New Academia Learning Innovations in Universiti Malaya (Inovasi Pembelajaran Akademia Baharu di Universiti Malaya)
Abstract
Teaching and learning innovations in higher learning institutions have been radically changed over time to suit the once an agricultural nation to a more industrialised society. This change needs to be taken as the New Millennium Learners are influenced by advanced information and communication technologies. As we aim to achieve a shift towards more active learning through innovations, a variety of approaches are employed as we make use of digital and physical learning spaces. Blended learning that moves away from traditional classroom approaches with a more interactive learning is integrated in the teaching and learning process. The use of space beyond the conventional classroom setting enhances collaboration with peers and teachers from other countries. This paper intends to synthesise the innovative teaching and learning approaches in Universiti Malaya to accommodate the progressive change of the diverse academic community and industry requirements of our graduates. It aims to present an overview of the current academia learning innovations that have been taking place in the university that provide some form of engagement with technology. It also shows how instructors and students are supported by the various initiatives, approaches and collaborative efforts carried out by the university in keeping abreast with technological advancements. Finally several implications for teaching and learning in higher education are also discussed in this paper.
Keywords: higher education; innovation; teaching and learning; blended learning; learning space
Abstract
Inovasi pengajaran dan pembelajaran telah berubah secara radikal mengikut peredaran masa dengan peralihan dari negara pertanian ke arah negara perindustrian. Perubahan ini perlu dibuat kerana Pelajar Alaf Baharu dipengaruhi oleh informasi dan teknologi komunikasi lanjutan. Sejajar dengan hasrat kami untuk mencapai peralihan ke arah pembelajaran yang lebih aktif melalui inovasi, pelbagai pendekatan diambil dengan menggunakan ruang belajar secara digital dan fizikal. Pembelajaran teradun yang melibatkan pembelajaran yang lebih interaktif, berbeza dari pendekatan kelas tradisional, diintegrasikan dalam proses pengajaran dan pembelajaran. Penggunaan ruang di luar persekitaran bilik darjah yang konvensional meningkatkan lagi kolaborasi dengan rakan sebaya dan pengajar dari negara lain. Artikel ini mensintesis pendekatan pengajaran dan pembelajaran yang inovatif di Universiti Malaya bagi disesuaikan dengan perubahan kemajuan masyarakat akademik yang pelbagai dan keperluan industri untuk para graduan. Ia bertujuan untuk memberi satu gambaran berkenaan inovasi pembelajaran akademia semasa yang telah dijalankan di universiti yang menyediakan satu bentuk penglibatan dengan teknologi. Ia juga menunjukkan bagaimana pengajar dan pelajar disokong oleh pelbagai inisiatif, pendekatan dan usaha kolaboratif yang dilaksanakan oleh universiti seiring dengan kemajuan teknologi. Akhir sekali, beberapa implikasi terhadap pengajaran dan pembelajaran di pengajian tinggi turut dibincang dalam artikel ini.
Kata kunci: pengajian tinggi; innovasi; pengajaran dan pembelajaran; pembelajaran teradun; ruang pembelajaran
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Al-Ani, W. T. 2013. Blended learning approach using moodle and student's achievement at Sultan Qaboos University in Oman. Journal of Education and Learning 2(3): 96-110.
Bates, A.W. 2000. Managing Technological Change: Strategies for College and University Leaders. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Betihavas, V., Bridgman, H., Kornhaber, R., & Cross, M. 2016. The evidence for ‘flipping out’: a systematic review of the flipped classroom in nursing education. Nurse education today 38: 15-21.
Blaine, A. M. 2019. Interaction and presence in the virtual classroom: An analysis of the perceptions of students and teachers in online and blended Advanced Placement courses. Computers & Education 132: 31-43.
Chikh, A., & Berkani, L. 2010. Communities of practice of e-learning, an innovative learning space for e-learning actors. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 2(2): 5022-5027.
Dziuban, C., & Moskal, P. 2001. Distributed learning impact evaluation. Research initiative for teaching effectiveness.
Escobar-Rodriguez, T., & Monge-Lozano, P. 2012. The acceptance of Moodle technology by business administration students. Computers & Education 58(4): 1085-1093.
Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. 2004. Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The internet and higher education 7(2): 95-105.
Garrison, D.R. and Kanuka, H., 2004. Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education 7(2): 95-105.
Gilboy, M. B., Heinerichs, S., & Pazzaglia, G. 2015. Enhancing student engagement using the flipped classroom. Journal of nutrition education and behavior 47(1): 109-114.
Graham, C. R. 2013. Emerging practice and research in blended learning. In: Moore, M.J. ed. Handbook of distance education. Routledge. 3: 333-350.
Hilliard, L. P., & Stewart, M. K. 2019. Time well spent: Creating a community of inquiry in blended first-year writing courses. The Internet and Higher Education. 41: 11-24.
Jackson, E. A. 2017. Impact of MOODLE platform on the pedagogy of students and staff: Cross-curricular comparison. Education and Information Technologies 22(1): 177-193.
López-Pérez, M. V., Pérez-López, M. C., & Rodríguez-Ariza, L. 2011. Blended learning in higher education: Students’ perceptions and their relation to outcomes. Computers & education 56(3): 818-826.
Martyn, M. 2003. The hybrid online model: Good practice. Educause Quarterly 26(1): 18-23.
Ministry of Education. 2012. Malaysian Education Blueprint 2013-2025. Putrajaya: Ministry of Education Malaysia.
Ministry of Education Malaysia. 2015. Executive Summary: Malaysia Education Blueprint 2015-2025 (Higher Education). Putrajaya: Ministry of Education Malaysia.
Moskal, P., Dziuban, C. and Hartman, J., 2013. Blended learning: A dangerous idea?. The Internet and Higher Education 18: 15-23.
Mwalumbwe, I., & Mtebe, J. S. 2017. Using learning analytics to predict students’ performance in the moodle learning management system: a case of Mbeya University of Science and Technology. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries 79(1): 1-13.
Naga Subramani &, V. Iyappan. 2018. Innovative methods of teaching and learning. Journal of Applied and Advanced Research 3(Suppl. 1): S20-S22.
Nouri, J. 2016. The flipped classroom: for active, effective and increased learning–especially for low achievers. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 13(1): 33.
Nunan, T., George, R., & McCausland, H. 2000. Rethinking the ways in which teaching and learning are supported: The Flexible Learning Centre at the University of South Australia. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 22(1): 85-98.
Porter, W.W., Graham, C.R., Spring, K.A. and Welch, K.R., 2014. Blended learning in higher education: Institutional adoption and implementation. Computers & Education 75: 185-195.
Robiah Sidin. 2000. Kualiti Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Universiti Tempatan. Akademika 57: 25-40.
Sánchez, R. A., & Hueros, A. D. 2010. Motivational factors that influence the acceptance of Moodle using TAM. Computers in Human Behavior 26(6): 1632-1640.
So, H. J., & Brush, T. A. 2008. Student perceptions of collaborative learning, social presence and satisfaction in a blended learning environment: Relationships and critical factors. Computers & education 51(1): 318-336.
Tam, M. 2000. Constructivism, instructional design, and technology: Implications for transforming distance learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society 3(2): 50-60.
Twigg, C. A. 2003. Improving learning and reducing costs: Lessons learned from round I of the PEW grant program in course redesign. Troy, New York: Centre for Academic Transformation, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.
Yeou, M. 2016. An investigation of students’ acceptance of Moodle in a blended learning setting using technology acceptance model. Journal of Educational Technology Systems 44(3): 300-318.
Vaughan, N. 2007. Perspectives on blended learning in higher education. International Journal on E-learning 6(1): 81-94.
Zamzami Zainuddin & Mohammad Attaran. 2016. Malaysian students’ perceptions of flipped classroom: a case study, Innovations in Education and Teaching International 53(6): 660-670.
Zamzami Zainuddin, Zhang, Y., Li, X., Chu, S.K.W., Idris, S. and Keumala, C.M., 2019. Research trends in flipped classroom empirical evidence from 2017 to 2018. Interactive Technology and Smart Education 16(3): 255-277.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
ISSN: 0126-5008
eISSN: 0126-8694