303110029A.PDF?
ref=Guzels.TV
Dafouz-Milne, E. (2008). The pragmatic role of textual and interpersonal metadiscourse markers in the construction and attainment of persuasion: A cross-linguistic study of newspaper discourse. Journal of pragmatics, 40(1), 95-113. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378216607001774
Dahl, T. (2004). Textual Metadiscourse in research articles: a marker of national culture or of academic discipline. Journal of Pragmatics, 36(10), 1807–1825. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378216604001018
Haqqani, S. (2011). Muslim televangelists and the construction of religious authority in the modern world: The case of Zakir Naik. Doctoral dissertation, Emory University. Atlanta, Georgia, US
Ho, V., & Li, C. (2018). The use of Metadiscourse and persuasion: An analysis of first year university students' timed argumentative essays. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 33, 53-68. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1475158518300511
Hunston, S., & Thompson, G. (Eds.). (2000). Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Oxford University Press, UK.
Hyland, K. (1996). Talking to the academy: Forms of hedging in science research articles. Written Communication, 13(2), 251-281. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0741088396013002004
Hyland, K. (1998). Persuasion and context: The pragmatics of academic Metadiscourse. Journal of pragmatics, 30(4), 437-455. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378216698000095
Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse: Exploring writing in interaction. Exploring Interaction in Writing. Continuum, Oxford
Le, E. (2004). Active participation within written argumentation: Metadiscourse and editorialist's authority. Journal of Pragmatics 36, 687–714. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378216603000328
Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics. Vols 1 & 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mao, L. R. (1993). I conclude not: Toward a pragmatic account of Metadiscourse. Rhetoric Review, 11(2), 265-289. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/07350199309389006?journalCode=hrhr20
Mauranen, A. (1993). Cultural Differences in Academic Rhetoric.: A Textlinguistic Study. Peter Lang.: https://researchportal.helsinki.fi/en/publications/cultural-differences-in-academic-rhetoric-a-textlinguistic-study
Mir, R. (2018). Zakir Naik and His Audiences: A Case Study of Srinagar, Kashmir, Journal of Religion, Media and Digital Culture, 7(2), 203-222. https://doi.org/10.1163/21659214-00702004
Mur Dueñas, M. (2007). A contribution to the intercultural analysis of Metadiscourse in business management research articles in English and in Spanish: Acorpus-driven approach. Doctoral dissertation, Universidad de Zaragoza. Zaragoza, Spain.
Nan, Y., & Liu, L. (2013). Investigating the interpersonal and textual meaning of Steve Jobs' Stanford speech in terms of Hyland's metadiscourse theory. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 1(4), 90-96. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.1017.9622&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Ni'am, M. R. (2014). Rhetorical Strategy Used By Dr. Zakir Naik in Convincing People on Qur'an Vs Bible Debate (Doctoral dissertation, Thesis). State Islamic University of Maulana Malik Ibrahim, Malang, Indunesia.
Noorian, M. and R. Biria. (2010). "Interpersonal Metadiscourse in Persuasive Journalism: a Study of Texts by AMERICAN and Iranian EFL Columnists". Journal of Modern Languages, 20(1), p.64-79. http://mojem.um.edu.my/index.php/JML/article/view/3374
Salmi-Tolonen, T. (2005). Persuasion in judicial argumentation. Persuasion Across Genres. A linguistic approach. 59-102. John Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins Publishing Company. https://goo.gl/FNGSEj
Samuel, G., & Rozario, S. (2010). Contesting science for Islam: the media as a source of revisionist knowledge in the lives of young Bangladeshis. Contemporary South Asia, 18(4), 427-441. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09584935.2010.526196
Sari, A. M. (2014). Interpersonal Metadiscourse Markers Used in Michelle Obama’s Speech. Bachelor thesis, Dian Nuswantoro University, Indonesia.
Sholihah, H., Wijayanto, A., Hikmat, M. H., & Hum, M. (2018). A Pragmatic Analysis Of Argumentation Strategies In Zakir Naik’s Debate Show. Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta. Surakarta, Indunesia.
Sornig, K. (1989). Some remarks on linguistic strategies of persuasion. Language, power and ideology: Studies in political discourse, 7,(95). https://books.google.com.sa/books?hl=en&lr=&id=YpFAgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA95&ots=3d1kWyzdcQ&sig=Q7yFfSMspUYBvmk6sZP1dsNAvU&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
Spurgin, S. (1994). The Power to Persuade: A Rhetoric and Reader for Argumentative Writing. 3rd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Sukma, B. P. (2017). Interpersonal Metadiscourse Markers as Persuasive Strategies in Barack Obama's 2012 Campaign Speeches. Aksara, 29(2), 283-292 https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/107d/183a6f7172b3330fb988e0b86adebc36ee76.pdf
Vasheghani Farahani, M. & Dastjerdi, H. (2019). Metadiscourse Features in two English Translations of the Holy Quran: A Comparative, Corpus-based Inquiry. Lebende Sprachen, 64(2), 378-398. https://doi.org/10.1515/les-2019-0020
William J. Vande Kopple. (1985). Some Exploratory Discourse on Metadiscourse. College Composition and Communication, 36(1), 82–93. https://doi.org/10.2307/357609
Winiharti, M. (2012). The Difference Between Modal Verbs in Deontic and Epistemic Modality. Humaniora, 3(2), 532-539. http://202.58.182.161/index.php/Humaniora/article/view/3396
Williams, M. Bizup, J. (2013). Style: Lessons in Clarity and Grace. London, Britain. Pearson plc. https://b-ok.cc/book/2858030/fd7d85
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
If the article is accepted for publication, copyright of this article will be vested to UKM Press, National University of Malaysia (UKM).
All articles published in this journal are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license, unless otherwise stated.
