Closing the Gap: The Need for Military Prosecution Appeal Right to Ensure Exclusive Accessibility to Justice

Haslida Isamail

Abstract


With its unique characteristics and sui juris nature, the military justice system is designed specifically for the armed forces and operates independently from the civilian criminal justice system. The same applies in Malaysia, where the system also differs from the ordinary criminal justice system in several aspects, including the availability of appeals. While the Public Prosecutor and the accused in the civilian criminal justice system have the right to appeal against a court‘s decision, the right to appeal for the prosecution in a court-martial is absent. This study aims to examine the implication of the absence of the military prosecution appeal right in Malaysia, exploring its impact on fairness and effectiveness in relation to Sustainable Development Goal 16 (SDG Goal 16). The absence of the prosecution‘s right to appeal hinders their ability to seek justice in the military justice system and goes against SDG Goal 16, which promotes peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, provides access to justice for all, and builds effective, accountable, and inclusive institutions at all levels. This study argues for the need to introduce a robust military prosecution appeal right in Malaysia‘s military justice system that would help promote peace, justice, and strong institutions. By addressing this gap, Malaysia can enhance the fairness and effectiveness of its military justice system, contributing to the broader objectives of sustainable development and justice for all.

Full Text:

PDF

References


References

Alagan, S. 2018. The Criminal Procedure Code: A Commentary With Appellate Practice & Procedure. Second Edition Ed.Malaysia: Sweet & Maxwell.

Aziz, S. A. 2019. Book Review, Military Legal Proceedings In Malaysia Lexis Nexis ( Hardcover ); Teo Say Eng & Colonel Wan Normazlan ( 2009 ). Malayan Law Journal

Backer, H. S. B. A. 2014. Janab's Key to Criminal Procedure. 3rd Edition Ed.Kuala Lumpur: Janab (M) Sdn. Bhd.

Dahl, R. C. & Whelan, J. F. 1960. The Military Law Dictionary. New York: Oceana Publications, Inc.

Dalton, H. L. 1985. Taking Right to Appeal (More or Less) Seriously. The Yale Law Journal Company 95(1): 69.

Eng, T. S. & Jaafar, C. W. N. B. C. 2009. Military Legal Proceedings in Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Lexis Nexis.

Fidell, E. R. 2016. In (ed.). Military Justice: A Very Short Introduction, p.55. Oxford University Press.

Fmt Reporters. 2022. Mahkamah putus perintah tahanan askar tidak sah, pangkat dikembalikan. Freemalaysiatoday, 7 September 2022

Fmt Reporters. 2023. ‘Askar dipecat enggan vaksin gagal peroleh semakan kehakiman’. Free Malaysia Today, 12 January 2023

Garner, B. A. 2004. Black's Law Dictionary, USA Thomson West Publishing Co. : 105.

Hart, C. 1998. Doing a Literature Review Releasing the Research Imagination. Second Ed.London: Sage Publication Ltd.

Jerry Kronenberg. 1958-1959. ‘Right of a State to Appeal in Criminal Cases’. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 49(5): 473.

Louise, J. 1999. Appeal by the Prosecution and the Right of the Accused to Be Protected against Double Jeopardy: A Comparative Perspective. The Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa 32(1): 5.

Major John B. Adams. 1975. The Need For A Prosecution Right To Appeal. The Judge Advocate General's School,, United States Army, United States.

Marshall, P. D. 2011. A Comparative Analysis of the Right To Appeal. Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law 1(46): 1.

Merriam-Webster, I. 2003. Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary. U.S.A, Merriam-Webster, Incorporated, .

Mindia Vashakmadze. 2018. Understanding Military Justice: A Practice Note.Geneva,

Nadzri, N. R. M. & Hassan, K. H. 2019. Model Perkembangan Undang-Undang Buruh Australia: Panduan untuk Malaysia. Akademika Journal of Southeast Asia Social Sciences and Humanities 89(Special Issue 2): 63.

Nobles, R. & Schiff, D. 2022. The Right to Appeal and Workable Systems of Justice. The Modern Law Review 65(5): 676.

Omar, L. K. S. I. B. S. 1996. Comparative Study in The Criminal Practice and Procedure of Military Law and Civil Law in Malaysia. Diploma Research PaperMalaya University, Kuala Lumpur.

Omar, L. K. S. I. B. S. 1997. Military Law: Jurisprudence and Jurisdiction Malayan Law Journal Articles 2: 9.

Pope, A. 1713 [1712]. An Essay on Criticism. London: Printed for W. Lewis.

Rahman, S. A., Khalid, R. M. & Jaafar, A. B. 2019. Kajian Keberkesanan Undang-undang Faraid di Malaysia. Akademika Journal of Southeast Asia Social Sciences and Humanities 89(Special Issue 2): 78.

Randawar, D. K. & Jayabalan, S. 2018. The Definition of Domestic Violence in Malaysia: A Cross-National Comparison. Akademika Journal of Southeast Asia Social Sciences and Humanities 88(3): 78.

Rashid, A. M., Awal, N. a. M., Shariff, A. a. M., Hamid, N. a. A. & Zainudin, T. N. a. T. 2019. Menangani Masalah Kelahiran Anak Tak Sah Taraf di Malaysia: Peranan Perundangan Jenayah Syariah dalam Masyarakat. Akademika Journal of Southeast Asia Social Sciences and Humanities 89(Special Issue 2): 9.

Saman, M. M. & Dahari, J. R. 2021. Bail and The Principle of Generalibus Specialia Derogant In The Malaysian Military Justice System. Zulfaqar Journal of Defence Management, Social Science & Humanities 4(1): 69.

Shapiro, M. 1980. Islam and Appeal. California Law Review 68(2): 350.

Shariff, A. a. M. & Rahman, M. A. 2018. Prinsip Syariah Berkaitan Prosedur Siasatan dan Pendakwaan: Khazanah Ilmu Yang Memangkin Perkembangan Perundangan Dalam Masyarakat. Akademika Journal of Southeast Asia Social Sciences and Humanities 88(3): 132.

Shavell, S. 1995. The Appeals Process as a Means of Error Correction. The Journal of Legal Studies 24(2): 379-426.

Stefania Negri. 2007. ‘Equality of Arms-Guiding Light or Empty Shell?.’ International Criminal Justice:A Critical Analysis of Institutions And Procedures (13): p. 13.

Suppiah, P. 1984. Malaysia Military Law. Kuala Lumpur: Malaysian Law Publisher.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN: 0126-5008

eISSN: 0126-8694