Kajian Keberkesanan Program Pentaksiran Kerja Amali Sains (PEKA): Satu Penilaian di Sekolah Rendah (Study of Evaluation Program of Practical Skill Assessment (PEKA): Assessment in Primary School)
Keywords:
Experiment, assessment, evolution, qualitative, quantitativeAbstract
This study is to evaluate the curriculum implementation of practical skill assessment (PEKA) in Primary School based on the Context, Input, Process And Product (CIPP) Evaluation Model. Design of study is a combination of qualitative and quantitative techniques, which are correlated to process of triangulation method. Sample selection is based on the stratified random sampling technique that involves 20 science teachers from 10 primary schools in Hulu Langat area. One set of questionnaires have been used for collecting the evaluation data, input and contexts from teacher, meanwhile a set test has been used to pupils for getting the evaluation data. Interviews and structured observation have also been applied to obtain the qualitative data for process evaluation in order to explain the quantitative data. Findings show the elements of contexts evaluation such as PEKA curriculum relevance, teacher’s perception towards PEKA, profiles of skills of teachers and pupils are moderate. The elements of input evaluation i.e. teaching duration and textbook contents are also moderately leveled; however, the BBM supply element is at the negative score. Process evaluation findings illustrate a positive for only the teaching elements and moderate for teaching activity, technique, type, method and strategy, whereas, BBM usages, the evaluation method of PEKA skill and product evaluation are leveled at negative. Khi square test was used to determine relatedness between gender, age and academic qualification with implementation of PEKA. Gender and age have significantly affects, meanwhile academic qualification significantly unrelated with implementation of PEKA. As conclusion, implementation of PEKA has many weaknesses, which need to improve, give more attentions and action must be taken with proper planning in improving the identified problem.References
Abdul Aziz, D. 1997. Adakah Bentuk Buku Teks Tahun 1990-an Masih Relevan pada Abad ke-20?. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
Abu Hassan, K. 2003. Tahap Penguasaan Kemahiran Proses Sains dan Hubungannya dengan Pencapaian Kimia di Kalangan Pelajar Tingkatan Empat Daerah Johor Bahru. Kertas Seminar, Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia Skudai, Johor Bahru.
Anizah Asimin. 2004. Mengkaji Tahap Kemahiran Pelajar dalam Mengendalikan dan Menggunakan Alat Pengukur dalam Makmal Sains di Sekolah Menengah Sekitar Inanam. Tesis Sarjana Pendidikan, Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Atan, L. 1980. Pedagogi: Kaedah Am Mengajar. Kuala Lumpur: Penerbit Fajar Bakti Sdn. Bhd.
Azizi, Y., Shahrin, H. & Fathiah, M.M.Z. 2007. Tahap Penguasaan Kemahiran Manipulatif di Kalangan Guru Pelatih Kimia Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Jurnal Pendidikan.
Hazrulrizawati, A.H. 2007. Perbandingan Tahap Penguasaan Proses Sains dan Cara Penglibatan Pelajar dalam Kaedah Amali Tradisional dengan Kaedah Makmal Mikro Komputer. Tesis Sarjana Pendidikan. Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Ishak, R. 2003. Inilah Kurikulum Sekolah. Kuala Lumpur: PTS Publication & Distributors Sdn. Bhd.
Lembaga Peperiksaan Malaysia. 2008. Science Practical Assessment. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia.
Mohd Salleh, L. 1996. Kurikulum Pendidikan di Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Berita Publishing.
Norwahidah, W. 2008. Tahap Penguasaan Kemahiran Manipulatif dan Hubungannya dengan Pencapaian Akademik Pelajar Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Tesis Sarjana Pendidikan, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Noor Hayati Salleh, Noor Aliza Ahmad & Ismail Khairullah Mohd Radhzi. 2009. Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Berasaskan Pendekatan Kontruktivisme Menerusi Pembelajaran Inkuiri-Penemuan Bagi Topik Sel Tumbuhan. Tesis Kolej Matrikulasi Perak. Perak.
Noorizal, M. 2008. Membangunkan Perisian Model Bahan Bantu Mengajar (BBM) Bertajuk “Solid Geometry II” Bagi Mata Pelajaran Matematik Tingkatan Dua. Tesis Ijazah Sarjana Muda Sains, Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Norizan, S. 1997. Kaedah tinjuan-siasat: Satu analisa terhadap perancangan dan perlaksanaan. Jurnal Guru. Keluaran 9. Jawatankuasa Pengelola Perayaan Hari Guru Peringkat Kebangsaan.
Oemar, H. 1989. Metodologi Pengajaran Ilmu Pendidikan. Bandung: Penerbit Mandar Maju.
Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum. 2001. Aplikasi Teori Kecerdasan Pelbagai dalam Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran. Kuala Lumpur: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum. 2001. Pembelajaran Secara Kontruktivisme. Kuala Lumpur: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum. 2001. Belajar Cara Belajar. Kuala Lumpur: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Richards, A. 2001. Teaching and Learning English A Guide to Recent Research Application. London and New York. Continuum.
Rohaida Mohd Saat. 2005. Keberkesanan program PEKA dalam penguasaan kemahiran proses sains bersepadu. Jurnal Pendidikan.
Selinger, H.W. & Shoharny, E. 2000. Reserch Design: Qualitative and Descriptive. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sharifah Nor Ashikin, S.A.R. 2005. Keberkesanan program PEKA dalam penguasaan kemahiran proses sains bersepadu. Jurnal Pendidikan 1: 67-77.
Stake, J.E. 2006. Paper Methods for Educational Eveluation: Using Stake’s Countenance Model of Evaluation. New York: Alexander and Hedberg’s Evaluation Framework.
Stufflebeam, D.L. 2003. The CIPP Model for Evaluation. Presented at Annual Conference of the Oregon Program Evaluators Network (OPEN). Portland, OR:Western Michigan University.
Sulaiman, N.R. 2002. Analisis Data dalam Penyelidikan Pendidikan. Ed. Ke-2. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
Tarmizim, A. 1997. Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Kemahiran Bertutur Bahasa Arab: Satu Kajian Kes di Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Agama. Disertasi Sarjana Bahasa Moden. Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur.
Theh, S.A. 2005. Kerja Amali & Bahagian B UPSR Proses Sains. Petaling Jaya: Pearson Malaysia Sdn. Bhd.
Zol Azlan, H. 2000. Strategi Pendekatan Sains, Teknologi, dan Masyarakat Selangor. Selangor: Prantice Hall.
Zulkifli, A.M., Shahril, M. & Shahril, J. 1995. Laporan Kajian Impak Skim Pinjaman Buku Teks (SPBT). Laporan yang dikemukakan kepada Bahagian Buku Teks, Kementerian Pendidikan
Downloads
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright of the article and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) Licence that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
It is the author’s responsibility to ensure that his or her submitted works do not infringe any other existing copyright. Authors should obtain letters of permission to reproduce or adapt copyright material and enclose copies of these letters with the final version of the accepted manuscript.
The author indemnifies the editors and publisher against any breach of such a warranty.
