The Impact of Metacognitive Strategy (MCS) in Reading Arabic Text Among SMK Agama Students in Seremban
Abstract
Although the study of Arabic text reading is growing in Arab and other countries, it is still not as commonplace in Malaysia. Thus, this study focused on the use of Arabic metacognitive strategy (MCS) which was used by form 4 students at SMK Agama in Seremban. Apart from that, this article aimed to investigate the effects of MCS use of Arabic text in comprehension and Arabic vocabulary. Based on stratified sampling, 60 respondents were taken from SMKA in Seremban to undergo this study. This group was divided into two groups, with 30 in the experimental group and 30 in the control group. This study is a quantitative research and is a numerical-based research method that used the ANCOVA test. In this study, training was provided between pre-test and post-test. Eventually, after quasi-experimental studies were done, the finding showed that there is a significant difference in the Arabic comprehension and Arabic vocabulary post-test between the experimental group and control group. The experimental group indicated higher levels than the control group. This study contributes to the field of Arabic education from the perspective of the comprehension and vocabulary in MCS reading Arabic text.
Keywords: Metacognitive Strategy (MCS); Arabic; reading text; comprehension; vocabulary
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adil Bentahar. (2012). Can ESL teachers teach reading metacognitive strategies? Master of Arts in Education, Curriculum and Instruction. Boise State University.
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Razavieh, A. & Sorensen, C. (2006). Introduction to Research in Education (7th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.
Anna Uhl Chamot, Jill R. & Aileen W. (2005). CALLA REVISTED: More Strategies for Ell Student Success Workshop for Region 10. New York City Board of Education New York, NY.
Asmaa Al-Mahbashi, Noorizah Mohd Noor & Zaini Amir. (2015). The Effect of Data Driven Learning on Receptive Vocabulary Knowledge of Yemeni University Learners. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies. Vol. 21(3), 13-24.
Brown, A. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms. In F. E. Weinert & R. H. Kluwe, (Eds.), Metacognition, Motivation, and Understanding (pp. 65-116). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Chamot, A.U., Barnhardt, S., El-Dinary, P.B. & Robbins, J. (1999). The Learning Strategies Handbook. White Plains, NY: Addison Wesley Longman.
Chamot, A. U., Keatley, C., Barnhardt, S., El-Dinary, P.B., Nagano, K. & Newman, C. (1996). Learning Strategies in Elementary Language Immersion Programs. Final report submitted to Center for International Education, U.S. Department of Education. Available from ERIC
Clearinghouse on Languages and Linguistics.
Chayada Danuwong. (2006). The role of metacognitive strategies in promoting learning English as a foreign language independently. Phd Thesis. Edith Cowan University.
Chua Lee Chuan. (2006). Jurnal Penyelidikan IPBL. Vol. 7, 2006. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/8303970/SAMPLE_SIZE_ESTIMATION_USING
_KREJCIE_AND_MORGAN_AND_COHEN_STATISTICAL_POWER_ANALYSIS_A_COMPARISON
Chua Yan Piaw. (2014). Kaedah Dan Statistic Penyelidikan: Ujian Univariat Dan Multivariat. McGraw-Hill Education. Malaysia.
Dakin, Caitlin. (2013). "The effects of comprehension through close reading". Education. Retrieve from http://scholarworks.boisestate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?
article=1259&context=td
Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In
Resnick, L. B. (Ed.), The Nature of Intelligence, Vol. 12 (pp. 231-235). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Flavell, J. H., Miller, P.H. & Miller, S.A. (1993). Cognitive Development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Ghazali Yusri, Nik Mohd Rahimi & Parilah M. Shah. (2010). Sikap Pelajar Terhadap Pembelajaran Kemahiran Lisan Bahasa Arab Di Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) Students ‟ Attitude Towards Oral Arabic Learning At Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM). GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies. Vol. 10(3), 15-33.
Harison Mohd Sidek. (2008). Second Language Reading: Problem, Diagnosis & Instruction. Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia. Malaysia.
Leslie, L. & Caldwell, J. (2004). Qualitative reading inventory-4. Boston: Pearson Education Company.
Leslie, L. & Caldwell, J. (2006). Qualitative reading inventory-4. Boston: Pearson Education Company.
Lovett. (2008). Teaching metacognition: Presentation to the Educause Learning Initiative Annual Meeting, 29th January 2008. Retrieved from, http://serc.carleton.edu/NAGTWorkshops/metacognition/teaching_metacognition.html
Mat Nawi Mat Jusoh, Mohd Ridwan Hj Abd Rashid & Mod Zaini Sijo. (2013). Al-Lughah al-arabiah lissanah ar-rabiah. Bahasa Arab Tingkatan 4. Percetakan Suria Sendirian Berhad. Bukit Katil. Melaka. Malaysia.
Mohsen Mahdavi & Majid Mehrabi (2014). Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies among Iranian EFL Learners in an “Input-poor” Environment. International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies. Vol. 5(4), 360-366.
Mokhtari, K. & Reichard, C. (2002). Assessing students’ metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology. Vol. 94(2), 249-259.
Nadwah Daud & Nadhilah Abdul Pisal. (2014). Permasalahan Pertuturan dalam Bahasa Arab Sebagai Bahasa Kedua. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies. Vol. 14(1), 117-133.
http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/GEMA-2014-1401-08
Nur Aisyah Mohamad & Zamri Mahamod. (2014). Tahap kemahiran metakognitif murid Pelajar Tingkatan 4. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu – JPBM. Malay Language Education Journal – MyLEJ. Vol. 4(1), 41-47.
Pallant, J. (2001). SPSS Survival Manual Step by Step Guide to Data Analysis using SPSS for Windows (Version 10).
Rosni Samah. (2009). Isu Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab Di Malaysia. Persidangan Kebangsaan Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab 2012 (PKEBAR’12).Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia.
Rosni Samah, Mohd Fauzi Abdul Hamid, Shaferul Hafes Sha’ari & Amizan Helmi Mohamad. (2013). Aktiviti Pengajaran Kemahiran Bertutur Bahasa Arab dalam Kalangan Jurulatih Debat. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies. Vol. 13(2), 99-116.
Saemah Rahman. (2001). Hubungan Antara Metakognisi, Motivasi Dan Pencapaian Akademik Pelajar Universiti. Phd Thesis. Universiti Malaya. Malaysia.
Sahlan Surat. (2012). Keberkesanan Strategi 4-Meta dalam Aktiviti Penulisan Bahasa Melayu strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology. Vol. 94(2), 249-259.
Shafee Abdul Hamid. (2012). Amalan Metakognitif Dalam Kalangan Murid Ketika Belajar Komponen Sastera. Project Paper. M.Ed Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi.
Schwartz, B. L. & Perfect, T. J. (2002). Introduction: Toward an applied metacognition. In T. J. Perfect & B. L. Schwartz (Eds.), Applied Metacognition (pp. 1-11). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Tobias, S. & Everson, H. T. (1996). Assessing Metacognitive Knowledge Monitoring. College Board Report No.96-01. New York: The College Board. Retrieved from
http://professionals.collegeboard.com/profdownload/pdf/RR%2096-1.PDF
Tobias, S. & Everson, H. T. (2002). Knowing What You Know and What You Don’t: Further Research on Metacognitive Knowledge Monitoring (Research Report No. 2002-3). New York: The College Board.
Yahya Othman. (2005). Trend dalam pengajaran bahasa Melayu. Kuala Lumpur: PTS Professional Publishing Sdn. Bhd.
Yahya Othman & Dayang Raini Pakar. (2013) Keberkesanan strategi metakognisi dalam pengajaran bacaan dan kefahaman menggunakan teks ekspositori. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies. Vol. 13 (3), 133-149.
Yen-Hui Wang. (2015). Metacognition in reading: EFL Learners’ metacognitive awareness of reading strategy use. International Journal of English Language and Literature Studies. Vol. 4(1), 27-36.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/3L-2017-2304-17
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
eISSN : 2550-2247
ISSN : 0128-5157