Kepelbagaian Sektor dalam Jaringan Perkhidmatan Kebajikan Kanak-Kanak di Sekolah Tunas Bakti (STB) Marang, Terengganu (Variety of Sectors in Child Welfare Network at Sekolah Tunas Bakti (STB) Marang, Terengganu)
Abstract
Jaringan sosial memainkan peranan yang sangat penting dalam penyampaian perkhidmatan kebajikan bagi meningkatkan kesejahteraan hidup kanak-kanak yang ditempatkan dalam institusi kebajikan. Satu kajian telah dilakukan untuk mengeksplorasi sektor-sektor yang terlibat dalam pelaksanaan amalan jaringan perkhidmatan kebajikan kanak-kanak yang ditempatkan di Sekolah Tunas Bakti (STB) Marang, Terengganu. Kajian dilakukan menggunakan reka bentuk kualitatif tradisi Penjanaan Teori untuk mendapatkan data kajian. Satu set protokol temu bual telah dibina sebagai panduan untuk melaksanakan temu bual secara bersemuka dan mendalam terhadap 30 orang responden yang terdiri daripada 24 agensi berlainan. Hasil kajian mendapati bahawa terdapat lebih kurang 50 buah agensi yang terlibat dalam penyediaan, pembekalan dan penyampaian keperluan makanan dan minuman; 37 buah agensi yang terlibat dalam penyediaan, pembekalan dan penyampaian keperluan insurans, tempat tinggal, pakaian dan keperluan-kepeluan lain; serta 10 pihak yang terlibat dalam penyediaan perkhidmatan kesihatan kanak-kanak di STB Marang. Dapatan kajian memberi implikasi kepada pihak yang berkepentingan seperti Jabatan Kebajikan Masyarakat agar dapat melipat gandakan usaha membentuk jaringan perkhidmatan kebajikan kanak-kanak secara bersepadu dengan pelbagai pihak termasuklah sektor formal, sektor tidak formal, sektor voluntari, sektor swasta dan individu perseorangan untuk meningkatkan kesejahteraan hidup kakak-kanak; khususnya kanak-kanak dalam jagaan institusi.
Kata kunci: jaringan sosial; jaringan kebajikan; kanak-kanak; penyampaian perkhidmatan; agensi sosial
Abstract
Social network plays an important role in delivering welfare services to increase child well-being especially children in institutional care. A study was conducted to explore the sectors involved in the implementation of the practice of child welfare services network located at Sekolah Tunas Bakti (STB) Marang, Terengganu. The study which is qualitative in its approach utilised Grounded Theory to gather data. A set of interview protocol was designed to guide a series of face-to-face and in-depth interviews among 30 respondents that come from 24 different agencies. The study found more than 50 agencies invovled in preparing, supplying and delivering the needs of food and drink; 37 agencies involved in preparing, supplying and delivering the needs of insurance, shelter, clothes, and other needs; and 10 parties involved in health services. As an overall impact, the study provided implications to the concerned parties such as Social Welfare Department to redouble efforts to form an integrated child welfare network services with various parties including the formal sector, informal sector, voluntary sector, private sector and individuals to improve child well-being; particularly children in institutional care.
Keywords: social networks; welfare networks; children; service delivery; social agency
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Avin, C., Lotker, Z., Peleg, D., Pignolet, Y-A., Turkel, I. 2018. Elites in social networks: An axiomatic approach to power balance and Price’s square root law. PLoS ONE 13(10): e0205820.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205820
Bott, E. 1957. Family and Social Network. London: Tavistock.
Bronfenbrenner, U. 1979. The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. 2018. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Los Angeles: SAGE Puablication.
Dunbar, R. I. M. 2020. Structure and function in human and primate social networks: implications for diffusion, network stability and health.
Proceedings of the Royal Society. http://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2020.0446
Fernández-Peña, R., Molina, J. L., & Valero, O. 2018. Personal Network Analysis in the Study of Social Support: The Case of Chronic Pain. International journal of environmental research and public health, 15(12), 2695. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15122695
Garbarino, J. 1982. Children and Families in the Social Environment. New York: Aldine.
Ghahtarani, A., Sheikhmohammady, M., & Rostami, M. 2020. The impact of social capital and social interaction on customers purchase intention, considering knowledge sharing in social commerce context. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 5(3): 191-199.
Gupta, M., Uz, I., Esmaeilzadeh, P., Noboa, F., Mahrous, A. A., Kim, E., et al. 2018. Do cultural norms affect social network behavior inappropriateness? A global study. Journal of Business Research, 85(2018): 10-22.
Hasan, S., & Koning, R. 2020. Designing social networks: Joint tasks and the formation and endurance of network ties. Journal of Organization Design, 9(2020), 1-19.Horner, N. (2012). What is Social Work: Context and Perspective. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.
Horner, N. 2012. What is Social Work: Context and Perspective. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.
Kadushin, C. 2012. Understanding social networks: Theories, concepts, and findings. New York: Oxford University Press.
Mitchell, J. C. 1969. The Concept and Use of Social Networks. In J. C. Mitchell (eds.), Social Networks in Urban Situations. Manchester: University of Manchester Press.
Paulson, S. K. 1985. A Paradigm for the Analysis of Interorganizational Networks. Journal of Social Networks, 7(2), 105-126.
Polister, P. E. 1980. Network Analysis and the Logic of Social Support. In R. H. Price & P. E. Polister (Eds.), Evaluation and Action in the Social Environment. New York: Academis Press.
Roy, S. 2021. Restructuring Institutional Care: Challenges and Coping Measures for Children and Caregivers in Post-COVID-19 Era. Institutionalised Children Explorations and Beyond, 8(1), 65–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/2349300320973825
Siti Balqis Mohd Azam, Siti Hajar Abu Bakar, Jal Zabdi Mohd Yusoff, & Siti Hajar Abdul Rauf. 2021. A case study on academic and vocational training for child offenders undergoing a multisystemic therapy-based rehabilitation order in malaysia. Children and Youth Services Review, 122.
Siti Hajar Abdul Rauf. 2015. Dari teori ke indikator ukuran: Kajian penilaian pembentukan jaringan perkhidmatan kebajikan kanak-kanak. The Malaysia Journal of Social Administration, 9(1): 113-129.
Siti Nurkhairina Mohd Nor, Mohammad Rahim Kamaluddin, & Wan Shahrazad Wan Sulaiman. 2019. Profl jenayah banduan wanita di malaysia: Satu kajian kualitatif. Akademika, 89(2), 43-56.
Sparrowe, R. T., Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., & Kraimer, M. L. 2017. Social networks and the performance of individuals and groups. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 316-325.
Streeter, C. L., & Gillespie, D. F. 1992. Social Network Analysis. Journal of Social Service Research, 16(1/2): 201-222.
Tharshini, N. K., Fauziah Ibrahim, Mohd Suhaimi Mohamad, & Zakaria, E. 2020. Hubungan di antara konsep kendiri dan kesedaran komuniti dengan sokongan sosial bagi pesalah muda di Malaysia. Akademika, 90(3), 39-49.
Tichy, N. M., & Fombrun, C. 1979. Network Analysis in Organizational Settings. Human Relations, 32: 923-965.
Tietjen, A. M. 1989. The Ecology of Children’s Social Support Networks. In D. Belle (ed.), Children’s Social Networks and Social Supports. New York: Wiley.
Wellman, B. 1979. The Community Question: The Intimate Networks of East Yorkers. American Journal of Sociology, 84(5): 1201-1231.
Westaby, J. D., Pfaff, D. L., & Redding, N. 2014. Psychology and social networks: A dynamic network theory perspective. American Psychologist, 69(3): 269–284. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036106
Zhao, X., Liu, F., Wang, J., & Li, T. 2017. Evaluating Influential Nodes in Social Networks by Local Centrality with a Coefficient. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 6(2), 35. MDPI AG. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijgi6020035
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
ISSN: 0126-5008
eISSN: 0126-8694