Managing Harvesting for Forest Sustainability in Malaysia: An SFL Perspective

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2022-2204-02

Keywords:

sustainable forest management, SFL, forestry discourse, Malaysian forest, professional report

Abstract

Forest management practices have been addressed widely in the forestry discipline but are rarely considered from a linguistic perspective. Linguistic exploration of the construction of meaning in forest discourses helps provide greater detail on how forest resources are governed through the forest management practices carried out by forestry professionals. This study adopted the approach from Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) and Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar to examine how lexicogrammatical resources are used by forestry professionals to institutionalise their narrative on sustainable forest management practices. Six field inspection reports issued by the Forestry Department of Peninsular Malaysia were selected as data for analysis. The reports were examined as a genre to ascertain their generic structure and the elements they contained. The findings show that the reports provide essential information concerning various aspects of forest management best practices, including technical information of the forest areas, their geographical and topographical conditions within and around the areas, the distribution of tree stands and other equally important aspects including their environmental, socio-economic and economic values. This paper suggests that a linguistic orientation employed in uncovering forestry matters such as the field inspection report allows concrete evidence of how forest management practices are communicated, especially in written reports and whether these practices are aptly represented through their language use.

Author Biographies

Wan Farah Wani Wan Fakhruddin, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

Wan Farah Wani Wan Fakhruddin is a Senior Lecturer at Universiti Teknologi Malaysia’s Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities (FSSH). She is currently on the task force committee for research and publication at FSSHKL. Her research interests include a functional perspective on language and discourse studies, concentrating on professional and academic genres from a Systemic Functional Linguistics perspective. 

Zuraidah Mohd Don, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

Zuraidah Mohd Don has built up a professorial profile in the course of her career as an academic for more than 30 years. Her teaching is integrated with her research and publications, especially in pragmatics and critical discourse analysis. She is on the Editorial Board of international journals including ISI- and Scopus-indexed journals.  Zuraidah has published quite extensively, including articles published in high impact ISI-indexed journals in language and linguistics and language policy documents.  She was appointed as an adviser on English Language matters and in her advisory role, she published eight documents related to language policy and planning and policy implementation.

Hanita Hassan, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

Hanita Hassan is currently the Chair of Language Academy, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Her research interests include Social Semiotics, Multimodality and Systemic Functional Linguistics.

References

Arnold, A. (2018). Climate Change and Storytelling: Narratives and Cultural Meaning in Environmental Communication. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69383-5

Arts, B., & Buizer, M. (2009). Forests, Discourses, Institutions: A Discursive-institutional Analysis of Global Forest Governance. Forest Policy and Economics 11, 340-347.

Arts, B., Appelstrand, M., Kleinschmit, D., Pülzl, H., & Visseren-Hamakers, I., 2010. Discourses, Actors and Instruments in International Forest Governance. In: Rayner, J., Buck, A., Katila, P. (Eds.), Embracing Complexity: Meeting the Challenges of International Forest Governance, A Global Assessment Report. International Union of Forest Research Organizations (pp. 57-73), Vienna, Austria.

Boscolo, M., Snook, L., & Quevedo, L. (2009). Adoption of Sustainable Forest Management Practices in Bolivian Timber Concessions: A Quantitative Assessment. International Forestry Review 11(4), 514-523.

de Jong, W., Galloway, G., Katila, P., & Pacheco, P. (2017). Forestry Discourses and Forest-based Development – An Introduction to the Special Issue. International Forestry Review 19(S1), 1-9.

Eggins, S. (2007). An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics (2nd Edition). Continuum, London.

Faiclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Longman, London.

Hajer, M., & Versteeg, W. (2005). A Decade of Discourse Analysis of Environmental Politics: Achievements, Challenges, Perspectives. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 7 (3), 175-184.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as a Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. Edward Arnold, London.

Halliday, M. A. K. (2007). Language and Education: Volume 9. A&C Black, London.

Halliday, M. A. K., Matthiessen, M. I. M. (2014). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. Edward Arnold, London.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammar (Second Edition). Edward Arnold, London.

Hasan, R. (1985). Language, Linguistics and Verbal Art. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Islam, R., & Siwar, C., Mohamad Ismail, S., Chamhuri, N. H. (2010). Criteria and Indicators for Sustainable Forest Management in Malaysia. American Journal of Environmental Sciences 6 (3), 212-218.

International Tropical Timber Organisation. (1990). Guidelines for the Sustainable Management of Natural Tropical Forests. Retrieved February 11, 2022 from https://www.itto.int/sustainable_forest_management/

Jaworski, A., & Coupland, N. (Eds.) (2006). The Discourse Reader. Routledge, London.

Jusoff, K., & Taha, D. (2008). Sustainable Forest Management Practices and Environmental Protection in Malaysia. WSEAS Transactions on Environment and Development 3 (4), 190-199.

Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (1985). Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. Verso, London.

Leipold, S. (2014). Creating Forests with Words – A Review of Forest-related Discourse Studies. Forest Policy and Economics 40, 12-20.

Leipold, S., Feindt, P., H., Winkel, G., & Keller, R. (2019). Discourse Analysis of Environmental Policy Revisited: Traditions, Trends, Perspectives. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 21(5), 445–463.

Malmkjær, K. (Ed.) (2009). The Routledge Linguistics Encyclopedia. Routledge, London.

Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. (2003). The Language of Evaluation (Vol. 2). Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.

Martin, J., & Rose, D. (2003). Working with Discourse: Meaning beyond the Clause (2nd edition). Continuum, London.

Martin, J., & Rose, D. (2008). Genre Relations: Mapping Culture. Equinox, London.

Martin, J. R. (1984). Language, Register and Genre. In: Christie, F. (Ed.), Children writing: Reader (pp.21-30). Deakin University Press, Victoria.

Martin, J. R. (1992). English Text. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam.

Matthiessen, C. M. (2004). Descriptive Motifs and Generalizations. In: Caffarel-Cayron, A., Martin, J. R., Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (Eds.), Language Typology: A Functional Perspective (pp.537-574), John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam.

Matthiessen, C. M. (2013). Applying Systemic Functional Linguistics in Healthcare Contexts. Text & Talk 33 (4-5), 437-466.

Matthiessen, C. M., Pun, J. (2019). Expounding Knowledge through Explanations: Generic Types and Rhetorical-relational Patterns. Semiotica 227, 31-76.

National Forestry Act. (1984). Laws of Malaysia, Act 313: National Forestry Act 1984. Retrieved February 11, 2022 from https://www.forestry.gov.my/images/JPSM/wargaperhutanan/AktaAPN_en.pdf

Plemenitaš, K. (2004). Some Aspects of the Systemic Functional Model in Text Analysis. ELOPE: English Language Overseas Perspectives and Enquiries 1 (1-2), 23-36.

Poore, D., Burgess, P., Palmer, J., Rietbergen, S., & Synnott, T. (1989). No Timber Without Trees: Sustainability in the Tropical Forest. Earthscan Publications, London.

Poudel, D. P., & Aase, T. H. (2015). Discourse Analysis as a Means to Scrutinise REDD+: An Issue of Current Forest Management Debate in Nepal. Journal of Forest and Livelihood 13(1), 44-55.

Rose, D., & Martin, J. R. (2012). Learning to Write, Reading to Learn: Genre, Knowledge and Pedagogy in the Sydney School. Equinox, London.

Schleppegrell, M. J. (2012). Systemic Functional Linguistics: Exploring Meaning in Language. In Gee, J. P., Handford, M. (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp.21-34). Routledge, New York.

Seelig, M. I. (2019). Popularizing the Environment in Modern Media. The Communication Review 22(1), 45-83.

Takala, T., Hujala, T., Tanskanen, M., & Tikkanen, J. (2019). Competing Discourses of the Forest Shape Forest Owners’ Ideas about Nature and Biodiversity Conservation. Biodiversity and Conversation 28, 3445-3464.

van Valin, R. D., & LaPolla, R. J. (1997). Syntax: Structure, Meaning, and Function. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Winkel, G. (2012). Foucault in the Forests—A Review of the Use of ‘Foucauldian’ Concepts in Forest Policy Analysis. Forest Policy and Economics,16, 81–92.

Downloads

Published

2022-11-30