The Potential Hazards of Fake Accounts and Buzzer Behaviour on Deliberative Democracy

Rendra Widyatama, Maizatul Haizan Mahbob

Abstract


The most famous political system globally is deliberative democracy, which involves the participatory engagement of free and fair citizens to achieve common interests through discussion-based reasoning and societal consensus. This system places all citizens on an equal footing in expressing their opinions and is a crucial indicator of the quality of deliberative democracy. The dynamics of deliberative democracy are also mirrored in the digital realm and often serve as indicators of public support. However, the digital sphere of democracy faces a severe threat today due to the proliferation of fake accounts and the practice of paying for buzzer behaviour. This phenomenon necessitates stringent regulation to ensure the continued quality and authenticity of deliberative democracy. This research describes the potential dangers of using fake accounts and paying for buzzer behaviour in politics concerning deliberative democracy. The researchers adopted an interpretive phenomenology approach, drawing data from various relevant sources. The research findings reveal that using fake accounts and paying for buzzer behaviour undermine deliberative democracy as they generate false information, manipulate public opinion, and hinder healthy dialogue. Additionally, using fake accounts and buzzer behaviour has severe psychological and social repercussions, including a decline in public trust and an increase in political polarization, all threatening the quality of democratic decision-making. The results of this research carry significant implications for designing relevant regulations to safeguard the agreed-upon and high-quality deliberative democracy, a vital asset of public governance.

 

Keywords: Fake accounts, buzzer behaviour, cyber trooper, deliberative democracy, virality. 

 

https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2024-4001-18


Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdullah, N. H., Hassan, I., Ahmad, M. F. bin, Hassan, N. A., & Ismail, M. M. (2021). Social media, youths and political participation in Malaysia: A review of literature. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/mpgg

Abdullah, N. N., & Rahman, M. F. A. (2017). The use of deliberative democracy in public policy making process. SSRN Electronic Journal, 5(3), 221–230. https://doi.org/mpgh

Abdullah, R. N., & Azman, M. N. A. (2019). Viral in social media: The Viralor and the Viralee. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 23(4), 1068–1076. https://doi.org/10.37200/ijpr/v23i4/pr190434

Afriyadi, A. D. (2019, April 8). Modal bisnis Buzzer: Ribuan akun palsu buat Giring Isyu. Detik Finance. https://finance.detik.com/berita-ekonomi-bisnis/d-4500784/modal-bisnis-buzzer-ribuan-akun-palsu-buat-giring-isu

Al-Qurishi, M., Rahman, S. M. M., Alamri, A., Mostafa, M. A., Al-Rubaian, M., Hossain, M. S., & Gupta, B. B. (2018). SybilTrap: A graph-based semi-supervised Sybil defense scheme for online social networks. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 30(5), 1–10.

Al-Rawi, A. (2019). Viral news on social media. Digital Journalism, 7(1), 63–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1387062

Anwar, M. C. (2021, Disember 12). Berapa gaji Buzzer di Indonesia? Kompas. https://money.kompas.com/read/2021/12/12/204332926/berapa-gaji-buzzer-di-indonesia?page=all

Aroja-Martin, J.-B., Mendiz-Noguero, A., & Victoria-Mas, J.-S. (2020). Virality as a paradigm of digital communication: Review of the concept and update of the theoretical framework. Profesional de La Informacion, 29(6), e290607.

Aubert, I. (2021). Social inclusion, a challenge for deliberative democracy? Some reflections on Habermas’s political theory. European Journal of Social Theory, 24(4), 448–466. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431020983781

Badrul Azmier Mohamed@Bakar. (2019). Media sosial dalam PRU-13 dan impaknya terhadap politik Malaysia [Tesis PhD, Fakulti Sains Sosial dan Kemanusiaan, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia].

Bakker, T. P., & de Vreese, C. H. (2011). Good news for the future? Young people, internet use, and political participation. Communication Research, 38(4), 451–470. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650210381738

Balyer, A., & Tabancali, E. (2019). The roles of interest and pressure groups in developing sustainable educational policies in Turkey. Sustainability, 11(24), 7052. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11247052

Becker, P., & Raveloson, J.-A. A. (2008). What is democracy? Friedrich Ebert Stiftung. https://library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/madagaskar/05860.pdf

Berger, J., & Milkman, K. L. (2012). What makes online content viral? Journal of Marketing Research, 49(2), 192–205. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.10.0353

Berita Harian. (2015, May 3). Tidak tegas punca ideologi IS mudah meresap. https://www.bharian.com.my/amp/bhplus-old/2015/05/52452/tidak-tegas-punca-ideologi-mudah-meresap

Boppolige, A. A., & Gurtoo, A. (2017). What determines viral phenomenon? Views, comments and growth indicators of TED talk videos. International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance, 8(2), 83–89. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijtef.2017.8.2.544

Bridges, F., Appel, L., & Grossklags, J. (2012). Young adults’ online participation behaviours: An exploratory study of web 2.0 use for political engagement. Information Polity, 17(2), 163–176. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-2012-0271

Chang, H. C. (2010). A new perspective on Twitter hashtag use: Diffusion of innovation theory. Proceedings of the ASIST Annual Meeting, 47(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/csxgx2

Choi, G. Y. (2015). BOOK REVIEW: The app generation: How today’s youth navigate identity, intimacy, and imagination in a digital world, by Howard Gardner and Katie Davis. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 92(3), 755-757.

Cini, L., & Felicetti, A. (2018). Participatory deliberative democracy: Toward a new standard for assessing democracy? Some insights into the Italian case. Contemporary Italian Politics, 10(2), 151–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/23248823.2018.1477239

Click, M. A. (2013). BOOK REVIEW: Spreadable media: Creating value and meaning in a networked culture, by Henry Jenkins, Sam Ford, and Joshua Green. Transformative Works and Cultures, 14. https://doi.org/10.3983/twc.2013.0525

Dasari, S., & Anandakrishnan, B. (2010). Viral marketing of retail products: A study on the influence of attributes of web portals and incentives offered on user registrations. The IUP Journal of Marketing Management, IX(1 and 2), 99–110.

Denisova, A. (2020). How to define ‘viral’ for media studies? Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture, 15(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.16997/WPCC.375

Dewantara, J. A., Syamsuri, S., Wandira, A., Afandi, A., Hartati, O., Cahya, N., ... Nurgiansah, T. H. (2022). The role of Buzzers in social media in guiding public opinion regarding political choices. JED: Jurnal Etika Demokrasi, 7(3), 681–694. https://doi.org/mpgv

Dimitriades, Z. S. (2007). Business ethics and corporate social responsibility in the Indian Economy: A commentary. Business and Organization Ethics Network (BON), 12(2), 93–97. https://doi.org/10.56902/irbe.2020.4.2.44

Ellingson, J. E., & McFarland, L. A. (2011). Understanding faking behaviour through the lens of motivation: An application of VIE theory. Human Performance, 24(4), 322–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2011.597477

Ezarfelix, J., Jeffrey, N., & Sari, N. (2022). Systematic literature review: Instagram fake account detection based on machine learning. Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science Journal (EMACS), 4(1), 25–31. https://doi.org/10.21512/emacsjournal.v4i1.8076

Ferrara, E., Interdonato, R., & Tagarelli, A. (2014). Online popularity and topical interests through the lens of Instagram. HT 2014 - Proceedings of the 25th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media, 24–34. https://doi.org/10.1145/2631775.2631808

Ferrara, E., Varol, O., Davis, C., Menczer, F., & Flammini, A. (2016). The rise of social bots [Magazine]. Communications of the ACM, 59(7), 96–104. https://doi.org/f8wdbj

Ferrari, E. (2020). Sincerely fake: Exploring user-generated political fakes and networked publics. Social Media + Society, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120963824

Fransisco, W. (2021). Legal consequences for political buzzers in Indonesia. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 4(2), 222–228. https://doi.org/mpgw

Free Malaysia Today. (2016, August 28). Here come the real cyber troopers of Malaysia. https://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/nation/2016/08/28/here-come-the-real-cyber-troopers-of-malaysia/

Gabriela, N. (2015). Pressure groups psychology in a democratic state. Procedia - Social and Behavioural Sciences, 205(May), 356–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.09.011

Gartland, J (2009). Evaluating deliberative democracy. Academia. https://www.academia.edu/9448459/Evaluating_Deliberative_Democracy

Grinberg, N., Joseph, K., Friedland, L., Swire-Thompson, B., & Lazer, D. (2019). Political science: Fake news on Twitter during the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election. Science, 363(6425), 374–378. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau2706

Hamid, R. S., Abror, A., Anwar, S. M., & Hartati, A. (2022). The role of social media in the political involvement of millennials. Spanish Journal of Marketing - ESIC, 26(1), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1108/SJME-08-2021-0151

Handini, V. A., & Dunan, A. (2021). View of Buzzer as the driving force for buzz marketing on Twitter in the 2019 Indonesian Presidential Election. International Journal of Science, Technology & Management, 2(2), 479–491.

Hassan, A., Alhalangy, A. G. I., & Alzahrani, F. (2023). Fake accounts identification in mobile communication networks based on machine learning. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 17(4), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v17i04.37645

He, B., Breen, M., & Fishkin, J. (Eds.). (2021). Deliberative democracy in Asia. New York: Routledge.

Hermawati, T., Setyaningsih, R., & Nugraha, R. P. (2021). Teen motivation to create fake identity account on Instagram social media. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 8(4), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v8i4.2459

Homssi, M. A., Abass Ali, A., & Kurdi, A. (2022). The impact of political marketing via social media on political participation: An empirical analysis in Lebanese context. Journal of Psychology and Political Science, 2(6), 14–21. https://doi.org/10.55529/jpps.26.14.21

Hopkins, J. (2014). Cybertroopers and tea parties: Government use of the Internet in Malaysia. Asian Journal of Communication, 24(1), 5–24.

Jackson, S. J., & Foucault Welles, B. (2015). Hijacking #myNYPD: Social media dissent and networked counterpublics. Journal of Communication, 65(6), 932–952. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12185

Juliadi, R. (2017). The construction of Buzzer identity on social media (A descriptive study of Buzzer identity in Twitter). Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Transformation in Communications 2017 (IcoTiC 2017), 150(ICoTiC 2017), 337–334.

Kanagavalli, N., & Baghavathi Priya, S. (2022). Social networks fake accounts and fake news identification with reliable deep learning. Intelligent Automation and Soft Computing, 33(1), 191–205. https://doi.org/10.32604/iasc.2022.022720

Kareem, R., & Bhaya, W. (2018). Fake profiles types of online social networks: A survey. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4.19), 919-925. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.19.28071

Kerrysa, N. G., & Utami, I. Q. (2023). Fake account detection in social media using machine learning methods: Literature review. Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, 12(6), 3790–3797. https://doi.org/10.11591/eei.v12i6.5334

Kim, E. Y. (2015). A comparative study on social media use and public participation in Korea and the United States: Does social media matter? Journal of Policy Studies, 30(1), 207–230. https://doi.org/10.52372/kjps30108

Koiranen, I., Koivula, A., Saarinen, A., & Keipi, T. (2020). Ideological motives, digital divides, and political polarization: How do political party preference and values correspond with the political use of social media? Telematics and Informatics, 46, 101322.

Kosmo. (2016). Keyboard warrior ancam kesejahteraan negara. pp. 1–6.

Lagadec, G. (2014). Optimal endogenous tariffs with implicit campaign contributions. Theoretical Economics Letters, 4(4), 296–304. https://doi.org/10.4236/tel.2014.44040

Lidwina, A. (2020). Rata-rata setiap orang Indonesia punya 10-11 akun media sosial. Databoks. https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2020/09/25/rata-rata-setiap-orang-indonesia-punya-10-11-akun-media-sosial

Lim, J. B. Y. (2017). Engendering civil resistance: Social media and mob tactics in Malaysia. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 20(2), 209–227. https://doi.org/mpsc

Lippert, K. J., & Cloutier, R. (2021). Cyberspace: A digital ecosystem. Systems, 9(3), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems9030048

Masduki. (2021). Media control in the digital politics of Indonesia. Media and Communication, 9(4), 52–61. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v9i4.4225

Mastura Mahamed & Siti Zobidah Omar. (2020). Is citizen journalism is similar to keyboard warriors and cyber troopers? An exploration and meanings from citizens journalists’ experience. International Journal of Academics Research in Business and Social Sciences, 10(6), 813-830.

Mavrin, A. S. (2022). Features of the development of soft and hard skills in people of generation Z. SMALTA International Scientific-Practical and Methodical Journal, 3, 5–16.

Mulyono, B., Affandi, I., Suryadi, K., & Darmawan, C. (2022). Online civic engagement: Fostering citizen engagement through social media. Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan, 19(1), 75–85. https://doi.org/10.21831/jc.v19i1.49723

Mustika, R. (2019). Pergeseran peran Buzzer ke dunia politik di media sosial. Diakom: Jurnal Media dan Komunikasi, 2(2), 144–151. https://doi.org/10.17933/diakom.v2i2.60

Nelson-Field, K., Riebe, E., & Newstead, K. (2013). The emotions that drive viral video. Australasian Marketing Journal, 21(4), 205–211. https://doi.org/gf8wkd

Novika, S. (2021, Feb 1). Lagi heboh soal Buzzer, berapa sih kira-kira bayarannya? Detik Finance. https://finance.detik.com/berita-ekonomi-bisnis/d-5356508/lagi-heboh-soal-buzzer-berapa-sih-kira-kira-bayarannya

Nurrahman, A. (2022, February 3). Mengintip besaran gaji Buzzer di Indonesia. Detik Finance. https://finance.detik.com/berita-ekonomi-bisnis/d-5926661/mengintip-besaran-gaji-buzzer-di-indonesia

Nurrianti Jalli, & Ika Karlina Idris. (2019). Fake news and election in two Southeast Asian nations: A comparative study of Malaysia General Election 2018 and Indonesia Presidential Election 2019. Journal of Advances of Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 367, 138-148.

OECD. (2020). Innovative citizen participation and new democratic institutions: Catching the deliberative wave. https://www.oecd.org/gov/open-government/innovative-citizen-participation-new-democratic-institutions-catching-the-deliberative-wave-highlights.pdf

Olaniran, B., & Williams, I. (2020). Platforms, protests, and the challenge of networked democracy. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36525-7

OUP. (2023). Oxford dictionary (Vol. 48). Oxford University Press.

Pandey, K. N. (2016). Paradigms of knowledge management with systems modelling case studies. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2785-4

Patrick, J. (2019, January 10). Uang panas industri Buzzer politik. CNN Indonesia. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/teknologi/20181210015450-185-352341/uang-panas-industri-buzzer-politik

Rahmawan, D. (2014). Selebtwits: Micro-celebrity practitioners in Indonesian Twittersphere. Jurnal Kajian Komunikasi, 2(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.24198/jkk.v2i1.6046

Rezky, M., & Ibrahim, A. L. (2022). Fake accounts on social media as a criminal act of electronic information manipulation in Indonesia. Yuridika, 37(3), 615–632. https://doi.org/mpgz

Rho, E. H. R., & Mazmanian, M. (2019). Hashtag burnout? A control experiment investigating how political hashtags shape reactions to news content. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 3(CSCW), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359299

Rimenda, T., Warsini, S., & Mirati, R. E. (2019). The influence of Electronic Word of Mouth (E-WOM) promotion of student interest in buying shares: Study on PNJ Inversment Galleries. Account, 6(1), 957–961.

Rudat, A., & Buder, J. (2015). Making retweeting social: The influence of content and context information on sharing news in Twitter. Computers in Human Behaviour, 46, 75–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.005

Rudyansjah, T., & Rasidi, P. P. (2022). Virtual embodiment in physical realities brand buzzers and disciplined bodies in an Indonesian cyberscape. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 12(2), 436–452. https://doi.org/10.1086/720302

Sani, M. A. M. (2021). Deliberative democracy versus elite deliberation in Malaysia. Deliberative Democracy in Asia, 87-102.

Saxton, G. D., Niyirora, J. N., Chao Guo, Waters. R. D. (2015). #AdvocatingForChange: The strategic use of hashtags in social media advocacy. Advances in Social Work, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.18060/17952

Shewale, R. (2023). Social media users — Global demographics (2023) (Vol. 2023). Demand Sage. https://www.demandsage.com/social-media-users/

Soundararaj, J. J., Baskaran, A., & Sivaprakkash, S. (2015). The power of buzz marketing. Journal of Exclusive Management Science, 4(3), 1–13.

Sugiono, S. (2020). Fenomena industri Buzzer di Indonesia: Sebuah kajian ekonomi politik media. Communicatus: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 4(1), 47–66. https://doi.org/gm5v3x

Swaraj, A. (2019). Exploratory research: Purpose and process. Parisheelan Journal, 15(2), 666–670. http://crm.skspvns.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/110-Ananya-Swaraj.pdf

Tapsell, R. (2018). The smartphone as 'weapon of the weak": Assessing the role of communications technologies in Malaysia's regime change. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 37(3), 9-29.

Wanda, P., Hiswati, M. E., Diqi, M., & Herlinda, R. (2021). Re-fake: Klasifikasi akun palsu di sosial media online menggunakan algoritma RNN. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Sains Teknologi dan Inovasi Indonesia (SENASTINDO), 3(November), 191–200. https://doi.org/mpg3

Wani, M. A., Sofi, M. A., & Wani, S. Y. (2017). Why fake profiles: A study of Anomalous users in different categories of online social networks. International Journal of Engineering Technology Science and Research, 4(9), 320–329.

Weiss, M. L. (2012). Politics in cyberspace: New media in Malaysia. Berlin: Fesmedia Asia Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.

White, S. K. (2022). Agonism, democracy, and the moral equality of voice. Political Theory, 50(1), 59–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591721993862

Yang, G. (2016). Narrative agency in hashtag activism: The case of #blacklivesmatter. Media and Communication, 4(4), 13–17. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v4i4.692

Yee, C., & Chin, C. (2013, April 13) Political troopers. R.Age. https://www.rage.com.my/political-troopers/

Yuliahsari, D. (2016). Pemanfaatan Twitter Buzzer untuk meningkatkan partisipasi pemilih muda dalam pemilihan umum. Jurnal The Messenger, 7(1), 41–48. https://doi.org/mpg4


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 2289-1528