Keperluan dan bantuan untuk integrasi semula: Perspektif gelandangan bekas banduan di Kuala Lumpur (The need and assistance for re-integration: The perspective of homeless former prisoners in Kuala Lumpur)
Abstract
Setiap tahun, ratusan ribu banduan dibebaskan tanpa sebarang perkhidmatan sambungan dari Jabatan Penjara Malaysia. Bantuan yang diberikan menerusi program parol dan rumah perantaraan yang hanya dapat dinikmati oleh segelintir bekas banduan yang menjadikan majoriti bekas banduan dibebaskan tanpa sebarang bantuan. Keadaan ini menjadikan mereka terpaksa berintegrasi semula dengan menggunakan usaha sendiri. Keadaan ini membuatkan keperluan melaksanakan kajian ini untuk mengenalpasti bantuan yang diterima oleh gelandangan bekas banduan dan keperluan yang diperlukan untuk mereka keluar dari kehidupan jalanan. Sebuah kajian kualititatif yang mengunakan kaedah fenomonologi dengan menemubual 15 orang informan gelandangan bekas banduan telah dilakukan. Hasil kajian menunjukkan majoriti informan yang menyatakan ketiadaan sebarang bantuan daripada pihak Jabatan Penjara Malaysia. Mereka memohon bantuan terutama dari Baitulmal dan Jabatan Kebajikan Masyarakat tetapi telah dirumitkan dengan ketiadaan kad pengenalan, birokrasi, dan dokumen-dokumen seperti sijil lahir. Kajian telah mengenalpasti beberapa bantuan yang boleh diperkenalkan oleh kerajaan untuk gelandangan bekas banduan agar mereka dapat keluar daripada kehidupan jalanan. Antaranya ialah pekerjaan, tempat tinggal, bantuan kewangan, penggantian kad pengenalan dan bimbingan agama. Keperluan untuk buat pihak kerajaan terutama Jabatan Penjara Malaysia dan Jabatan Kebajikan Masyarakat untuk menjadi lebih cakna dalam mengenalpasti perkhidmatan yang boleh diberikan kepada gelandangan bekas banduan agar mereka dapat keluar daripada kehidupan di jalanan ini. Diharap dapatan kajian ini dapat digunakan sebagai input dalam membentuk program bantuan dan sokongan lanjutan yang bersesuaian buat gelandangan bekas banduan.
Kata kunci: Bantuan, gelandangan bekas banduan, keperluan asas, pembebasan, perkhidmatan sosial, sokongan sosial.
Thousands of prisoners are being released without extension of services from the Malaysian Prison Department annually. Parole programs and halfway houses often serve as the only form of aid to former prisoners as many of them are released without any proper assistance, forcing them to self-reintegrate into the society. Thus, a network of necessities is essential for this minority group of former prisoners to successfully reintegrate into society and prevent them from being homeless. This motivates the present study to identify the assistance received by homeless former prisoners alongside any additional necessities that they require for reintegration. Adopting a qualitative approach, the current study utilises the phenomenology method where an interview was conducted among 15 former prisoners who are homeless. The results of the study showed that the majority of informants stated that there was no assistance from the Malaysian Prisons Department. Applying for basic aids from Baitulmal and the Malaysian Department of Social Welfare proved to be tedious and difficult as they are faced with several obstacles such as the absence of national identity cards and evidence of important documents such as birth certificates. The issue of bureaucracy also proves to be a major challenge in the application process. Additionally, this study puts forth possible solutions for the government in resolving the issue of homeless former prisoners which includes employment, housing, financial assistance, identity card replacement and religious guidance. There is a strong need for the government, especially the Malaysian Prison Department and the Department of Social Welfare Malaysia to collaborate and ensure the provision of necessary services for former prisoners. Overall, this study provides useful insights into the formation of relevant strategies and support programs required for the reintegration of former prisoners as a fully functional member of the society.
Keywords: Assistance, homeless former prisoners, basic needs, release, social services, social support.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Atkin, C. A., & Armstrong, G. S. (2011). Does the concentration of parolees in a community impact employer attitudes toward the hiring of ex-offenders? Criminal Justice Policy Review, 24(1), 71-93.
Bales, W., & Mears, D. (2008). Inmate social ties and the transition to society: Does visitation reduce recidivism? Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 45(3), 287-321.
Brown, A. S. (2016). Ex-convicts in a dilemma of reintegration: A study of Uyo, South-South Nigeria. International Journal of Social Sciences, 10(4), 81-91.
Cobbina, J., Huebner, B., & Berg, M. (2012). Men, women, and post release offending: An examination of the nature of the link between relational ties and recidivism. Crime and Delinquency, 58(3), 331-61.
Cochran, J. (2014). Breaches in the wall: Imprisonment, social support, and recidivism. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 51(3), 200-229.
Cochran, J., Mears, D., Bales, W., & Stewart, E. (2012). Does inmate behavior affect post-release offending? Investigating the misconduct-recidivism relationship among youth and adults. Justice Quarterly, 31(6), 1044-1073.
Cullen, F. T. (2012). Taking rehabilitation seriously: Creativity, science, and the challenge of offender change. Punishment and Society, 14, 94–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 1462474510385973
Emmerij, L. (2010). The Basic Needs Development Strategy. Background paper, World Economic and Social Survey, 2010. Diambil dari http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/ policy/wess/wess_bg_papers/bp_wess2010_emmerij.pdf.
Gideon, L. (2007). Family role in the reintegration process of recovering drug addicts: A qualitative review of Israeli offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 51(2), 212–226.
Harding, D. J., Wyse, J. J. B., Dobson, C., & Morenoff, J. D. (2014). Making ends meet after prison. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 33(2), 440-470.
Hochstetler, A., DeLisi, M., & Pratt, T. (2010). Social support and feelings of hostility among released inmates. Crime & Delinquency, 56(4), 588–607.
Jabatan Penjara Malaysia (2020). Jumlah banduan pengulanglaku jenayah, 2010-2019. Diambil dari http://www.prison.gov.my/portal/page/portal/biru/kepenjaraan
Jasni, M. A., Ah, S. H. A. B., Yusoff, J. Z., Shahid, K. M., Omar, N., & Azman, Z. (2018). Faktor penghijrahan dan penumpuan bekas banduan di Jalan Chow Kit, Kuala Lumpur. Geografia-Malaysian Journal of Society and Space, 14(1), 87-101.
Jasni, M. A., Ah, S. H. A. B., & Nasir, N. C. M. (2020) Three major interrelated factors contributing to homelessness issue among former prisoners in Malaysia. The International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 9, 415-430.
Jasni, M. A., Ah, S. H. A. B., & Nasir, N. C. M. (2021). Tough life after prison: An analysis of 19 former prisoners in Malaysia. Journal of Community Development Research (Humanities and Social Sciences), 14(1), 24-36.
Johnson, G., & Moschion, J. (2019). Ex-prisoners are more likely to become homeless but the reverse isn't true. Diambil dari https://phys.org/news/2019-04-ex-prisoners-homeless-reverse-isnt-true.html
Loeffler, C. (2013). Does imprisonment alter the life course? Evidence on crime and employment from a natural experiment. Criminology, 51(1), 137-166.
Luther, J. B., Reichert, E. S., Holloway, E. D., Roth, A. M., & Aalsma, M. C. (2011). An exploration of community reentry needs and services for prisoners: A focus on care to limit return to high-risk behavior. AIDS Patient Care and STDs, 25(8), 475-481.
Martinez, D., & Abrams, L. (2013). Informal social support among returning young offenders: A metasynthesis of the literature. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 57(2), 169–190.
Mears, D., & Mestre, J. (2012). Prisoner reentry, employment, signaling, and the better identification of desisters: Introduction to the special issue. Criminology and Public Policy, 11(1), 5-15.
O'Donoghue, J. (2018). People released from prison are 10 times more likely to be homeless. Diambil dari https://www.nola.com/news/politics/article_513e3074-5cde-5ec7-88a9-7c14a04f82dd.html
Petersilia, J. (2009). When prisoners come home: Parole and prisoner reentry. Oxford: Oxford Press.
Prison Fellowship (2017). Needs of ex prisoner. Diambil dari https://www.prisonfellowship.org/ wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Needs-of-Ex-Prisoners-2017.pdf
Savolainen, J. (2009) Work, family and criminal desistance. British Journal of Criminology, 49(3), 285-304.
Taylor, C. (2012). Family support and the successful reentry of formerly incarcerated individuals. Doctoral dissertation. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University.
Thompkins, D. (2010). The expanding prisoner reentry industry. Dialectical Anthropology, 34(4), 589-604.
Travis, J. (2004). Reentry and reintegration: New perspectives on the challenges of mass incarceration. Dlm Patillo, M., Weiman, D.F. & Western, B. (pnyt.). Imprisoning America: The Social Effects of Mass Incarceration. (hlm. 247-268). New York, NY: Russell Sage.
Wheeler, D., & Patterson, G. (2008). Prisoner reentry. National Health Line, 33(2), 145-147.
Williams, S., & Stickley, T. (2011). Stories from the streets: People's experiences of homelessness. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 18(5), 432-439.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/geo-2021-1704-01
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.