LIFE IN LIMBO: WHY DO ROHINGYA REFUGEES REMAINS RESIDE IN MALAYSIA?
Abstract
We do not deny that residing in Malaysia presents formidable challenges, particularly for Rohingya refugees, due to the increasingly prevalent xenophobic attitudes towards them. Consequently, the question arises: "Despite the numerous hardships they must face, why do they remain to reside in Malaysia?" The theoretical aim of our study is to elucidate that despite the challenges, refugees still have the capacity to lead meaningful lives. Based on interviews with seven Rohingya refugees, our findings suggest that factors including the peaceful region, family members and friends, acts of kindness and generosity, and support from organizations, especially UNHCR and NGOs, motivate refugees to remain in Malaysia. These indicators stem from Malaysia's status as a peaceful region, which facilitates the emergence of these factors in refugees' lives. In summary, refugee life is not as dire as previously portrayed in much of the literature; they still possess what we refer to as "spaces," as this group is capable of leading lives that include informal employment, education, and receiving aid and support, whether from state or non-state actors. These spaces serve as a crucial function in justifying why Rohingya refugees choose to remain in Malaysia.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Agamben, G. 1998. Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Alhojailan, I. M. 2012. Thematic analysis: a critical review of its process and evaluation. West East Journal of Social Sciences 1(1): 39-47.
Altrichter, H., Posch, P., & Somekh, B. 2013. Teachers Investigate Their Work:An Introduction To the Methods of Action Research (Investigating Schooling). New York: Routledge.
Angrosino, M. 2007. Doing Ethnographic and Observational Research. London: Sage.
Mustafa, A. B., Ahmad, L. A., Aziz, J. & Wahab, A. A. 2023. Komunikasi Antarabudaya Pelarian Rohingya di Malaysia: Peranan Pekerjaan dan Pendidikan dalam Akulturasi dan Integrasi. Jurnal Komunikasi 39(2): 194-209. doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2023-3902-11
Basu, R., & Asci, P. 2020. Intermediary Cities of Refuge: From Istanbul to Kolkata. In: Thakur, R., Dutt, A., Thakur, S., Pomeroy, G. (eds) Urban and Regional Planning and Development. Springer, Cham. doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31776-8_30
Caldeira, T. P. 2015. Social movements, cultural production, and protests: São Paulo's shifting political landscape. Current Anthropology 56(S11): S126–S136. doi.org/10.1086/681927
Darling, J. 2016. Privatizing asylum: Neoliberalisation, depoliticization and the governance of forced migration. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 41(3): 230-243.
Darling, J. 2021. Refugee urbanism: seeing asylum 'like a city.' Urban Geography 42(7): 894-914. doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2020.1763611.
Dell, C. A. 2022. Refugee life, refugee space: Ankara as a bottom-up alternative. Migration Journal 61: 210–221. doi.org/10.1111/imig.13032
Dunn, E. C., and Cons, J. 2014. Aleatory sovereignty and the rule of sensitive spaces. Antipode 46(1): 92-109.
Durodola, T. S. 2023. Where is home without legal status? understanding the choice to stay among post-cessation Liberians in Nigeria." Refugee Survey Quarterly 42(4): 429-52. doi.org/10.1093/rsq/hdad019
Eriksen, T. H. 2020. Filling the Apps. The Smartphone, Time and the Refugee. In Waiting and the Temporalities of Irregular Migration. Edited by M. Jacobsen, C., Karlsen, A.M & Khosravi, S. London: Routledge, pp. 57–72.
Haque, M. M., Othman, Z., & Bin Mat, B. 2023. Rohingya refugees and their right to work in Malaysia. Asian Affairs: An American Review 50(2), 95–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/00927678.2023.2197582
Institute for Economic & Peace. 2020. Global Peace Index 2023. https://reliefweb.int/report/world/global-peace-index- 2023. Accessed on 31 May 2021.
Kilibarda, P. 2017. Obligations of transit countries under refugee law: a Western Balkans case study. International Review of the Red Cross 99(1): 211-239.
Lancion, M. 2023. For a Liberatory Politics of Home. Duke University Press.
Larkin, B. 2013. The politics and poetics of infrastructure. Annual Review of Anthropology 42(1): 327-343. doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-092412-155522
Lombard, M. 2014. Constructing ordinary places: place-making in urban informal settlements in Mexico. Progress in Planning 94:1–53. doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2013.05.003
Lyytinen, E. 2015. Congolese refugees' 'right to the city' and urban (in)security in Kampala, Uganda. Journal of Eastern African Studies 9(4): 593-611. doi:10.1080/17531055.2015.1116142
Maguire, M. & Delahunt, B. 2017. Doing a thematic analysis: a practical, step-by-step guide for learning and teaching scholars. Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education 8(3): 3351-33514.
Mahaseth, H., & Banusekar, S. 2022. Living in the Shadows: Rohingya Refugees in Malaysia. Asian Journal of International Law 12: 259-266. doi:10.1017/S2044251322000091
Miller, B. G. 2003. Invisible indigenes: The politics of nonrecognition. University of Nebraska.
Muzafarkamal, N. S., & Hossain, I. 2019. Malaysia's Policy towards the Rohingya refugees (Polisi Malaysia terhadap pelarian Rohingya). Journal of Islam in Asia 16(3): 436–453. doi.org/10.31436/jia.v16i3.848
Nazri, A. S. 2022. Ruang kemanusiaan NGO dalam persekitaran aman di Malaysia. Akademika 92(3): 101–115. doi.org/10.17576/akad-2022-9203-08
Nazri, A. S. & Zainuddin, E. 2023. Refugees’ Presence in Malaysia: Unravelling its Pull Factors. Journal of Ethnic and Diversity Studies 1(2):1-16.
Omata, N. 2014. The end of refugee life? Peace Review 26(3): 394–401. doi.org/10.1080/10402659.2014.937999
Oomen, B. 2020. Cities of Refuge – Rights, Culture and the Creation of Cosmopolitan Citizenship. In Buikema, R., Buyse, A. & Robben, A. C. G. M. (eds) Cultures, Citizenship and Human Rights. Abingdon/New York: Routledge, pp. 121–136.
Pineteh, E. A. 2017. Moments of suffering, pain and resilience: Somali refugees' memories of home and journeys to Exile. Cogent Social Sciences 3(1): 1372848-. doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2017.1372848
Rahman, M. M., & Dutta, M. J. 2023. The United Nations (UN) card, identity, and negotiations of health among Rohingya Refugees. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 20(3385): 1-13. doi.org/10.3390/ijerph201809415
Wehrhahn, R. & Hathat, Z. E. 2022. Refugee migration to Europe – current challenges and potentials for cities and regions. Comparative Population Studies 47: 513-532.
doi.org/10.12765/CPoS-2022-19
Rajan, N. 2023. Creating refugeescapes: Afghan refugee women's strategies of surviving and thriving in Delhi. Gender, Place & Culture 30(3): 374–394. doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2022.2069686
Putri, K. A. A. R. & Gabiella, D. 2022. The organizational pattern of Rohingya refugee community in Malaysia: structural opportunities, constraints, and intra- community dynamics. Refugee Survey Quarterly 41(4): 673–699.
Sahak, S., Nordin, R. & Ishak, K. M. 2020. The plight of refugees in Malaysia: Malaysia as a transit country in protecting refugees’ rights. Journal of Nusantara Studies 5(1): 378-394.
Sampson, R. & M. Gifford, S. 2010. Place-making, settlement and well-being: The therapeutic landscapes of recently arrived youth with refugee backgrounds. Health & Place 16(1): 116-131. doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2009.09.004
Silver, J., & McFarlane, C. 2019. Social infrastructure, citizenship and life on the margins in popular neighbourhoods: Practices and identities of citizens and the state. In C. Lemanski (Ed.), Citizenship and infrastructure (pp. 22–42). Routledge.
Simone, A. 2015. Relational infrastructures in postcolonial urban worlds. In S. Graham, & C. McFarlane (Eds.), Infrastructural lives: Urban infrastructure in context (pp. 17–38). Routledge.
Simone, A. 2010. The social infrastructures of city life in contemporary Africa. Discussion paper 51. Nordiska Afrika institute.
Simone, A. 2014. Jakarta: Drawing the City Near. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Simone, A. 2021. Ritornello: "People as infrastructure." Urban Geography 42 (9):1341– 48. doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2021.1894397
Sunam, R. 2023. When bare life is bearable: the life projects of Rohingya and Hazara refugees living in Malaysia. International Migration Review 57(1): 449-74. doi.org/10.1177/01979183221106174
Togoo R.R. & Ismail F.H.B.M. 2021. Security dilemma of Rohingya refugees in Malaysia. Open Journal of Political Science11: 12-20. doi: 10.4236/ojps.2021.111002
Tsavdaroglou, C. 2020. The Refugees' Right to the Center of the City and Spatial Justice: Gentrification vs Commoning Practices in Tarlabaşı-Istanbul. Urban Planning 5(3): 230–240. doi.org/10.17645/up.v5i3.3098
Liempt, V. I. & Staring, R. 2021. Homemaking and places of restoration: belonging within and beyond places assigned to Syrian refugees in the Netherlands. Geographical Review 111 (2): 308-326. doi:10.1080/00167428.2020.1827935
Wahab, A. A. & Khairi, A. 2020. Right to justice and legal aid barriers to the vulnerable non-citizens in Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Society and Space 16(1): 13-23.
Widdowson, M. 2011. Case study research methodology. International Journal of Transactional Analysis Research 2(1): 25-34.
Wilson, H, F. 2017. On geography and encounter: Bodies, borders, and difference. Progress in Human Geography 41(4): 451–471.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
ISSN: 0126-5008
eISSN: 0126-8694