Digital Literacy to Improve The Professionalism of Online Media Journalists in Bengkulu, Indonesia
Abstract
This study aims to know the competence of digital literacy Online media journalists in Bengkulu City in complying with cyber media guidelines to support professionalism ranging from verification activities to writing news or delivering coverage to editors. Also to identify efforts made by online media journalists in Bengkulu City using tools for fact checking to verify news materials. This research uses a qualitative descriptive approach. The data collection method uses interviews, observation and focus group discussion. This study's Informants are journalists registered as members of the Indonesian Cyber Media Network (JMSI) and the Indonesian Cyber Media Union (SMSI) in Bengkulu. The results of the study concluded that the literacy of journalists in using digital media is quite good. However, it cannot be included in the excellent category because journalists lack knowledge and skills in digital literacy competencies. Moreover, journalists knowledge and skills upgrades such as fact-checking or digital literacy training is minimal, eventhough journalists understand the challenges in publishing journalistic works today. Generally, journalists use tools for checking facts or verifying sources of information either conventionally or manually. However, the strength in publishing journalistic works is the collaboration of cyber media within press companies to produce quality work. The FGD found that only Bengkulu Eskpress conducts fact checks in its journalistic work, because its journalists have received fact-check training conducted by the Alliance of Independent Journalists (AJI). The study results also show that online media utilize digital-based tools because they have received fact checking training, namely Bengkulu Ekspress.
Keywords: Digital literacy, professionalism, online media, journalists, fact checking.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abd-Elaal, A. I. A., Badr, A. Z., & Mahdi, H. M. K. (2020). Detecting violent radical accounts on Twitter. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 11(8), 516–522. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2020.0110865
Asker, D., & Dinas, E. (2019). Thinking fast and furious: Emotional intensity and opinion polarization in online media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 83(3), 487–509. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfz042
Cakranegara, D. I., Ahmadi, D., Kurnia, S. S., Firmansyah, & Karsa, S. I. (2023). The role of local mass media in anticipating hoax information (Case study at Radar Tasikmalaya). Nyimak Journal of Communication, 7(1), 55–70.
Casula, C. (2021). Local broadcast journalists and the trap of professional heterogeneity. Professions and Professionalism, 11(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.7577/pp.3912
De Paor, S., & Heravi, B. (2020). Information literacy and fake news: How the field of librarianship can help combat the epidemic of fake news. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 46(5), 102218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102218
Dogruel, L., Masur, P., & Joeckel, S. (2022). Development and validation of an algorithm literacy scale for internet users. Communication Methods and Measures, 16(2), 115–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2021.1968361
Falloon, G. (2020). From digital literacy to digital competence: the teacher digital competency (TDC) framework. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(5), 2449–2472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09767-4
Fincham, K. (2021). Business as usual: How journalism’s professional logics continue to shape news organization policies around social media audiences. Journalism Practice, 17(7), 1482-1499. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2021.1991437
Garachkovska, O., Parfeniuk, I., Haludzina-Horobets, V., Dmytrenko, N., Osaula, V., & Grebnov, G. (2022). Social media as a tool for the development of future journalists’ communicative competence. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 11(6), 16–29. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v11n6p16
García-Orosa, B., López-García, X., & Vázquez-Herrero, J. (2020). Journalism in digital native media: Beyond technological determinism. Media and Communication, 8(2), 5–15. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i2.2702
Gossen, M., & Heinrich, A. (2021). Encouraging consumption reduction: Findings of a qualitative study with clothing companies on sufficiency-promoting communication. Cleaner and Responsible Consumption, 3(January), 100028. https://doi.org/mwm3
Henrichsen, J. R. (2020). Breaking through the ambivalence: Journalistic responses to information security technologies. Digital Journalism, 8(3), 328–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2019.1653207
Humprecht, E. (2020). How do they debunk “fake news”? A cross-national comparison of transparency in fact checks. Digital Journalism, 8(3), 310–327. https://doi.org/dknc
Iosifidis, P., & Nicoli, N. (2020). The battle to end fake news: A qualitative content analysis of Facebook announcements on how it combats disinformation. International Communication Gazette, 82(1), 60–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048519880729
Ismail, A. (2021). Values influencing the practice of investigative journalism in Malaysia: Media Practitioners’ Perspectives. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 37(4), 366–383. https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2021-3704-21
Lima Quintanilha, T. (2021). Journalists’ professional self-representations: A Portuguese perspective based on the contribution made by the sociology of professions. Journalism, 22(7), 1775–1792. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884919828246
Matthews, J., & Onyemaobi, K. (2020). Precarious professionalism: Journalism and the fragility of professional practice in the Global South. Journalism Studies, 21(13), 1836–1851. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2020.1797524
Muslikhin, & Mulyana, D. (2021). The practice of mcjournalism in Indonesia’s cyber media. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 37(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2021-3702-01
Nurlatifah, M., & Mutmainnah, N. (2021). Disruption and collaboration in digital journalism: Ambivalence of social responsibility and political economy practices of media companies. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 37(1), 181–195. https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2021-3701-10
O’Connor, C., & Joffe, H. (2020). Intercoder reliability in qualitative research: Debates and practical guidelines. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919899220
Omar, B., & Dequan, W. (2020). Watch, share or create: The influence of personality traits and user motivation on TikTok mobile video usage. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 14(4), 121–137. https://doi.org/10.3991/IJIM.V14I04.12429
Paidi, R., & Hassan, A. (2021). News on Pakatan Harapan: A study on behavior of social media users. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 37(3), 18–37. https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2021-3703-02
Pangrazio, L., Godhe, A. L., & Ledesma, A. G. L. (2020). What is digital literacy? A comparative review of publications across three language contexts. e-Learning and Digital Media, 17(6), 442–459. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753020946291
Panievsky, A. (2022). The strategic bias: How journalists respond to antimedia populism. International Journal of Press/Politics, 27(4), 808–826. https://doi.org/mwm6
Poplavska, N., Synorub, H., Yordan, H., Medynska, O., Kushnir, O., & Dragan-Ivanets, N. (2022). The use of binary online lessons in the context of forming critical thinking in future journalists. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 11(1), 273–285. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v11n1p273
Sahingoz, O. K., Buber, E., Demir, O., & Diri, B. (2019). Machine learning based phishing detection from URLs. Expert Systems with Applications, 117, 345–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.09.029
Salvo, P. Di, & Porlezza, C. (2020). Hybrid professionalism in journalism: Opportunities and risks of hacker sources. Studies in Communication Sciences, 20(2), 243–254. https://doi.org/10.24434/J.SCOMS.2020.02.007
Sidiropoulos, E., Vryzas, N., Vrysis, L., Avraam, E., & Dimoulas, C. (2019). Growing media skills and know-how in situ: Technology-enhanced practices and collaborative support in mobile news-reporting. Education Sciences, 9(3). https://doi.org/mwm9
Simaku, X. (2021). A comparative research between Italian and Turkish journalists: Professionalism, autonomy, clientelism, and ethic. SAGE Open, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211010173
Skarzauskiene, A., Maciuliene, M., & Ramasauskaite, O. (2020). The digital media in Lithuania: Combating disinformation and fake news. Acta Informatica Pragensia, 9(2), 74–91. https://doi.org/10.18267/J.AIP.134
Straub, J., & Spradling, M. (2022). Americans’ perspectives on online media warning labels. Behavioral Sciences, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/bs12030059
Surdu, I., Ivan, C., Teodor, M., & Chiru, I. (2021). Ethical engagement, responsibility and strategic communication in the digital era: Practitioners’ approaches. Icono14, 19(1), 155–178. https://doi.org/10.7195/RI14.V19I1.1621
Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2019). Challenging presentism in journalism studies: An emotional life history approach to understanding the lived experience of journalists. Journalism, 20(5), 670–678. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884918760670
Waldenström, A., Wiik, J., & Andersson, U. (2019). Conditional autonomy: Journalistic practice in the tension field between professionalism and managerialism. Journalism Practice, 13(4), 493–508. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2018.1485510
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
e-ISSN: 2289-1528