Healthy Cities and Social Reality Indicators: Comparative Lessons From High Income And Lower Middle Income Economies (Indikator Bandar Sihat dan Realiti Sosial: Pengajaran Perbandingan daripada Negara Berpendapatan Tinggi dan Negara Berpendapatan Sederhana Rendah)
Abstract
ABSTRACT
The implementation of healthy cities varies across countries, shaped by national issues unique to each context and classified according to their respective social realities. As such, the assumption that more developed countries inherently lead in development is not always applicable since each country possesses different levels of national readiness based on social conditions. This study aims to explore the differences in the implementation of global Healthy City initiatives by analyzing national factors rooted in the social realities of each country. Understanding how these social realities shape development prospects offers valuable lessons for international development efforts, including those in Malaysia. Four countries - South Korea, Nepal, China, and South Africa, were selected to represent diverse global cases of Healthy City implementation. The selection was based on geographical location, economic status, prevailing social conditions, and different approaches to healthy city development. This study employed case studies and content analysis of selected written sources, including official documents and academic journals. Data were sourced from databases such as Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar using search terms like “healthy city policy” or “healthy city implementation in [country name].” A total of 24 documents were analyzed to extract insights and processes that reflect the broader phenomenon under investigation. The analysis identified three key national factors, shaped by each country’s social realities that influence the formulation and implementation of healthy city initiatives: (1) the vulnerability and burden on the health sector, (2) political dynamics and economic resources, and (3) population characteristics and local social issues. These findings provide a reference for the more effective implementation of healthy cities tailored to the specific needs of communities within different national contexts.
Keywords: Healthy City, social reality, selected countries, differences in implementation, development lessons
ABSTRAK
Pelaksanaan bandar sihat berbeza merentasi negara, dibentuk oleh isu nasional yang unik bagi setiap konteks serta diklasifikasikan mengikut realiti sosial masing-masing. Oleh itu, anggapan bahawa negara yang lebih maju secara semula jadi mendahului dalam pembangunan tidak semestinya terpakai kerana setiap negara mempunyai tahap ketersediaan nasional yang berbeza berdasarkan keadaan sosial. Kajian ini bertujuan meneroka perbezaan dalam pelaksanaan inisiatif Bandar Sihat global dengan menganalisis faktor nasional yang berakar daripada realiti sosial setiap negara. Memahami bagaimana realiti sosial ini membentuk prospek pembangunan menawarkan pelajaran berharga bagi usaha pembangunan antarabangsa, termasuk di Malaysia. Empat negara, iaitu Korea Selatan, Nepal, China, dan Afrika Selatan dipilih untuk mewakili kes global yang pelbagai dalam pelaksanaan Bandar Sihat. Pemilihan ini dibuat berdasarkan lokasi geografi, status ekonomi, keadaan sosial semasa, serta pendekatan berbeza terhadap pembangunan bandar sihat. Kajian ini menggunakan kaedah kajian kes dan analisis kandungan terhadap sumber bertulis terpilih, termasuk dokumen rasmi dan jurnal akademik. Data diperoleh daripada pangkalan data seperti Webof Science, Scopus, dan Google Scholar menggunakan istilah carian seperti “healthy city policy” atau “healthy city implementation in [nama negara].” Sebanyak 24 dokumen dianalisis untuk mengekstrak pandangan dan proses yang mencerminkan fenomena lebih luas yang sedang dikaji. Analisis mendapati tiga faktor nasional utama, yang dibentuk oleh realiti sosial setiap negara, yang mempengaruhi pelaksanaan inisiatif bandar sihat: (1) kerentanan dan beban terhadap sektor kesihatan, (2) dinamika politik dan sumber ekonomi, dan (3) ciri populasi serta isu sosial tempatan. Dapatan ini menyediakan rujukan bagi pelaksanaan bandar sihat yang lebih berkesan, disesuaikan dengan keperluan khusus komuniti dalam konteks nasional yang berbeza.
Kata kunci: bandar sihat, realiti sosial, negara terpilih, perbandingan, pengajaran pembangunan
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Acharya, K.P., Khanal, S.P., & Chhetry, D. 2022. Factors
Affecting Poverty in Nepal-Binary Logistic Regression
Model Study. Pertanika Journal Social Science &
Humanities 30, no. 2: 641-663.
Ashton, J., Grey, P., & Barnard, K. 1986. Healthy cities -
WHO’s New Public Health Initiative. Health Promotion
International 1, no. 3: 319-324.
Ashton, J., & Seymour, H. 1988. The New Public Health: The
Liverpool Experience. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Asian Development Bank (ADB). 2013. Nepal Cities: Clean
And Healthy Urban Development, ADB, Philippines.
Bachani, D., Saxena, S., Amri Bakar, M., Gupta, R., Basnet,
S., & Pomeroy-Stevens, A. 2022. Healthier Cities Through
Systems Thinking: Practical Considerations for City
Leaders. Journal of Urban Health 99: 733-737.
Bapari, M.Y., Haque, M.E., Chowdhury, M.K., & Islam,
M.J. 2016. Impacts of Unplanned Urbanization on The
Socio–Economic Conditions and Environment of Pabna
Municipality, Bangladesh. Journal of Environment and
Earth Science 6, no. 9: 105-114.
Central Bureau of Statistics. 2011. Nepal Living Standard
Survey (2010/11). National Planning Commission
Secretariat, Government of Nepal, Nepal.
Baokang, Y. 2021. An Overview of The Chinese Healthcare
System. HepatoBiliary Surgery and Nutrition 10, no. 1: 93-
Becker, H.S. 1970. Sociological Work: Method and Substance.
New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
Congressional Research Service Report (CRSR). 2020. South
Africa: Current Issues, Economy, and U.S. Relations,
CRSR, Washington.
Dooris, M., & Heritage, Z. 2011. Healthy Cities: Facilitating
The Active Participation and Empowerment of Local
People. Journal of Urban Health 90, no. 1: 74-91.
East Asian Institute (EAI). 2021. China’s Population Census,
East Asian Institute, National University of Singapore,
Singapore.
Gehlot, V., Sloane, E.B. & Thalassinidis. Personal Health
Technology: CPN Based Modelling of Coordinated
Neighbourhood Care Environments (Hubs) and Personal
Care Device Ecosystems, the working paper was presented
at the Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International
Conference on System Sciences, Manoa, 8 Julai 2019, p.
-4174.
Godfrey, R. & Julien, M. 2015. Urbanisation and health.
Clinical Medicine 5, no. 2: 137-141.
Harpham, T., Burton, S., & Blue, L. 2001. Healthy City Projects
in Developing Countries: The First Evaluation. Health
Promotion International 16, no. 2: 111-125.
Heo, U., Jeon, H., Kim, H., & Kim, O. 2008. The Political
Economy of South Korea: Economic Growth,
Democratization, and Financial Crisis. Maryland Series in
Contemporary Asian Studies 2, no. 1: 1-24.
Hisashi, O. 2003. Healthy Cities Project in the Western Pasific,
In Healthy Cities and Urban Policy Research, edited by
Takano, 21-40. London: Spon Press.
Human Science Research Council (HSRC). 2021. Adolescents
Living with HIV in South Africa, HSRC, Cape Town, South
Africa.
James, T.C. & Bhatnagar, A. Special Wellness Zones for
Wellness Tourism: Exploring Prospects of Creating
Dedicated ISM Hubs, the working paper presented at the
Forum on Indian Traditional Medicine, New Delhi, 4 Julai
, p. 1-7.
Kai, X., Yuheng, Y., Zhizhen, B. & Zhijun, Z. & Zhijun, Z. 2021.
Development and Evaluation of Healthy Cities, the working
paper presented at the 2021 International Conference on
Physics, Computing, and Mathematical, Xiamen, 29 - 30
Disember 2021, p. 1-4.
Korea Economic Institute of America (KEIA). 2015. Korea’s
Economy, KEIA, USA.
Kenzer, M. (1999). Healthy Cities: A Guide to The Literature.
Environment and Urbanization 11, no. 1: 201-220.
Lee, J.W. 2016. The Republic of Korea’s Economic Growth and
Catch-up: Implications for the People’s Republic of China.
Tokyo: Asian Development Bank Institute.
Lim Seng Boon. 2020. Membina Model Bandar Pintar
Berpusatkan Rakyat di Malaysia [Developing a People-
Centered Smart City Model in Malaysia]. PhD thesis.
Developmental Science, Faculty of Social Sciences and
Humanities, The National University of Malaysia.
Martinez Perez, G., Cox, V., Ellman, T., Moore, A., Patten, G.,
Shroufi, A., Stinson, K., Van Cutsem, V., & Ibeto, M. 2016.
‘I Know That I Do Have HIV but Nobody Saw Me’: Oral
HIV Self-Testing in an Informal Settlement in South Africa.
PLoS ONE 11, no. 4: 1-15.
Merriam, S.B. 1998. Qualitative Research and Case Study
Application in Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Munjae, L., Sewon, P., & Kichan, Y. 2019. Does Health
Promotion Program Affect Local Resident’ Emotions?.
International Journal of Environment Research and Public
Health 16, no. 549: 1-14.
Munjae, L., & Kichan, Y. 2020. Effects of The Health Promotion
Programs on Happiness. Sustainability 12: 1-14.
Nuan-Ching, H., Hsien-Wen, K., Te-Jen, H., & Susan C.
H. (2019). Do Healthy City Performance Awards Lead
To Health in All Policies?. International Journal of
Environmental Research and Public Health 16: 1-13.
Park, Y. 2018. Modern Korean Economy 1984-2008. Korea:
The Academy of Korean Studies.
Patnaik, S., & Pandey, S.C. 2019. Case Study Research, In
Methodological Issues in Management Research, edited
by Subudhi, R.N., & Mishra, 163-179, Bingley: Emerald
Publishing Limited.
Sharma, B., & Nam E.W. 2017. A Healthy City Project: A Case
Study of Wonju City, South Korea and Its Relevance to The
Cities In Nepal. Journal of Gandaki Medical College-Nepal
, no. 1: 34-42.
Sieberhagen, C., Pienaar, J., & Els, C. 2011. Management of
Employee Wellness in South Africa: Employer, Service
Provider and Union Perspectives. SA Journal of Human
Resource Management 9, no. 1: 1-14.
The World Bank. 2018. South Africa Economic Update, The
World Bank, Washington.
The World Bank. 2022. World Bank Indicators Database:
Population 2022, The World Bank, Washington.
UN. 2022. Economic and Social Council: Nepal, UN, New
York.
UNAIDS. 2019. Communities At the Centre: Defending Rights
Breaking Barriers Reaching People with HIV Services,
UNAIDS, Geneva.
U.S Energy Information Administration. 2022. Country Analysis
Executive Summary: China, U.S Energy Information
Administration, Washington.
USAID. 2022. Implementation Plan: Municipal Actions for Air
Quality in the Kathamandu Valley, USAID, Arlington.
Webster, P., & Sanderson, D. 2012. Healthy Cities Indicators - A
Suitable Instrument to Measure Health. Journal of Urban
Health 90, no. 1: 52-61.
WHO. 2015. Healthy Cities: Good Health is Good Politics,
WHO, Geneva.
WHO. 2018. Copenhagen Consensus of Mayors, WHO,
Denmark.
Xin, W., Xizhuo, S., Fangfang, G., Yixiang, H., Lijin, C., Yong,
Z., & Stephen, B. 2018. The Luohu Model: A Template for
Integrated Urban Healthcare Systems in China. International
Journal of Integrated Care 18, no. 4: 1-10.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
ISSN 2289-1706 | e-ISSN : 2289-4268
Institut Alam dan Tamadun Melayu (ATMA)
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
43600 UKM Bangi, Selangor Darul Ehsan
MALAYSIA
© Copyright UKM Press, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia