Introducing Self-Regulated Performance Evaluation Model (SRPEM) for a Comprehensive and Effective Evaluation of Academic Performance

NOOR LIZA ADNAN, ROKIAH MUDA, WAN NOOR HAZLINA WAN JUSOH, ROHANA YUSOFF

Abstract


Academics responsibilities have multiplied in recent years as exhibited in yearly Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) outlined by higher educational institutions’ performance evaluation system. Performance evaluation at universities is claimed to cause unnecessary stress due to various factors. The criteria and metrics set in the evaluation do not accurately capture the complexities of academic responsibilities, leading to pressure and anxiety as academics try to meet the targets that may not align with their styles and interests. Therefore, this study aims to propose the Self-Regulated Performance Evaluation Model (SRPEM), designed to assess employees' performance fairly without causing undue stress, particularly for academics in HEIs. This qualitative research involved face-to-face semi-structured interviews conducted online via the Google Meet application with 16 academics selected based on purposive sampling from different institutions who are involved directly with the evaluation process, a state Deputy Mufti, a Registrar and Deputy Registrar. The interviews gathered insights on the current performance evaluation systems, suggestions for improvement, and opinions on fair evaluation practices. Based on the collected input, the SRPEM was
developed, consisting of three key components: the performance evaluation process, the evaluators, and the measures. Unlike previous studies that heavily rely on quantitative measures, this model takes into account humanistic and spiritual aspects by integrating theories such as self-determination theory. The SRPEM aims to create a comprehensive and effective performance evaluation system that aligns with the needs and values of academics. Although the proposed model may seem idealistic, it was created by modifying the current evaluation system based on input from interviewees and suggestions from theories. As such, it is advisable to do an experimental investigation in future research to confirm its significance.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alberto Bayo-Moriones, Jose E. Galdon-Sanchez & Sara Martinez-de-Morentin. 2020. Performance Appraisal: Dimensions and Determinants,The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 31(15): 1984-2015.

Awadallah, E. A., & Allam, A. 2015. A critique of the balanced scorecard as a performance measurement tool. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 6(7): 91-99.

Che Omar, I., Md Yunus, A., Azman, N., & Mohd Zain, A. 2014. Academic Promotion in Malaysian Public Universities: Amidst Changing Priorities and Multiple Reward Systems. Paper presented at the Education Research Institutes Network in the Asia Pacific (ERI-Net) Expert Meeting, Hangzhou, China.

Chen, W. S., Haniff, J., Siau, C. S., Seet, W., Loh, S. F., & Abd, M. H. 2014. Burnout in academics: an empirical study in private universities in Malaysia. The International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Invention, 1(2), 62-72.

Cugueró-Escofet, N. and Rosanas, J. M., 2017. The ethics of metrics: Overcoming the dysfunctional effects of performance measurements through justice. Journal of Business Ethics, 140: 615-631.

de Jonge, J., & Peeters, M. C. 2019. The vital worker: towards sustainable performance at work. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute.

DeNisi, A. S., & Murphy, K. 2017. Performance appraisal and performance management: 100 years of progress? Journal of Applied Psychology, 102: 421–433.

Eisy Humaira Abdul Azziz, Zeratul Izzah Mohd Yusoh & Azah Kamilah Muda. 2020. Performance Measurement Model for Malaysia Higher Education Institutions using Knowledge-based System Approach. International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT)(Editor’s Issues): 22-29.

Ernst, K., Michael, P., Heiko, S., Claus, D., & Wolfgang, A. 2011. Humanistic Management in Practice. Retrieved from http://www.alexandria.unisg.ch/Publikationen/71204.

Franco-Santos, M., & Doherty, N. 2017. Performance management and well-being: A close look at the changing nature of the UK higher education workplace. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(16): 2319-2350.

Franco-Santos, M., Lucianetti, L., & Bourne, M. 2012. Contemporary performance measurement systems: A review of their consequences and a framework for research. Management Accounting Research, 23(2): 79-119.

Gagne, M. N., & Deci, E. L. 2005. Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26: 331–362. doi:10.1002/job.322

Galinsky, E., Bond, J. T., Kim, S. S., Backon, L., Brownfield, E., & Sakai, K. 2005. Overwork in America: When the way we work becomes too much. New York: Families and Work Institute.

Ghasemy, M., Hussin, S., Megat Daud, M. A. K., Md Nor, M., Ghavifekr, S., & Kenayathulla, H. B. 2018. Issues in Malaysian Higher Education: A Quantitative Representation of the Top Five Priorities, Values, Challenges, and Solutions From the Viewpoints of Academic Leaders. (January-March): 1–15.

Grote, R. C., & Grote, D. 2002. The performance appraisal question and answer book: A survival guide for managers. New York: Broadway.

Jamali Janib, Roziah Mohd Rasdi, Zoharah Omar, Siti Noormi Alias, Zeinab Zaremohzzabieh & Seyedali Ahrari. 2021. The relationship between workload and performance of Research University academics in Malaysia: The mediating effects of career commitment and job satisfaction. Asian Journal of University Education (AJUE), 17(2): 85-99.

Kallio, K. M., & Kallio, T. J. 2012. Management-by-result and performance measurement in universities - implications for work motivation. Studies in Higher Education, 39: 574-589.

Kallio, K. M., Kallio, T. J., Tienari, T., & Hyvonen, T. 2016. Ethos at stake: Performance management and academic work in universities. Human Relations, 69(3): 685-709.

Kallio, K.M., & Kallio, T.J. 2014. Management-by-results and performance measurement in universities – implications for work motivation. Studies in Higher Education, 39(4): 574-589.

Karakas, F. 2010. Spirituality and performance in organizations: A literature review. Journal of Business Ethics, 94: 89-106.

Khan, B., Farooq, A., & Hussain, Z. 2010. Human resource management: an Islamic perspective. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 2(1): 17-34.

Kim, T., & Holzer, M. 2016. Public employees and performance appraisal: A study of antecedents to employees’ perception of the process. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 36: 31-56. doi:10.1177/0734371X14549673

Kumar, J., Prince, N., & Baker, H. K. 2022. Balanced Scorecard: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Issues. FIIB Business Review, 11(2): 147- 161.https://doi.org/10.1177/23197145211049625

Manganelli, L., Thibault-Landry, A., Forest, J., & Carpentier, J. 2018. Self-Determination Theory Can Help You Generate Performance and Well-Being in the Workplace: A Review of the Literature. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 20(2): 227–240. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422318757210

Melé, D. 2016. Understanding Humanistic Management. Humanist Management Journal, 1: 33–55. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s41463-016-0011-5

Mohd Ismail Ramli & Roziah Mohd Janor. 2006. Hadhari Scorecard: An Islamic perspective Balanced Scorecard. Paper presented at the International Conference VII Accounting, Commerce and Finance: The Islamic Perspective, Kingdom of Bahrain.

Mohd Suhaimi Mohamad & Nasrudin Subhi. 2020. Relationship between Psychological Stress and Mental Health among Young Lecturers. Akademika, 93(3): 213-224.

Moreno-Guerrero, A. J., Rodríguez-Jiménez, C., Gómez-García, G., & Ramos Navas-Parejo, M. 2020. Educational innovation in higher education: Use of role playing and educational video in future teachers’ training. Sustainability, 12(6): 2558.

Noman, M. 18 Nov 2021. Universities must acknowledge excessive workload problem. NST Online. Retrieved from https://www.nst.com.my/opinion/columnists/2021/11/746290/universities-must-acknowledge-excessive-workload-problem

Noor Liza Adnan, Rokiah Muda, Wan Noor Hazlina Wan Jusoh & Rohana Yusoff. 2021a. Is the vitality of Malaysian academics at stake? Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 14(4): 1536-1553.

Noor Liza Adnan, Wan Noor Hazlina Wan Jusoh, Rokiah Muda & Rohana Yusoff. 2021b. A Proposed Islamic Performance Management Model (IPMM): Towards More Productive Employees with Better Quality of Work Life. Advances in Business Research International Journal, 7(2): 145 – 160.

Nur Zainie Abd Hamid. 2020. Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) of Lecturers in Public Universities, Malaysia. FBM INSIGHTS, 2, 53-54.

Phin, L. W. 2014. The Effectiveness of Performance Appraisal in the Private Education Industry in Malaysia. International Journal of Business and Information, 10(1): 95-124.

Poon, J. M. L. L. 2004. Effects of Performance Appraisal Politics on Job Satisfaction and Turnover Intention. Personnel Review, 33: 322-334.

Selvarajan, T. T., Singh, B., & Solansky, S. 2018. Performance appraisal fairness, leader member exchange and motivation to improve performance: A study of US and Mexican employees. Journal of Business Research, 85: 142–154.

Sharul Effendy Janudin & Ruhanita Maelah. 2016. Performance measurement system in Malaysian public research universities: is it contemporary? International. Journal of Management Education, 10(3): 219–233.

Suciu, L. E., Mortan, M., & Lazar, L. 2013. Vroom's expectancy theory. An empirical study: Civil servant's performance appraisal influencing expectancy. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 9(39): 180-200.

Tweedie, D., Wild, D., Rhodes, C., & Martinov‐Bennie, N. 2019. How Does Performance Management Affect Workers? Beyond Human Resource Management and Its Critique. International Journal of Management Reviews, 21(1) 76-96. doi:10.1111/ijmr.12177

Zainudin Awang Junaidah Hanim Ahmad & Nazmi Mohamed Zin. 2010. Modelling job satisfaction and work commitment among lecturers: A case of UiTM Kelantan. Journal of Statistical Modeling and Analytics, 1(2): 45-59.

Zuriekat, M., Salameh, R., & Alrawashdeh, S. 2011. Participation in performance measurement systems and level of satisfaction. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(8): 159 – 169.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN: 0126-5008

eISSN: 0126-8694