Persaingan PRU ke-14 di Pahang: Pengekalan status quo melalui pertembungan tiga penjuru (The 14th General Election in Pahang: Maintaining status quo through three-cornered fights)

Muhamad Nadzri Mohamed Noor

Abstract


Strategi memecahkan undi pihak pembangkang oleh pihak penyandang Barisan Nasional (BN) dalam Pilihan Raya Umum ke-14 (PRU 14) bukan lagi satu misteri. Matlamat penyandang adalah untuk memenangi kawasan legislatif sebanyak yang mungkin, sekurang-kurangnya secara pluraliti. Strategi ini walau bagaimanapun tidak menjadi di kesemua negeri di Semenanjung kecuali di Perlis dan Pahang. Objektif artikel ini, untuk itu adalah untuk menganalisis kedinamikan persaingan tiga penjuru dan hubungkaitnya dengan faktor kewilayahan dalam PRU 2018 di Pahang. Artikel ini juga mengenal pasti beberapa implikasi sistem pilihan raya pelbagai parti di negeri itu. Berdasarkan kaedah pemerhatian langsung dan laporan media, artikel ini menghujahkan, meskipun strategi pertembungan tiga penjuru telah mengekalkan status quo di Pahang, tetapi corak pengundian yang menolak BN di negeri itu adalah hampir sama di negeri-negeri lain di Semenanjung. Hal ini menperjelaskan mengapa kerusi BN di Pahang khasnya kerusi Dewan Undangan Negeri (DUN) di Pahang semakin berkurangan dengan ketara di dalam PRU 14, dan pihak pencabar hanya kekurangan beberapa kerusi sahaja untuk menafikan majoriti BN. Malah persaingan tiga penjuru telah mengelakkan BN daripada kalah dengan lebih teruk di peringkat parlimen disamping mempertahankan kedudukannya sebagai kerajaan negeri di Pahang. Artikel ini berharap untuk menambah korpus ilmu secara khusus di dalam politik pilihan raya Pahang dan perspektif regionalisme dalam memahami politik Malaysia secara amnya.

Kata kunci: Barisan Nasional, Pakatan Harapan, PRU ke-14 Pahang, persaingan tiga penjuru, regionalism

The strategy in splitting the opposition’s votes utilized by the then ruling party in Malaysia, the  Barisan Nasional (BN) in the 14th General Election (GE 14) is no longer a mistery. The objective was to win the elections, both at the federal and state level, at least based on plurality. In the Peninsular, almost all of the constituencies were contested with three-cornered fights. This stategy, however, turned out badly for BN except in Perlis and Pahang. The objective of this paper is to analyse the dynamics of the three-cornered fights and its relationship with regionalisme in Pahang in GE 2018. Based on direct observation and media reporting, this article argues that, although the strategy for the three-cornered competition has enabled BN to sustain its status quo in Pahang, but voting trend in Pahang was almost similar to the other states in the Peninsular. This explains why the number of the legislative seats won by BN, particularly at the state assembly of Pahang, have decreased significantly. In fact, the opposition lack only few seats to deny BN’s simple majority in Pahang. The three-cornered contest, thus, have avoided BN from suffering a bigger losses. This paper hopes to contribute to the academic corpus particularly on elections in Pahang and regionalism perspective in Malaysia politics in general. 

Keywords: Barisan Nasional, GE 14 in Pahang, Pakatan Harapan, three-cornered contest, regionalism


Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdul Razak Raaff. (2018). 825,636 layak mengundi di Pahang. Harian Metro. 13 April. Retrieved from https://www.hmetro.com.my/mutakhir/2018/04/330280/825636-layak-mengundi-di-pahang

Brownlee, J. (2007). Authoritarianism in an Age of Democratization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Campbell, A., Converse, P.E., Miller, W.E., & Stokes, D.E. (1960). The American Voter. Oxford: John Wiley.

Compton, Robert W. (2000). East Asian Democratization: Impact of globalization, culture,and economy. Wesport: Praeger.

Department of Information. (2015). Population by States and Ethnic Group. Ministry of Communications and Multimedia, Malaysia.

EC chief admits racial redelineation, says ethnic groups can’t be split. (2018, March 29). The Malay Mail. Retrieved from https://www.malaymail.com/s/1610117/ec-chief-admits-racial-redelineation-says-ethnic-groups-cant-be-split

Fiorina, M.P. (1981). Retrospective voting in American national elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Lazarsfeld, P.F., Berelson, B., & Gaudet, H. (1944). The people's choice. Oxford: Duell, Sloan & Pearce.

López, Juan J. (2002). Democracy Delayed: The Case of Castro's Cuba. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Muhamad Nadzri Mohamed Noor. (2018). The 14th General Election, the Fall of Barisan Nasional, and Political Development in Malaysia, 1957–2018. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 37(3): 139-171.

Muhamad Nadzri Mohamed Noor & Jamaie Hamil. (2018). Politik, Pengundi dan Faktor Melayu/Bumiputera: Analisis Terhadap Kegagalan Barisan Nasional dalam PRU 2018. Journal of History, Politics and Strategic Studies (JEBAT), 45(2): 386-408.

Ostwald, K., Schuler, P. and Chong, J.M. (2018). Triple Duel: the Impact of Coalition Fragmentation and Three-Corner fights on the 2018 Malaysian Election. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 37(3): 31–55.

Shamsul A.B. (1996). Nations-of-intent in Malaysia. In S. Tønnesson, & H., Hans Antlöv, Asian Forms of the Nation (pp. 323-347). Hove: Psychology Press.

Shedler, A. (2002). Election without democracy: The menu of manipulation. Journal of Democracy, 13(2): 36–50.

The Star Online. (2018). GE 14. Retrieved from https://election.thestar.com.my/pahang.html


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.