Aktiviti berbasikal: Pemangkin Kelestarian Kampus (Cycling Activities: A Catalyst for Maintaining Campus Sustainability)
Abstract
Mengekalkan kelestarian kampus adalah salah satu cabaran dalam kehidupan warga kampus. Universiti Malaysia Sabah (UMS) telah mengorak langkah mengamalkan kehidupan kampus berlandaskan EcoCampus sejak tahun 2013. Pengunaan basikal diperkenalkan sebagai pemangkin kepada kehijauan kampus UMS. Kaji selidik dijalankan terhadap 300 pelajar UMS meliputi pelbagai unit kediaman (kolej), fakulti dan peringkat tahun pengajian pelajar berdasarkan kaedah persampelan rawak berstrata. Analisis data menggunakan kaedah deskriptif dan inferensi menerusi frekuensi, skor min purata dan khi kuasa dua. Tujuan kajian adalah mengenal pasti ciri, faktor dan kekangan penggunaan mod pengangkutan alternatif ini dalam kalangan pelajar UMS. Penemuan kajian menunjukkan kebanyakan pelajar wanita yang menginap di kampus dan merupakan pelajar tahun akhir pengajian peringkat sarjana muda didapati mendominasi penggunaan basikal di kampus. Kekerapan penggunaan basikal bertujuan untuk beriadah. Kesedaran terhadap faktor kesihatan adalah pemangkin utama penggunaan basikal, diikuti kesedaran penjagaan alam sekitar dan kebolehsampaian yang tinggi. Namun faktor cuaca, keselamatan dan kekurangan infrastruktur penyumbang utama basikal sukar dijadikan sebagai mod alternatif di kampus. Penambahbaikan infrastruktur dan mempergiatkan kempen penggunaan basikal dikalangan warga kampus dapat membantu peningkatan penggunaan basikal serta mengekalkan kelestarian kampus UMS.
Kata kunci: aktiviti berbasikal, alam sekitar, basikal, eco-campus, kelestarian kampus, mod alternatif
Cycling Activities: A Catalyst for Maintaining Campus Sustainability
Abstract
Maintaining a sustainable campus is one of the many challenges in the life of those who live on campus. Universiti Malaysia Sabah (UMS) has paved the way to practice the concept of Ecocampus living since the year 2013. The use of bicycles is introduced as the catalyst to promote ‘greening UMS campus’. Based on stratified random sampling, a total of 300 questionnaires were distributed to students from various residential colleges, faculties in different stages/year of their study. The collected data was analysed using descriptive methodology and inferences through frequency and average mean score and Chi-Square. The objective of this study is to identify the various factors that affect the use of an alternative mode of transportation amongst UMS students. The finding shows that most of the female students that lived on campus and in their final year (undergraduate) dominated the use of bicycles on campus. And, the most frequent use of bicycle is for leisure cycling. Health awareness is the primary factor that encourages the use of bicycles on campus, followed by environmental awareness and accessibility. On the other hand, weather conditions, security issues and lack of facilities are identified as the main hindrances. This study suggests that an increased effort to improve infrastructure and the initiatives to intensify campaigns promoting the use of bicycles on campus should be carried out as such measures would ultimately contribute to maintaining a sustainable campus.
Keywords: cycling activity, environment, bicycle, eco-campus, sustainable campus, alternative mode
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abd Halim, & Syed Danial. (1990). Perkhidmatan pengangkutan awam rel bas. Shah Alam, Instituti Teknologi Mara.
Adeyemi, A.A.I. (2012). The development and application of Malaysian University Campus Emission Tool (MUCET): Towards Creating Sustainable Campus (PhD dissertation), Retrieved from Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Amiruddin Ismail, & Shazrizil Zakaria. (2014). Development of bicycle shift models in Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Campus. Jurnal Kejuruteraan, 26, 69-75.
Balsas, C.J. (2003). Sustainable transportation planning on college campuses. Transport Policy, 10(1), 35-49.
Bonham, J., & Koth, B. 2010. Universities and the cycling culture. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 15(2), 94-102.
Bruton, M.J. (1995). Introduction to transport planning. (3rd Edition). London, Hutchinson and Company Limited.
Creswell, J.W. (1996). Research design. Qualitative and Quantitative Approach. Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications.
Dawe, G. F., Vetter, A., & Martin, S. (2004). An overview of ecological footprinting and other tools and their application to the development of sustainability process: Audit and methodology at Holme Lacy College, UK. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 5(4), 340-371.
Fishman, E., Washington, S., & Haworth, N. (2012). Barriers and facilitators to public bicycle scheme use: A qualitative approach. Transportation research part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 15(6), 686-698.
Force, U.M.B.A.T. (2012). Recommendations for a bicycle-friendly campus. Milwaukee, University of Wisconsin.
Hamon, L.S., Aldaz,C. B., Pomeda, J.R., Fernandez, F.S., & De Navarrete, F.C.F (2017). From ecocity to ecocampus: Sustainability policies in university campuses. International Conference on Urban Regenaration and Sustainability, 12(3), 541-551.
Handy, S., Van Wee, B., & Kroesen, M. (2014). Promoting cycling for transport: Research needs and challenges. Transport Reviews, 34(1), 4-24.
Jamil Ahmad. (2002). Pemupukan budaya penyelidikan di kalangan guru di sekolah: Satu penilaian. (PhD dissertation) Retrieve from Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
Jalalkamali, N., & Ghraei, F.M.N. (2012). The cycling potentials of Malaysian students in UiTM campus. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 50, 941-949.
Johns, R. (2010). Likert items and scales. Survey Question Bank: Methods Fact Sheet, 1, 1-11.
Kaplan, D.H. (2015). Transportation sustainability on a university campus. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 16(2), 173-186.
Kampus (2008). Pelajar baru USM digalak guna basikal. Utusan Online. Retrieved from http://ww1.utusan.com.my/utusan/info
Kincaid, V. (2014). A policy and infrastructure analysis of bicycle friendly campuses: An examination of three Atlanta-area universities. (Master dissertation). Retrieved from Georgia State University.
Khongouan, W., & Sakulrattanakulchai, S. (2014). Guidelines to promote cycling on university campus: Case Study of Kasetsart University, Mahidol University and Thammasat University. Journal of Architectural/Planning Research and Studies, 11(1), 59-72.
Koth, B.A. (2006). Student cycle commuting as a spur to bicycle friendly cities. Road & transport research: A Journal of Australian and New Zealand Research and Practice, 15(4), 30-42.
Mazdi, M. (2012). Perancangan dan pengurusan ke arah pembentukan pengangkutan dan lalu lintas lestari di Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris. Tanjung Malim, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.
Muhammad R., Rozmi I., & Riza A. (2013). Analisis jarak perjalanan mod pengangkutan tidak bermotor. Jurnal of Business and Social Development, 1(1), 117-127.
Muhamad Razuhanafi Mat Yazid, Sharinatol Akmanida Jamaludin, Nik Mohd Iznan Tuan Yaakub, & Muhamad Nazri Borhan. (2015). Pendekatan Pemodelan Konjoin Kabur dalam pengangkutan aktif. International Conference on Technical Vocational Education and Training (ICTVET).
Na’asah Nasrudin, Katiman Rostam, & Rosniza Aznie Che Rose. (2014). Persepsi penduduk Shah Alam terhadap dasar pengangkutan dan kesediaan mengguna pengangkutan mampan. Geografia Malaysian Journal of Society and Space, 10(2), 133-142.
Norfadillah Derahim, Halimaton Saadiah Hashim, Noraziah Ali, & Sarah Aziz. (2012). UKM sebagai kampus lestari: Tinjauan awal pengetahuan, kesedaran dan penglibatan pelajar dan kakitangan di Kampus UKM Bangi. Geografia Malaysian Journal of Society and Space, 8(8), (76-90).
Pritchard, R. (2018). Revealed preference methods for studying bicycle route choice: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(3), 470.
Pucher, J., & Dijkstra, L. (2003). Promoting safe walking and cycling to improve public health: lessons from the Netherlands and Germany. American Journal of Public Health, 93(9), 1509-1516.
Raja Syahira, Bayu Martanto, Angelalia Roza, & Mohamed Rehan. (2011). Preference of university student towards cycling in campus. In. Proceedings of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies The 9th International Conference of Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 2011 (pp. 239-239). Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies.
Rissel, C. (2003). Editorial–Ride your bike: Healthy policy for Australians. Health Promotion Journal of Australia, 14(3), 151-153.
Rojas-Rueda, D., de Nazelle, A., Tainio, M., & Nieuwenhuijsen, M.J. (2011). The health risks and benefits of cycling in urban environments compared with car use: Health impact assessment study. Bmj, 343, d4521.
Ryley, T. (2006). Use of non-motorised modes and life stage in Edinburgh. Journal of Transport Geography, 14(5), 367-375.
Shuhana, Ahmad Bashri, Hasanuddin, Norsiah, Rozeyta, & Masliyana Md Noor. (2007). Kriteria reka bentuk persekitaran kampus yang kondusif bagi institusi pengajian tinggi di Malaysia. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Retrieved from http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/2979/1.
Swiers, R., Pritchard, C., & Gee, I. (2017). A cross sectional survey of attitudes, behaviours, barriers and motivators to cycling in University students. Journal of Transport & Health, 6, 379-385.
Tin, S.T., Woodward, A., Thornley, S., Langley, J., Rodgers, A., & Ameratunga, S. (2009). Cyclists' attitudes toward policies encouraging bicycle travel: Findings from the Taupo Bicycle Study in New Zealand. Health Promotion International.
Tolley, R. (1996). Green campuses: Cutting the environmental cost of commuting. Journal of Transport Geography, 213-217.
UNESCO.2007. The UN decade of education for sustainable development (DESD 2005 2014):The first two years. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org.
Yazid, M.R.M. (2013). Model persamaan struktur untuk mengkaji penggunaan kenderaan tidak bermotor berdasarkan teori tingkah laku terancang. Jurnal Teknologi, 62(1). 69-76.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.