Pengaruh rangkaian pengangkutan Mass Rapid Transit (MRT) berkualiti terhadap kualiti hidup pengguna (The influence of a quality transportation network of Mass Rapid Transit (MRT) on users' quality of life)

Rosmiati Ahmad, Noordeyana Tambi

Abstract


Sektor pengangkutan memainkan peranan yang signifikan dalam kehidupan seharian masyarakat bagi memenuhi tuntutan keperluan pengangkutan masyarakat moden di kawasan bandar yang mengutamakan kepantasan dalam urusan kehidupan. Oleh itu, Mass Rapid Transit (MRT) diperkenalkan sebagai pengangkutan alternatif moden dan mampan kepada orang ramai. Namun begitu, kelemahannya dari segi aksesibiliti, mobiliti dan ketersambungan perkhidmatan seperti mana yang dilaporkan dalam akhbar dan internet. Perkara ini telah menjejaskan urusan harian pengguna untuk bekerja, belajar, membeli-belah, berhibur dan berekreasi serta lain-lain aktiviti kehidupan seharian mereka. Justeru, kajian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui tahap prestasi rangkaian pengangkutan awam MRT dan menganalisis hubungan serta pengaruhnya terhadap kualiti hidup pengguna. Kajian mengaplikasikan Konsep CAM (connectivity, accessibility and mobility) bagi mengukur prestasi rangkaian perkhidmatan pengangkutan awam dan ketiga-tiga elemen tersebut dipilih untuk mengukur rangkaian pengangkutan awam yang berkualiti, cekap dan efisien serta saling melengkapi dan berhubung antara satu sama lain. Kajian kuantitatif menggunakan borang soal selidik melibatkan 386 pengguna MRT Laluan Kajang dan MRT Laluan Putrajaya sebagai responden berdasarkan kaedah persampelan bertujuan. Keputusan analisis deskriptif menunjukkan bahawa tahap mobiliti dan kelancaran ketersambungan perkhidmatan MRT adalah sangat tinggi berbanding aksesibiliti perkhidmatan tersebut yang berada pada tahap tinggi. Manakala dapatan analisis inferensi menunjukkan hubungan dan pengaruh yang signifikan dan positif antara aksesibiliti, mobiliti dan kelancaran ketersambungan dengan kualiti hidup pengguna perkhidmatan tersebut. Kesimpulannya, perkhidmatan MRT mempunyai tahap rangkaian pengangkutan yang sangat baik, berkualiti dan efisien memenuhi keperluan pengangkutan pengguna perkhidmatan tersebut. Justeru, pihak penyedia perkhidmatan dan PBT perlu memastikan usaha berterusan diambil bagi mengekalkan dan meningkatkan lagi tahap prestasi rangkaian pengangkutan MRT terutamanya dari segi aksesibiliti perkhidmatan tersebut kepada pengguna.

 

Kata kunci: Aksesibiliti, kualiti hidup, mobiliti, MRT, pengangkutan awam, perkhidmatan awam 

The transportation sector plays a significant role in the community’s daily life in order to meet the transport needs of modern society in urban areas that emphasized fast-paced lifestyle, Therefore, Mass Rapid Transit (MRT) was introduced as a modern and sustainable alternative transport for the public. However, weaknessess in terms of accessibility, mobility and service connectivity as reported in the press and the internet, have affected the daily affairs of users for work, study, shopping, entertainment and recreation as well as other activities of their daily life. Therefore, this study aims to find out the level of performance of the MRT public transport network, then analyse the relationship and its influence on the quality of life of its users. This study applies the CAM Concept (connectivity, accessibility and mobility) to measure the performance of the public transport service network and the said three elements were chosen because they form a quality and efficient public transport network and its complement as well as connect with each other. This quantitative approached through a questionnaire involving 386 users of MRT Kajang Line and MRT Putrajaya Line as respondents based on purposive sampling method. The results of the descriptive analysis show that the level of mobility and seamless connectivity of the MRT service is very high compared to the accessibility of the service which is only at a high level. While the findings of the inference analysis show a significant and positive relationship and influence between accessibility, mobility and seamless connectivity with the quality of life of its users. The conclusion shows that the MRT service has a very good level of transportation network as it offers a quality and efficient services, therefore meeting the transportation needs of its users. Therefore, service providers and local authorities need to ensure that continuous efforts are taken to maintain and further improve the level of performance of the MRT transport network, especially in terms of the accessibility of the service to users.

 

Keywords: Accessibility, quality of life, mobility, MRT, public transportation, public services 


Keywords


Aksesibiliti, kualiti hidup, mobiliti, MRT, pengangkutan awam, perkhidmatan awam (Accessibility, quality of life, mobility, MRT, public transportation, public services)

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ab Majid, Rohayu, Rosli Said, Norsiah Mohamad, Jamalunlaili Abdullah & Rohana Ngah. (2020). The impact of time attribute on mass rapid transport (MRT) ridership in Malaysia. Academia Industry Network, International Journal of Social Science Research, 2(4), 338-349

Abdul Ghapar Othman & Kausar Hj Ali. (2020). Transportation and quality of life. Journal Of The Malaysian Institute of Planners, 18(3), 35–50.

Beck, D., Teixeira, M., Maróstica, J., & Ferasso, M. (2024). Quality perception of São Paulo transportation services: A sentiment analysis of citizens’ satisfaction regarding bus terminuses. Revista de Gestão Ambiental e Sustentabilidade (GeAS), 13(1), 1–53.

Bina, M., & Biassoni, F. (2023). Travel experience and reasons for the use and nonuse of local public transport: A case study within the community interregional project SaMBA (Sustainable mobility behaviors in the Alpine region). Sustainability, 15(24), 16612.

Bubelíny, O., Kubina, M., & Varmus, M. (2021). Railway stations as part of mobility in the smart city concept. Transportation Research Procedia, 53, 274-281.

Cheng, Y. H., & Chen, S. Y. (2015). Perceived accessibility, mobility and connectivity of public transportation systems. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 77, 386-403.

Chidambaram, B. (2022). TRAWEL: A transportation and wellbeing conceptual framework for broadening the understanding of quality of life. In. Wac, K., & Wulfovich, S. Quantifying Quality of Life: Incorporating Daily Life Into Medicine (pp. 553-581). Springer International Publishing.

De Ona, J., de Oña, R., Eboli, L., Forciniti, C., & Mazzulla, G. (2016). Transit passengers’ behavioural intentions: the influence of service quality and customer satisfaction. Transportmetrica A Transport Science,12(5), 385-412.

Deniz, D. (2016). Improving perceived safety for public health through sustainable development. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 216, 632–642.

Douglas, O., Russell, P., & Scott, M. (2019). Positive perceptions of green and open space as predictors of neighbourhood quality of life: Implications for urban planning across the city region. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 62(4), 626-646.

Feller, G. (2022). How public transit improves quality of life.

Garcia-Martinez, A., Cascajo, R., Jara-Diaz, S. R., Chowdhury, S., & Monzon, A. (2018). Transfer penalties in multimodal public transport networks. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 114, 52-66.

Gargiulo, C., & Sgambati, S. (2022). Active mobility in historical centres: towards an accessible and competitive city. Transportation Research Procedia, 60, 552-559.

Gilhooly, M., Hamilton, K., O'Neill, M., Gow, J., Webster, N., Pike, F., & Bainbridge, D. (2002). Transport and ageing: Extending quality of life for older people via public and private transport. Economic and Social Research Council, 3-32.

Haslauer, E., Delmelle, E. C., Keul, A., Blaschke, T., & Prinz, T. (2015). Comparing subjective and objective quality of life criteria: A case study of green space and public transport in Vienna, Austria. Social Indicators Research, 124, 911-927.

Hasniza M. Yusoff, Edie Ezwan M. Safian, Kamalludin Bilal & Azlina M. Yassin. (2019). The criteria of railway station in Malaysia: a review of issues in facilities improvement. Science International (Lahore), 31(2), 283-287.

Javid, M. A., Tahir, Q., Ammar, M. M., Khan, B. A., Mehdi, Y., & Ali, N. (2024). Customers’ satisfaction and intentions with public transportation in Faisalabad, Pakistan: Implications for a bus rapid transit service. Transactions on Transport Sciences, 15(1), 28–39.

Khoo, C., & Ooi, T. (2023). Geotechnical challenges and innovations in urban underground construction–The Klang Valley Mass Rapid Transit project. Geomechanik Und Tunnelbau, 16(3), 243–262.

Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607-610.

Kumar, G., Kaur, A., & Singh, K. K. (2014). Public transport and urban mobility: Perception of people on services of public transport in Bathinda City, Punjab, India. International Research Journal of Social Sciences, 3(12), 8-14.

Kurniati, Basalamah, R., & Asiyah, S. (2023). The influence of service quality on customer loyalty and satisfaction as an intervening variable in using bus transportation services. Jurnal Nusantara Aplikasi Manajemen Bisnis, 8(2), 487–498.

Kwan, Soo Chen Kwana, Rosnah Sutan & Jamal Hisham Hashim. (2018). Trip characteristics as the determinants of intention to shift to rail transport among private motor vehicle users in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Sustainable Cities and Society, 36, 319-326

Lättman, K., & Otsuka, N. (2024). Sustainable development of urban mobility through active travel and public transport. Sustainability, 16(2), 534.

Lim, S., Wong, W. C., Wu, Z. X., & Tan, C. S. (2020). The impact of perceived accessibility to MRT service and perceived neighborhood safety on quality of life: A study in Malaysia. Asia-Pacific Social Science Review, 20(4), 113–122.

Litman, T. A. (2022). Evaluating Accessibility For Transport Planning: Measuring People’s Ability To Reach Desired Services And Activities. Victoria Transport Policy Institute.

Malaysia. (1987). Akta Pengangkutan Jalan 1987. (Akta 333).

Mayo, N. E., & Mate, K. K. V. (2022). Quantifying mobility in quality of life. In. Wac, K., & Wulfovich, S. Quantifying Quality of Life: Incorporating Daily Life Into Medicine (pp. 119-136). Springer International Publishing.

Mikuličić, J. Ž., Kolanović, I., Jugović, A., & Brnos, D. (2024). Evaluation of service quality in passenger transport with a focus on liner maritime passenger transport-A systematic review. Sustainability, 16(3), 1125.

Minhan Puteela, Othman Yeop Abdullah, Nizamuddin Zainuddin, Zulkufli Aziz. (2021). Shipper’s intention on using rail transportation in the case of Malaysia border. Journal of Global Business and Social Entrepreneurship (GBSE), 7(20), 73-87.

Mohd Rizaimy Shaharudin, Amir Imran Zainoddin, Jamaludin Akbar, Dahlan Abdullah & Nur Hannah Saifullah. (2018). Determinants of the passengers' light rail transit usage in the Klang Valley Malaysia. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 7(6), 231-241.

Mohd Syafiq Asyraaf Mohd Talmizi & Zurinah Tahir. (2020). Keberkesanan perkhidmatan pengangkutan awam di Bandar Baru Bangi. Jurnal Wacana Sarjana, 4(1), 1-7.

Mokhtar, S., Khamis, K. A., & Omar, R. (2023). Assessing customer satisfaction in rail transportation: A case study of Malaysia’s public transport system. Proceedings on Engineering Sciences, 5(4), 701–708.

Muhammad Iskandar Hamzah, Siti Norida Wahab, Muhammad Hafiz Abd Rashid & Boo Ho Voon. (2023). Switching intention, WOM and quality of public transport services : A case of the Kuala Lumpur conurbation. Multimodal Transportation, 2(3), 100082.

Nag, D., Manoj, B. S., Goswami, A. K., & Bharule, S. (2019). Framework for public transport integration at railway stations and its implications for quality of life. ADBI Working Paper 1054. Tokyo: Asian Development Bank Institute.

Nguyen, N. T., Miwa, T., & Morikawa, T. (2018). Switching to public transport modes for commuting trips: considering latent motivations in Ho Chi Minh City. Asian Transport Studies, 5(1), 117-136.

Nordbakke, S., & Schwanen, T. (2014). Well-being and mobility: A theoretical framework and literature review focusing on older people. Mobilities, 9(1), 104-129.

Parahoo, S., Harvey, H., & Radi, G. (2014). Changing consumer behavior paradigms: Does passenger age impact factors influencing MRT usage?. Corporate Reputation Review, 17, 64-77.

PLANMalaysia. (2017). Garis Panduan Pelaksanaan Bandar Sihat Mesra Pejalan Kaki (Healthy Walkable City).

Purba, G. A., & Widiyastuti, D. (2024). First mile and last mile analysis using users’ perceived quality of Jakarta Mass Rapid Transit (MRT Jakarta) North-South Corridor Phase 1. IOP Conference Series: Earth & Environmental Science, 1313(1), 1–12.

Redman, L., Friman, M., Gärling, T., & Hartig, T. (2013). Quality attributes of public transport that attract car users: A research review. Transport Policy, 25, 119-127.

Salvo, G., Lashewicz, B. M., Doyle-Baker, P. K., & McCormack, G. R. (2018). Neighbourhood built environment influences on physical activity among adults: A systematized review of qualitative evidence. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(5), 897.

Schneider, I. E., Guo, T., & Schroeder, S. (2013). Quality of Life: Assessment For Transportation Performance Measures.

Spinney, J. E., Scott, D. M., & Newbold, K. B. (2009). Transport mobility benefits and quality of life: A time-use perspective of elderly Canadians. Transport Policy, 16(1), 1-11.

Steg, L., & Gifford, R. (2008). Sustainable transport and quality of life. In. Lee-Gosselin, A., & Perrels, A. (eds.). Building Blocks for Sustainable Transport: Obstacles, Trends, Solutions (pp. 183-202). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Sukwadi, R., Cory, S., & Liang, Y. C. (2022). The study of travel satisfaction in MRT Jakarta during the pandemic of COVID-19. GeoJournal of Tourism and Geosites, 40(1), 191–199.

Tuan, V. A. (2015). Mode choice behaviour and modal shift to public transport in developing countries – The case of Hanoi City. Journal of East Asian Society for Transportation Studies, 11, 473-487.

Van Dut, V. (2017). Accessibility and connectivity challenges of mass rapid transit in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Siri Kertas Kerja MIT-UTM Malaysia Sustainable Cities Program. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

van Grunsven, L., & Benson, M. (2020). Urban development in Malaysia: Towards a new systems paradigm. Malaysia’s Urban Future – Think City Institute Urban Policies Series.

Yenisetty, P. T., & Bahadure, P. (2020). Measuring accessibility to various ASFs from public transit using spatial distance measures in indian cities. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 9(7), 446.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.