The quality of life among visitors of recreational parks: A case study of Recreational Parks in Temerloh Town, Pahang, Malaysia
Abstract
Recreational parks are important in encouraging physical activities and social relationship among the community as well as to improve the quality of life (QoL) of the community through their participation in the parks. Quality of life can be incorporated into the ideas of expectation and satisfaction, which covers physical, social and health aspects. Participation in leisure or recreation activities is considered by many researchers as an essential component of an individual’s sense of QoL. A study had been carried out in Temerloh town to study the QoL impact of the recreation parks. A questionnaire survey was carried out among the visitors to examine the expectation and satisfaction of respondents (visitors) on the three aspects of QoL, i.e. physical, social and health. As a result, the study found that respondents were having lower “satisfaction” scores as compared to the scores for “expectation” on average. It shows a low level of QoL for the study areas. Furthermore, the study also found that the satisfaction of respondents on physical aspects was positively and significantly correlated to the social aspects of QoL. Thus, the physical aspects of recreation parks were potentially impacting the social aspects of QoL among respondents who used the parks. It is suggested that recreational parks should be improved especially the physical aspects, i.e. safety and physical facilities for the purpose to increase the QoL of the users including the community interaction, family life and health.
Keywords: expectation, health, physical, quality, satisfaction, social.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ahmad, A. (2005). Kualiti hidup dan pengurusan persekitaran di Malaysia, UKM.
Ariane L, Mowen A.J., Cohen, D.A. (2005). The Significance of Parks to Physical Activity and Public Health. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 28(2), 159-168.
Atefeh, A. and Norsidah, U. (2014). The impact of physical features on user attachment to Kuala Lumpur City Centre (KLCC) Park, Malaysia. Geografia-Malaysia Journal of Society and Space, 10(3): 44-59.
Baker, D.A., & Palmer, R.J. (2006). Examining the Effects of Perceptions of Community and Recreation Participation on Quality of Life. Social Indicators Research, 75(3), 395-418.
Barton, H. (2009). Land use planning and health and well-being. Land use policy, 26, S115-S123.
Boyer & Savageau. (1981). Places Rated Almanac. New York, Rand McNally.
Dolnicar, S., Yanamandram, V.K., Cliff, K. (2012). The Contribution of Vacations to Quality of Life. Annals of Tourism Research, 39(1), 59-83.
Farah Ayuni, S. (2015). Urban sustainability in Barcelona: Living and learning the experience. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 168, 381-388.
Gadais, T., Boulanger, M., Trudeau, F., Rivard, M.C. (2018). Environments favorable to healthy lifestyles: A systematic review of initiatives in Canada. Journal of Sport and Health Science, 7(1), 7-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2017.09.005
Google Inc. (2019). Google Maps. Retrieved from https://www.google.com/
Hazlina, H, Nurul Shakila, K., Nurul Faizah, B. (2017). People in city: the relation of urban park and the quality of life. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 2(6): 311-318.
Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf. (2018). G*Power: Statistical Power Analyses for Window and Mac. Retrieved from http://www.psycho.uni-duesseldorf.de/abteilungen/aap/gpower3
Henderson, G. (1996). Human relations issues in management. Westport, CT., Quorum Books.
Hunter. (2003). The Connection Between Psychological and Physical Health. Retrieved from https://www.cqu.edu.au/data/assets/pdf_file/0006/57282/The_Connection_between_Psychological_and_Physical_Health_slides_for_webinar_pdf.pdf
Jusoh, H., Ahmad, H., Buang, A., Zoolberi, F. A., Nik Muhammad, N. M., Yusop, N. A., Er, A. C., & Mahmud, M. (2014). Impak kawasan hijau terhadap persekitaran sosial komuniti Putrajaya. Geografia-Malaysia Journal of Society and Space, 10(8), 26-39.
Kara, F., & Demirci, A. (2010). Spatial analysis and facility characteristics of outdoor recreational areas in Istanbul. Environ Monit Assess, 164(1-4), 593-603.
Ling, O.H.L., Norseha, M.M., Nur Asma, A. H., Marlyana, A.M., & Jamalunlaili A. (2018a). Quality of life among residents in a sub-urban area. Case study: Puncak Alam, Selangor, Malaysia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 117(1).
Ling, O.H.L., Nur Hidayah, S., Marlyana, A.M., & Sharifah Zannierah, S.M. (2018b). Healthy lifestyle of urban residents. Case study: Sri Pahang public housing, Bangsar, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Planning Malaysia, 16(3), 1-12.
Liu, H., Li, F., Li, J., & Zhang, Y. (2017). The relationships between urban parks, residents' physical activity, and mental health benefits: A case study from Beijing, China. Journal of Environmental Management, 190, 223-230.
Masana, L., Ros, E., Sudano, I., & Angoulvant, D. (2017). Is there a role for lifestyle changes in cardiovascular prevention? What, when and how? Atherosclerosis Supplements, 26(2017), 2-15.
Mukherjee, R. (1989). The quality of life. New Delhi, Sage Publications.
Newman, D., Tay, L., & Diener, E. (2014). Leisure and subjective well-being: A model of psychological mechanisms as mediating factors. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15(3), 555-578.
Nur Farhana, R., Noor Suzilawati, R. & Mariana, M.O. (2018). Perception of quality of life among community in Selangor. Planning Malaysia Journal, 16(2): 12-20.
Nurul Shakila, K., Nurul Faizah, B., & Hazlina, H. (2018). Improving quality of life through recreational behaviour in urban park. Asian Journal of Quality of Life, 3(13), 80-88.
Ngesan, M.R., Abdul Karim, H., & Zubir, S.S. (2012). Human Behaviour and Activities in Relation to Shah Alam Urban Park during Nighttime. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 68, 427-438.
Razak, M. A. W. A., Othman, N., & Nazir, N. N. M. (2016). Connecting people with nature: Urban park and human well-being. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 222, 476-484.
Rosniza Aznie, C.R. & Nur Efazainiza, A.B. (2019). Analisis tahap kepuasan pengunjung di taman rekreasi awam Sabah. Geografia-Malaysia Journal of Society and Space, 15(4): 336-349.
Shamirah, R., Ling, O.H.L., Nurhazlin Amira, M.A., & Marlyana Azyyati, M. (2020). Relationship between quality of urban parks and physical activity: A case study in Changkat Public Park, Batu Gajah, Perak. Planning Malaysia Journal, 18(4): 158-172.
Siti Nur Afiqah, M.M., Ling, OHL, Dasimah, O., & Subramaniam, K. (2015). Theoretical review on environmental health in relation to neighbourhood planning and human physical activity. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 201, 325-332.
Smith, A. (2000). Researching quality of life of older people: concept, measures and findings. Working Paper No. 7, Centre for Social Gerontology, Keele University. Retrieved from https://www.keele.ac.uk/csg/downloads/centreworkingpapers/research_quality.pdf
Szalai, A. & Andrews, F.M. (1980). The Qualiy of life- Comparative studies, USA, Sage Studies in International Sociology.
Ulrich, R. S., & Addoms, D. L. (1981). Psychological and recreational benefits of a residential park. Journal of Leisure Research, 13, 43-65.
Unit Perancang Ekonomi (2002). Kualiti hidup Malaysia 2002, Kuala Lumpur.
World Health Organization Quality of Life Group (1994). Development of the WHOQOL: Rationale and Current Status. International Journal of Mental Health, 23(3), 24-56.
Zhou, X., Rana MMP (2012). Social benefits of urban green space: A conceptual framework of valuation and accessibility measurements. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 23(2), 173-189.
Zohreh, M. & Melasutra, M.D. (2016). Adolescent use of urban parks and their social environment consequences. Geografia-Malaysia Journal of Society and Space, 12(11), 123-136.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.