Lexical Innovation Processes of Youth Netspeak on Malay Twitter Posts
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2023-2301-03Keywords:
social media, Twitter, neologisms, non-standard words, MalayAbstract
The formation of neologisms in Malay has not been extensively studied and therefore has yet to be fully understood. The current study examined the lexical innovation processes in Twitter posts in Malay. A 25,679-word corpus was compiled from 2,000 tweets of 200 Malaysian Twitter users in their twenties. The textual analysis performed through AntConc software identified “ni” (this) and “nk” (want) as the top two neologisms, and these words constituted 45.8% of the corpus. Most of the neologisms are formed through clipping (65%) and pseudo-elliptical construction (26%), while blending (7%) and elongation (2%) are minor word formation processes. The clipping affects vowels (28%) more than consonants (9%), whether it is deletion, replacement, or addition. The pseudo-elliptical constructions involve letters of the alphabet and phonological adjustments to vowels and consonants. On vowel changes, the results show that there is a simplification of diphthongs to monophthongs, and a movement towards vowels in the middle position [e] or [o]. As for consonant changes, there is a shift in the place of articulation towards bilabial consonants [p], [m], and [w] and words containing [h] and [r] are likely to be dropped or replaced. The changes in the spelling are a result of changes in the spoken discourse. The findings suggest that exploring the phonological rules can explain pseudo-elliptical constructions, leading to a better framework on morphology and phonology to understand formation of neologisms in social media discourse.References
Anthony, L. (2005). AntConc: Design and development of a freeware corpus analysis toolkit for the technical writing classroom. Proceedings of Professional Communication Conference, pp. 729-737. 10.1109/IPCC.2005.1494244.
Ariffin, S. N. A. N., & Tiun, S. (2018). Part-of-speech tagger for Malay social media texts. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 18(4), 124-142
Athirah, R. R., Soon, L. K., & Haw, S. C. (2019). Exploring edit distance for normalising out-of-vocabulary Malay words on social media. In R. Černý, J. Kočí & V. Kočí (Eds.), MATEC Web of Conferences
(pp. 1-7). Les Ulis, France: EDP Sciences.
Barseghyan, L. (2013). On some aspects of Internet slang. Graduate School of Foreign Languages N, Yerevan State University, Yerevan, 14, 19-31. Retrieved December 20, 2020, from
http://ysu.am/files/Liana%20BARSEGHYAN.pdf
Baldwin, T., & Li, Y. (2015). An in-depth analysis of the effect of text normalization in social media. Proceedings of the 2015 conference of the North American chapter of the association for
computational linguistics: human language technologies (pp. 420-429).
Bauer, L. (2006). Compounds and minor word‐formation types. In B. Aarts & A. McMahon (Eds.), The handbook of English linguistics (pp. 463-482). Blackwell Publishing.
Chekima, K., & Alfred, R. (2017). Sentiment analysis of Malay social media text. In R. Alfred, H. Iida, A. A. A. Ibrahim, & Y. Lim (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on
Computational Science and Technology (pp. 205-219). Singapore: Springer.
Craig, D. (2003). Instant messaging: The language of youth literacy. The Boothe Prize Essays 1, 116-133. Retrieved December 20, 2020, from https://nl.ijs.si/janes/wp-
content/uploads/2014/09/craig03.pdf
Gligorić, K., Anderson, A., & West, R. (2018). How constraints affect content: The case of Twitter’s switch from 140 to 280 characters. Retrieved December 20, 2020, from
https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.02318
Gulnazir, N., & Salehuddin, K. (2022). Investigating lexical variation and change in Malaysian Twitter: A conceptual paper. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 22(4), 90-107.
Harared, N. (2018). Slang created and used in 1CAK. COM Site: A sociolinguistics study. Humaniora, 9(2), 119-127.
Hong, L., Convertino, G., & Chi, E. H. (2011). Language matters in Twitter: A large scale study. In L. A. Adamic, R. A. Baeza-Yates, & S. Counts (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference
on Weblogs and Social Media. Catalonia, Spain: The AAAI Press.
Izazi, Z. Z., & Tengku-Sepora, T. M. (2020). Slangs on social media: Variations among Malay language users on Twitter. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 28(1), 46-58.
Jaidka, K., Zhou, A., & Lelkes, Y. (2019). Brevity is the soul of Twitter: The constraint affordance and political discussion. Journal of Communication, 69(4), 345-372.
Kamus Dewan (4th ed.). 2007. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
Kilim Nam, J. A., & Jung, H. Y. (2022). The emergence and spread of Korean COVID-19 neologisms in news articles and user comments and their lexicographic. Lexicography of Coronavirus-related
Neologisms, 163, 43-72.
Kiparsky, P. (1983). Word-formation and the lexicon. In F. J. Ingemann (Ed.), Mid-America Linguistics Conference Papers (pp. 3-29). Dept. of Linguistics, University of Kansas.
Klymenko, O. (2019). Twitterverse: The birth of new words. Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America, 4(11), 1-12.
Ljubotenska, D. (2018). The influence of instant messages on English word formation and changes in the dynamics of the communication process. Knowledge International Journal, 26(3), 785-788.
Lutfiyana, F. (2020). Students’ accuracy in pronouncing English palate alveolar sounds: A case study of students of English Department, Universitas Negeri Semarangin the Academic year of 2019/2020.
Final Year Project report, Universitas Negeri Semarangin.
Mustafa, S. Z. B., Kandasamy, M., & Yasin, M. S. M. (2015). An analysis of word formation process in everyday communication on Facebook. International Journal of Education and Research, 3(6), 261-
Mutiah, S. D., Hidayat, D. N., & Alek, A. (2021). Exploring the word formation process on Rich Brian’s official music video comments. EduLite: Journal of English Education, Literature and Culture, 6(1),
-212.
Mworia, R. (2015). Use of English neologisms on social media: A case of Twitter language in Kenya. Nairobi: University of Nairobi.
Nevihayati, M. (2018). English slang word formation processes on twitter. Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Negeri Malang.
Ningsih, W. W. (2020). Word formation analysis of slang language used in comments of Rich Brian’s Youtube channel. Final year project report, State Institute for Islamic Studies, Salatiga, Indonesia.
Nisa, R. F. (2016). Word formation process of non-standard vocabulary in Twitter statuses of Indonesian dangdut singers. Final Year Project Report, Diponegoro University.
Nkhata, L., & Jimaima, H. (2020). Neologisms: A morphological analysis of social media discourses on the Zambian online media. Multidisciplinary Journal of Language and Social Sciences Education, 4,
-93.
Omar, S. N., Najib, A. F. M., & Zaihan, Z. A. M. (2016). New-word formation processes in Twitter: A study among Malaysian youth. Retrieved January 10, 2021, from
https://www.academia.edu/35623710/NEW-WORD_FORMATION_PROCESSES_IN_TWITTER_A_STUDY_AMONG_MALAYSIAN_YOUTH.docx
Paputungan, A. U. (2015). Analysis of word formation process in Twitter. Skripsi, 1. Retrieved January 10, 2021, from https://repository.ung.ac.id/skripsi/show/321411087/analysis-of-word-formation-
process-in-twitter.html
Parkins, R. (2012). Gender and emotional expressiveness: An analysis of prosodic features in emotional expression. Pragmatics and Intercultural Communication, 5(1), 46–54.
Pesetsky, D. (1979). Russian morphology and lexical theory. MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Pesetsky, D. (1985). Morphology and logical form. Linguistic Inquiry, 16(2), 193-246.
Renner, V. (2019). French and English lexical blends in contrast. Languages in Contrast, 19(1), 27-47.
Renner, V. (2020). An ecosystem view of English word-formation. The Mental Lexicon, 15(1), 4-20.
Rusli, N. F. M., Jobar, N. A., & Adam, N. F. M. (2022). Kesalahan ejaan murid berdasarkan bunyi konsonan dalam ujaran guru: Analisis Fonologi Generatif. Issues in Language Studies, 11(2), 37-60.
Saloot, A. M., Idris, N., Aw, A. A., & Thorleuchter, D. (2014). Twitter corpus creation: The case of a Malay Chat-style-text Corpus (MCC). Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 31(2), 227-243.
Scholarly Community Encyclopedia. (2022). LOL. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/28581
Statista. (2021). Twitter’s user base in Malaysia amounts to approximately 5.51 million users. Retrieved July 31, 2021, from https://www.statista.com/forecasts/1145758/twitter-users-in-malaysia
Sukma, D. (2014). Analysis of word formation in Short Message Service (SMS) text sent by the second semester students at Pasir Pengaraian University. Edu Research, 3(1), 43-52.
Suparta, I. W., Qomariana, Y., & Rahayuni, N. K. S. (2016). Word formation on Twitter posts. Jurnal Humanis,18(2), 6-23.
Tchokni, S., Seaghdha, D., & Quercia, D. (2014). Emoticons and phrases: Status symbols in social media. Eighth international AAAI conference on weblogs and social media. Palo Alto, CA.
Thelwall, M. (2021). This! Identifying new sentiment slang through orthographic pleonasm online: Yasss slay gorg queen ilysm. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 36(4), 114-120.
Thorpe, S. (2002). Vowel-consonant patterns (Part 1). Word Ways, 35(4), 249-254.
Twitter. (2020). Retrieved December 20, 2020, from https://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/monthly-active-user-mau.asp
Wu, L., Morstatter, F., & Liu, H. (2018). SlangSD: Building, expanding and using a sentiment dictionary of slang words for short-text sentiment classification. Language Resources and Evaluation, 52(3),
-852.
Yang, J. S., Ko, M. S., & Chung, K. S. (2019). Social emotional opinion decision with newly coined words and emoticon polarity of social networks services. Future Internet, 11(8), 165-171.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
If the article is accepted for publication, copyright of this article will be vested to UKM Press, National University of Malaysia (UKM).
All articles published in this journal are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license, unless otherwise stated.
