Bioteknologi Moden: Aplikasi, Status, Isu Etika dan Perspektif Penyelidik dan Industri terhadap Prinsip Etika Utama (Modern Biotechnology: Applications, Status, Ethical Issues and Perspectives of Researchers and Industries on the Key Ethical Principles)
Abstract
Perkembangan bioteknologi moden di Malaysia menimbulkan pelbagai kontroversi. Terkini, Lembaga
Biokeselamatan Kebangsaan telah meluluskan 29 jenis produk kejuruteraan genetik (GE) ke dalam pasaran Malaysia. Antara isu-isu etika dalam bioteknologi moden dan produknya ialah kesan jangka masa panjang, kesan terhadap kesihatan dan alam sekitar, kesan sosio-ekonomi dan isu ‘bertindak seolah-olah Tuhan’ Malaysia seharusnya bergerak seiring dengan negara-negara barat untuk mewujudkan garis panduan etika bioteknologi moden. Garis panduan etika memerlukan prinsip panduan. Objektif artikel ini ialah untuk membincangkan aplikasi, status, isu-isu etika bioteknologi moden dan perspektif penyelidik dan industri di Malaysia terhadap prinsip etika sekular utama iaitu autonomi, kebajikan, tidak memudaratkan dan keadilan. Penyelidikan ini dijalankan secara perbincangan kumpulan fokus (FGD) menggunakan instrumen semi berstruktur. Perbincangan yang diadakan mengambil masa sekitar 3 jam dan telah dirakam. Rakaman perbincangan telah ditranskrip secara ‘verbatim’ sebelum dianalisis. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahawa semua panel amat bersetuju mengenai kepentingan dan kesesuaian keempat-empat prinsip etika untuk diguna pakai sebagai prinsip bagi garis panduan etika bioteknologi moden di Malaysia. Para panel telah mencadangkan penyusunan semula empat prinsip etika kepada tiga dan telah menambahbaik terma, menghasilkan prinsip autonomi dan kepentingan awam; kebajikan dan tidak memudaratkan; dan keadilan dan bukan diskriminasi. Panel juga telah menambahbaik huraian bagi definisi setiap prinsip yang ada.
Kata kunci: Bioteknologi moden; etika; Malaysia; penyelidik; industri
Abstract
The development of modern biotechnology in Malaysia has given rise to many controversies. Currently, the National Biosafety Board (NBB) has approved 29 types of genetically engineered products for the Malaysian market. The ethical issues of modern biotechnology and its products include their long-term impact, effects on human health, environment and socio-economy and the issue of ‘playing God’. Malaysia should be in tandem with the western countries in introducing ethical guideline for modern biotechnology. Ethics guideline needs suitable guiding principles. The objectives of this article are to discuss the applications, status and ethical issues in modern biotechnology and to analyze the perspectives of researchers and industries in Malaysia toward the key secular ethical principles: autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficent and justice. The study was conducted by the Focus Group Discussion (FGD) method using a semi structured instrument. The discussion took about 3 hours and was recorded. The recorded discussions were verbatim transcribed prior to analysis. The research findings showed that the panelists strongly agreed on the importance and
suitablility of the four ethical principles to be adopted as the guiding principles for a Malaysian guideline on the ethics of modern biotechnology. The penalists suggested on the reorganization of the four ethical principles into three, with some improvements in the terminologies, resulting in the principles of autonomy
and public interest; beneficence and non-maleficent; and justice and non-discrimination. Additionally, the descriptions/definitions of the principles have been improved by the panelists.
Keywords: Modern biotechnology; ethical principles; Malaysia; researchers; industry
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abu Zahrin, S. N., Idris, F. Mastor, K. A., Basir@Ahmad, A., Ismail, R. & Osman, H. 2017. Relationship
between Islamic concept & ethical behavior (Akhlaq) of being in love among youth. Akademika 87(3):3-14
Akta Biokeselamatan 2007. Akta 678. Kuala Lumpur: Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment.
al-Qaradhawi. 2001. Fiqh Keutamaan. Kuala Lumpur: Angkatan Belia Islam Malaysia (ABIM).
Amin, L., Azad, M.A.K., Ahmad Azlan, N.A. & Zulkifli, F. 2014. Factors influencing stakeholders’ attitude toward cross-kingdom gene transfer in rice. New Genetics and Society 33(4): 370-399.
Anastasia, G. 2011. Focus group as a tool in the construction of questionnaires: The case of discriminatory attitudes. International Journal of Methodology 1(45): 1217-1231.
Ashtankar, O.M. 2016. Islamic perspectives on environmental protection. International Journal of Applied Research 2(1): 438-441.
Atmojo, I.R.W., Sajidan, Sunarno, W., Ashadi & Nugraha, D.A. 2014. The profiles of pre-service elementary teachers (PETs) in biotechnology using RCB. AIP Conference proceedings.
https://aip. scitation.org/doi/pdf/10.1063/1.5054467. Retrieved on: 10 Oktober 2018.
Australian Government. 2012. National Framework of ethical Principles in Gene Technology 2012. Australia: Gene Technology Ethics and Community Consultative Committee.
Barrows, G., Sexton, S. & Zilberman, D. 2014. Agricultural biotechnology: The promise and prospects of genetically modified Crops. Journal of economic perspectives 28(1): 99-120.
Beauchamp & Childress. 1994. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 4th edition. USA: Oxford University Press.
Bennett, A.B., Chi-Ham, C., Barrows, G., Sexton, S. & Zilberman, D. 2013. Agricultural biotechnology: Economics, environment, ethics and the future. Annu Rev Environ Resour 38:249-79.
Bio’s Guide to Biotechnology. 2017. http://www.bio.org/aboutbio/guide1.html. Retrieved on: 24 Julai 2017.
Biotech Corp Annual Report 2015. Malaysian Biotechnology Corporation Sdn Bhd (BiotechCorp). http://www.bioeconomycorporation.my/. Retrieved on: 9 Jun 2017.
Chamsi-Pasha, H. & Albar, M. A. 2013. Western and Islamic bioethics: How close is the gap? Journal of Medicine 3(1):8-14.
CHEMIK. 2012. Rainbow code of biotechnology. Science 66(8): 811-816.
Clingerman, F. & O’Brien, K. J. 2014. Playing God: Why religion belongs in the climate engineering debate. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 70(3): 27-37.
Comstock, G. 2014. Ethics and genetically modified foods. Ethics and Emerging Technologies: 473–485.
Desk Study Report-Malaysia. 2016. http://bch.cbd.int/mainstreaming/malaysia%20-%20desk%20study. pdf. Retrieved on: 12 Jun 2017
Government of Canada.1999. Towards a Coherent Ethics Framework for Biotechnology in Canada. Canada:
Interdepartmental Committee on Ethics of the Government of Canada.
Green, J. & Thorogood, N. 2018. Qualitative Methods for Health Research. London: SAGE Publications.
Hamin, Z. & Idris, S.H. 2011. Bioethical Issues on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) In Malaysia: Biting Into the Legal Protection under the Biosafety Act 2007. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Biotechnology and Food Science IPCBEE vol.7 (2011), Singapore.
Hasan, K. Z. 1994. Islam and the four principles: A Pakistani view. In Principles of Health Care Ethics, edited by Gillon, R. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Publication.
Hassan, S. H. John Kua, S. B. & Harun, H. 2016. Muslim consumers’ perception and purchase intention toward GM food. International Food Research Journal 23(2): 806-815.
Hussain, A. A. 2005. Ensoulment and the Prohibition of Abortion in Islam. Islam and Christian-Muslim Relations 16(3): 239-250.
Kementarian Sumber Asli dan Alam Sekitar. 2017. http://www.biosafety.nre.gov.my/country_decision/app_ffp.shtml. Retrieve on: 2 Ogos 2017.
Khan, S., Ullah, M.W., Siddique, R., Nabi, G., Manan, S., Yousaf, M. & Hou, H. 2016. Role of recombinant DNA technology to improve life. Int. J. Genomics 16:1-14.
Malaysian Agriculture Biotechgnology Malaysia. 2016. https://gain.fas.usda.gov/Recent%20GAIN%20Publications/Agricultural%20Biotechnology%20Annual_Kuala%2 Lumpur_Malaysia_9-2-2016. pdf. Retrieved on: 2 Ogos 2017
Mohd Shariff, A.A. & Abdul Rahman, M. 2018. Prinsip Shariah berkaitan prosedur siasatan dan pendakwaan khazanah ilmu yang memangkin perkembangan perundangan dalam masyarakat Shariah. Akademika 88(3): 127-135.
MyMetro. 2015. https://www.hmetro.com.my/ mutakhir/2015/07/61792/al-quran-panduanlengkap-hidup. Retrieved on: 15 Oktober 2018.
Saat, N. 2012. Islamising Malayness: Ulama discourse and authority in contemporary Malaysia. Contemporary Islam 6(2): 135-153.
Sahih Muslim Bishareh Al Nawawi, Dar AlFiker. Beirut: Lebanon; 2004. Hadith No: 1008.
Saifuddeen, S.M., Abdul Rahman, N.N., Isa, N.M., Baharuddin, A. 2014. Maqasid al-Shariah as a comlementary framework to conventional bioethics. Sci. Eng. Ethics 20 (2):317-327.
Tongco, M. D. C. 2007. Purposive sampling as a tool for imformant selection. Ethnobotany Research and Applications 5: 147-158.
UNESCO. 2005. Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights. United Nation.
UNESCO. 2008. Bioethics Core Curriculum. Paris.
United States Department of Agriculture “Agricultural Biotechnology Concepts and Definitions”. 2017. http://www.biotechknowledge.com/showlib.php3?1739. Retrieved on: 24 Julai 2017
Wong, L. P. 2008. Focus group discussion: a tool for health and medical research. Singapore Med. J. 49(3):256-261.
Zhang, C., Wohlhueter, R. & Zhang, H. 2016. Genetically modified foods: A critical review of their promise and problems. Food Science and Human Wellness 5(16): 116-123.
Zika, E., Papetryfon, I. Wolf, O., Gomez-Barbero, M., Stein A. J. & Bock, A. K. 2007. Consequences, Opportunities and Challenges of Modern Biotechnology for Europe. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
ISSN: 0126-5008
eISSN: 0126-8694