Impak Sosioekonomi dan Politik Program Perumahan Rakyat Lembah Subang, Selangor (The Socio-economic and Polical Impact of Peoples’ Housing Programme in Lembah Subang, Selangor )

Junaidi Awang Besar, Mazlan Ali, Vivien Yew W.C., Novel Lyndon, Mohd Nor Shahizan Ali

Abstract


Perumahan yang sempurna ialah yang dapat memenuhi keperluan penghuni, memberi kesejahteraan kepada isi rumah dan seterusnya memacu kepada peningkatan kualiti hidup. Program Perumahan Rakyat (PPR) merupakan program pembangunan rumah untuk rakyat di kawasan bandar yang tidak mempunyai kediaman sendiri sama ada untuk disewa atau dimiliki mengikut kawasan. Program ini memberi manfaat kepada penghuni bandar untuk menjalani kehidupan yang selesa seterusnya dapat mencapai kesejahteraan hidup. Namun terdapat tiga isu sosioekonomi dalam pelaksanaan skim PPR ini iaitu perpaduan, sosial dan ekonomi. Justeru, tujuan penulisan artikel ini untuk membincangkan impak sosioekonomi dan politik terhadap Program Perumahan Rakyat (PPR) Lembah Subang, Selangor. Kajian ini menggunakan metodologi secara kuantitatif melalui penggunaan instrumen borang soal selidik bagi mengumpul data daripada responden. Seramai 360 orang responden terlibat dan rujukan terhadap data sekunder iaitu artikel jurnal, kertas persidangan/seminar dan buku-buku ilmiah yang berkaitan diperlukan bagi menjayakan kajian. Hasil kajian mendapati majoriti responden bersetuju terhadap pelaksanaan perumahan PPR dan program ini telah berjaya meningkatkan taraf ekonomi, mengurangkan masalah sosial dan mewujudkan perpaduan untuk memenuhi aspirasi negara dalam mencapai matlamat 1 Malaysia. Program ini juga telah memberikan nilai tambah terutamanya sokongan kepada Kerajaan Persekutuan. Akhir sekali, impak kepada kajian ini penting sebagai panduan kepada pihak pelaksana dasar untuk mengetahui pandangan masyarakat bagi memastikan kejayaan proses pelaksanaan di masa akan datang dan melakukan penambahbaikan dasar berkenaan yang sesuai mengikut keperluan semasa.

Kata kunci: Program perumahan rakyat; sosioekonomi; politik; kesejahteraan hidup; taraf ekonomi


Abstract

Perfect housing can be described as the one that meets residents’ requirement, provides well-being to the household and promotes the quality of life. People's Housing Programme (PPR) is a housing development program for people in the urban area who do not own a house either for rental or for living. This program benefits the city dwellers to enjoy comfortable life and provide well-being. However, there are three socio-economic issues in the PPR scheme; unity, social and economic. To investigate more on those issues, this article discusses the socio-economic and political impact of the PPR in Lembah Subang, Selangor. This study used quantitative method, namely questionnaires to collect data from respondents. A total of 360 respondents were selected to participate in this survey and references to secondary data such as journal articles, conferences or seminars and scientific books were consulted throughout this study. Findings indicate that majority of respondents are satisfied with the implementation of PPR and it has successfully improved the economic status, reduced the social problems and created social cohesion in achieving national aspiration towards development 1 Malaysia. Besides that, this program has delivered a good support to the government especially in providing quality life to the people. Finally this study has contributed a significant guidance in identifying opinions among the society for successfully executing this project in the future and also in enhancing this policy in order to meet current requirements.

Keywords: People’s housing program; socio-economic; politics; well-being; economic status



Full Text:

PDF

References


Aishah Haji Mohamed. 2013. Perubahan sosial, kesihatan dan kualiti hidup di Wilayah Metropolitan Lembah Klang-Langat. Akademika 83(1): 11-24.

Baharuddin Asek. 2007. The Peoples Housing Programme: A Study on the Implementation of Federal Government Housing in Peninsular Malaysia. Tesis Doktor Falsafah, Jabatan Antropologi dan Sosiologi, Fakulti Sastera dan Sains Sosial, Universiti Malaya

Davenport, T.C. 2010. Public Accountability and political participation: effects of a face-to-face feedback intervention on voter turnout of public housing residents. Political Behavior 32 (3): 337-368.

Delgado, A. & Troyer, D.T., 2017. Housing preferences for affordable social housing projects in Guayaquil, Ecuador. International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis 10(1): 112-139.

Geoffrey K.P. 1977. Urban housing in the third world. New York: Leornard Hill.

Glassner, M. I. 1993. Political geography. Connecticut: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Hassan N. Khalid. 2012. Satu analisis mengenai dikotomi antara kemiskinan bandar dan luar bandar di Malaysia. PERSPEKTIF 4 (1): 1-21.

Junaidi Awang Besar, Rosmadi Fauzi & Amer Saifude Ghazali. 2012a. Dasar perumahan negara: hakmilik dan impak geopolitik di Kuala Lumpur. Postgraduate Research Seminar (POGRES) 2012. Fakulti Sains Sosial dan Kemanusiaan, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), Bangi, Selangor. 20-21 November.

Junaidi Awang Besar, Rosmadi Fauzi & Amer Saifude Ghazali. 2012b. Penilaian awal impak perlaksanaan Dasar Perumahan Negara terhadap sektor perumahan di Kuala Lumpur. Geografia Online: Malaysia Journal of Society and Space. Themed issue on “Pengurusan perubahan sosial ekologi dan ketidaktentuan dalam era global”. 8(6): 90-108.

Junaidi Awang Besar, Rosmadi Fauzi & Amer Saifude Ghazali. 2014. Pembangunan Program Perumahan Rakyat (PPR): Impak geopolitik di Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur dalam Pilihan Raya Umum 2004, 2008 dan 2013. E-Bangi: Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities 9(1): 001-023.

Kamarul Afizi Kosman, Lim Yong Long, Rosdan Abdul Manan, Azimin Samsul Mohd Tazilan & Mohamad Tajuddin Mohamad Rasdi. 2008. 50 tahun perumahan awam di Kuala Lumpur: Menyingkap sejarah, perkembangan dan halatuju perumahan di ibu negara. Bangi: Institut Alam dan Tamadun Melayu (ATMA), Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

Lejeune, Z., Xhignesse, G., Kryvobokov, M. & Teller, J. 2016. Housing quality as environmental inequality: the case of Wallonia, Belgium. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 31(3): 495-512.

Mc Gee, T.C. 1967. The South East Asia city. London: G. Beld & Sons.

Mohd Razali Agus. 2001. Perumahan awam di Malaysia: dasar dan amalan. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publication & Distributors. Sdn. Bhd.

Muhd Fadhil Nurdin. 2002. Peningkatan Kesejahteraan Sosial Melalui Perumahan: Perbandingan Polisi dan Amalan di Malaysia dan Indonesia. Tesis Doktor Falsafah, Jabatan Antropologi dan Sosiologi, Fakulti Sastera dan Sains Sosial, Universiti Malaya.

Quinlivan, A., Weeks, L. 2010. The 2009 local elections in the Republic of Ireland. Irish Political Studies 25 (2): 315-324.

Rozumah Baharuddin, Rumaya Juhari, Asnarul Abu Samah, Tan Jopei, Amna Md. Nor & Masor Abu Talib. 2005. Predictors of Conduct Problems among School-going adolescents in West Malaysia. Malaysian Jurnal of Social Policy and Society 2: 92-107.

Sekaran, Uma. 2003. Research Methods for Business – A Skill Building Approach. New York: John Wiley and Sons Inc.

Shamsuddin Suhor & L.J. Vale. 2017. Hoping for more: redeveloping U.S. public housing without marginalizing low-income residents? Housing Studies. 32(2): 225-244.

Schwartz, A. 2012. US Housing Policy in the age of Obama: From crisis to stasis. European Journal of Housing Policy 12 (2): 227-240.

Wan Azmi Ramli. 1982. Dasar sosial di Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Sarjana Enterprise.

Xun Bian. 2017. Housing equity dynamics and home improvements. Journal of Housing Economics 37: 29-41.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN: 0126-5008

eISSN: 0126-8694