Meneroka Refleksi Simpati Rasional Orang Tengah dalam Rantaian Pengeluaran Kelapa Sawit Pekebun Kecil (Exploring the Reflection of Rational Sympathy of Middlemen within the Palm Oil Smallholders’ Supply Chain)
Abstract
Kajian ini bertujuan menilai peranan orang tengah dalam pasaran hasil pertanian berdasarkan Teori Sentimen Moral. Penjelasan tersebut memberi refleksi sejauhmana aktiviti Peniaga Buah Sawit (FD) mengandungi elemen etika iaitu simpati rasional dan kepemurahan seperti dikemukakan oleh Teori Sentimen Moral Smith. Kajian ini memberi tumpuan kepada konteks FD di Malaysia. Kajian menggunakan metod temubual mendalam dengan empat orang peniaga buah sawit di Sabak Bernam, Selangor, Malaysia. Penemuan menunjukkan peranan FD telah memberi refleksi kepada simpati rasional dan kepemurahan dalam skop Teori Sentimen Moral. Pelaksanaan sentimen moral dikesan pada dua aspek, iaitu komersil dan sosial. Simpati rasional diterjemahkan dalam bentuk perkhidmatan berasaskan teras komersil tulen seperti belian buah sawit mentah, khidmat pengurusan kebun, jualan keperluan pertanian dan pengangkutan. Meskipun perkhidmatan tersebut dikenakan caj tertentu, pekebun telah memperolehi manfaat daripada penawaran perkhidmatan tersebut. Di samping itu, pekebun turut memperolehi faedah perolehan kredit kewangan dan keperluan pertanian dengan mudah dan ini menggambarkan elemen kepemurahan orang tengah yang sanggup mengenepikan peluang mengaut untung tambahan. Walaupun bayaran balik kredit tersebut dipotong daripada hasil jualan buah sawit, pekebun masih memperolehi faedah kerana kredit diperolehi tanpa perlunya cagaran, pematuhan prosedur permohonan pinjaman yang ketat, caj kewangan dan aturan bayar balik yang fleksibel. Oleh itu aktiviti orang tengah selari dengan sentimen moral dan menandakan elemen etika wujud dalam operasi FD kelapa sawit bagi konteks kajian. Implikasi polisi turut dikemukakan iaitu meningkatkan bilangan FD di pasaran dan koloborasi maklumat serta tindakan antara FD-Malayasian Palm Oil Board.
Kata kunci: Orang tengah; pekebun kecil; kepemurahan; simpati; sentimen moral
Abstract
The middlemen remain as an essential element in the value chain of agricultural produce. This study aims to examine the middlemen roles in agriculture produce market based on the Theory of Moral Sentiment. The explanation reflects the implementation of rational sympathy and benevolence of middlemen actions according to Moral Sentiment Theory argument. This study emphasizes the context of palm fruit middlemen (FD) in Malaysia. This study employs in-depth interview with four palm fruit dealers in Sabak Bernam, Selangor, Malaysia. The finding indicates that the middlemens’ roles have reflected the rational sympathize and benevolence as in the Moral Sentiment Theory. Execution of moral sentiment is found in two aspects, namely the commercial and social aspects. The rational sympathy is translated in the form of pure commercial services such as purchase of raw produces, farm management, selling of farm necessities and transportation. Although they are paid services, the small holders gain advantages from such services. On the other hand, the middlemen also obtain cash advance and farm items credit which reflects FD benevolence to willingly forgo potential of extra profit. Although repayment of credits is deductable from the selling proceeds, small palm holders still gain benefits from the service as it was provided without the need of collateral, compliance of rigid loan application procedures, finance charges and with flexible payback arrangement. Therefore, middlemen activities are in line with the moral sentiment and has explicitly underlies the particular FD context. Policy implications have been proposed such as increasing the numbers of FD in the market and colloboration of information and actions between FD-MPOB.
Keywords: middlemen; small holder; benevolence; sympathy; moral sentiment
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ahmad Raflis Che Omar, Suraiya Ishak, Abd. Hair Awang, Mohd Yusof Hussain, Novel Lyndon dan Abdullah Sanusi Othman. 2016. Oarng tengah dalam rantaian pengeluaran pekebun kecil kelapa sawit di Malaysia: satu penemuan awal dari Perak. Geografia Malaysian Journal of Society and Space 12(5): 161-170.
Ahmad Raflis Che Omar, Suraiya Ishak, Jumaat Abd. Moen & Megat Mohd Azlan Mohd Arshad. 2013. Sufficient and sustainable livelihood via community economy: case of natural farming program in east Malaysia. Asian Social Science 9(5): 110-117.
Ali-Olubandwa, A.M., Kathuri, N.J. Odero-wanga, D. & Shivoga, W.A. 2011. Challenges facing small scale maize farmers in western Province of Kenya in the agricultural reform era. American Journal of Experimental Agriculture 1(4): 466-476.
Baritaux, V., Aubert, M., Montaigne, E. & Remaud, H. 2006. Matchmakers in wine marketing channels. The case of French Wine Brokers. Agribusiness 22(3): 375-390.
Biéabe, E. & Sautier, D. 2008. The role of small scale producers’ organizations to address market. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/57a08c1340f0b64974000fa0/2ProducerOrganisationsBienabefinal24Feb.pdf Tarikh capaian: 8 Mei 2017.
Boehlje, M., Rouchan-Kane, M. & Brὃring. 2011. Future agribusiness challenges: strategic uncertainty, innovation and structiral change. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 14(5): 53-83.
Borneo Post. 2013. Aktiviti pemasaran petani perlu diperkasa. Borneo Post Online, 28 Ogos http://www.theborneopost.com/2013/08/28/aktiviti-pemasaran-petani-perlu-diperkasa/. Tarikh capaian: 8 Mei 2017.
Brandi, C., Cabani, T., Hosang, C., Schirmbeck, S., Westermann, L. & Wiese, H. 2013. Sustainability Certification in the Indonesian Palm Oil Sector. Benefits and Challenges for Smallholders. Bonn: German Development Institute.
Chigusiwa, L., Bindu, S., Muchabaiwa, L. & Mudavanhu, V. 2013. The role of market middlemen in the marketing of smallholder horticultural products in Zimbabwe. Greener Journal of business and management studies 3(8) (October): 369-377.
Dev, M.S. 2012. Small farmers in India: Challenges and Opportunities. Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai. http://www.igidr.ac.in/pdf/publication/WP-2012-014.pdf Tarikh capaian: 10 Mei 2017.
Fatimah Arshad. 2005. Prospek pemasaran secara terus komoditi pertanian pekebun kecil. Serdang: Fakulti Ekonomi Dan Pengurusan, Universiti Putra Malaysia. http://econ.upm.edu.my/~fatimah/dir_mktg.htm Tarikh capaian: 10 Mei 2017.
Friedman, M. 2004. The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. Dlm. Beauchamp, T.L. dan Bowie, N.E. (pnyt.). Ethical Theory and Business: 50-55. Upper Saddle River New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc.
Heliawaty, M. Saleh S. Ali. Darmawan Salman & Rahman Mappangaja. 2015. Social capital and economic behavior of farmers. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research 4(01): 89-91.
Kosmo. 2016. Jihad Ismail Sabri perangi orang tengah. Kosmo, 19 Mei. http://www.kosmo.com.my/kosmo/content.asp?y=2014&dt=0519&pub=Kosmo&sec=Rencana_Utama&pg=ru_01.htm Tarikh capaian: 11 Mei 2017.
Louw, A., Jordaan, D., Ndanga, L. & Kirsten, J.F. 2008. Alternative marketing options for small-scale farmers in the wake of changing agri-food supply chains in South Africa. Agrekon 47(3): 287-308.
Macfie, A.L. 1959. Adam Smith’s moral sentiments as foundation for his Wealth of Nations. Oxford Economics Papers 11: 209-228.
Mitchell, T. 2011. Middlemen, bargaining and price information: is knowledge power? http://www.personal.Ise.ac.uk/Mitchell/JMP.pdf Tarikh capaian: 10 Mei 2017.
Mitra, S., Mookherjee, D. Torero, M., Visaria, S. 2012. Assymetric information and middlemen margins. An experiment with West Bengal potato farmers. http://www.theigc.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Mitra-Et-Al-2012-Working-Paper.pdf Tarikh capaian: 11 Mei 2017.
Muhammad Ashfaq & Arif Raza. 2016. Small growers at the mercy of middlemen. http://www.pakissan.com/english/issues/small.growers.at.the mercy.of.middlemen.shtml Tarikh capaian: 11 Mei 2017.
Norliza Abd Rahman. 2014. Sektor pertanian ada masa depan. Utusan Malaysia. 19 Mei.
Quartey, P. Chris Udry, Seidu Al-Hassan & HellenSeshie. 2012. Agricultural financing and credit constraints: The role of middlemen in marketing and credit outcomes in Ghana. London: International Growth Centre.
Rust, J. & Hall, G. 2002. Middlemen versus market markers: A theory of competitive exchange. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Sandika, A.L. 2011. Impact of middlemen on vegetable marketing channels in Sri Lanka. Tropical agricultural research & extension 14 (3): 2011.
Smith, A. 1991. The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Dlm. Raphael , D.D. dan Macfie, A.L (pnyt.). Adam Smith: The Theory of Moral Sentiments. New York: Oxford University Press.
Suraiya Ishak & Ahmad Raflis Che Omar. 2009. Penggerak tanggungjawab sosiak korporat: Teori Pemaksimuman Untung atau Teori Pemegang Kepentingan. Manusia dan Masyarakat 18: 64-72.
Suraiya Ishak & Ahmad Raflis Che Omar. 2011. Paradigma baru dalam pelaksanaan tanggungajwab sosial syarikat milik kerajaan. Akademika 81(3): 75-81.
Suraiya Ishak, Ahmad Raflis Che Omar & Amal Hayati Ishak. 2012. Konsep dan Amalan Perniagaan Sosial di Malaysia. Manusia dan Masyarakat 22: 55-70.
Suraiya Ishak, Ahmad Raflis Che Omar, Mohd Yusof Hussain, Abdul Hair Awang, Novel Lyndon, Abdullah Sanusi Othman, Mohd Syafiq Akmal Kasimun. 2016. Menjejaki mekanisme kawalan ke atas aktviti orang tengah dalam rantaian pengeluaran hasil pekebun kecil kelapa sawit di Malaysia. Geografia Malaysian Journal of Society and Space 12(4): 46-58.
Syahrin Suhaimee, Noorlidawati Ab. Halim, Mohd HafizudinZakaria, Mohd Syauqi Nazmi, Rawaida Rusli & Rozhan Abu Dardak. 2015. Roles of cooperative movement as middlemen to increase the efficiency of agricultural marketing in Malaysia. Serdang: Malaysian Agricultural Research and Development Institute (MARDI).
Utusan. 2014. Jihad perangi orang tengah. Utusan Online, 10 Februari http://ww1.utusan.com.my/utusan/Dalam_Negeri/20140210/dn_01/Jihad-perangi-orang-tengah Tarikh capaian: 11 Mei 2017.
Van Driel, H. 2003. The role of middlemen in the International Coffee Trade since 1870: The Dutch Case. Business History 45(2): 77-101.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
ISSN: 0126-5008
eISSN: 0126-8694