Perancangan dan pengurusan landskap di Klebang, Melaka (Landscape Planning and Management at Klebang, Melaka)

Rosniza Aznie Che Rose, Siti Azah Abdul Ghani

Abstract


Perancangan dan pengurusan landskap memainkan peranan yang penting dalam memastikan kelestarian landskap dalam pembangunan sesebuah kawasan rekreasi. Perlaksanaan perancangan landskap yang terancang dapat meningkatkan kualiti kawasan rekreasi dan dalam masa yang sama memastikan keharmonian masyarakat terpelihara. Kajian ini bertujuan untuk mengenal pasti tahap kemudahan dan elemen landskap sama ada mencukupi atau tidak. Selain itu, kajian ini juga mengkaji tahap kepuasan masyarakat terhadap perancangan landskap serta memberikan cadangan konsep pembangunan landskap yang sesuai di kawasan kajian. Kawasan kajian yang dipilih ialah Dataran 1Malaysia Klebang, Melaka. Kaedah kajian yang digunakan iaitu temu bual informal, kaedah soal selidik dan pemerhatian di lapangan. Sampel kajian yang diambil ialah seramai 80 orang responden berdasarkan teknik persampelan rawak mudah. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan bahawa aspek perancangan, pembangunan, perlaksanaan dan pengurusan landskap di kawasan kajian berada di tahap sederhana dan perlu diperbaiki untuk mencapai tahap kelestarian yang lebih baik. Beberapa cadangan penambahbaikan seperti penambahan terhadap pokok teduhan dan renek yang mencukupi, pembangunan elemen air, penambahbaikan laluan pejalan kaki, penambahbaikan terhadap perabot taman dan elemen landskap kejur dan elemen landskap lembut di sekitar kawasan kajian. Ini penting untuk memastikan matlamat asal penubuhan kawasan rekreasi sebagai kawasan riadah serta untuk kesejahteraan hidup masyarakat dapat dicapai.

Kata kunci: kesejahteraan, landskap, pembangunan, pengurusan persekitaran, perancangan

Landscape planning and management play important roles in creating a sustainable landscape in a recreational area. A well-planned landscape implementation can create a high quality recreational area and at the same time, can keep a community harmonious. The study is to identify whether the landscape facilities and elements are sufficiently provided. Also to identify whether the community is truly satisfied with the landscape planning and if they have suggestion on the suitable landscape development concept upon the area. The chosen site is Dataran 1Malaysia Klebang, Melaka. Informal interviews, series of questionnaire and field observation were some of the data collecting methods used during the study. The sample of the study was 80 respondents based on simple random sampling technique. The findings of the study showed that the landscape planning, implementation, development, and management of the area are at the average level and need to be improved and enhanced to achieve a better and sustainable landscape condition. Several enhancements have been suggested such as, sufficient numbers of trees and shrubs must be planted, developing water elements, enhancement of pedestrian walkway and landscape furniture, and overall hardscape and softcape elements over the study area. This is very important to ensure that the first goal of developing the recreational area as a place to exercise plus for the wellbeing of the community is accomplished.

Keywords: wellbeing, landscape, development, environmental management, planning



Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdul Haris, S. (2013). Landscape management: An effective landscape management and maintenance. Shah Alam: Penerbit UiTM.

Angelstam, P., Barnes, G., Elbakidze, M., Marsh, A., Marais, C., Mills, A., Polonsky, S., Richardson, D.M., Rivers, N., Shackleton, R., & Stafford, W. (2017). Collaborative learning to unlock investments for functional ecological infrastructure: Bridging barriers in social–ecological systems in South Africa. Ecosyst Serv, 27, 291–304.

Angelstam, P., Elbakidze, M., Lawrence, A., Manton, M., Melecis, V., & Pereira, A. (2018). Barriers and bridges for landscape stewardship and knowledge production to sustain functional green infrastructures. In: Pereira, A., Peterson, U., Pastur, G., Iverson, L., & Plieninger, T. (eds), Sustaining ecosystem services in forest landscapes (pp. 127–167). Dordrecht: Springer.

Angelstam, P., Manton, M., Elbakidze, M. (2019). LTSER platforms as a place-based transdisciplinary research infrastructure: Learning landscape approach through evaluation. Landscape Ecol, 34, 1461-1484.

Bernama. (2019). Kebersihan tandas awam tanggungjawab bersama: Muhammad Bakhtiar. BERNAMA. 25 Ogos 2019. Diperoleh daripada https://www.sinarharian.com.my/article/44702. 02.03.2020.

Bieling, C. & Plieninger, T. (eds). (2017). The science and practice of landscape stewardship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Dearden, P. (1981) Public participation and scenic quality analysis. Landscape Planning, 8, 3-19.

Deborah, K. & Andrew, M. (2008). Visitor perceptions of the benefits of a local park. Pennsylvania, US: Recreation, Park and Tourism Management the Pennsylvania State University.

Deng, X., Li, Z., & Gibson, J. (2016). A review on trade-off analysis of ecosystem services for sustainable land-use management. J Geogr Sci, 26(7), 953-968.

Er, A.C., Nur Azlin, M.A., & Mohd Fakhrulrazi, S. (2009). Kesedaran awam terhadap pemeliharaan dan pemuliharaan alam semula jadi: Kes Taman Wetland, Putrajaya. Geografia-Malaysian Journal of Society and Space, 11(8),13-26.

Fischer, A.P., Klooster, A., & Cirhigiri, L. (2019). Cross-boundary cooperation for landscape management: Collective action and social exchange among individual private forest landowners. Landscape and Urban Planning, 188, 151-162.

Jabatan Landskap Negara. (2008). Garis panduan landskap negara (Edisi Ke-2). Diperoleh daripada http://jln.kpkt.gov.my/index.php/pages/view/58

Goh, H.C. & Noratiqah, M. (2016). The user’s perceptions of Perdana Botanical Garden in Kuala Lumpur. Journal of Design and Built Environment, 16(1), 27-36.

Jansson, M., Vogel, N., Fors, H. & Randrup, T.B. (2019). The governance of landscape management: New approaches to urban open space development. Landscape Research, 44(8), 952-965.

Jubenville, A. & Ben, W.T. (1993). Outdoor recreation (Ed ke-3). USA: Venture Publishing Inc State College.

Krejcie, R.V. & Morgan, D.W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Phychological Measurement, 30, 607-610.

Locatelli, B., Lavorel, S., Sloan, S., Tappeiner, U., & Geneletti, D. (2017). Characteristic trajectories of ecosystem services in mountains. Front Ecol Environ, 15(3),150-159.

More, T.A. (1989). Factors affecting the productivity of urban parks. Research paper, Department of Agriculture, US. Diperoleh daripada https://www.fs.fed.us/ne/ newtown_square/publications/research_papers/pdfs/scanned/OCR/ne_rp630.pdf

Noralizawati, M. & Noriah, O. (2010). Push and pull factor: Determining the visitors’ satisfactions at urban recreational area. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 49, 175-182.

Osman, M.T. (2002). Pembudayaan landskap berkualiti pemangkin kehidupan dan persekitaran berkualiti. Serdang: Fakulti Rekabentuk dan Senibina, Universiti Putra Malaysia.

Potschin, M. & Haines-Young, R. (2013). Landscapes, sustainability and the place-based analysis of ecosystem services. Landscape Ecol, 28(6), 1053-1065.

Rosniza Aznie, C.R. & Nur Efazainiza Ainie, B. 2019. Analisis tahap kepuasan pengunjung di taman rekreasi awam Sabah. Geografia-Malaysian Journal of Society and Space, 15(4), 336-349.

Thompson, J.W. & Sorvig, K. 2000. Sustainable landscape construction: A guide to green building outdoors. Washington DC: Island Press.

Verbrugge, L., Buchecker, M., & Garcia, X. (2019). Integrating sense of place in planning and management of multifunctional river landscapes: Experiences from five European case studies. Sustain Sci, 14, 669-680.

Wan Mohammad, W.M. (1995). Quality sports and recreational facilities for effective utilization. Kertas kerja dibentangkan di Seminar Kemudahan Sukan di UiTM Shah Alam, Selangor. 13-15 Jun 1995.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.