Is WhatsApp free of the elites: The 2018 General Elections in Malaysia
Abstract
2018 was a particularly significant year for Malaysia, as citizens democratically dethroned a 61-year-old regime, Barisan Nasional (BN, the National Front), and replaced it with Pakatan Harapan (PH, the Alliance of Hope) without bloodshed. This article attempts to systematically analyze the evolution of new media from the 2008 election (taking place in the blogging era, which contributed to the “electoral tsunami” in Malaysia that year) to 2018, which saw the rise of encrypted messaging services such as WhatsApp, a formidable point for the dissemination and consumption of political news in Malaysia. Methodologically, the normative method of the shared values theory was adopted to better explain how new media is currently used to shape the political ideas of ordinary Malaysians. The findings suggest that there is a clear attempt by political leaders to coopt opinion leaders at various levels, particularly religious leaders, academicians, think tanks and non-governmental organizations (NGOs), with the intention of influencing and shaping the political leanings of those who are less interested in politics, using a centralized agenda-setting mechanism. The findings also suggest that opinion leaders were purposely selected according to their higher social capital value and social authority, and evidence from the study suggests that instant messaging services are not totally free from the influence of political and economic elites.
Keywords: Collective identity, Malaysian politics, new media, political mobilizations
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abbott, J.P. (2001). Democracy@ internet. asia? The challenges to the emancipatory potential of the net: Lessons from China and Malaysia. Third World Quarterly, 22(1), 99-114.
—. (2004). The Internet, reformasi and democratisation in Malaysia. In Gomez, E. T (ed.), The State of Malaysia: Ethnicity, Equity and Reform. New York: Routledge. 79–104.
Attia, A. M., Aziz, N., Friedman, B., & Elhusseiny, M. F. (2011). Commentary: The impact of social networking tools on political change in Egypt’s “Revolution 2.0.” Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, (June), 1–6. doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2011.05.003
Barsamian, D., & Chomsky, N. (2001). Propaganda and the public mind: Conversations with Noam Chomsky. Pluto Press.
Box-Steffensmeier, J. M., Brady, H. E., & Collier, D. (eds.). (2008). The Oxford handbook of political methodology (Vol. 10).
Boyce, C., & Neale, P. (2006). Conducting in-depth interviews: A guide for designing and conducting in-depth interviews for evaluation input.
Brown, G. (2005). The Rough and Rosy Road: Sites of Contestation in Malaysia’s Shackled Media Industry. Pacific Affairs, 78(1), 39–56.
Chin, J. (2018). The Comeback Kid: Mahathir and the 2018 Malaysian General Elections. The Round Table, 107(4), 535–537.
Chin, J., & Huat, W. C. (2009). Malaysia's electoral upheaval. Journal of Democracy, 20(3), 71–85
Chowdhury, M. (2008). The Role of the Internet in Burma’s Saffron Revolution. Berkman Center Research Publication, 8. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_ id=1537703
Diamond, L. (2010a). liberation technology. Journal Of Democracy, 21(3), 69–83.
—. (2010b). Why are there no Arab democracies. Journal Of Democracy, (1), 92–104.
Farooq, G. (2017). Politics of Fake News: how WhatsApp became a potent propaganda tool in India. Media Watch, 9(1), 106-117
Fernandez, K. (2010). The two waves of cyberpolitics in Malaysia: What does the by-elections barometer tell us?. CEU Political Science Journal, (04), 597-626
Fernandez, K., & Sivamurugan, P. (2016). Multi-ethnic Malaysia in the Era of Najib. Economic & Political Weekly, 51(1), 59
Fernandez, K., Sivamurugan, P., S., & Bakar, M. Z. A. (2014). Alternative Media Bridging the Digital Divide in Malaysia: Case Study of Sarawakreport. org. In Handbook of Research on Political Activism in the Information Age. IGI Global. 166–178
Filippini, M. (2016). Using Gramsci: A new approach. Pluto Press.
Fiske, J. (1989). Understanding popular culture. Routledge: New York.
Gustafsson, N. (2009). This time it's personal: Social networks, viral politics and identity management. In 4th Global Conference: Cybercultures-Exploring Critical issues.
Goldstein, J. (2007). The role of digital networked technologies in the Ukrainian Orange Revolution. Berkman Center Research Publication. Retrieved from http://www.msenergysolutions.net/index.pl/ar/00/http/cyber.law.harvard.edu/sites/cyber.law.harvard.edu/files/Goldstein_Ukraine_2007.pdf
Habermas, J. (1992). Further reflections on the public sphere. Habermas and the public sphere, 428.
Holub, R.C. (1991). Jurgen Habermas: Critic in the Public Sphere. Routledge: New York
Johns, A. (2020). 'This will be the WhatsApp election': Crypto-publics and digital citizenship in Malaysia's GE14 election. First Monday, 25(12).
Katz, E. (2001). Lazarsfeld's map of media effects. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 13(3), 270-279
Khoo, B. T. (2016). Networks in pursuit of a “two-coalition system” in Malaysia: Pakatan Rakyat’s mobilization of dissent between Reformasi and the tsunami. Southeast Asian Studies, 5(1), 73-91
Kow, G. C. (2016). BR1M not corruption, Wan Azizah disagrees with Dr M. Malaysiakini. Retrieved from https://www.malaysiakini.com/news/367343
Kulikova, S. V., & Perlmutter, D. D. (2007). Blogging Down the Dictator? The Kyrgyz Revolution and Samizdat Websites. International Communication Gazette, 69(1), 29–50. doi:10.1177/1748048507072777
Lawrence, E., Sides, J., & Farrell, H. (2010). Self-Segregation or Deliberation? Blog Readership, Participation, and Polarization in American Politics. Perspectives on Politics, 8(01), 141. doi:10.1017/S1537592709992714
Lysenko, V. V., & Desouza, K. C. (2010). Cyberprotest in contemporary Russia: The cases of Ingushetiya.ru and Bakhmina.ru. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77(7), 1179–1193. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2010.04.021
—. (2011). Moldova’s internet revolution: Analyzing the role of technologies in various phases of the confrontation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, In Press. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2011.05.009
Mariotti, C. (2020). Elite Theory. In The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Interest Groups, Lobbying and Public Affairs. Springer: New York. 10.1007/978-3-030-13895-0_67-1.
Merdeka Center. (2019). National Voter Sentiments: Excerpt of Principal Indicators. Retrieved from file:///Users/kevinfernandez/Downloads/National%20March%202019 %20-%20Excerpt%20for%20Press%20Release%20(1).pdf
Nahon, K. (2015). Where there is social media there is politics. In The Routledge companion to social media and politics (pp. 39-55). Routledge: New York.
Newman N., Fletcher, R., Schulz, A., Andi, S., & Nielsen, R.K. (2020). Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2020. Retrieved from https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/ sites/default/files/2020-06/DNR_2020_FINAL.pdf
Pareto, V. (1916). Trattato di sociologia generale. Barbera: Firenze, Italy
Pempek, T.,Yermolayeva, Y., & Calvert, S. (2009). College students' social networking experiences on Facebook. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30. 227-238. 10.1016/j.appdev.2008.12.010
Rheingold, H. (1993). The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier. Addison-Wesley: Reading, Massachusetts
Shaw, A., & Benkler, Y. (2012). A Tale of Two Blogospheres: Discursive Practices on the Left and Right. American Behavioral Scientist, 56(4), 459–487. doi:10.1177/0002764211433793
Scott, J. C. (2008). Weapons of the Weak. Yale University Press.
Tapsell, R. (2018). The Smartphone as the “Weapon of the Weak”: Assessing the Role of Communication Technologies in Malaysia's Regime Change. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 37(3), 9-29
Tan, J. E., & Ibrahim, Z. (2008). Blogging and democratization in Malaysia: A new civil society in the making. SIRD: Petaling Jaya
The Star. (2017). Malaysians Spent RM6.8 Billion on Smartphones. Retrieved from www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2017/07/06/malaysians-spent-billions-on-smartphones-in-2016-gfk/>
Zangana, A. (2017). The impact of new technology on the news production process in the newsroom. The University of Liverpool: United Kingdom
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/geo-2021-1704-09
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.