Method in the Madness: Teaching of English Literature in Japanese Universities
Abstract
This paper explores the problematics of teaching English Literature in an EFL context. The analysis is based on class-observations and interviews with students and teachers in six Japanese universities over a period of nine months. The focus is on issues of English proficiency and literary competence, on choices made for medium, material and method, and on problem-solving measures taken to reduce the ‘foreignness’ of English literary texts. Among the measures looked at are the current use of the grammar-translation method and the inclusion of various support/introductory/survey courses built into the English Studies programme as an attempt to close the students’ proficiency-comprehension-knowledge gaps. Among the more contentious issues discussed are related to the wisdom of transplanting the canon of Western universities into non-English-speaking institutions, the appropriateness of imported teaching methodologies and the absence of local perspective input. Keywords: English Literature in EFL; English Studies in Japan, teaching methodology; literary competence; Grammar Translation method, New CriticismReferences
Aspinall, R. W. (2003). Japanese nationalism and the reform of English language teaching. In Can the Japanese change their education system? Goodman, Roger and David Phillips (Eds). Oxford: Symposium Books.
Bell, K. (2011). How ESL and EFL classrooms differ. English language teaching global blog, OUP. http://oupeltglobalblog.com/2011/07/12/how-esl-and-efl-classrooms-differ
Eades, J.S., Goodman, Roger & Hada, Yumiko. (2005). The ‘Big Bang’ in Japanese Higher Education. Melbourne: Trans Pacific Press.
Gupta, S. (2009). Globalisation and Literature. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Hagerman, C. (2009). English policy and practice in Japan. www.wilmina.ac.jp/ojc/edu/kiyo_2009/kiyo_06_pdf/2009_04.pdf
Holliday, A. (2005). The Struggle to Teach English as an International Language. New York: Oxford University Press.
Loveday, L. (1996). Language Contact in Japan: A Socio-linguistic History. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
McVeigh, Brian J. (2002). Japanese Higher Education as Myth. New York: M.E. Sharpe.
Norris, Robert W. (1994). Getting students more personally involved: An alternative to the Yakudoku and lecture-dominated methods of reading literature and reading. Fukuoka Women’s Junior College Studies. 48, 25-38.
Seidhofer, B. (1999). Double standards: Teacher education in the expanding circle. World Englishes. 18(2), 233-245.
The Asahi Shimbun. September 10, 2014
TOEFL iBT Test Data. (2014). www.ets.org/s/toefl/pdf/94227_un/web.pdf
Yoshida, K. (1997). Language Gap. AEN March. 28(5), 1-12.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
If the article is accepted for publication, copyright of this article will be vested to UKM Press, National University of Malaysia (UKM).
All articles published in this journal are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license, unless otherwise stated.