Perbankan Berasaskan Pengetahuan: Membudayakan Amalan Pengurusan Pengetahuan (Knowledge-based Banking: Fostering A Knowledge-based Management Culture)
Abstract
Knowledge Management is a relatively new practice in the banking sector. It is the after effect of the financial liberalization of domestic banks depicting the claims that the operation of bank organizations revolves around knowledge. This study analyses the practice of knowledge management from the perspectives of Procurement and Empowerment of knowledge, Training and Mentorship, and Communication and Incentives in the domestic banking sector. Based on the results of a questionnaire survey administered on the human resources management of 10 local commercial banks in Malaysia, four aspects of procurement and empowerment of knowledge, six aspects of training and mentorship, three aspects of communication and two aspects of incentives were analyzed to see the differences. The results proved the hypothesed existence of knowledge management practices in all the four aspects analysed. Firstly, the main items for knowledge management practices in the aspect of procurement and empowerment of knowledge showed that bank organizations procured and used knowledge from industrial associations, competitors, customers and suppliers. Secondly, the aspect of training and mentorship obtained its main items for knowledge management practices by encouraging workers to continue their education through reimbursement of fees for work-related courses. Thirdly, in the aspect of communication, the preparation of written documents such as procurement of benefits, training manuals, positive work practices, and printed articles (organizational knowledge) served as the primary practice for knowledge management. Finally, in the aspect of incentives, knowledge infused financial and non-financial incentives were practiced consistently. In conclusion, bank organizations should accept and practise knowledge management as a new best practice.
Keywords: management, knowledge-based-management banking, management best practice
ABSTRAK
Pengurusan Pengetahuan merupakan satu praktis yang relatifnya baru dalam sektor perbankan. Kesan penggabungan organisasi perbankan domestik dan liberalisasi kewangan menuntut supaya operasi organisasi perbankan berpaksikan kepada pengetahuan. Kajian ini bertujuan mengenal pasti amalan pengurusan pengetahuan dalam aspek Perolehan dan Penguasaan Pengetahuan, Latihan dan Mentor, Komunikasi dan Insentif dalam sektor perbankan domestik. Kaedah tinjauan yang menggunakan teknik soal selidik untuk pengumpulan data digunakan. Bancian dilakukan terhadap Pengurus Sumber Manusia di 10 buah bank perdagangan tempatan di Malaysia. Empat aspek perolehan dan penguasaan pengetahuan, enam aspek latihan dan mentor, tiga aspek komunikasi dan dua aspek insentif dianalisis untuk melihat perbezaannya. Hipotesis membuktikan kewujudan amalan pengurusan pengetahuan dalam keempat-empat aspek tersebut. Item utama amalan pengurusan pengetahuan dalam aspek perolehan dan penguasaan pengetahuan memperlihatkan organisasi perbankan memperoleh dan menggunakan pengetahuan daripada persatuan industri, pesaing, pelanggan dan pembekal. Aspek latihan dan mentor pula mendapati item utama amalan pengurusan pengetahuan ialah menggalakkan pekerja melanjutkan pendidikan dengan membayar balik yuran bagi kursus yang berkaitan dengan kerja. Manakala, dalam aspek komunikasi, penyediaan dokumen bertulis seperti perolehan faedah, manual latihan, amalan kerja positif, artikel penerbitan (organisasi berpengetahuan) merupakan amalan utama pengurusan pengetahuan. Dalam aspek insentif, insentif kewangan dan bukan kewangan diamal secara konsisten. Kajian ini memotivasikan organisasi perbankan untuk menerima pengurusan pengetahuan sebagai suatu amalan baru yang harus diterapkan.
Kata kunci: pengurusan, pengurusan-berasaskan pengetahuan, perbankan, amalan baik pengurusan
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alavi, M. 1999. Knowledge management and knowledge management systems. http://www.rhsmith.umd.edu/is/malavi/icis-97-KMS Accessed 15 October 1999.
Almashari, M., Zairi, M. & Alathari, A. 2002. An empirical study of the impact of knowledge management on organizational performance. The Journal of Computer Information Systems 42(5): 74-82.
Babbie, E.R. 1998. The Basic of Social Research. Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing.
Bank Negara Malaysia. 2001. Laporan Tahunan 2001. Kuala Lumpur: Percetakan Kum Sdn. Bhd.
Barnes, S. 2002. Knowledge Management Systems: Theory and Practice. London: Thomson Learning.
Berman, S.L., Down, J. & Hill, C.W.L. 2002. Tacit knowledge as a source of competitive advantage in the National Basketball Association. Academy of Management Journal 45(1): 13-31.
Birkinshaw, J., Nobel, R. & Ridderstrale, J. 2002. Knowledge as a contingency variable: do the characteristics of knowledge predict organization structure? Organization Science 13(3): 274-289.
Brown, J.S. 2000. Balancing act: how to capture knowledge without killing it. Harvard Business Review Mei-Jun: 73-80.
Burstein, F., Zyngier, S. & Rateb, Z. 2002. Knowledge management in the financial services: understandings and trends in Australia. Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Knowledge Management, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland, MCIL, pp. 113-125.
Carlile, P.R. 2002. A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: boundary objects in new producr development. Organization Science 13(4): 442-455.
Churchman, C.W. 1971. The Design of Inquiring System: Basic Concepts of Systems and Organisation. New york: Bencis Books.
Coff, R. 2003. Bidding wars over R&D-intensive firms: knowledge, opportunism, and the market for corporate control. Academy of Management Journal 46(1): 74-85.
Cross, R. 2001. Financial institutions fail to realize the benefits of knowledge management. Financial Technology Bulletin 19(3).
Danish KM Project. 2002. OECD Survey of knowledge management. http://www.systematic.dk
Davenport, T.H. & Glaser, J. 2002. Just-in-time delivery comes to knowledge management. Harvard Business Review 80(7): 107-111.
Davenport, T.H. & Prusak, L. 1998. Working Knowledge, How Organization Manage What They Know. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press.
Drucker, P. & Ruggles, R. 1998. The state of the notion: knowledge management in practice. California Management Review 40(3): 81-89.
Dvorak, R. 1996. A knowledge management framework. Production 110(1): 18-20.
Earl, L. 2001. Are we managing our knowledge? http://www.statcan.ca/cgi-bin/downpub/research.cgi?subject=193.
Edler, J. 2002. OECD survey on knowledge management. http://www.fisr.org/KMOECD/survey.
Edler, J. & Earl, L. (2001). KM practices OECD. (http://www. statcan.ca) [Accessed 2 October 2002].
Fanelli, A. & Hargadon, A. 2002. Action and possibility: reconciling dual perspectives of knowledge in organizations. Organization Science 13(3): 290-302.
Gray, P.H. 2002. Knowledge sourcing effectivenss. http://80- wwwlib.umi.com.eserv.uum.edu.my/dissertations/fullcit/ NQ73300.
Hafizi, M.A. & Nor Hayati, A. 2004. The integration of knowledge management in the operations of Malaysian banks. The Symposium Proceeding of International Symposium 2004 on Human Resources Strategies for Sustainable Competitiveness, Mandarin Oriental Hotel Majapahit, Surabaya, Indonesia, Volume II, pp. 1-13.
Hafizi, M.A. & Zawiyah, M.Y. 2004. Knowledge management in Malaysian banks: a study of causes and effects. Information Development 20(3): 161-168.
Huey, M.N. 1994. Personal ontologies. IEEE Internet Computing September-Oktober: 85-87.
King, W.R. 2000. Playing on integral role in knowledge management. Information Systems Management 17(4): 59-60.
Kwok, R.C.W., Ma, J. & Vogel, D.R. 2002. Effects of group support systems and content facilitation on knowledge acquisition. Journal of Management Information Systems 19(3): 185-229.
Maglitta, J. 1996. Know-how. Inc. Computerworld 30(3): 73-75.
Mohmad Yazam, S. 2004. Knowledge of knowledge management among Islamic bankers in Malaysia: some preliminary findings. The Symposium Proceeding of International Symposium 2004 on Human Resources Strategies for Sustainable Competitiveness, Mandarin Oriental Hotel Majapahit, Surabaya, Indonesia, Volume II, pp. 1-13.
Nonaka, I. 1994. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organizational Science: 14-17.
O’Dell, C., Grayson, C.J. & Essaides, N. 1998. If Only We Knew What We Know; the Transfer of Internal Knowledge and Best Practice. New york: The Free Press.
Ormerod, P. & Aitken, G. 2004. Helping a skilled workforce thrive at RBS: measuring engagement through the human capital model. Knowledge Management Review 7(4).
Polanyi, M. 1983. The Tacit Dimension. MA: Doubleday & Company Inc.
Postrel, S. 2002. Islands of shared knowledge: specialization and mutual understanding in problem-solving teams. Organization Science 13(3): 303-320.
Ribiere, V. 2001. Assessing knowledge management initiatives’ success as a function of organizational culture. http://www. km.gwu.edu.
Rivkin, J.W. 2001. Reproducing knowledge: replication without imitation at moderate complexity. Organization Science 12(3): 274-293.
Sekaran, U. (2000). Research Methods for Business – A Skill Building Approach. New york: John Wiley and Sons.
Sharp, D. 2003. Knowledge management today: challenges and opportunities. Information Systems Management 20(2): 32-37.
Shane, S. 2002. Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organization Science 11(4): 448-469.
Snyder, C. & Templeton, G. 1997. Toward a method of providing database structures derived from an ontological specification process: the example of knowledge management. Proceedings KI’ 97: 1-11.
Sun, P. 1996. Soal strategi dan dasar. http://www.lib.usm.my/ press/SSU/DZUL/soal.html.
Takeishi, A. 2002. Knowledge partitioning in the interfirm division of labor: the case of automotive product development. Organization Science 13(3): 321-338.
Tapscott, D. & McQueen, R. 1995. The Digital Economy: Competing in the Networked Economy. New york: Addison Wesley.
Tiwana, A. 2002. The Knowledge Management Toolkit: Orchestrating IT, Strategy and Knowledge Platforms. NJ: Prentice Hall.
Vance, D.M. 1997. Information, knowledge and wisdom: the epistemic hierarchy and computer-based information systems. Proceedings of the 1997 America’s Conference on Information Systems: 1-5.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
ISSN: 0126-5008
eISSN: 0126-8694