Establishing an Appeal Mechanism for Investor-State Dispute Settlement: Challenges, Feasibility, and Options

Xi Zhang, Rozanah Ab Rahman

Abstract


There is a growing international consensus stating investor-state dispute settlement mechanism (ISDS), with international investment arbitration as the main means of dispute settlement, needs to be reformed, but the reform proposals have not yet been finalised. Among the many options, the option of establishing an appeal mechanism has generated extensive discussion. The permanent, independent and corrective nature of the appeals mechanism helps to address the lack of independence and impartiality of arbitrators under the ISDS mechanism, the inconsistency of arbitral awards, and the lack of control mechanisms. It also has benefit of improving the accuracy of awards. Under the current system of international investment treaties, establishing a multilateral appeal mechanism presents many challenges. However, the Mauritius Convention on Transparency, which uses multilateral instruments to amend bilateral treaties, provides evidence that establishing a multilateral appeal mechanism is feasible.


Keywords


Legitimacy crisis; relief program; Rules on Transparency; Opt-in Convention; Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alvarez, H. C. 2009. Judicial review of NAFTA Chapter 11 arbitral awards. In F. Bachand, & E. Gaillard (Eds.), Fifteen years of NAFTA chapter 11 arbitration (pp.103-171). Juris.

American Arbitration Association. 2013. Optional appellate arbitration rules. https://www.adr.org/sites/default/files/AAA-ICDR_Optional_Appellate_Arbitration_Rules.pdf

Corten, O., & Klein, P. (Eds.). 2011. The Vienna Conventions on the law of treaties: A commentary. Oxford Commentaries on Interna.

Drahozal, C. R. 1998. Judicial incentives and the appeals process. Southern Methodist University Law Review 51(3), 469-70.

European Court of Arbitration. 2015. Arbitration rules of the European court of arbitration. https://cour-europe-arbitrage.org/arbitration-rules/

International Institute for Conflict Prevention & Resolution. 2015. Appellate arbitration procedure. https://www.cpradr.org/resource-center/rules/arbitration/appellate-arbitration-procedure

JAMS. 2003. JAMS optional arbitration appeal procedure. https://www.jamsadr.com/files/Uploads/Documents/JAMS-Rules/JAMS_Optional_Appeal_Procedures-2003.pdf

Kim, D. 2011. The annulment committee’s role in multiplying inconsistency—in ICSID arbitration. New York University Law Review 86(1), 242.

Liu, S. 2009. An analysis of the issue of establishing an appeal mechanism for international investment arbitration. Modern Law (5),122-130. http://doi:CNKI:SUN:XDFX.0.2009-05-014

Roberts, A. 2013. Clash of paradigms: Actors and analogies shaping the investment treaty system. American Journal of International Law (7), 45-46.

Wang, Y. Z. 2011. Legalization of international investment dispute settlement: Achievements and challenges. Contemporary Law Review (3), 16. http://doi:CNKI:SUN:DDFX.0.2011-03-003

Xiao, J. 2015. Feasibility study on the establishment of an international investment arbitration appeals mechanism—from the negotiation of bilateral investment treaties between China and the United States. Legal and Business Studies 2(2), 168. http://doi:10.16390/j.cnki.issn1672-0393.2015.02.018

Yannaca-Small, K. 2006. Improving the system of investor-state dispute settlement. OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/631230863687


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.