Challenges Faced by Lecturers in Teaching Interpersonal Communication Skills Online to Medical Students at University Malaysia Sarawak

Vimala Govindaraju, Malia Taibi

Abstract


The COVID-19 pandemic has brought about changes in the teaching and learning process at overall educational institutions and higher educational institution such as universities also affected. The pandemic period had an impact on the implementation of online teaching and learning  with medical students at the Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Malaysia Sarawak. It is important to develop medical students' interpersonal communication skills by shifting theoretical and practical courses to virtual courses, which encourage the students to adapt early in their medical student careers. Interpersonal communication is needed in the context of building an educational civilization in shaping the medical student personality. Due to COVID-19 pandemic, educational institutions have been required to conduct teaching and learning activities from face-to-face classes to fully online classes. The challenge today is the loss of interpersonal communication caused by online teaching and learning. This study examines the challenges faced by the lecturers at the Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Malaysia Sarawak. This study adapted the qualitative method through a phenomenological approach. Semi-structured In-depth interviews were conducted with lecturers who were experienced in teaching medical students. The data transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematically to encode the main themes and subthemes. There are several challenges identified in online learning such as limited non-verbal cues, reduced student engagement and emotional disconnect, technological barriers and  assessment difficulties for lecturers in teaching using interpersonal communication skills to medical students at University Malaysia Sarawak.

 

Keywords: Interpersonal, communication, lecturers, challenges, skills.

 

https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2025-4101-22


Full Text:

PDF

References


Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2011). Assessing metacognition in an online community of inquiry. The Internet and Higher Education, 14(3), 183-190.

Alkharang, M., & Ghinea, G. (2013, October). Factors influencing the adoption of e-learning in Kuwait. In T. Bastiaens & G. Marks (Eds.), E-Learn: World conference on e-learning in corporate, government, healthcare, and higher education (pp. 239-249). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

Alonso, F., López, G., Manrique, D., & Viñes, J. M. (2005). An instructional model for web‐based e‐learning education with a blended learning process approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(2), 217-235.

Alqurashi, E. (2019). Predicting student satisfaction and perceived learning within online learning environments. Distance Education, 40(1), 133-148.

Alruwais, N., Wills, G., & Wald, M. (2018). Advantages and challenges of using e-assessment. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 8(1), 34-37.

Attardi, S. M., Barbeau, M. L., & Rogers, K. A. (2018). Improving online interactions: Lessons from an online anatomy course with a laboratory for undergraduate students. Anatomical Sciences Education, 11(6), 592-604.

Ayoub, F., Moussa, M., Papatsoris, A. G., Abou Chakra, M., Chahine, N. B., & Fares, Y. (2020).The online learning in medical education: A novel challenge in the era of COVID-19 pandemic. Hellenic Urology, 32(2), 89-96.

Aziz, A. R. A., Sukor, N. M., & Ab Razak, N. H. (2020). Wabak Covid-19: Pengurusan aspek kesihatan mental semasa norma baharu. International Journal of Social Science Research, 2(4), 156-174.

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191.

Bragg, L. (2007). Students’ conflicting attitudes towards games as a vehicle for learning mathematics: A methodological dilemma. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 19(1), 29-44.

Canary, D. J., & Lakey, S. G. (2006). Managing conflict in a competent manner. In J. G. Oetzel & S. Ting-Toomey (Eds.), The Sage handbook of conflict communication: Integrating theory, research, and practice (pp. 185-210). SAGE.

Cangara, H. (2007). Pengantar ilmu komunikasi (Edisi revisi). Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Castelli, F. R., & Sarvary, M. A. (2021). Why students do not turn on their video cameras during online classes and an equitable and inclusive plan to encourage them to do so. Ecology and Evolution, 11(8), 3565-3576.

Chen, S. (2021). Interpersonal communication instruction during COVID-19: Challenges and opportunities. Frontiers in Communication, 6, 652241.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.

Esani, M. (2010). Moving from face-to-face to online teaching. American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science, 23(3), 187-190.

Cucus, A., & Aprilinda, Y. (2016). Pengembangan e-learning berbasis multimedia untuk efektivitas pembelajaran jarak jauh. Explore: Jurnal Sistem Informasi dan Telematika, 7(2), 331238.

Dabbagh, N. (2007). The online learner: Characteristics and pedagogical implications. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 7(3), 217-226.

Dhawan, S. (2020). Online learning: A panacea in the time of COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(1), 5-22.

Dyche, L. (2007). Interpersonal skill in medicine: the essential partner of verbal communication. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 22, 1035-1039.

Eberle, J., & Hobrecht, J. (2021). The lonely struggle with autonomy: A case study of first-year university students’ experiences during emergency online teaching. Computers in Human Behavior, 121, 106804.

Feng, X., Zheng, Q., & Chen, P. (2016). Research on the evaluation model of online cognitive level from the perspective of learning analytics. Journal of Distance Education, 34(06), 39-45.

Fredricks, J. A., Filsecker, M., & Lawson, M. A. (2016). Student engagement, context, and adjustment: Addressing definitional, measurement, and methodological issues. Learning and Instruction, 43, 1-4.

Gray, J. A., & DiLoreto, M. (2016). The effects of student engagement, student satisfaction, and perceived learning in online learning environments. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 11(1), n1.

Handelsman, M. M., Briggs, W. L., Sullivan, N., & Towler, A. (2005). A measure of college student course engagement. The Journal of Educational Research, 98(3), 184-192.

Haswani, F., & Siregar, M. (2020). Learner types and their preferences in learning English. Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal, 3(2), 777-783.

Khe, Hew. F., Cheung, W. S., & Ng, C. S. L. (2010). Student contribution in asynchronous online discussion: A review of the research and empirical exploration. Instructional Science, 38, 571-606.

Khan, R. A., & Jawaid, M. (2020). Technology enhanced assessment (TEA) in COVID 19 pandemic. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 36(COVID19-S4), S108.

Kusuma, I. P. I. (2022). EFL teachers’ online teaching inrural schools during the COVID-19 pandemic: Stories from Indonesia. Studies in English Language and Education, 9(1), 203-221.

Ladyshewsky, R. (2013). Instructor presence in online courses and student satisfaction. The International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 7(1), 1-23.

Laidlaw, A., & Hart, J. (2011). Communication skills: An essential component of medical curricula. Part I: Assessment of clinical communication: AMEE Guide No. 51. Medical Teacher, 33(1), 6-8.

Liang, Y. (2018). Study on influence of rubric-based peer assessment of cognition, emotional engagement and learning outcomes on online learning. E-educ. Res, 39, 66-74.

Macnamara, J. (2021). New insights into crisis communication from an “inside” emic perspective during COVID-19. Public Relations Inquiry, 10(2), 237-262.

Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2018). Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online Learning, 22(1), 205-222.

Moore, J. (2014). Effects of online interaction and instructor presence on students’ satisfaction and success with online undergraduate public relations courses. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 69(3), 271-288.

Moore, M. (1990). Recent contributions to the theory of distance education. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 5(3), 10-15.

Morse, J. M. (1994). Designing funded qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 220–235). Sage Publications, Inc.

Nandi, D., Hamilton, M., Chang, S., & Balbo, S. (2012). Evaluating quality in online asynchronous interactions between students and discussion facilitators. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(4).

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Sage Publications.

Putra, P., Liriwati, F. Y., Tahrim, T., Syafrudin, S., & Aslan, A. (2020). The students learning from home experience during COVID-19 school closures policy in indonesia. Jurnal Iqra, 5(2).

Rahmat, N. H. (2021). Revisiting lecturers ‘role: Towards a model of lecturers ‘quadrants. European Journal of Education Studies, 8(6).

Richardson, J. C., & Ice, P. (2010). Investigating students' level of critical thinking across instructional strategies in online discussions. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1-2), 52-59.

Scheel, L., Vladova, G., & Ullrich, A. (2022). The influence of digital competences, self-organization, and independent learning abilities on students’ acceptance of digital learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), 1-33.

Schwartzman, S. (Ed.). (2020). Higher education and the challenges of the twenty-first century: An introduction. In, Higher Education in Latin America and the Challenges of the 21st Century (pp. 1-17). Springer Nature.

Shan, M., & Wen-bo, Y. (2018, December). College students' interpersonal communication from the perspective of Social Exchange Theory. Paper presented at the 1st International Conference on Contemporary Education and Economic Development (CEED 2018) (pp. 523-527). Atlantis Press.

Sharipudin, M. N. S., Rejab, M. M., Tugiman, N., Indiyati, D., & Andriani, A. D., (2024). The influence of digital communication technology on university branding: An understanding of open and distance learning (ODL) from students’ perspectives. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 40(1), 408-428.

Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 571.

Slimi, Z. (2020). Online learning and teaching during COVID-19: A case study from Oman. International Journal of Information Technology and Language Studies, 4(2), 44-56.

Surani, D., & Hamidah, H. (2020). Students’ perceptions in online class learning during the Covid-19 pandemic. International Journal on Advanced Science, Education, and Religion, 3(3), 83-95.

Tang, L., & Omar, S. Z. (2023). Cyberbullying using the phenomenological approach: A systematic literature review. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 39(4), 561-580.

Taveira-Gomes, I., Mota-Cardoso, R., & Figueiredo-Braga, M. (2016). Communication skills in medical students–An exploratory study before and after clerkships. Porto Biomedical Journal, 1(5), 173-180.

Toufaily, E., Zalan, T., & Lee, D. (2018). What do learners value in online education? An emerging market perspective. E-Journal of Business Education and Scholarship of Teaching, 12(2), 24-39.

Triwardhani, I. J., Trigartanti, W., & Putra, R. P. (2020). Study of communication ethnography for entrepreneurship culture in the interpersonal relations of teachers and students. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 36(1), 109-123.

Tuerah, P., Pangalila, T., Najoan, M., & Korompis, E. (2019, November). Effects of interpersonal communication; work ethic and leadership style towards junior high school teacher performance in the city of Tomohon. Paper presented at the International Conference on Social Science 2019 (ICSS 2019) (pp. 722-727). Atlantis Press.

Vladova, G., Ullrich, A., Bender, B., & Gronau, N. (2021). Students’ acceptance of technology-mediated teaching–how it was influenced during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020: A study from Germany. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 636086.

Vladova, G., Scheel, L., & Ullrich, A. (2022). Acceptance of digital learning in higher education - What role do teachers' competencies play? ECIS 2022 Research Papers, 168.

Watnaya, A. K., Muiz, M. H., Sumarni, N., Mansyur, A. S., & Zaqiah, Q. Y. (2020). Pengaruh teknologi pembelajaran kuliah online di era COVID-19 dan dampaknya terhadap mental Mahasiswa. Edu Teach: Jurnal Edukasi dan Teknologi Pembelajaran, 1(2), 153–165.

World Health Organization (WHO). (2020). World Health Organization Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) dashboard.

Wu, D. T., Wu, K. Y., Nguyen, T. T., & Tran, S. D. (2020). The impact of COVID 19 on dental‐education in North America—Where do we go next? European Journal of Dental Education, 24(4), 825-827.

Xiao, J. (2017). Learner-content interaction in distance education: The weakest link in interaction research. Distance Education, 38(1), 123-135.

Yu, J., Huang, C., Han, Z., He, T., & Li, M. (2020). Investigating the influence of interaction on learning persistence in online settings: Moderation or mediation of academic emotions? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(7), 2320.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 2289-1528