Penilaian Kepuasan Perkhidmatan Pendidikan TVET Berdasarkan Bangsa di Universiti Awam Malaysia (The Assessment of TVET Education Services Satisfaction Base on Race in Malaysia Public University)
Abstract
Permintaan pasaran pekerjaan kini mengehendaki pekerja yang berdaya saing dan berkemahiran.Justeru itu, institusi pendidikan memainkan peranan penting dalam menawarkan perkhidmatan pendidikan yang benar-benar berkualiti untuk melatih sumber modal manusia mengikut keperluan pasaran.Oleh itu, pendekatan kajian kuantitatif dijalankan bertujuan untuk meninjau kualiti perkhidmatan pendidikan yang ditawarkan kepada pelajar bidang TVET di IPTA.Kajian ini menggunakan reka bentuk kajian tinjauan keratan rentas silang dan instrumen soal selidik digunakan sebagai kaedah pengumpulan data.Borang soal selidik terdiri daripada dua bahagian iaitu Bahagian A: Profil responden dan Bahagian B: Kualiti perkhidmatan pendidikan. Kajian rintis dijalankan melibabkan 50 responden yang mempunyai ciri-ciri yang hampir sama dengan populasi kajian. Kebolehpercayaan instrumen, penyelidik merujuk kepada nilai ketekalan dalaman alfa Cronbach kualiti perkhidmatan institusi pengajian pada nilai alfa Cronbach =0.887 dan kualiti perkhidmatan latihan dan amali pada nilai alfa Cronbach = 0.918. Analisis data yang dilibatkan secara deskriptif iaitu min, peratusan dan sisihan piawai.Sementara analisis inferensi pula melibatkan pengujian MANOVA.Hasil dapatan menunjukkan bahawa tahap kepuasan perkhidmatan pendidikan dalam kalangan pelajar TVET di IPTA adalah sederhana.Dapatan juga menunjukkan terdapat perbezaan yang signifikan kualiti perkhidmatan pendidikan berdasarkan demografi bangsa.Hasil dapatan kajian ini jelas membuktikan bahawa wujud perbezaan kepuasan perkhidmatan pendidikan dalam kalangan pelajar TVET di IPTA berdasarkan demografi bangsa yang boleh diteroka secara mendalam melalui pendekatan kualitatif.
Kata kunci: Penilaian perkhidmatan pendidikan tinggi; kepuasan pendidikan; bangsa; universiti awam; TVET
Abstract
Currently, labor market demand now requires a competitive and skilled workforce. Hence, educational institutions play an important role in offering quality education services that are excessive quality to train human capital resources conferring to market requirements. Therefore, a quantitative study approach is intended at assessing the quality of educational services offered to TVET students in IPTAs. This study uses cross sectional survey design and questionnaire instrument used as a data collection method. The questionnaire consists of two parts (Part A: Profile of respondents) and (Part B: Quality of education services). A pilot study was conducted with 50 respondents who have the same characteristics as the population. Reliability of the instrument, the researcher refers to the value of internal consistency of alpha Cronbach of the institution's quality of service at alpha Cronbach = 0.887 and the quality of training and practice services at alpha Cronbach = 0.918. The descriptive data analysis is involved, that is mean, percentage and standard deviation While, inferential analysis, it involves MANOVA testing. The findings show that the level of satisfaction of education services among TVET students in IPTA is moderate. The findings also show that there is a significant difference in the quality of education services based on race demographics.The results of this study clearly demonstrate that there is a difference in satisfaction of educational services among TVET students in IPTA based on the race demographics that can be deeply explored through a qualitative approach.
Keywords: Higher education services assessment; educational satisfaction; race; public university; TVET.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abdullah, F. 2006. The development of HEdPERF: A new measuring instrument of service quality for the higher education sector. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 30(6): 569-581.
Abd Rahim, R. & Abdul Shukor, S. 2008. Kualiti perkhidmatan berdasarkan perspektif pelajar di Institusi Pengajian Tinggi Awam Malaysia.Jurnal Pengurusan Awam.
Ahmad Asrul, I., Azah, M. & Asraf, M. M. 2009. Status kebolehpasaran graduan kejuruteraan elektrik, elektronik dan sistem UKM. Seminar Pendidikan Kejuruteraan dan Alam Bina.
Ali, R. J., Md. Aminul, I. & Ku Halim, K. A. 2011. Service satisfaction: The case of a Higher Learning Institution in Malaysia. International Education Studies 4(1):182 -192.
Alias, B. 1997. Statistik penyelidikan dalam pendidikan dan sains sosial. Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
Alkin, M. C. 1969. Evaluating theory development. Evaluation Comment 2: 2-7.
Aida, K., Khalim, Z., & Maznah, I. 2013. An assessment of the services quality of Palestine higher education. International Education Studies; Vol. 6( 2): 13-23
Becket, N., & Brookes, M. 2008. Quality management practice in higher education - what quality are we actually enhancing. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, Vol.7 (.1): 40-53.
Beeby, C. E. 1978. The Meaning of Evaluation. Wellington: Department of Education.
Chua Y., P. 2009. Statistik Penyelidikan Lanjutan (Buku 5): Ujian Regresi, Analisis Faktor dan Analisis SEM. McGraw-Hill Malaysia Sdn. Bhd.
Chua, Y. P. 2013. Asas Statistik Penyelidikan: Analisis Data Skala Likert (edisi kedua). Diterbitkan oleh; McGraw-Hill Education (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd. Selangor, Malaysia
Cohen, J. W. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd Ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. 2001.Research Methods in Education (5th Ed.) London: Routledge Falmer.
Cronbach, L.J. 1963. Course Improvement through Evaluation. Teacher College Record 64: 672- 683.
Dicker, R., Garcia, M., Kelly, A., Modabber, P., O’Farrell, A., Pond, A., Pond, N. & Mulrooney, H. M .2017. Student perceptions of quality in higher education: effect of year of study, gender and ethnicity. New Directions in the Teaching of Physical Sciences, Vol 12(1) :15-25.
Doll, R.C. 1978. Curriculum Improvement: Decision Making and Process. Boston: Allyn and Bacon Inc.
Fitzpatrick, J.L., Sanders, J.R. & Worthen, B.R. 2004. Program evaluation - alternative approaches and practical guidelines. Ed. ke-3. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Gusni, S. 2019. “Komuniti” sebagai konsep dan metod dalam penyelidikan sains sosial: Tafsiran sosiologikal. Akademika 89(3):53-62.
Gronlund, N.E. 1993. How to make achieve tests and assessment Ed. Fifth. New York: Macmillan Co.
Hair, J., Black, w., babin, b., Anderson, r., & tatham, r. 2006. Multivariate data analysis (6th Ed.). Upper saddle River, N.J: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J. & Anderson, R. E, 2010. Multivariate data analysis (7th Ed.).Prentice Hall, Upper saddle River, New Jersey.
Ishak, Y., Rahmah, I. & Robiah, S. 2008. Graduan dan alam pekerjaan: Kes siswazah UKM. Akademika 72(2) : 3-24.
J. Joseph, C. & Taylor, S. A. 1994. SERVPERF versus SERVQUAL: Reconciling performance-based and perceptions minus expectation measurement of service quality. Journal of Marketing Vol 1: 125-131.
Kamaruzaman, M. 2013. Penilaian program: Tinjauan terhadap konsep dan model-model berkaitan. Institut Aminddin Baki, Genting Highlands.
Kirkpatrick, D.L. 1994. Evaluating training programs - The four levels. Ed. Pertama. San Francisco, CA: Berret-Koehler Publishers, Inc.
Lim, C. H. 2007. Penyelidikan pendidikan: Pendekatan kuantitatif dan kualitatif. Kuala Lumpur: McGraw Hill Education.
Linn, R.L. & Miller, M.D. 2005. Measurement and assessment in teaching. Ed. ke9. New Jersey: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.
Mahapatra, S. S. & Khan, M. S. 2007. A neural network approach for assessing quality in technical education: An empirical study. International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management Decision 2(3): 287-306.
Malaysia Qualification Agency. 2016. Yearly report 2016. Agensi Kelayakan Malaysia, Selangor.
Mohamad Sattar, R., Rose Amah, A. R., & Ahmad Rosli, M. N. 2014. Future employability skills set for manufacturing industries. International Education Studies; Vol. 7 (10): 14-24
Mohamad Sattar, R., Rose Amah, A. R., &Azlin Norhaini, M. 2013. Employability skills indicator as perceived by manufacturing employers. Asian Social Science; Vol. 9 (8) :15-25
Mohd Zuhdi, I., Mohd Nizam, A. R. & Ruhizam. M. Y. 2012. Assessing students’ perceptions of service quality in Technical Educational and Vocational Training (TEVT) institution in Malaysia. Journal Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 56(2): 272- 283.
Mohd Majid, K. 2005. Kaedah Penyelidikan pendidikan. Edisi ke-7. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
Neuman, W., L. 2006.Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Toronto: Pearson.
Nitko, A.J. 2004. Educational assessment of student. Edisi ke-4. New Jersey: Pearson Merril Prentice Hall.
Nooriah, Y., & Zakiah, J. 2017. Development of graduates’ employability: The role of university and challenges. Jurnal Personalia Pelajar 20 (1): 15- 32.
Nurfariha, I. & Muhammad, H. 2015.Kemahiran kebolehpasaran dalam kalangan pelajar university kebangsaan Malaysia.International Conference on Global Education III.
Pallant, J. 2007. SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS third edition. Australia: Allen & Unwin.
Pallant, J. 2016. SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS (6th Ed.). McGraw Hill.
Parasuraman, A., Berry, L. L. & Zeithaml, V., A. 1991.Refinement and reassessment of the SERQUAL scale. Journal of Retailing 67(4): 420-450.
Popham, J.W. 1975. Educational evaluation. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc.
Pusat Pengurusan Akademik (PPA). 2018. Statistik pelajar tahun akhir MTUN. Rangkaian Universiti-Universiti Teknikal Malaysia.
Rallis, S.F. & Rossman, G.B. 2000. Dialogue for learning: evaluator as critical friend. Dlm. Hopson, R. K. (pnyt). How and why language matters in evaluation. New Direction for Evaluation 86: 81-92.
Ramseook Munhurrun, P. Naidoo, P. & Nundlall, P. 2010. A proposed model for measuring service quality in secondary education. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences 2(3): 355-351.
Rong, T. S. 2012. Statistical products and service solution.Ed. Ke-2. Dongbei: Dongbei University & Economics Press.
Safiek, M. 2012. The influence of service quality on satisfaction: A gender comparison. Public Administration Research Vol. 1( 1): 12-20.
Sax, G. 1973. Principles of educational measurement and evaluation. California: Wadsworth Publishing Co. Inc.
Scriven, M.S. 1991. Evaluation thesaurus (Ed. fourth). Newbury Park, California: Sage Publications.
Senthilkumar, N. & Arulraj, A. 2011. SQM-HEI determination of service quality measurement of higher education in India.Journal of Modeling in Management 6 (1): 60-78.
Siti Mistima, M., Zatul Iradah, A. K., Nurasikin, S. & Nurul Naimy, W. 2018. Validating students employability skills using comfirmatory factor analysis among engineering technology students. Journal of Advance Research & Control Systems, Vol. 10 (04-Special Issue), 2018:1607-1613.
Siti Rahayah, A. 2003. Teori, konsep & amalan dalam pengukuran dan penilaian. Bangi: Pusat Pembangunan Akademik UKM.
Suarman. 2014. Gender differences on students’ satisfaction: The role of teaching quality in higher education. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research 21(9):1434-1441.
Suchman, E.A. 1967. Evaluative research. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.
Sheal, P.R. 1990. How to develop and present staff training courses. London: Kogan Page Limited.
Suharmi, I., Nurulhuda, A. M., & Faridah, J. 2019. Kajian undang-undang tadbir urus universiti bagi pembangunan masyarakat Malaysia. Akademika, 89 (2): 93-103.
Tabachnick, B. G. & Fidell, L. S. 2013.Using multivariate statistics. Pearson Education, Boston: Pearson Education.
Teguh, W. 2004. Membaca hasil analisis dengan SPSS.Pelatihan Komputer bersama Fakultas Biologi UKSW 26 – 27 Marc.
Te, T. S., Arnida, A., & Abdullah, M. R. 2019. Pengaruh faktor terpilih terhadap inspirasi kerjaya keusahawanan dalam kalangan pelajar Kolej Komuniti. Akademika 89(3): 41-52.
The World Bank. 2007. Malaysia and the knowledge economy: Building a world-class higher education system, March 2007.
Tyler, R.W. 1950. Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. 2003. Kajian pengesanan graduan UKM 2002. Bangi: Pusat Pembangunan Pelajar, UKM.
Yanti, R., Ismarul, Y. I., & Nur Zakiah, M. S. 2015. Discipline-based employability skills among the students in health-related faculties in UKM, Kuala Lumpur campus. Advance Science Letters Vol. 21: 2409-2412
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
ISSN: 0126-5008
eISSN: 0126-8694