Pengaruh Kecerdasan Pelbagai terhadap Pencapaian Akademik Pelajar bagi Subjek Pengajian Perniagaan di Larut Matang dan Selama, Perak. (Influence of Multiple Intelligences Toward Students’ Academic Performance for the Subject Business Studies in Larut Matang & Selama, Perak.)
Abstract
Teori kecerdasan pelbagai dibangunkan oleh Gardner memperlihatkan setiap manusia mempunyai kecerdasan pelbagai. Teori ini telah mengakui setiap individu mempunyai kekuatan yang perlu dicungkil agar berjaya dalam kehidupan. Maka kajian ini dijalankan adalah untuk menentukan pengaruh kecerdasan pelbagai terhadap pencapaian akademik bagi subjek Pengajian Perniagaan di Larut, Matang dan Selama (LMS), Perak. Kajian ini melibatkan 291 orang responden yang terdiri daripada lapan buah sekolah menengah di bahagian LMS yang menawarkan subjek Pengajian Perniagaan kepada pelajar tingkatan enam. Kajian ini menggunakan persampelan secara rawak. Instrumen yang digunakan adalah berasaskan Multiple Intelligences Test yang dibangunkan oleh Gardner yang mempunyai lapan domain kecerdasan pelbagai. Antaranya domain kecerdasan verbal linguistik, kecerdasan logik matematik, kecerdasan visual ruang, kecerdasan kinestetik, kecerdasan muzik, kecerdasan interpersonal, kecerdasan intrapersonal dan kecerdasan naturalis. Data dianalisis dengan menggunakan ujian regresi pelbagai. Hasil dapatan kajian menunjukkan terdapat empat domain kecerdasan pelbagai yang mempunyai pengaruh terhadap pencapaian akademik iaitu domain kecerdasan verbal linguistik, kecerdasan logik matematik, kecerdasan visual ruang dan kecerdasan interpersonal. Hasil kajian juga turut menunjukkan terdapat empat domain kecerdasan pelbagai yang tidak signifikan terhadap pencapaian akademik subjek pengajian Perniagaan iaitu kecerdasan kinestetik, kecerdasan muzik, kecerdasan intrapersonal dan kecerdasan naturalis. Secara keseluruhannya, hasil kajian juga menunjukkan kecerdasan pelbagai memberi impak positif dalam kalangan pelajar dari segi mengenal pasti kekuatan diri sendiri, memperkembangkan potensi diri, berfikir secara kritis serta membina modal insan yang unggul seterusnya mendorong pencapaian akademik yang cemerlang.Kesimpulannya, kecerdasan pelbagai memberi implikasi membimbing guru mempraktikkan pengajaran pelbagai dalam pelbagai kaedah agar mencungkil potensi pelajar dalam pencapaian akademik subjek Pengajian Perniagaan.
Kata kunci: Kecerdasan pelbagai; pencapaian akademik; domain verbal linguistik; domain interpersonal; domain visual ruang
Abstract
The Multiple Intelligences which was developed by Gardner showed that every human being has multiple intelligences. This showed that each individual has his and her own strength to succeed in life. Therefore, this study was aimed to determine the influences of multiple intelligences towards the achievements of Business Studies in Larut, Matang and Selama (LMS), Perak. The survey involved 291 respondents randomly selected from eight secondary schools, which offer Business Studies for form six students in LMS. The instruments used for this study were based on Multiple Intelligences Test by Gardner with eight domains of multiple intelligences namely verbal linguistic intelligence, logic mathematical intelligence, spatial intelligence, kinaesthetic intelligence, musical intelligence, interpersonal intelligence, intrapersonal intelligence and naturalistic intelligence. The data gathered were analysed by using regression test. Findings from the study revealed that four domains of multiple intelligences significantly influenced student’s achievements in Business Studies namely verbal linguistic intelligence, mathematical logic intelligence, interpersonal intelligence and spatial intelligence. The findings also showed that the other four domains of multiple intelligences were not significant in influencing the achievements of students in Business Studies, namely kinaesthetic intelligence, musical intelligence, intrapersonal intelligence and naturalistic intelligence. Overall, the findings conveyed that multiple intelligences have a positive impact among students in terms of behaviour, motivation and provided students the opportunity to identify their own strength, develop their own potentials, think creatively and critically and enable students to be valuable and excel in their academic achievements. In conclusion, multiple intelligences assist teachers to apply multiple intelligences in various ways to develop students potentials and to enhance academic achievements in Business Studies.
Keywords: Multiple Intelligences; academic achievement; domain verbal linguistic; domain interpersonal; domain visual spatial.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Armstrong, T. 1994. Multiple Intelligences In The Classroom. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Armstrong. T. 2009. Multiple Intelligences In The Classroom. 3rd ed. Alexandria VA. ASCD.
Bartlett, A., Higgins., & Kotrlik. 2001. Organizational Research: Determining appropriate Sample Size in survey Research information Technology, Learning and performance Journal. Vol.19, No1, P 43-50.
Berman, M. 1998. A Multiple Intelligence: Road to an ELT classroom. Wales: Crownhouse Publishing Limited.
Bhasah Abu Bakar. 2007. Kaedah Analisis Data Penyelidikan Ilmiah. Utusan Publications & Distributors Sdn Bhd. Kuala Lumpur.
Campbell, L.,Campbell, B. & Dickinson, D. 1996. Teaching and Learning Through Multiple Intelligences. London: Allyn & Bacon.
Carl A. Grant & Christine E. Sleeter. 2007. Doing Multicultural Education for Achievement and Equity. Routledge. London.
Carla F. Wilson. 2013. Relationship between Mathematics Anxiety and multipleIntelligences Among Rural and Suburban Sixth Grade Students. Dissertaion. Doctor Of Philosophy. Northcentral University
Chua Yan Piaw. 2012. Asas Statistik Penyelidikan Buku 1: Selangor: Mc Graw Hill Education.
Chua Yan Piaw. 2012. Statistik Penyelidikan Lanjutan Ujian Regresi, Analisis Faktor Dan Analisis Sem, Buku 5: Selangor: Mc Graw Hill Education.
Cohen. J. 1992. Quantitative Methods in psychology A Power Primer Psychological. Bullletin. 112(1) 155-159.
Conti. H. 2014. Multiple Intelligences. Research Starters. Academic Topic Overview. Ebscoresearch starters.1
Davis Katie, Christidoulou J. & Seider S. 2011. The Theory of Multiple Intelligences & Gardner. Research Gate. http:// www. Research gat. Net/publication/31788610.
Coakes, S.J., Steed, L. & Dzidic, P. 2007. SPSS Version 16.0 for Windows: Analysis Without Anguish. Australia: John Wiley and Sons Australia Ltd.
Dunn, R. 2000. Learning Styles: Theory, Research,and practice. In National Forum of Applied Educational Research Journal 13(1), 3-22. Retreived from ProQuest Education Journal Database.
Eid & Alizh, N. 2004. Applying the multiple intelligence theory in teacher training programs. Teacher’s college Record, 95(4), 554-559.
Field A.. 2009. Discovering Statistic Using SPSS London: SAGE.
Field. A. & Miles J. 2010. Discovering Statistic Using SPSS. London SAGE.
Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. 1996. How To Design and Evaluate Research In Education. (3rd ed.) New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc
Fuzirah Hashim, Ahmad Aminuddin Soopar & Bahiyah Abdul Hamid. 2017. Linguistic Features of Malaysian Students’ Online Communicative Language in an Academic Setting: The Case of Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Jurnal Akademika 87(1), April 2017: 231-242.
Gardner, H.E. 1983. Frames of Mind. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Gardner, H. E.1999. Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21st century. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Gardner. H. 2000. Project Zero: Nelson Goodman’s Legacy in Arts Education. Journal of Aesthetics and Criticism. 58(3), 245-249.
Gardner, H. E. 2006. Multiple Intelligences: New Horizons in Theory and Pratice. New York, NY Basic Books. Pendidikan Malaysia.
Hank, P. 2009. The Impact of Copora on Dictionaries in P. Baker (Ed) Contemporary Corpus Linguistics (pp 214-236), New York: Continuum Intertional Publishing Group.
Hair Joseph, J., F.,William. Black, Barry J. Babin, Rolph E. Anderson. 2010. Multivatiate Data analysis. London: Prentice Hall. 568-581.
Ikhsan Othman. 2010 Aplikasi Teori Kecerdasan Pelbagai Dalam Pelaksanaan Kurikulum. Asia Pacific Journal of Educatiors and Education. Vol 25,21-32, 2010.
Jaccard James., Becker., Michael A. 1990. Statistic For Behavioral Science. CENGAGE Learning Custom Publishing.
Jasmine, J. 1996. Teaching with Multiple Intelligence. Westmintster: Teacher Created Materials.
Joan Hanafin. 2014. Multiple Intelligences Theory, Action Research, and Teacher Profesional Delopment: The Irish MI Project. Australian Journal of Teacher Education. Vol (30) Issue 4. Art. 8.
Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. 2012. Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2015. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Krejcie, R. V. & Morgan. D.W. 1970. Determining Size for Research Activities. Educational & Psychological Measurement 30:607.610
Lazear, D. 1991. Seven Ways of Teaching. The Artistry of Teaching with Multiple Intelligences. Palatin, lL: skylight Publishing.
Lembaga Peperiksaan Malaysia. 2013. Pentaksiran Kemahiran Berfikir Aras Tinggi. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. 168.
Mahathir Bin Mohamad. 2020. Majlis Pelancaran Dekad Membaca Kebangsaan di Universiti Kebangsaan. Tahun 2020-2030. http://www.Penerangan.gov.my. capaian 13 Februari 2020
Mahathir Bin Mohamad. 2020. Mahathir perkuatkan fizikal untuk seranggan balas. Minda Rakyat. https://mindarakyat.blogspot.com. Capaian 7 March 2020.
Mahathir Bin Mohamad. 2018. Anak Muda Mesti Peka Isu Negara. Teruskan pembelajaran Sepanjang Hayat. Sinar Harian, 8 Oktober: BM
Mahathir Bin Mohamad. 2011. A Doctor in The House: The Memoirs of Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad. Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
Marmolejo, F. 2017. Celik Industri 4.0. Utusan Online. http://www.utusanonline.com/my/rencanautama/celikindustri4.0-1524994.
Mohd. Majid Koding. 2009. Kaedah Penyelidikan Pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: DBP.
Nurhafizah Zaidi, Roslinda Rosli & Mohamed Yusoff bin Mohd Nor. 2015. Aplikasi PetaPemikiran I- think dalam Proses Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Matematik.
Nolen, J. L. 2003. Multiple Intelligences in the classroom. Educational Leadership. 124(1), 115-119.
Noor Baizura Bahrum & Mohd Ali Samsudin 2015. Pembelajaran Topik dunia Melalui Deria Kita Menerusi Pendekatan Kecerdasan Pelbagai. Jurnal Pemikir Pendidikan. 6:67-80.
Razali Md Amin. 2019. Pembangunan Model Pengajaran Gamelan Melayu Peringkat Sekolah Menengah Rendah di Malaysia. Jurnal Akademika 89(1), April 2019: 191-1205.
Sekaran. 2009. Research Method of Business. A Skill Building Approach (3nd Edition). New York.
Shearer, C. B.2004. Using a multiple intelligences assessment to promote teacher development and student achievement. Teachers College ecord, 106(1), 147-162.
Siti Rahayah Ariffin, Roseni Ariffin dan Hafsa Mohamed Makki.2008. Faktor Kontribusi Kecerdasan Pelbagai dalam Kalangan Pelajar. Jurnal Pendidikan 33(2008) 35-46.
Siti Rahayah Arrifin, Roseni Ariffin, Arbaiyah Md Zin & Nik Nurolhuda Nik Mohamed 2011. Faktor Kecerdasan Pelbagai dalam pembentukan Profil Remaja. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction. 8: 183-204
Silver, H., Strong, R., & Perini, M. 1997. Integrating learning styles and multiple intelligences Educational Leadership, 55(1), 22-27.
Sukatan Pelajaran Pengajian Perniagaan. 2012. Majlis Peperiksaan Malaysia.
Syner, Rebecca Finley. 2000. The Relationship Between Learning Styles/Multiple Intelligences and Academic Achievement Of High School students. High School Journal. Vol 83, Issue 2, p11.10p.
Pallant Julie. 2016. SPSS Survival Manual. A Step by Step Guide to Data Analysis Using IBM SPSS. Allen & Unwin. London.
Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum 2001. Aplikasi Teori kcerdasan Pelbagai Dalam pengajaran dan Pembelajaran. Kuala Lumpur: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Rubado, K. 2002. Empowering students through multiple intelligences. Reclaiming Children and Youth, 10(4), 233-235.
Schirduan Victoria 2001. Elementary Students with Attention Deficit Hyperativity Disorder (ADHD) in Schools Using Multiple Intellegences Theory: Intelligences, Self-concepts and Achievement. Tesis Doktor Pendidikan Universiti Hartford.
Thurstone, L., L. 1938. Primary Mental abilities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Wan Mohd Zaifurin Wan Nawang & Ibrahim Mamat. 2019. Faktor-Faktor Penentu Kecenderungan keusahawanan dalam Kalangan Pelajar Sekolah Menengah. Jurnal Akademika 89(2) Julai 2019:3-15
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
ISSN: 0126-5008
eISSN: 0126-8694