Acceptable or Plagiarized? Thai University Students’  Evaluations of Academic Texts

Parinda Jantori; Daron Benjamin Loo

Acceptable or Plagiarized? Thai University Students’ Evaluations of Academic Texts

Parinda Jantori, Daron Benjamin Loo

Abstract

University students are expected to develop an awareness of correct and ethical approaches to writing. This awareness includes the ability to determine the suitability of academic texts that are written based on references made to other sources. This study aims to examine Thai university students’ evaluation of the acceptability of academic texts that were paraphrased. Recent research from the region had indicated that university students had an incomplete understanding of acceptable academic writing. To further examine this phenomenon, this current study employs a mixed-methods approach where students had to rate the acceptability of three paraphrased versions of a text and provide their views on what constituted acceptable paraphrase through a survey. The survey was distributed to university students enrolled in an undergraduate-level academic writing course. A total of 104 students completed the survey by providing their ratings of acceptability. Among these, 89 students provided qualitative responses to share their views on what acceptable paraphrase is. The quantitative results indicated that many students were able to identify texts that were paraphrased completely; nonetheless, the qualitative responses revealed that students’ perceptions towards paraphrased revolved around form, that is, the substitution of words and reorganization of text. This reaffirmed existing studies from the Thai context, but it also provided new insights about how students viewed academic writing.

Keywords

Academic integrity; plagiarism; academic writing; student perspectives; English as a foreign language

Full Text:

PDF

References

Aziz, Z. A., & Silfiani, F. M. (2020). Plagiarism among junior lecturers in Indonesia: How and why? Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 8(3), 86-94. https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2020.8310

Bai, B., & Wang, J. (2023). Conceptualizing self-regulated reading-to-write in ESL/EFL writing and investigating its relationships to motivation and writing competence. Language Teaching Research, 27(5), 1193-1216. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820971740

Bowen, N. E. J. A., & Nanni, A. (2021). Piracy, playing the system, or poor policies? Perspectives on plagiarism in Thailand. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 51, Article 100992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2021.100992

Charubusp, S. (2015). Plagiarism in the perception of Thai students and teachers. Asian EFL Journal Professional Teaching Articles, 87, 61-81.

Dalal, N. (2015). Responding to plagiarism using reflective means. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-015-0002-6

Davis, M., & Morley, J. (2015). Phrasal intertextuality: The responses of academics from different disciplines to students’ re-use of phrases. Journal of Second Language Writing, 28, 20-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2015.02.004

Du, Y. (2020). Evaluation of intervention on Chinese graduate students’ understanding of textual plagiarism and skills at source referencing. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(1), 14-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1601680

Elliott, S., Hendry, H., Ayres, C., Blackman, K., Browning, F., Colebrook, D., ... & White, P. (2019). ‘On the outside I’m smiling but inside I’m crying’: Communication successes and challenges for undergraduate academic writing. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 43(9), 1163-1180.

https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2018.1455077

Erguvan, I. D. (2021). The rise of contract cheating during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study through the eyes of academics in Kuwait. Language Testing in Asia, 11(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-021-00149-y

Festas, I., Seixas, A., & Matos, A. (2022). Plagiarism as an academic literacy issue: the comprehension, writing and consulting strategies of Portuguese university students. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-022-00119-8

Gallant, T. B. (2017). Academic integrity as a teaching & learning issue: From theory to practice. Theory Into Practice, 56(2), 88-94. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2017.1308173

Golzar, J., Noor, S., & Tajik, O. (2022). Convenience sampling. International Journal of Education & Language Studies, 1(2), 72-77. https://doi.org/10.22034/ijels.2022.162981

Hill, G., Mason, J., & Dunn, A. (2021). Contract cheating: An increasing challenge for global academic community arising from COVID-19. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 16, Article 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-021-00166-8

Hosseini, M., Rasmussen, L. M., & Resnik, D. B. (2023). Using AI to write scholarly publications. Accountability in Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2023.2168535

Hussein, N., Rusdi, S. D., Rahman, N. A. A., & Mohamad, S. S. (2021). Self-perceived plagiarism from the perspective of non-business students of public university in Malaysia. Asian Journal of Research in Education and Social Sciences, 3(2), 163-170.

https://myjms.mohe.gov.my/index.php/ajress/article/view/14089

İrina, R., & Ali, I. (2018). Eliciting ELT students’ understanding of plagiarism in academic writing. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 193-211. https://doi.org/10.32601/ejal.464115

Keck, C. (2006). The use of paraphrase in summary writing: A comparison of L1 and L2 writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(4), 261-278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2006.09.006

Keck, C. (2014). Copying, paraphrasing, and academic writing development: A re-examination of L1 and L2 summarization practices. Journal of Second Language Writing, 25, 4-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2014.05.005

Khathayut, P., & Walker-Gleaves, C. (2021). Academic faculty conceptualisation and understanding of plagiarism–a Thai university exploratory study. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 45(4), 558-572. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2020.1795093

Khathayut, P., Walker-Gleaves, C., & Humble, S. (2020). Using the theory of planned behaviour to understand Thai students’ conceptions of plagiarism within their undergraduate programmes in higher education. Studies in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1750584

Kitjaroonchai, N., Kitjaroonchai, T., & Sanitchai, P. (2022). The effects of process genre-based writing and process writing approaches on Asian EFL pre-university students' writing performance. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 13(4), 860-871. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1304.19

Li, Y., Chen, H., Liu, X., & Wang, S. (2025). Content specialists’ anti-plagiarism pedagogical interventions: A thematic review. Journal of Academic Ethics, 23, 1299–1319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-024-09589-6

Liu, M., & Wu, Y. (2020). Chinese undergraduate EFL learners’ perceptions of plagiarism and use of citations in course papers. Cogent Education, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1855769

Liu, S., & Lin, D. (2022). Developing and validating an analytic rating scale for a paraphrase task. Assessing Writing, 53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2022.100646

Loo, D. B., & Imperial, R. A. (2022). Are We Dialogical or Sociomaterial in Our Written Corrective Feedback? A Reflection by Two Academic Writing Instructors. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 16(2), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2022.160202

Nagi, K., & John, V. K. (2020). Plagiarism among Thai students: A study of attitudes and subjective norms. Proceedings of the 2020 Sixth International Conference on e-Learning, 45-50. https://doi.org/10.1109/econf51404.2020.9385427

Negretti, R. (2012). Metacognition in student academic writing: A longitudinal study of metacognitive awareness and its relation to task perception, self-regulation, and evaluation of performance. Written Communication, 29(2), 142-179. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088312438529Merkel, W.

(2020). A case study of undergraduate L2 writers’ concerns with source-based writing and plagiarism. TESOL Journal, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.503

Negretti, R., & McGrath, L. (2018). Scaffolding genre knowledge and metacognition: Insights from an L2 doctoral research writing course. Journal of Second Language Writing, 40, 12-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.12.002

Nontasee, W., & Sukying, A. (2023). Multiple aspects of word knowledge in Thai EFL students: The hierarchical acquisition and relationships. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies, 23(1), 17-39. http://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2023-2301-02

Palmer, A., Pegrum, M., & Oakley, G. (2019). A wake-up call? Issues with plagiarism in transnational higher education. Ethics & Behavior, 29(1), 23-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2018.1466301

Patak, A. A., Wirawan, H., Abduh, A., Hidayat, R., Iskandar, I., & Dirawan, G. D. (2021). Teaching English as a foreign language in Indonesia: University lecturers’ views on plagiarism. Journal of Academic Ethics, 19(4), 571-587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-020-09385-y

Peungcharoenkun, T., & Waluyo, B. (2023). Implementing process-genre approach, feedback, and technology in L2 writing in higher education. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 8(34). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-023-00211-7

Purser, E., Dreyfus, S., & Jones, P. (2020). Big ideas & sharp focus: Researching and developing students’ academic writing across the disciplines. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.100807

Riazi, A. M., & Candlin, C. N. (2014). Mixed-methods research in language teaching and learning: Opportunities, issues and challenges. Language Teaching, 47(2), 135-173. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444813000505

Rustan, E., & Thaha, H. (2023). Decreased plagiarism behaviour in academic writing by using reflective writing. International Journal of Society, Culture & Language, 11(3), 23–40. https://doi.org/10.22034/ijscl.2023.2002642.3037

Samaranayake, S. W., Thienpermpool, P., & Kositchaivat, S. (2025). Investigating an adapted process genre writing model and its implications for undergraduate Thai students. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 10(1), 73-90.

https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1467925.pdf

Santelmann, L. M., Stevens, D. D., & Martin, S. B. (2018). Fostering master’'s students’' metacognition and self-regulation practices for research writing. College Teaching, 66(3), 111-123. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2018.1446898

Sefcik, L., Striepe, M., & Yorke, J. (2020). Mapping the landscape of academic integrity education programs: what approaches are effective? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(1), 30-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1604942

Shen, Y., & Hu, G. (2021). Chinese graduate students’ perceptions of plagiarism: A mixed-methods study. Accountability in Research, 28(4), 197-225. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2020.1819253

Soto, C., Gutiérrez de Blume, A. P., Jacovina, M., McNamara, D., Benson, N., & Riffo, B. (2019). Reading comprehension and metacognition: The importance of inferential skills. Cogent Education, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1565067

Stander, M. (2020). Strategies to help university students avoid plagiarism: A focus on translation as an intervention strategy. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 44(2), 156-169. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2018.1526260

Sukying, A. (2025). The role of vocabulary knowledge in L2 speaking and writing abilities of Thai EFL undergraduates. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies, 25(3), 755-776. http://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2025-2503-10

Suzina, A. C. (2021). English as lingua franca. Or the sterilisation of scientific work. Media, Culture & Society, 43(1), 171-179. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443720957906

Teng, M. F., & Yue, M. (2022). Metacognitive writing strategies, critical thinking skills, and academic writing performance: A structural equation modeling approach. Metacognition and Learning, 18(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-022-09328-5

Thangthong, P., Phiromsombut, J., & Imsa-ard, P. (2024). Navigating AI writing assistance tools: Unveiling the insights of Thai EFL learners. Thai TESOL Journal, 37(1), 111-131. https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/thaitesoljournal/article/view/270168

Thienthong, A. (2018). Inferential reasoning as a means of avoiding plagiarism in paraphrasing. PASAA: Journal of Language Teaching and Learning in Thailand, 56, 9-32. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1224445.pdf

Thomas, D. (2017). Factors that explain academic dishonesty among university students in Thailand. Ethics & Behavior, 27(2), 140-154. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2015.1131160

Thomas, D. (2020). Academic dishonesty, religious fundamentalism among students at a religious university. International Forum Journal, 23(1), 126-138.

Wette, R. (2014). Teachers’ practices in EAP writing instruction: Use of models and modeling. System, 42, 60-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.11.002

Wingate, U. (2012). Using Academic Literacies and genre-based models for academic writing instruction: A ‘literacy’ journey. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(1), 26-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.11.006

Xu, T. S., Zhang, L. J., & Gaffney, J. S. (2023). A multidimensional approach to assessing the effects of task complexity on L2 students’ argumentative writing. Assessing Writing, 55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2022.100690

Yang, A., Stockwell, S., & McDonnell, L. (2019). Writing in your own voice: An intervention that reduces plagiarism and common writing problems in students’ scientific writing. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 47(5), 589-598. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.21282

Yeo, M. A. (2023). Academic integrity in the age of Artificial Intelligence (AI) authoring apps. TESOL Journal, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.716

Yoshimura, F. (2018). Another possible reason for plagiarism: Task representations of summary writing. TESL-EJ, 22(3), Article 3. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1195938.pdf